Bias in Self-reported Prepregnancy Weight Across Maternal and Clinical Characteristics

Details

• Alternative Title:
  Matern Child Health J
• Personal Author:
  Sharma, Andrea J. ; Bulkley, Joanna E. ; Stoneburner, Ashley B. ; Dandamudi, Padmavati ; Leo, Michael ; Callaghan, Williams M. ; Vesco, Kimberly K.
• Description:
  Objectives
  
  Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) are known determinants of maternal and child health; calculating both requires an accurate measure of prepregnancy weight. We compared self-reported prepregnancy weight to measured weights to assess reporting bias by maternal and clinical characteristics.
  
  Methods
  
  We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pregnant women using electronic health records (EHR) data from Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a non-profit integrated health care system in Oregon and southwest Washington State. We identified women age ≥ 18 years who were pregnant between 2000 and 2010 with self-reported prepregnancy weight, ≥ 2 measured weights between ≤ 365-days-prior-to and ≤ 42-days-after conception, and measured height in their EHR. We compared absolute and relative difference between self-reported weight and two “gold-standards”: (1) weight measured closest to conception, and (2) usual weight (mean of weights measured 6-months-prior-to and ≤ 42-days-after conception). Generalized-estimating equations were used to assess predictors of misreport controlling for covariates, which were obtained from the EHR or linkage to birth certificate.
  
  Results
  
  Among the 16,227 included pregnancies, close agreement (± 1 kg or ≤ 2%) between self-reported and closest-measured weight was 44% and 59%, respectively. Overall, self-reported weight averaged 1.3 kg (SD 3.8) less than measured weight. Underreporting was higher among women with elevated BMI category, late prenatal care entry, and pregnancy outcome other than live/stillbirth (p < .05). Using self-reported weight, BMI was correctly classified for 91% of pregnancies, but ranged from 70 to 98% among those with underweight or obesity, respectively. Results were similar using usual weight as gold standard.
  
  Conclusions for Practice
  
  Accurate measure of prepregnancy weight is essential for clinical guidance and surveillance efforts that monitor maternal health and evaluate public-health programs. Identification of characteristics associated with misreport of self-reported weight can inform understanding of bias when assessing the influence of prepregnancy BMI or GWG on health outcomes.
  
  
• Subjects:
  Article Body Mass Index Body Weights And Measures Child Female Gestational Weight Gain Humans Infant, Newborn Overweight Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Retrospective Studies Self Report Validation Studies

  More +
• Source:
  Matern Child Health J. 25(8):1242-1253
• Pubmed ID:
  33929655
• Pubmed Central ID:
  PMC8924792
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• Funding:
  CC999999/ImCDC/Intramural CDC HHSUnited States/ ; Contract # CDC 200-2016-M-91914/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHSUnited States/
• Volume:
  25
• Issue:
  8
• Collection(s):
  CDC Public Access
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:7cdac789e60efc9eb71007136829e527f0ad024c6b18a4585dd21eb3e288baa0
• Download URL:
  https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/115495/cdc_115495_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 781.22 KB ]