<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">8709538</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">5861</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Neurotoxicol Teratol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Neurotoxicol Teratol</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Neurotoxicology and teratology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0892-0362</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1872-9738</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">25192776</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">7401901</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ntt.2014.08.005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA877237</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Genetic correlational analysis reveals no association between MPP<sup>+</sup> and the severity of striatal dopaminergic damage following MPTP treatment in BXD mouse strains</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>Byron C.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>James P.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">c</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>Robert W.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">c</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>Gelareh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>Diane B.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">b</xref><xref rid="CR1" ref-type="corresp">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>a</label>Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA</aff><aff id="A2"><label>b</label>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA</aff><aff id="A3"><label>c</label>University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USA</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1"><label>*</label>Corresponding author at: CDC-NIOSH, Morgantown, WV 26505-2888, USA. Tel.: +1 304 285 6121. <email>dum6@cdc.gov</email> (D.B. Miller).</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>23</day><month>7</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>9</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>Sep-Oct</season><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>04</day><month>8</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>45</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>92</lpage><!--elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/j.ntt.2014.08.005--><abstract id="ABS1"><p id="P1">1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) is a pro-neurotoxicant that must be metabolized to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP<sup>+</sup>) and taken up into striatal dopaminergic neurons to produce neurodegeneration. Recently, we showed wide genetic variability in MPTP-associated neuronal damage in a panel of recombinant inbred mouse strains. Here we examined the amount of MPP<sup>+</sup> produced in the striatum in the same strains of inbred BXD mice. This allowed us to determine if the differences in the dopaminergic neurotoxicity and associated astrogliosis among the BXD mouse strains were due to differential metabolism of MPTP to MPP<sup>+</sup>. Using the same BXD mouse strains examined previously (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>) we found that the extent of the striatal damage produced following MPTP treatment is not correlated quantitatively with the production of MPP<sup>+</sup> in the striatum. Our findings also extend those of others regarding strain differences in MPTP-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Importantly, our finding suggests that additional factors influence the neurodegenerative response other than the presence and amount of the toxicant at the target site.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Genetic correlational analysis</kwd><kwd>BXD recombinant inbred mice</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="S1"><label>1.</label><title>Introduction</title><p id="P2">MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) is a proneurotoxin that is able to enter the brain when given systemically where it is metabolized by astrocytes to produce 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP<sup>+</sup>). MPP<sup>+</sup> is taken up preferentially by the dopamine (DA) transporter resulting in striatal DA terminal degeneration and, at higher dosages, loss of DA neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) (<xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">Muthane et al., 1994</xref>; <xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">O&#x02019;Callaghan et al., 1990</xref>). Treatment of mice with a single low dosage of MPTP serves as an experimental tool for studying factors that may impact striatal dopaminergic nerve terminal degeneration (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>; <xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">Sriram et al., 2004</xref>; <xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">O&#x02019;Callaghan et al., 1990</xref>, <xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>).</p><p id="P3">Recently, we reported large genetic variation in MPTP-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity among ten BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>). Male mice were treated with a single s.c. injection of 12.5 mg/kg MPTP and the striatum was harvested 48 h later (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>). This dosage regimen damages striatal dopaminergic nerve terminals but does not damage SN. Striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity was apparent as evidenced by decreases in DA and its metabolites, homovanillic acid (HVA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), as well as in levels of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) protein, a measure of DA terminal loss. Furthermore, this dopaminergic damage was accompanied by elevation in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a hallmark of the astroglial response to underlying neural injury (e.g. see <xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">O&#x02019;Callaghan et al., 2014</xref>). Nearly all of these indicators of striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity were affected in our inbred mouse strains, especially striatal DA content, as measured by HPLC in tissue homogenates and reported in <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref>. Because this reduction showed large differences across strains, i.e., between 20 and 90%, the question addressed in this short communication was whether there are differences in metabolism of MPTP to MPP<sup>+</sup> across the strains. In this work we determined the amount of MPP<sup>+</sup> produced by each BXD strain following the same single dosage of MPTP used previously (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="S2"><label>2.</label><title>Materials and methods</title><p id="P4">Following the protocol of <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref> we obtained male mice from nine of the original ten BXD strains; sufficient numbers of mice from one BXD strain (27) were not available for the determination of MPP<sup>+</sup> in this paper due to poor reproduction. Mice (n = 5&#x02013;6 per group) received 12.5 mg/kg MPTP s.c. and were killed 60 min later. The brains were removed and the striatum was dissected free hand and weighed prior to analysis for MPP<sup>+</sup> by HPLC using a modification of the method of <xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">Miller et al. (1998)</xref>. Briefly, the striatum was sonified in 200 &#x003bc;l of 5% trichloroacetic acid containing a known amount of the internal standard 1-methyl-3-phenyl pyridinium iodide and the supernatant collected following centrifugation twice at 14,000 g for 10 min. The supernatants were analyzed using a Waters Associates 616 pump, C18 RP column and 474 fluorescence detector (Milford, MA) with a mobile phase of 0.15 M triethanolamine/HCl, 0.1 M acetic acid (17.4 M), pH 2.3 with formic acid, and 9% acetonitrile. Excitation and emission wavelengths of 290 and 370 nm, respectively, were used to detect MPP<sup>+</sup> with a retention time of ~10 min. Chromatograms were recorded and integrated using Millennium 32 software (Waters Associates, Milford, MA).