U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Sterile field contamination from powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) versus contamination from surgical masks

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Am J Infect Control
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    Background:

    Currently, powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) are not recommended for usage in close proximity to sterile fields owing to concerns that exhaled, unfiltered air potentially may cause contamination; however, this has not been confirmed by experimental study.

    Methods:

    After establishing background levels of airborne contamination, our team placed settling plates in a sterile field and collected contamination from participants who were performing particulate-generating actions. Participants performed the actions while wearing various forms of respiratory protection, including: (1) a full facepiece PAPR, (2) a full facepiece PAPR with a shoulder-length hood, (3) a surgical mask, and (4) no facial covering (as a positive control to determine contamination-reduction effectiveness). Specimens were collected at the end of a 10-minute sampling time frame. After incubation at 36.58C for 72 hours, we tabulated colony forming units as a marker of contamination.

    Results:

    Surgical masks and the 2 PAPR configurations all drastically reduced aerosolized droplet contamination. Surgical masks reduced contamination by 98.48%, and both PAPRs reduced contamination by 100% (compared with the usage of no facial covering). There was no statistical difference between their effectiveness (surgical mask vs both PAPRs, P value = .588 and no hood PAPR vs hood PAPR, P value >.999).

    Discussion/Conclusions:

    Based on these findings, the tested PAPR configurations are effective at reducing aerosolized droplet contamination into a sterile field, and further testing is warranted to assess other PAPR configurations as well as PAPR suitability in an operating room.

  • Subjects:
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Am J Infect Control. 48(2):153-156
  • Pubmed ID:
    31519477
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC10906747
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    48
  • Issue:
    2
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:1e3ca3753ab269e5755cc2a373f49374c676f1d60d33fd6266fcfde0b68c5eb3
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 268.62 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.