Automated Measurement of Liver Attenuation to Identify Moderate-to-Severe Hepatic Steatosis from Chest CT Scans
Supporting Files
-
2019/10/25
-
File Language:
English
Details
-
Journal Article:Eur J Radiol
-
Personal Author:
-
Description:Purpose:
Develop and validate an automated method for measuring liver attenuation in non-contrast low-dose chest CT (LDCT) scans and compare it to the standard manual method for identifying moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS).
Method:
The automated method identifies a region below the right lung within the liver and uses statistical sampling techniques to exclude non-liver parenchyma. The method was used to assess moderate-to-severe HS on two IRB-approved cohorts: 1) 24 patients with liver disease examined between 1/2013-1/2017 with non-contrast chest CT and abdominal MRI scans obtained within three months of liver biopsy, and 2) 319 lung screening participants with baseline LDCT performed between 8/2011-1/2017. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods, the manual MRI method, and pathology for determining moderate-to-severe HS was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa by applying a 40 HU threshold to the CT method and 17.4% fat fraction to MRI. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Variability was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA).
Results:
In the first cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC=0.97, κ=1.00) with LoA of −7.6—4.7 HU. Both manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement with MRI (κ=0.90) and substantial agreement with pathology (κ=0.77). In the second cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC=0.94, κ = 0.87). LoA were −10.6—5.2 HU.
Conclusion:
Automated measurements of liver attenuation from LDCT scans can be used to identify moderate-to-severe HS on LDCT.
-
Subjects:
-
Keywords:Author Keywords: Hepatic Steatosis; Low-dose CT; Image Analysis; Lung Screening Medical Screening; Screening Methods; Medical Equipment; Scanning Techniques; Imaging Techniques; X-rays; Computers; Liver; Lung; Equipment Reliability; Performance Tests; Performance Capability; Measurement Equipment; Physiological Measurements; Automation; Manual Controls;
-
Source:Eur J Radiol. 122:108723
-
Pubmed ID:31778964
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC7179816
-
Document Type:
-
Funding:
-
Genre:
-
Place as Subject:
-
CIO:
-
Topic:
-
Location:
-
Pages in Document:26 pdf pages
-
Volume:122
-
NIOSHTIC Number:nn:20059107
-
Federal Fiscal Year:2020
-
Performing Organization:Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
-
Peer Reviewed:True
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:b199b63c04638ae4e1bcde9b63edb829969dc9de753b780eccb50d2e51712751f201f5870d216bfcae058d39669e4002da32c135dd9ccffd4be7b9b768232ac0
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
CDC STACKS serves as an archival repository of CDC-published products including
scientific findings,
journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other public health information authored or
co-authored by CDC or funded partners.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
As a repository, CDC STACKS retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
You May Also Like