</p><p id="P5">We determined the degree of association between the amount of MPP<sup>+</sup> produced in this study and MPTP-related striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity as well as the associated astrogliosis reported in the <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref> study. GFAP is an astrogliosis marker (see <xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">O&#x02019;Callaghan et al., 2014</xref>; <xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">O&#x02019;Callaghan and Sriram, 2005</xref>). The associations were estimated by Pearson correlation using the BXD strain means for the principal component (PC) analysis-derived composite of MPTP-based reductions in striatal DA, DOPAC, HVA and TH protein from <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref>. We also determined the correlation between the GFAP increases induced by MPTP and the degree of dopaminergic neurotoxicity (PCs) as well as MPP<sup>+</sup> levels.</p></sec><sec id="S3"><label>3.</label><title>Results</title><p id="P6"><xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref> presents PC values (z-scores) for the dopaminergic neurotoxicity composite, the striatal MPP<sup>+</sup> (mg/g tissue) levels determined in this study and the striatal GFAP increases (&#x003bc;g/mg tissue) from <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref>. We quantified the MPP<sup>+</sup> levels in the striatum but not SN as this dosage regimen normally does not damage SN in the C57BL6J. It would be open to question as to whether the BXD strains that show the most damage in the striatum would have SN damage.</p><p id="P7">Our data show that the association between MPP<sup>+</sup> levels and the striatal dopamine compromise caused by MPTP treatment is weak and not statistically significant as measured by Pearson&#x02019;s r. The association between MPP<sup>+</sup> and GFAP, a marker of astrocyte activation in response to neural injury, was also weak. However, there was a strong and significant relationship between the degree of dopaminergic neurotoxicity (PC) and GFAP (r = 0.69, p &#x0003c; 0.03).</p></sec><sec id="S4"><label>4.</label><title>Discussion</title><p id="P8">Others have reported strain differences in the response to MPTP in the parental strains of the BXDs (e.g., <xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">Hamre et al., 1999</xref>). Our observation that the association between MPP<sup>+</sup> production and a reduction in measures of striatal DA terminal integrity was weak or nonexistent was unexpected. But it should be noted that others also have reported strain differences in MPTP neurotoxicity that were not related to MPP<sup>+</sup> levels (<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">Boyd et al., 2007</xref>). We also found little to no association between MPP<sup>+</sup> levels and the GFAP response to striatal dopaminergic terminal damage in the BXD strains, i.e., the strains with the most damage did not have the highest levels of MPP<sup>+</sup>. Nonetheless, the MPTP-associated dopaminergic damage (decreased DA, its metabolites and TH protein) was significantly correlated with the increase in GFAP, as expected. It is well-established that MPTP must be converted to MPP<sup>+</sup> in the brain and its neurotoxicity is assumed to reflect &#x0201c;dose to target&#x0201d; levels of MPP<sup>+</sup>. However, our clear strain differences in dopaminergic neurotoxicity and the lack of association with the MPP<sup>+</sup> levels indicate that other factors play a role in the degree of damage induced by MPP<sup>+</sup> in striatal DA nerve terminals. These factors could include but are not limited to a differential susceptibility of the DA terminal to damage or some other aspect of terminal function. The DA transporter (DAT) is responsible for entry of MPP<sup>+</sup> into the nerve terminal ultimately resulting in sufficient concentration of the toxicant to cause damage. The differential susceptibility of the BXD mice to MPP<sup>+</sup> could be conferred by strain differences in the DAT levels themselves or in their DA reuptake capabilities. Certainly, a continued investigation into the differential vulnerability of the BXD strains to MPTP is a worthy endeavor as it would help to broaden our understanding of the factors contributing to the susceptibility of the nigral striatal system to neurodegeneration.</p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="SM1"><title>Supplementary Material</title><supplementary-material content-type="local-data" id="SD1"><label>Transparency Statement</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS877237-supplement-Transparency_Statement.pdf" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="d39e331" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material></sec></body><back><ack id="S5"><p id="P9">Funding</p><p id="P10">The intramural funds are from UTHSC, CDC-NIOSH and Penn State University, NIAAA Integrative Neuroscience Initiative on Alcoholism (U01AA016662, U01 AA013499) and the UTHSC Center for Integrative and Translational Genomics. This study is supported in part by USPHS Grant R01 ES022614.</p></ack><fn-group><fn id="FN1"><p id="P11">Transparency document</p><p id="P12">Transparency document associated with this article can be found, in the online version.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="R1"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Boyd</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Shepherd</surname><given-names>KR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Faherty</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Slack</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jiao</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>, <etal/> Response to 1<article-title>-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) differs in mouse strains and reveals a divergence in JNK signaling and COX-2 induction prior to loss of neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta</article-title>. <source>Brain Res</source>
<year>2007</year>;<volume>1175</volume>:<fpage>107</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17884023</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Hamre</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Tharp</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Poon</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Xiiong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Smeyne</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name>. <article-title>Differential strain susceptibility following 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) administration acts in an autosomal dominant fashion: quantitative analysis in seven strains of Mus musculus</article-title>. <source>Brain Res</source>
<year>1999</year>;<volume>828</volume>:<fpage>91</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>103</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10320728</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Unger</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Systems analysis of genetic variation in MPTP neurotoxicity in mice</article-title>. <source>Neurotoxicology</source>
