Relationships Between Observational Estimates and Physical Measurements of Upper Limb Activity
Public Domain
-
2009/05/01
-
Details
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:This study examined the internal validity of observational-based ergonomic job analysis methods for assessing upper limb force exertion and repetitive motion. Six manual tasks were performed by multiple 'workers' while direct measurements were made to quantify force exertion and kinematics of the upper limb. Observational-based analyses of force and upper limb motion/repetition were conducted by 29 professional ergonomists. These analysts overestimated the magnitude of individual force exertions - temporal aspects of force exertion ( duty cycle) were estimated more accurately. Estimates of the relative severity of repetitive motions among the jobs were accurate. Absolute counts of repetitive motions were less accurate. Modest correlations (r(2) = 0.28 to r(2) = 0.50) were observed between ratings of hand activity level and measured joint velocities. Ergonomic job analyses relying on systematic observation should be applied and interpreted with consideration given to the capabilities and limitations of analysts in estimating the physical risk factors. These findings are relevant to a better understanding of the internal validity of ergonomic job analysis methods based on systematic observation. See corrigundum: Ergonomics 2009 Sep; 52(9):1183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140130903148761. [Description provided by NIOSH]
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
ISSN:0014-0139
-
Document Type:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Division:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Volume:52
-
Issue:5
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20035483
-
Citation:Ergonomics 2009 May; 52(5):569-583
-
Contact Point Address:Brian D. Lowe, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DART, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-24, Cincinnati, OH 45226
-
Email:blowe@cdc.gov
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2009
-
NORA Priority Area:
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Source Full Name:Ergonomics
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:816e8fc9b7caad03541285ded824aa866788cb5e223a0a337f339dbb55a513ff42b3351a7bf7dd2b66e61973d6a0f6fa2728de7009b02228a6daa75346af0f12
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like