Impact of pesticide exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risks in the Agricultural Health Study
Public Domain
-
2011/07/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Alavanja MCR ; Beane Freeman L ; Blair, Austin ; Coble J ; Dosemeci, Mustafa ; Hines CJ ; Hoar Zahm S ; Hoppin JA ; Kamel F ; Knott C ; Lubin JH ; Lynch CF ; Purdue MP ; Sandler DP ; Thomas K
-
Description:Background: The Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is a prospective study of licensed pesticide applicators and their spouses in Iowa and North Carolina. We evaluate the impact of occupational pesticide exposure misclassification on relative risks using data from the cohort and the AHS Pesticide Exposure Study (AHS/PES). Methods: We assessed the impact of exposure misclassification on relative risks using the range of correlation coefficients observed between measured post-application urinary levels of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and a chlorpyrifos metabolite and exposure estimates based on an algorithm from 83 AHS pesticide applications. Results: Correlations between urinary levels of 2,4-D and a chlorpyrifos metabolite and algorithm estimated intensity scores were about 0.4 for 2,4-D (n=64), 0.8 for liquid chlorpyrifos (n=4) and 0.6 for granular chlorpyrifos (n=12). Correlations of urinary levels with kilograms of active ingredient used, duration of application, or number of acres treated were lower and ranged from -0.36 to 0.19. These findings indicate that a priori expert-derived algorithm scores were more closely related to measured urinary levels than individual exposure determinants evaluated here. Estimates of potential bias in relative risks based on the correlations from the AHS/PES indicate that non-differential misclassification of exposure using the algorithm would bias estimates towards the null, but less than that from individual exposure determinants. Conclusions: Although correlations between algorithm scores and urinary levels were quite good (ie, correlations between 0.4 and 0.8), exposure misclassification would still bias relative risk estimates in the AHS towards the null and diminish study power. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1351-0711
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:Iowa ; Maryland ; North Carolina ; Ohio ; OSHA Region 3 ; OSHA Region 4 ; OSHA Region 5 ; OSHA Region 7
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:68
-
Issue:7
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20038641
-
Citation:Occup Environ Med 2011 Jul; 68(7):537-541
-
Contact Point Address:Aaron Blair, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza South, Room 8008, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
-
Email:blaira@mail.nih.gov
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2011
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Occupational and Environmental Medicine
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:0a6c595a97f047e8504581bffd6c0f1560d6a7a52be99671aacf1cecacae0ee69172728bed182aeaf8bb753347b18b5eacaa0fa1b2186bd79114d54928dd4df1
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like