Comparability of diagnostic data; coded by the 8th and 9th revisions of the International classification of diseases

Duggar, Benjamin C.; Lewis, W. Frank, 1936-

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Comparability of diagnostic data; coded by the 8th and 9th revisions of the International classification of diseases

July 1987
By Duggar, Benjamin C. ; Lewis, W. Frank, 1936-
Series: Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research ; no. 104

[PDF-3.16 MB]

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Personal Author:

Duggar, Benjamin C. ; Lewis, W. Frank, 1936-

Duggar, Benjamin C. ; Lewis, W. Frank, 1936- Less -
Corporate Authors:

National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)
Description:

This report describes how the changes in the classification system used to code diagnoses reported in the National Hospital Discharge and the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys for utilization occurring in 1979 and later affect the comparability with similar data collected for utilization from 1968 through 1978. Comparability ratios are developed by coding the data using both coding classification revisions and dividing the national estimate based on one revision by the estimate based on the other revision. The comparability ratios can be used to estimate what the values published using one revision of the classification system would have been had coding been conducted according to the other revision.
Content Notes:

Prepared by Benjamin C. Duggar and W. Frank Lewis.

Bibliography: p. 22.
Subjects:

[+]

Ambulatory Care Classification Disease Evaluation Hospitals Medical Care Patient Discharge Statistical Methods Utilization
Series:

Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research ; no. 104 ; DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 87-1378

Vital and health statistics. Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research ; no. 104 ; DHHS publication ; no. (PHS) 87-1378 Less -
Pubmed ID:

3672940
Document Type:

Journal Issue
Name as Subject:

National Hospital Discharge Survey (U.S.) ; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (U.S.) ; National Hospital Discharge Survey (U.S.) ; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (U.S.)

National Hospital Discharge Survey (U.S.) ; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (U.S.) ; National Hospital Discharge Survey (U.S.) ; National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (U.S.) Less -
Genre:

Statistics
Place as Subject:

United States
Collection(s):

Stephen B. Thacker CDC Library collection
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:cd60be7eea350a03c83da811fc206c3233cb2b1f5ccdcfec07efefb2419a02a3
Download URL:

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11183/cdc_11183_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Comparability of diagnostic data; coded by the 8th and 9th revisions of the International classification of diseases

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like