Letter to the editor: law, behavior, and research design: a final note
-
2010/08/01
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Oleinick and Zaidman [2010] suggest that assumptions are a defect in empirical analysis.We interpret their argument to mean that we [Boden and Ozonoff, 2010]-and by implication others-should not rely on untested assumptions nor should we use sensitivity analyses "to buttress results." Let us examine one assumption made in their response: that BLS reporting rates are the same for different types of cases "since reporting rules are the same for all cases." This assumption is critical to their calculations, but we see no reason for it to be correct. For example, we suspect that reporting for an injury involving only 2 days off work is not as likely as for one involving 4 weeks off work. Indeed, a primary motivation for studying reporting is to see if reporting rules are being followed. If these rules are in fact not being followed, then the level of reportingmay well depend on injury duration, injury type, conflict over benefit payments, and other factors. Empirical work, including ours and theirs, must rely on assumptions. Moreover, when a range of plausible assumptions cannot be tested in a particular study, it also seems appropriate to explore the sensitivity of results to alternate assumptions. Additional research can then be designed to determine whether such assumptions are warranted. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0271-3586
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:53
-
Issue:8
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20038303
-
Citation:Am J Ind Med 2010 Aug; 53(8):856
-
Contact Point Address:Leslie I. Boden, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118
-
Email:lboden@bu.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2010
-
Performing Organization:Boston University, Medical Campus
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20020901
-
Source Full Name:American Journal of Industrial Medicine
-
End Date:20060831
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:89bc83dcdf67e11ce2a8ab71a238329f40562902b6a503b1e2a7a31d6f6d31fbc189dc95681b77ca5931259a05be2f5fd1afd684f04b895be8b18cd595a5f55c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like