Quantifying Repetitive Hand Activity for Epidemiological Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders–Part II: Comparison of Different Methods of Measuring Force Level and Repetitiveness
-
2006/03/15
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:This paper focuses on comparisons between the different methods of assessing repetitive hand activities. Various methods were used to measure hand force and repetitiveness of hand activities on 733 subjects in the study described by Bao et al. (2006). Two definitions of repetitiveness were used in analysis of detailed time studies of repetitive hand activities and four parameters of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) hand activity level (HAL) and the Strain Index methods were estimated by ergonomists and used to quantify repetitiveness. Hand forces were measured or estimated using three different methods: 1) measured with a force gauge or mimicked on a force gauge (force matching); 2) estimated by ergonomists using rating scales; 3) self-reports by subjects. The jobs were also evaluated using the ACGIH HAL and Strain Index methods when different repetitiveness quantification methods were used. Results showed that different definitions of repetitive exertion might lead to measuring different physical exposure phenomena and produce very different results. There were poor correlations between the measures of repetitiveness estimated by the different methods. Correlations between force quantifications using different methods were also poor. This suggests that parameters measured by different methods might not be interchangeable. Both the ACGIH HAL and Strain Index methods identified more 'hazardous' jobs when repetitiveness was estimated by ergonomists than when it was calculated by detailed time studies of forceful hand exertions. The Strain Index method identified more 'hazardous' jobs than the ACGIH HAL method. Overall, the between-methods agreements were found to be moderate to substantial. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0014-0139
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:381-392
-
Volume:49
-
Issue:4
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20030456
-
Citation:Ergonomics 2006 Mar; 49(4):381-392
-
Contact Point Address:Safety & Health Assessment & Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, P.O. Box 44330, Olympia, WA 98504, USA
-
Email:baos235@LNI.WA.GOV
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2006
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Performing Organization:Washington State Department of Labor and Industries
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20000930
-
Source Full Name:Ergonomics
-
End Date:20060929
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:70d96ff3f1cbc073322b392eb73874b659cfe5ee04ae68fc3342041790bac804af521c2551bc3838af0f8d3466c98060c1c144e45b7c941f4437cea2c7a1bfed
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like