An Ergonomic Comparison Between Mechanical and Manual Patient Transfer Techniques
-
2002/07/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Multiple studies have concluded that manual patient transfer and repositioning techniques are a significant cause of low back injuries. The objective of this study was to compare the low back stresses resulting from the use of two different mechanical patient transfer assist devices with the use of traditional manual transfer techniques. The mechanical transfer systems used were the Barton Patient Transfer System and a Sling-Suspension Lift similar to a "Hoyer Lift". The back compressive forces derived using the Michigan 3D Static Strength Model (Version 4.0) and electromyography (EMG) of the muscles of the low back were compared. This study found that the mechanical assist devices placed less stress on the low back and were more desirable to use than the traditional manual techniques. The Barton System was found to be, in general, less hazardous and more preferred than the Sling Suspension Lift. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:1051-9815
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:19-34
-
Volume:19
-
Issue:1
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20037555
-
Citation:Work 2002 Jul/Aug; 19(1):19-34
-
Contact Point Address:Donald S. Bloswick, Ph.D., P.E., CPE, University of Utah, Mechanical Engineering, 50 S. Central Campus Dr., Rm. 2202, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9208
-
Email:bloswick@mech.utah.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2002
-
Performing Organization:University of Utah
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:19950701
-
Source Full Name:Work
-
End Date:20020630
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:716ea8b2c50ae502a4cc2b78179f74372cf5d4eada3763b6a307b73c7d9a8d6f59caac7735eb7cde1a4d1524c28072e0d737f4473668aa087dc5f7e6b9b618d4
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like