Welcome to CDC Stacks | Implementation of an Evidence-Based Depression Care Management Program (PEARLS): Perspectives From Staff and Former Clients - 19825 | Preventing Chronic Disease | CDC Public Access
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Implementation of an Evidence-Based Depression Care Management Program (PEARLS): Perspectives From Staff and Former Clients
  • Published Date:
    Apr 26 2012
  • Source:
    Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9.
Filetype[PDF - 203.05 KB]


Details:
  • Pubmed ID:
    22537909
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC3406738
  • Funding:
    R18/ DP001150/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
  • Document Type:
  • Description:
    Introduction

    Although researchers develop evidence-based programs for public health practice, rates of adoption and implementation are often low. This qualitative study aimed to better understand implementation of the Program to Encourage Active, Rewarding Lives for Seniors (PEARLS), a depression care management program at a Seattle-King County area agency on aging.

    Methods

    We used stratified, purposive sampling in 2008 to identify 38 PEARLS clients and agency staff for participation. In 9 focus groups and 1 one-on-one interview, we asked participants to identify benefits and negative consequences of PEARLS, facilitators of and barriers to program implementation, and strategies for overcoming the barriers. Two independent researchers used thematic analysis to categorize data into key themes and subthemes.

    Results

    PEARLS benefits clients by decreasing depression symptoms and addressing other concerns, such as health problems. For staff, PEARLS provides "another set of eyes" and is a comprehensive program to help them meet clients' mental health needs. Barriers included issues with implementation process (eg, lack of communication) and the perception that eligibility criteria were more rigid than those of other agency programs. Recommended solutions included changing eligibility criteria, providing additional staff training, increasing communication, and clarifying referral procedures, roles, and responsibilities.

    Conclusion

    Barriers to PEARLS delivery discourage referrals to what is generally viewed as a beneficial program. Implementing participants' strategies for overcoming these barriers can enhance delivery of PEARLS to a greater number of older adults and help them improve their depression symptoms.