Experiences of Discrimination: Validity and Reliability of a Self-Report Measure for Population Health Research on Racism and Health
-
2005/10/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Population health research on racial discrimination is hampered by a paucity of psychometrically validated instruments that can be feasibly used in large-scale studies. We therefore sought to investigate the validity and reliability of a short self-report instrument, the "Experiences of Discrimination" (EOD) measure, based on a prior instrument used in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Study participants were drawn from a cohort of working class adults, age 25-64, based in the Greater Boston area, Massachusetts (USA). The main study analytic sample included 159 black, 249 Latino, and 208 white participants; the validation study included 98 African American and 110 Latino participants who completed a re-test survey two to four weeks after the initial survey. The main and validation survey instruments included the EOD and several single-item discrimination questions; the validation survey also included the Williams Major and Everyday discrimination measures. Key findings indicated the EOD can be validly and reliably employed. Scale reliability was high, as demonstrated by confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha (0.74 or greater), and test-re-test reliability coefficients (0.70). Structural equation modeling demonstrated the EOD had the highest correlation (r=0.79) with an underlying discrimination construct compared to other self-report discrimination measures employed. It was significantly associated with psychological distress and tended to be associated with cigarette smoking among blacks and Latinos, and it was not associated with social desirability in either group. By contrast, single-item measures were notably less reliable and had low correlations with the multi-item measures. These results underscore the need for using validated, multi-item measures of experiences of racial discrimination and suggest the EOD may be one such measure that can be validly employed with working class African Americans and Latino Americans. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0277-9536
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:61
-
Issue:7
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20028837
-
Citation:Soc Sci Med 2005 Oct; 61(7):1576-1596
-
Contact Point Address:Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
-
Email:nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2006
-
Performing Organization:Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20010930
-
Source Full Name:Social Science and Medicine
-
End Date:20050929
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:1cbdab0aa0ef91b46fcbdd7a0e07270acc16aa6e087feb214c71df12b67f4353b59b096a6126a0950b6b6094bcae81e636c9b8cdce5f7199e2314c0c35031d2f
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like