An International Comparison of the Crystallinity of Calibration Materials for the Analysis of Respirable Alpha-Quartz Using X-Ray Diffraction and a Comparison with Results from the Infrared KBr Disc Method
Public Domain
-
2009/08/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:Beauparlant M ; Dion C ; Fernandez P ; Friede B ; Kauffer E ; Key-Schwartz, Rosa J. ; Moulut JC ; Stacey P ; Wake D
-
Description:This paper lists the values recommended by the working group for use with XRD analysis. The values for crystallinity obtained for some of the materials (NIST 1878, Min-U-Sil5 and A9950) were 6-7% lower than the original certification or estimates reported in other comparisons. Crystallinity values obtained by XRD gave a good correlation with BET surface area measurements (r(2) = 0.91) but not with mean aerodynamic particle size (r(2) = 0.31). Subsamples of two of the materials (A9950 Respirable and Quin 1 Respirable) with smaller particle size distribution than their parent material did not show any significant change in their values for crystallinity, suggesting that the area XRD measurement of these materials within the particle size range collected is more dependent on how the quartz is formed geologically or how it is processed for use. A comparison of results from laboratories using the infrared (IR) and KBr disc method showed that this method is more dependent than XRD on differences in the particle size within the respirable size range, whereas the XRD values were more consistent between the different measurement values obtained on each material. It was not possible to assign a value for percentage purity to each material for users of IR analysis. This work suggests that differences are likely to exist between the results from XRD and IR analysis when measuring 'real' workplace samples and highlights the importance of matching the particle size of the calibration material to the particle size of the workplace dust for measurements of crystalline quartz. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0003-4878
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:53
-
Issue:6
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20035820
-
Citation:Ann Occup Hyg 2009 Aug; 53(6):639-649
-
Contact Point Address:Peter Stacey, The Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK
-
Email:Peter.Stacey@hsl.gov.uk
-
CAS Registry Number:
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2009
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Annals of Occupational Hygiene
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:6c4865d5a4bc436638b591ba54f89a7c1d314e68db3f69ebbaa6ed61dbd3a8eeef564851d87f9a2f98c7599afae2d7fc910de0874d919baa721bbfd641cc0af4
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like