U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Trends in the Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema and Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy Among Commercially Insured Adults Aged <65 Years

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Diabetes Care
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Objective:

    Examine the ten-year trend in the prevalence and treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) among commercially insured adults with diabetes.

    Research Design and Methods:

    We analyzed the ten-year trend (2009–2018) in healthcare claims for adults 18–64 years using the IBM® MarketScan® Database, a national convenience sample of employer-sponsored health insurance. We included patients continuously enrolled in commercial fee-for-service health insurance for 24 months who had a diabetes ICD-9/10-CM code on ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 different day outpatient claims in the index year or previous calendar year. We used diagnosis and procedure codes to calculate the annual prevalence of patients with ≥1 claims for: 1) any DME, 2) either DME/VTDR, and 3) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections [anti-VEGF] and laser photocoagulation treatment, stratified by any DME, VTDR with DME, and VTDR without DME. We calculated Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC).

    Results:

    From 2009–2018, there was an increase in the annual prevalence of patients with DME/VTDR (2.1% to 3.4%; AAPC=7.5%; p<0.001) and any DME (0.7% to 2.6%; AAPC=19.8%; p<0.001). There were sex differences in the annual prevalence of DME/VTDR and any DME, with males having a higher prevalence than females. Annual claims for anti-VEGF increased among those with any DME (327%) and VTDR with DME (206%); laser photocoagulation decreased among patients with any DME (−68%), VTDR with DME (−54%), and VTDR without DME (−62%).

    Conclusions:

    Annual claims for DME/VTDR and anti-VEGF injections increased while laser photocoagulation decreased among commercially insured adults with diabetes.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Diabetes Care. 46(4):687-696
  • Pubmed ID:
    36637915
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC10928529
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    46
  • Issue:
    4
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:c7ca443a023dd452e141917c27655b5d89cb5811becba9d07e387ce770fc7d9f
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 707.32 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.