<year>2013</year>;<volume>37</volume>:<fpage>26</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23558233</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>SF</given-names></name>, <name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Laws</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name>. <article-title>The impact of gender and estrogen on striatal dopaminergic neurotoxicity</article-title>. <source>Ann N Y Acad Sci</source>
<year>1998</year>;<volume>844</volume>:<fpage>153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>65</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Muthane</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ramsay</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jackson-Lewin</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Donaldson</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Differences in nigral neuron number and sensitivity to 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in C57/bl and CD-1 mice</article-title>. <source>Exp Neurol</source>
<year>1994</year>;<volume>126</volume>:<fpage>195</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>204</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7925820</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sriram</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>. <article-title>GFAP and other glial proteins as biomarkers of neurotoxicity</article-title>. <source>Expert Opin Drug Saf</source>
<year>2005</year>;<volume>4</volume>:<fpage>433</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>42</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15934851</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Reinhard</surname><given-names>JF</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name>. <article-title>Characterization of the origins of astrocyte response to injury using the dopaminergic neurotoxicant, 1-methyl-4-phenyl- 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine</article-title>. <source>Brain Res</source>
<year>1990</year>;<volume>117</volume>:<fpage>228</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>33</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Van Gilder</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Sofroniew</surname><given-names>MV</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>. <article-title>Early activation of STAT3 regulates reactive astrogliosis induced by diverse forms of neurotoxicity</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source>
<year>2014</year>;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>e102003</fpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0102003</pub-id><comment>.</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25025494</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Sriram</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Benkovic</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hebert</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>O&#x02019;Callaghan</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>. <article-title>Activation of the gp130-JAK/STAT3 pathway in astrocytes precedes the induction of GFAP in the MPTP model of dopaminergic neurodegeneration: Key signaling pathway for astrogliosis</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source>
<year>2004</year>;<volume>279</volume>:<fpage>19936</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14996842</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="P13">Strain means of z-scores for the 1st PC of difference scores between saline and treated (a), following MPTP treatment vs. MPP<sup>+</sup> concentration (b) and GFAP concentration (c) in the striatum of 10 BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains (taken from <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al., 2013</xref>). The PC measures included DA, DOPAC, HVA, and TH (all highly correlated). The comparisons clearly show that the degree of neurotoxicity for a given strain (a) is not related to the concentration of MPP<sup>+</sup> (b) but is related to GFAP concentration (c), an astrocyte marker of injury. Further, MPP<sup>+</sup> concentration (b) is not related to GFAP concentration (c). All groups in this work and the <xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Jones et al. (2013)</xref> contained an n of 5&#x02013;6 mice.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">BXD strain</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean z score 1st principal component (PC)(a)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean &#x000b1; sem MPP<sup>+</sup> mg/g striatum (b)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mean &#x000b1; sem increase in GFAP &#x003bc;g/mg striatum (c)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02212;1.75</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.43 &#x000b1;1.10</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.44 &#x000b1; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">27</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.24</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">NA</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.23 &#x000b1; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">29</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.53</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.19 &#x000b1; 1.03</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.08 &#x000b1; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.84</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.08 &#x000b1; 0.90</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.08 &#x000b1; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">40</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02212; 2.73</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.53 &#x000b1; 0.76</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.31 &#x000b1;0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">48</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02212; 1.56</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13.36 &#x000b1; 1.20</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.31 &#x000b1; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">60</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02212; 1.48</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.25 &#x000b1; 0.95</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.11 &#x000b1; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">62</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.92</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15.95 &#x000b1; 0.46</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.10 &#x000b1; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">69</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.43 &#x000b1; 0.51</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.22 &#x000b1; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">84</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.92</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.09 &#x000b1; 1.27</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.14 &#x000b1; 0.03</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><p id="P14">Comparisons: (1) PC (a) vs MPP<sup>+</sup> (b) r = &#x02212;0.15, p &#x0003e; 0.30, one tailed; (2) PC (a) vs GFAP (c) r = &#x02212;.69, p &#x0003c; 0.025, one tailed; (3) MPP<sup>+</sup> (b) vs GFAP (c) r = &#x02212;0.23, p &#x0003e; 0.25, one tailed.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>