A comparison of work-exacerbated asthma cases from clinical and epidemiological settings
-
2013/05/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:BACKGROUND: Clinical and epidemiological studies commonly use different case definitions in different settings when investigating work-exacerbated asthma (WEA). These differences are likely to impact characteristics of the resulting WEA cases. OBJECTIVES: To investigate this issue by comparing two groups of WEA cases, one identified using an intensive clinical evaluation and another that fulfilled epidemiological criteria. METHODS: A total of 53 clinical WEA cases had been referred for suspected work-related asthma to two tertiary clinics in Canada, where patients completed tests that confirmed asthma and ruled out asthma caused by work. Forty-seven epidemiological WEA cases were employed asthma patients treated at a health maintenance organization in the United States who completed a questionnaire and spirometry, and fulfilled criteria for WEA based on self-reported, work-related worsening of asthma and relevant workplace exposures as judged by an expert panel. RESULTS: Using different case criteria in different settings resulted in case groups that had a mix of similarities and differences. The clinical WEA cases were more likely to have visited a doctor's office = / >3 times for asthma in the past year (75% versus 11%; P<0.0001), but did not seek more asthma-related emergency or in-patient care, or have lower spirometry values. The two groups differed substantially according to the industries and occupations where the cases worked. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from both types of studies should be considered when measuring the contribution of work to asthma exacerbations, identifying putative agents, and selecting industries and occupations in which to implement screening and surveillance programs. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1198-2241
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:159-164
-
Volume:20
-
Issue:3
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20042748
-
Citation:Can Resp J 2013 May/Jun; 20(3):159-164
-
Contact Point Address:Dr. Catherine Lemière, Department of Chest Medicine, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, 5400 Ouest, Montreal, Quebec H4J IC5
-
Email:catherine.lemiere@umontreal.ca
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2013
-
Performing Organization:Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20050901
-
Source Full Name:Canadian Respiratory Journal
-
End Date:20110831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:3bf846d596df0a468f8f1c7e0cd7eddb2d8ee03fbd147974fa394e349b4a153ac7a023f3a8cf86fd1a5a7ecc38915a7f37c06115eff225c867845d26da80d2f1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like