Ergonomics of Abrasive Blasting: A Comparison of High Pressure Water and Steel Shot
-
2006/09/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Abrasive blasting with silica sand has long been associated with silicosis. Alternatives to sand are being used increasingly. While NIOSH has done extensive investigations of the respiratory effects of the substitutes for sand, the ergonomic effects of the substitutes have not been examined. Too often, hazards are shifted, and technologies that might save workers' lungs could do so at the expense of their musculoskeletal systems. Hence, the objective of this study was to examine the ergonomic effects of alternatives to sand. Multiple methods, both qualitative and quantitative, were used to yield numerous kinds of data for the analysis of exposures to abrasive blasters. PATH, a method for quantifying ergonomic exposure in non-routine work, was combined with interviews with workers, biomechanical modeling and noise level readings to assess the ergonomics of two abrasive blasting operations: high-pressure water and steel shot. Advantages and disadvantages of each medium are discussed. High-pressure water was slightly less ergonomically stressful, environmentally cleaner, much quieter and less dusty that steel shot, and it was reported to be slower on those tasks where both media could be used. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-6870
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:37
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20031338
-
Citation:Appl Ergon 2006 Sep; 37(5):659-667
-
Contact Point Address:Beth Rosenburg, ScD, MPH, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111
-
Email:beth.rosenberg@tufts.edu
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2006
-
Performing Organization:Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20000801
-
Source Full Name:Applied Ergonomics
-
End Date:20030731
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:cef5b79650a6bdf0aa055a1215a769ecc19dc9e21093810338890a4d071ea54bf0376c9afd4326aae408a6e1f42c5d491930545a5e6c6f0fc8b93bdf5c8e69d7
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like