Field and Wind Tunnel Comparison of Four Aerosol Samplers Using Agricultural Dusts
-
2009/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Donham, Kelley ; Golla V ; Keefe T ; Mehaffy J ; Nakatsu J ; Nonnenmann M ; O'Shaughnessy P ; Reynolds SJ ; Thorne PS ; Tillery M
-
Description:Occupational lung disease is a significant problem among agricultural workers exposed to organic dusts. Measurements of exposure in agricultural environments in the USA have traditionally been conducted using 37-mm closed-face cassettes (CFCs) and respirable Cyclones. Inhalable aerosol samplers offer significant improvement for dose estimation studies to reduce respiratory disease. The goals of this study were to determine correction factors between the inhalable samplers (IOM and Button) and the CFC and Cyclone for dusts sampled in livestock buildings and to determine whether these factors vary among livestock types. Determination of these correction factors will allow comparison between inhalable measurements and historical measurements. Ten sets of samples were collected in swine, chicken, turkey, and dairy facilities in both Colorado and Iowa. Pairs of each sampling device were attached to the front and back of a rotating mannequin. Laboratory studies using a still-air chamber and a wind tunnel provided information regarding the effect of wind speed on sampler performance. Overall, the IOM had the lowest coefficient of variation (best precision) and was least affected by changes in wind speed. The performance of the Button was negatively impacted in poultry environments where larger (feather) particulates clogged the holes in the initial screen. The CFC/IOM ratios are important for comparisons between newer and older studies. Wind speed and dust type were both important factors affecting ratios. Based on the field studies (Table 6), a ratio of 0.56 is suggested as a conversion factor for the CFC/IOM (average for all environments because of no statistical difference). Suggested conversion factors for the Button/IOM are swine (0.57), chicken (0.80), turkey (0.53), and dairy (0.67). Any attempt to apply a conversion factor between the Cyclone and inhalable samplers is not recommended. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-4878
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:53
-
Issue:6
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20036272
-
Citation:Ann Occup Hyg 2009 Aug; 53(6):585-594
-
Contact Point Address:Stephen J. Reynolds, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO 80523, USA
-
Email:stephen.reynolds@colostate.edu
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2009
-
Performing Organization:Colorado State University - Ft. Collins
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Start Date:20020801
-
Source Full Name:Annals of Occupational Hygiene
-
End Date:20070731
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:67fdf45679e104810db78cca369718dc2bf6882fe262de62e05e52dc55b1768efa1f0608a3ec49f062fe4b508b95f56e3d532944952501ebc163366a914c8c2c
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like