Conceived and designed the experiments: MSH JH SK BM GD BG. Performed the experiments: MSH DK JP TJ MT JK S. Dlamini. Analyzed the data: MH JH CD GD BG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CD JN EA S. Dutta CO. Wrote the paper: MSH JH GD BG.
To guide malaria elimination efforts in Swaziland and other countries, accurate assessments of transmission are critical. Pooled-PCR has potential to efficiently improve sensitivity to detect infections; serology may clarify temporal and spatial trends in exposure.
Using a stratified two-stage cluster, cross-sectional design, subjects were recruited from the malaria endemic region of Swaziland. Blood was collected for rapid diagnostic testing (RDT), pooled PCR, and ELISA detecting antibodies to
The prevalence of malaria infection and recent exposure in Swaziland are extremely low, suggesting elimination is feasible. Future efforts should address imported malaria and target remaining foci of transmission. Pooled PCR and ELISA are valuable surveillance tools for guiding elimination efforts.
Global progress in malaria control has led to increased interest in and optimism for elimination. Of 99 countries that remain endemic, 32 are moving towards elimination, including four in sub-Saharan Africa
The burden of malaria is typically estimated by passive and active surveillance. Passive surveillance generally involves health facility based reporting of malaria cases, which can be limited by incomplete reporting, healthcare seeking in the private sector, and poor diagnostic capacity, particularly in low transmission settings where health workers see few malaria cases. Active surveillance addresses some of these limitations and generally involves cross-sectional surveys of defined sample populations, where the primary malaria indicator is the proportion of persons infected with malaria parasites (parasite prevalence)
Estimating parasite prevalence typically relies on microscopy, which is time and labor intensive, and often inaccurate in operational settings
Swaziland is a country in southern Africa that has experienced recent declines in malaria burden
5613 participants living in 1751 households were surveyed. Most participants lived in urban areas (53.3%), and in the eastern region of Lubombo (79.2%). Twelve percent of participants reported international travel in 2010, with South Africa (84.3%) and Mozambique (14.4%) being the most frequent destinations. Most participants resided in their current residence for >3 years (76.1%) (
| Baseline characteristic | No. (weighted %, 95% CI) |
| Male (n = 5613) | 2721 (48.6%, 47.0–50.2) |
| Age category (n = 5611) | |
| <10 years | 1463 (24.7%, 23.3–26.1) |
| 10–19 years | 1221 (21.0%, 19.3–22.7) |
| ≥20 years | 2929 (54.3%, 52.4–56.2) |
| Urban residence (n = 5613) | 2186 (53.3%, 48.7–57.9) |
| Mean altitude, meters (n = 5557) | 345.9 (325.4–366.4) |
| Region (n = 5613) | |
| Hhohho | 782 (10.2%, 5.0–15.3) |
| Lubombo | 4054 (79.2%, 72.8–85.6) |
| Manzini | 334 (4.2%, 1.0–7.3) |
| Shiselweni | 443 (6.5%, 2.5–10.6) |
| Residence in current district (n = 5199) | |
| <1 year | 528 (11.2%, 9.7–12.7) |
| 1–3 years | 619 (12.7%, 11.4–14.1) |
| >3 years | 4052 (76.1%, 74.0–78.1) |
| International travel in 2010 (n = 5199) | 559 (11.6%, 9.9–13.3) |
Indoor residual spraying (IRS) in the past 12 months was reported in 44.5% of households. Bed net use was low: 3.6% of participants reported sleeping under an ITN the previous night. Among children and women who sought care for fever in the last two weeks, 0% and 15.4%, respectively, received a finger or heel stick for malaria diagnosis (
| Intervention | No. (weighted %, 95% CI) |
| Vector control | |
| Household sprayed in the past 12 months (n = 1751) | 773 (44.5%, 40.3–48.6) |
| Household with at least 1 insecticide treated bed net (ITN) (n = 1751) | 301 (16.6%, 14.1–19.1) |
| Household with at least 1 ITN and/or sprayed in last 12 months (n = 1751) | 926 (53.2%, 49.4–57.0) |
| Slept under an ITN the previous night, all participants (n = 5613) | 176 (3.6%, 2.5–4.6) |
| Slept under an ITN the previous night, children <5 years (n = 766) | 41 (5.8%, 3.3–8.4) |
| Slept under an ITN the previous night, women (n = 1296) | 49 (3.8%, 2.5–5.2) |
| Diagnostic/ treatment service | |
| Diagnosed with malaria within the past 2 weeks (all participants, n = 5411) | 45 (0.9%, 0.4–1.3) |
| Treated with an antimalarial drug in the past 2 weeks (all participants, n = 5411) | 46 (0.9%, 0.5–1.4) |
| Children with fever in the last 2 weeks and sought care (n = 38) | 26 (67.4%, 51.6–83.1) |
| Children with fever in the last 2 weeks and received finger or heel stick (n = 38) | 0 |
| Women with fever in the last 2 weeks and sought care (n = 45) | 22 (53.5%, 40.7–66.3) |
| Women with fever in the last 2 weeks and received a finger stick (n = 22) | 3 (15.4%, 0–33.9) |
*Total number of children with fever in last 2 weeks (n = 362): 39 (12.5%, 95% CI 6.7–18.3%).
