U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    J Int Soc Respir Prot
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    As part of development of performance standards, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) technical committee, ISO/TC 94/SC 15 Respiratory protective devices (RPD), adopted work of breathing (WOB) to evaluate airflow resistance for all designs (classes) of respiratory protective devices. The interests of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) are to compare the proposed WOB method and results for current RPD with those for present resistance methods. The objectives here were to assemble a method to meet the ISO SC15 standards, validate operation and conformance, and assess repeatability of WOB measurements for RPD. WOB method implementation and use followed standards ISO 16900-5:2016 and ISO 16900-12:2016. Volume-averaged total work of breathing (WOB|/V| where V| is tidal volume) determined for standard orifices was analyzed for variation and bias. After fabrication and assembly, the method gave preliminary verification orifice results that met ISO requirements and were equivalent to those from other laboratories. Evaluation of additional results from RPD testing showed tidal volume and frequency determined compliance. Appropriate adjustments reduced average absolute bias to 1.7%. Average coefficient of variation for WOB|/V| was 2.3%. Over 97% of results obtained during significant use over time met specifications. WOB|/V| for as-received air-purifying and supplied-air RPD were repeatable (p<0.05). WOB|/V| for unsealed half mask air-purifying RPD was an average of 31% lower compared to sealed. When experimental parameters were appropriately adjusted, the ISO WOB method implemented by NIOSH NPPTL consistently provided ISO-compliant verification WOB|/V|. Results for appropriately sealed RPD were reproducible.
  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    J Int Soc Respir Prot. 34(2):81-94
  • Pubmed ID:
    37333866
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC10273392
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Volume:
    34
  • Issue:
    2
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:e97cca9b2a67db257e402f9c64eef5897e8b3d8e39df4c6bc5dfdba610f31880
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.09 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.