Safety, incentives, and the reporting of work-related injuries among union carpenters: "You're pretty much screwed if you get hurt at work.
-
2013/04/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:BACKGROUND: In the high-risk construction industry little is known about the prevalence or effects of programs offering rewards for workers and/or their supervisors for improved safety records or those that punish workers in some way for injury. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous survey of 1,020 carpenter apprentices in three union training programs to document prevalence of their exposure to such efforts. We explored associations between perceptions of the reporting of work-related injury and elements of these programs. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent (58%; n = 592) reported some safety incentive or negative consequence of work-related injuries on their current jobsite. Reporting of work-related injuries was 50% less prevalent when workers were disciplined for injury experiences. Otherwise, we saw minimal evidence of association between injury reporting practices and safety incentive programs. However, considerable evidence of fear of reprisal for reporting injuries was revealed. Less than half (46.4%) reported that work-related injuries were reported in their current workplace all or most of the time; over 30% said they were almost never or rarely reported. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple layers of disincentives to the reporting of work-related injuries that hamper understanding of risk and pose threats to workplace safety and productivity. These pressures do not arise in a vacuum and are likely influenced by a host of contextual factors. Efforts that help us understand variation across jobsites and time could be enlightening; such inquiries may require mixed methodologies and should be framed with consideration for the upper tiers of the public health hierarchy of hazard control. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0271-3586
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:389-399
-
Volume:56
-
Issue:4
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20041996
-
Citation:Am J Ind Med 2013 Apr; 56(4):389-399
-
Contact Point Address:Hester Lipscomb, PhD, PO Box 3834, DUMC, Durham, NC 27710
-
Email:hester.lipscomb@duke.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2013
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Performing Organization:CPWR - The Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, Maryland
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20090901
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Industrial Medicine
-
End Date:20240831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:c007e565e3e919782cf12778a01efda05f9b1b8e91e033486ef84b60ed0464dcbafd5aaf2a45c56c1c12079c49c358474c97a797dffd45c89e8ed7b9238ddec4
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like