**Total number of women with fever in last 2 weeks (n = 961): 47 (4.7%, 95% CI 2.6–6.8%).
RDTs were performed in 4330 of 5613 (77%) participants and three were positive for
DBS, dried blood spots.
Using a pooled strategy for PCR, a total of 182 assays were performed to test the 4028 dried blood spots (
Cost and other operational issues were considered in a comparison amongst RDT, microscopy, individual PCR, and pooled PCR (
| Cost or Operational Issue | RDT | Microscopy | PCR |
| Cost per sample | $1.50 | $0.26 | $1.55 |
| Cost for all 4031 samples | $6047 | $1048 | $6248 (individual PCR)$291 (pooled PCR) |
| Detection limit | 100 to 200 p/µL | 4 to 100 p/µL | <4 p/µL (individual PCR) 100 p/µL (pooled PCR) |
| Point-of-care test | Yes | Only if basic laboratory services available | Not practical |
| Capital equipment | None | Microscope | PCR machine |
| Training | Minimal | Moderate | Extensive |
| Turnaround time per sample | 15 minutes | 30 minutes | 2 days |
| Turnaround time for all 4031 samples | n/a | Weeks | Weeks (individual PCR)Days (pooled PCR) |
p/µL = parasites/µL.
*Costs presented in US$ and do not include personnel. Estimates for microscopy were approximated based on published figures
**Estimates based on published figures
1820 of 4031 participants with dried blood spots were sampled for serology. Overall, 82 participants (5.8%, 95% CI 3.9–7.6) had antibodies to both AMA-1 and MSP-142 antigens. There was a step increase in seroprevalence at 20 years of age (
There were no significant relationships between seropositivity and wealth index, urban vs rural residence, altitude, IRS coverage, or bed net use. Reported travel to Mozambique, but not South Africa, within 2010 was significantly associated with seropositivity (OR 4.4, 95% CI, 1.0–19.0,
Spatial cluster analysis was performed to identify areas with higher than expected seroprevalence. A primary cluster was identified in the southeast region of the country (RR for seropositivity 3.8,
To guide strategic planning for the transition from malaria control to elimination, we utilized novel malaria surveillance techniques of pooled PCR and serology to perform the first large scale cross-sectional malaria survey in Swaziland and found that prevalence of infection and recent exposure was extremely low. By pooled PCR, only one
Large-scale prevalence surveys have traditionally relied on microscopy, but considering the significant time and labor required, and potential operational limitations, the Swaziland malaria program decided to use RDTs. As a simple point-of-care test, RDTs are convenient, but can give false positive results with underlying autoimmune conditions, non-malarial infections, or persistence of the
RDTs may also miss infections of low parasite density and many do not detect non-falciparum species
One limitation with measuring parasitemia in a cross-sectional survey is that regardless of the sensitivity of the test, only one moment in time is captured. In low endemic settings such as Swaziland, prevalence may be so low that it will be difficult to track progress toward elimination. As a measure of past infection, serology has been proposed as a useful way to estimate exposure in low endemic settings
Serological data may additionally help to identify other epidemiological risk factors for malaria. Travel to Mozambique and residence in the southeastern region were found to be associated with seropositivity. The first finding is consistent with Swaziland's passive surveillance and case investigation data, which have found travel to Mozambique to be a risk factor for infection
One potential limitation in our study is that cutoff for seropositivity was based on an assumption of a bi-modal distribution of seropositives and seronegatives within the population sampled. Samples from representative seronegatives (e.g. age- and genetically-matched participants from Swaziland with no history of falciparum exposure but similar exposure to other infections that could result in cross-reactive antibodies) were not available and in practice may be difficult to obtain. Our data suggest a clear temporal trend of a decline in malaria transmission 20 years prior. However, the potential non-specific response seen among younger age groups may suggest that this method is not specific enough to show cessation of transmission, as has been shown in other settings
Findings of this study have important implications on Swaziland's strategic planning for malaria elimination. First, the findings of extremely low parasite prevalence and recent exposure suggest that the high IRS coverage (45% compared to other parts of Africa, where IRS coverage is approximately 10%
For low transmission countries aiming to eliminate malaria, reliance on microscopy or RDT for active surveillance may be inadequate. We document the first national survey from an elimination setting to show that pooled PCR and serology, as accurate and efficient methods to measure current and past infection, can provide critical data to inform strategic planning. Additionally, renewed interest in elimination has been accompanied by skepticism about the feasibility of elimination, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa
We aimed to measure and describe the burden of malaria in Swaziland as relevant to planning for malaria elimination. We hypothesized that compared to using RDT, use of pooled-PCR and serology would improve sensitivity and efficiency for detection of infections and use of serology would clarify temporal and spatial trends in exposure.
