Accuracy-based proficiency testing for estradiol measurements
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

Accuracy-based proficiency testing for estradiol measurements



Public Access Version Available on: February 01, 2025, 12:00 AM
Please check back on the date listed above.
English

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    Clin Biochem
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Objectives:

    Accuracy of estradiol measurements is important but conventional proficiency testing (PT) cannot assess accuracy when possibly non-commutable samples are used and method peer-group means are the targets. Accuracy-based assessment of estradiol measurements is needed.

    Design and Methods:

    Five serum samples were prepared from single donors, frozen, and distributed overnight to 76 New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH)-certified laboratories. Participants analyzed samples for estradiol. The biases of group means were assessed against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined targets, evaluated using the Hormone Standardization Program (HoSt) E2 performance criterion of ±12.5 %. Each laboratory’s performance was evaluated using total allowable error (acceptance limits) of target ±25 % or ±15 pg/mL (55 pmol/L) (whichever was greater, NYSDOH), target ±30 % (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA]), and target ±26 % (minimal limit based on biological variation [BV]).

    Results:

    The biases (range) were 34 % (−17 % to 175 %), 40 % (−33 % to 386 %), 16 % (−45 % to 193 %), 5 % (−27 % to 117 %), and 4% (−31 % to 21 %), for samples at estradiol of 24.1, 28.4, 61.7, 94.1, and 127 pg/mL, or 89, 104, 227, 345, and 466 pmol/L, respectively. Large positive method/analytical systematic biases were revealed for 9 commonly used method/analytical systems in the United States at low estradiol concentrations. Of the 9 analytical systems, 0, 0, 3, 7 and 6 met the HoSt criterion for the samples with estradiol at the five respective concentrations. PT evaluation showed that 59 %, 69 % and 87 % of laboratories would receive a PT event passing (satisfactory) score when the CDC-defined target and a criterion of NYSDOH, CLIA or BV was used, respectively. However, >95 % laboratories would obtain PT passing score if method peer-group means were used as targets regardless of the criterion used.

    Conclusions:

    Improvement in accuracy of estradiol measurements is needed, particularly at low estradiol concentrations. Accuracy-based PT provides unambiguous information about the accuracy of methods/analytical systems.

  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
  • Pubmed ID:
    38043696
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC11261451
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    124
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at stacks.cdc.gov