Usability and safety in electronic medical records interface design: a review of recent literature and guideline formulation
-
2015/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to (a) review electronic medical record (EMR) and related electronic health record (EHR) interface usability issues, (b) review how EMRs have been evaluated with safety analysis techniques along with any hazard recognition, and (c) formulate design guidelines and a concept for enhanced EMR interfaces with a focus on diagnosis and documentation processes. BACKGROUND: A major impact of information technology in health care has been the introduction of EMRs. Although numerous studies indicate use of EMRs to increase health care quality, there remain concerns with usability issues and safety. METHOD: A literature search was conducted using Compendex, PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases to find EMR research published since 2000. Inclusion criteria included relevant English-language papers with subsets of keywords and any studies (manually) identified with a focus on EMR usability. RESULTS: Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Results revealed EMR and EHR usability problems to include violations of natural dialog, control consistency, effective use of language, effective information presentation, and customization principles as well as a lack of error prevention, minimization of cognitive load, and feedback. Studies focusing on EMR system safety made no objective assessments and applied only inductive reasoning methods for hazard recognition. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the identified usability problems and structure of safety analysis techniques, we provide EMR design guidelines and a design concept focused on the diagnosis process and documentation. APPLICATION: The design guidelines and new interface concept can be used for prototyping and testing enhanced EMRs. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0018-7208
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:57
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20046936
-
Citation:Hum Factors 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-834
-
Contact Point Address:David B. Kaber, North Carolina State University, 400 Daniels Hall, 111 Lampe Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906
-
Email:dbkaber@ncsu.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2015
-
Performing Organization:University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Human Factors
-
End Date:20270630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:3055530f1df289572e11a3a96845023d22f91d5e015b6ba801ba0e96872efe27e98fc7fb68e26da323a0f6e692dc4d36d40e9de15ed379d2fcd8f38de2ccda56
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like