Boundary-spanning work demands and their consequences for guilt and psychological distress
-
2011/03/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Using data from a national survey of working Americans (Work, Stress, and Health Survey; N = 1,042), the authors examine the associations between boundary-spanning work demands and self-reported feelings of guilt and distress. The authors document gender differences in the emotional and mental health consequences of boundary-spanning work demands, as indexed by the frequency of receiving work-related contact outside of normal work hours. Specifically, the authors observe that frequent work contact is associated with more feelings of guilt and distress among women only. Analyses also demonstrate that guilt accounts for the positive association between the frequency of work contact and distress among women. Statistical adjustments for levels of guilt reduce the positive association between frequent work contact and distress among women to nonsignificance. The findings underscore the importance of focusing on gender and emotions in work-family interface processes, as well as their implications for psychological health. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0022-1465
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:43-57
-
Volume:52
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20038879
-
Citation:J Health Soc Behav 2011 Mar; 52(1):43-57
-
Contact Point Address:Paul Glavin, Department of Sociology, 725 Spadina Ave., University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2J4 Canada
-
Email:paul.galvin@utoronto.ca
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2011
-
Performing Organization:University of Toronto
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20040901
-
Source Full Name:Journal of Health and Social Behavior
-
End Date:20090831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:14a51901bd28663e2aafa1973900326442e3c4f2dffcf4bd98cf23ad7822f818dbe1a90785e3f640134283951116466d88528581dc20156d06596ba63afcb0e0
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like