The historically malaria endemic eastern part of the country was included. Based on the ecological and administrative subdivisions of the country, census enumeration areas (EAs) were arranged into four strata. Of 598 EAs, 172 were randomly selected based on probabilities proportional to population size. Geo-coordinates of all households within selected EAs were recorded
An MIS with a stratified two-stage cluster sample, cross-sectional design was used to generate representative estimates of intervention coverage and malaria disease burden. Given Swaziland's goal of elimination, several modifications were made to the traditional MIS design
A single finger prick was performed to collect blood for RDT (First Response Malaria Ag
Blood spots were dried for at least three hours and stored in individual plastic bags with desiccant at ambient temperature. They were transferred to 4°C within one week and to −20°C within one month. In duplicate, dried blood spots from RDT-positive participants were individually chelex extracted then tested by PCR using nested PCR targeting the
Samples from RDT-negative participants were tested using a three-stage PCR-based pooling strategy as previously described
A sub-sample of all participants with a dried blood spot was selected for serologic testing. Those less than one year of age were excluded due to potential persistence of maternal antibodies. All participants one to nine years of age were included because results in this age group were expected to be most reflective of recent changes in transmission. Based on reported declines in incidence, age-stratified analyses were expected to be powered by a lower seroprevalence in younger age groups. Therefore, participants ten to 49 years of age were randomly sampled by district based on the maximum number of participants in the younger age categories. Participants 50 years of age and older were excluded.
ELISA assays were performed similarly to previously described methods
The sample size was generated to provide an estimate of insecticide-treated bed net (ITN) use in children less than five years of age. Based on previous surveys, response rate and design effect were estimated at 90% and 1.3, respectively, allowing for a sampling error of 12%
Survey data were entered into personal digital assistants (PDAs) and downloaded into Microsoft Access (2007). Analyses were performed using SAS (version 9.2) and STATA (version 11.0). Point estimates and confidence intervals were calculated incorporating survey procedures and weights to adjust for multi-stage clustering and changing selection probability.
For serologic analyses, raw optical densities were standardized by dividing values by a positive control on all plates. Samples with a coefficient of variation >0.3 between duplicates were repeated. To determine seropositivity cutoffs for each antigen, standardized optical densities were fitted to a mixture model that assumed a bi-modal normal distribution, and seropositivity was defined as three standard deviations above the mean of the lower distribution
Evidence for temporal changes in exposure was explored by assessing the relationship between age and seroprevalence. To formally assess a temporal change in exposure, a catalytic conversion model assessing seroconversion rate was fitted to the data, allowing for a change in the seroconversion rate at a single time-point. The time point at which a change in seroconversion occurred was assessed by maximum likelihood with confidence intervals based on the chi-squared distribution on one degree of freedom
To analyze relationships between seropositivity and baseline characteristics, chi-squared, t-test, logistic regression, or two-sample test of proportions was performed as appropriate.
For the household and women's questionnaires, oral informed consent was provided by a household head and women 15 to 49 years of age, respectively. Written consent was not performed because data along with oral consent was entered electronically into PDAs, and there were no sensitive questions and thus minimal risks for participants. Written informed consent for blood testing was obtained from participants or a parent or guardian for children less than 14 years of age. Ethical approval for the study, including the use of oral consent for the questionnaires, was obtained from the review committees at the Swaziland Ministry of Health, University of California, San Francisco, and United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
We thank the study participants for their partaking in the study and the MIS staff for their field support. We thank Anatoly Frolov for programming the PDAs, Allen Hightower and the Central Statistical Office of Ministry of Economic Planning for their statistical inputs, and Roly Gosling for his review of the paper. Lastly we appreciate the encouragement and overall support provided by: Swaziland Ministry of Health, National Malaria Control Program, Oliver Sabot, Allison Phillips, Richard G. Feachem, S. Patrick Kachur, Larry Slutsker, and Jay Tureen.