Watts-to-Wellbeing: does residential energy conservation improve health
-
2014/02/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Residential energy conservation has been increasing in number of houses treated, frequency, and scope, but few studies have examined whether modern energy conservation measures improve the health status of the occupants. We measured self-reported general, respiratory, cardiovascular, and mental health via structured telephone interviews using an adaptation of the National Health Interview Survey at baseline and follow-up in 2009-2012 [n=248 households in Boston, Chicago, and New York City (248 adults and 75 children)]. Housing included buildings with one to three units (n=106 units) located in Boston and buildings with >3 units/building (n=142) located in Chicago and New York. The energy conservation typically included insulation, heating equipment, and ventilation improvements. Adult respondents reported a 0.29-point improvement in the mean general health score (1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 = fair, 5 = poor) (3.07 to 2.78, p<0.001). Sinusitis, hypertension, overweight, and reduced use of asthma medication during asthma attacks showed 5 %, 14 %, 11 %, and 20 % differentials between improvement and worsening (p=0.038, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.077, respectively). Forty-two adult respondents reported doctor-diagnosed asthma at baseline. Two measures of asthma severity worsened (days with problems sleeping-differential between improvement and worsening -28 %, p=0.009; and frequency of symptoms such as cough, wheezing, and shortness of breath-differential between improvement and worsening -26 %, p=0.031). Nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide were low and showed no significant changes from baseline to follow-up in 41 housing units. This study found that residential energy conservation work conducted by trained professionals that balances energy efficiency and indoor environmental quality improves general health, sinusitis, and reduced asthma medication. Further research is needed to understand asthma-related outcomes. Erratum: The grant number in the Acknowledgment section should have been MDLHH0190-08 instead of ILLHH0191-08. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1570-646X
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:151-160
-
Volume:7
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20045806
-
Citation:Energy Efficiency 2014 Feb; 7(1):151-160
-
Contact Point Address:David Jacobs, National Center for Healthy Housing, 10320 Little Patuxent Pkwy, Suite 500, Columbia, MD, 21044
-
Email:djacobs@nchh.org
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2014
-
Performing Organization:University of Illinois at Chicago
-
Peer Reviewed:False
-
Start Date:20050701
-
Source Full Name:Energy Efficiency
-
End Date:20290630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:29797d74fa72e47db488d63e1a52131f6e3ac3e9682029491da8b6b3104cbd6e60f70ca863b48f4573f536ec5e482e9f0bf4d299cbd0f24a414cab2271dae5b6
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like