Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Centers (PERRC) Mid-Project Review : a Report from the Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC)

Details

• Personal Author:
  Inglesby, Thomas ; Sosin, Daniel M.
• Corporate Authors:
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response.
• Description:
  Approved by Vote of the BSC: January 3, 2012 ; Respectfully Submitted: March 19, 2012 ; External peer review is a highly regarded mechanism for critically evaluating the scientific and technical merit of research and scientific programs. This rigorous process identifies strengths, gaps, redundancy, and research or program effectiveness in order to inform decisions regarding scientific direction, scope, prioritization, and financial stewardship. External peer review will address program quality, approach, direction, capability, and integrity and will also be used to evaluate the program’s public health impact and relevance to the missions of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response (OPHPR).
• Subjects:
  • Disasters
  • Disease Outbreaks
  • Emergencies
  • Global Health
  • Public Health
  • Public Health Administration
  • United States Government Agencies
• Document Type:
  Report
• Corporate as Subject:
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Coordinating Office for Terrorism Preparedness and Emergency Response.
• Place as Subject:
  United States
• CIO:
  ORR
• Division:
  ORR
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/139841/cdc_139841_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 9.66 MB]
• Collection(s):
  Historical CDC.gov Content
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:7a9e6a487e0239b970fdd952518c5eb1498a983b4f7ba4d76687ca947b785b47c2a49963a2e106675da51014080fca26bdd7831d2cb21eb820bd0f983b7bf93d