CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
Farmworker-Relevant Heat Exposure in Different Crop and Shade Conditions
-
10-2024
-
-
Source: J Agromedicine. 29(4):547-560
Details:
-
Alternative Title:J Agromedicine
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Objectives.
Agricultural workers are at risk of heat-related illness, which is preventable. Few field studies have compared farmworker-relevant heat exposure in different conditions. We examined heat exposure over time in different potential shade and work locations to inform future occupational heat prevention approaches.
Methods.
We assessed heat exposure in Eastern Washington State (WA) cherry and grape fields in August 2022. QUESTemp° monitors recorded Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) and Black Globe Temperature (BGT) every 10 minutes from approximately 07:00–14:00 for 3 days in the center of crop rows (mid-row), under portable shade structures (shade), and in open field (open) locations. Linear mixed effects regression (LMER) models compared WBGT and BGT among field locations. Hourly time-weighted average WBGT and comparisons with occupational exposure limits (OELs) were computed for different hypothetical work-rest cycles, assuming different worker effort levels, rest locations (mid-row versus shade), and acclimatization statuses, during the hottest sampling hours.
Results.
Across all crops and locations during the study period, the mean/SD air temperature was 31°C(88°F)/3.9°C(6.9°F), with a maximum temperature of 39°C(102°F) and a mean/SD relative humidity of 30%/9.6%. LMER models suggested no significant difference in mid-row versus open WBGT but significantly lower WBGT in shade versus open locations for both cherries (main effect −5.14: 95% confidence interval [CI] −6.97,−3.32) and grapes (−6.20: 95%CI −7.73,−4.67), though this difference diminished over the course of the day. BGT was significantly higher in the mid-row than the shade (cherries main effect 14.33: 95%CI 9.52,19.13 and grapes 17.10: 95%CI 13.44,20.75). During the hottest sampling hour, exceedances of OELs were reduced with assumptions of increased shaded break lengths, reduced effort level, and acclimatization.
Conclusions.
Shade canopies, but not the crops studied, provided significant reductions in heat exposure. We observed increased protection from heat assuming longer shaded breaks and reduced effort levels. Results highlight the need for additional field research on the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of different shade types and work-rest cycles to guide employer optimization of best practices for worker protections, including acclimatization before high heat, sufficient shaded rest time, reduced effort levels as the day warms, and avoiding work in peak heat.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:
-
Source:
-
Pubmed ID:38874305
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC11410529
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Volume:29
-
Issue:4
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
File Type:
-
Supporting Files:No Additional Files
