Models vs. measurement. Are we on the right track? The promise and limitations of occupational exposure banding
Public Domain
-
2015/03/01
-
By McKernan L
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Chemicals are being introduced into commerce at a rate which significantly outpaces the development of authoritative Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs). The NIOSH Occupational Exposure Banding process uses available toxicological data to create a range of concentrations or an Occupational Exposure Band (OEB), to control chemical exposures. The objective of this paper is to examine 1) the NIOSH Occupational Exposure Banding process 2) review the tier 1 and tier 2 validation results. Methods: To validate Tier 1 process, OELs for approximately 800 chemicals were compared to derived occupational exposure bands (OEBs). To validate the tier 2 process, approximately 115 chemicals from the EPA IRIS database, the TLV "Under Study" List, the MAK list of "Substances for which no MAK value can be established at present", and Health Canada and compared the banding results from multiple users for seven health endpoints. Results: The tier 1 validation results illustrated that the exposure concentrations for powder and dust concentrations needed adjustment. In the tier 2 validation, health endpoints irritation and sensitization commonly caused discrepancies in the final bands selected by users. Other discrepancies were caused by judgment calls with qualitative data, or using unique data sources other than those specified in the NIOSH process manual. Conclusions: The built-in flexibility of the process allowed users to incorporate specialized knowledge about the chemical, when necessary. OEBs can be performed by industrial hygienists and toxicologists to provide useful risk management guidance. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-4878
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:25-26
-
Volume:59
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20046067
-
Citation:Ann Occup Hyg 2015 Mar; 59(Suppl 1):25-26
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2015
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Source Full Name:Annals of Occupational Hygiene
-
Supplement:1
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:7f66b51a0094a7da31b39f662baa6410a0646e601a53ab409b3cff48e0b9dcbdb6914f5bd285c50232fa0da2c3081c3ed505d4fe89270d2aa6f0f6d198b84118
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like