U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Characterizing Clinics With Differential Changes in the Screening Rate in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Supporting Files
File Language:
English


Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Cancer
  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    BACKGROUND:

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funds the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates in primary care clinics by implementing evidence-based interventions (EBIs). This study examined differences in clinic characteristics and implementation efforts among clinics with differential changes in screening rates over time.

    METHODS:

    CRCCP clinic data collected by the CDC were used. The outcome was the clinic status (highest quartile [Q4] vs lowest quartile [Q1]), which was based on the absolute screening rate change between the first and second program years. Five clinic characteristic variables and 12 clinic-level CRCCP variables (eg, EBIs) were assessed in bivariable analyses, and logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of the outcome.

    RESULTS:

    Each group included 78 clinics (N = 156). Clinics with a Q4 status saw a 14.9 percentage point increase in the screening rate, whereas clinics with a Q1 status experienced a 9.1 percentage point decline. Q4s were more likely than Q1s to have a CRC champion, implement 4 EBIs versus fewer EBIs, implement at least 1 new EBI, and increase the number of implemented EBIs. The adjusted odds of Q4 status were 5.3 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9–14.9) if a clinic implemented an additional EBI. The adjusted odds of Q4 status increased to 7.1 (95% CI, 2.2–23.1) if a clinic implemented 2 to 4 additional EBIs.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Implementing new EBIs or enhancing existing ones improves CRC screening rates. Additionally, clinics with lower screening rates had greater rate increases and may have benefited more from the CRCCP.

  • Subjects:
  • Source:
    Cancer. 127(7):1049-1056
  • Pubmed ID:
    33301173
  • Pubmed Central ID:
    PMC9242539
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Name as Subject:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Volume:
    127
  • Issue:
    7
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:34c85ea9da9209d0a6102a19381a8e45bf139f08fbac15f4c548dcfc473e3007
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 104.38 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or co-authored by CDC or funded partners.

As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.