<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">9111860</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">20952</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Int J Antimicrob Agents</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International journal of antimicrobial agents</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0924-8579</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1872-7913</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27499432</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">6198316</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.05.018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA992504</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>In vitro growth of multidrug-resistant <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates is inhibited by ETX0914, a novel spiropyrimidinetrione <xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1">&#x02606;</xref></article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Papp</surname><given-names>John R.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref><xref rid="CR1" ref-type="corresp">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Lawrence</surname><given-names>Kenneth</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Sharpe</surname><given-names>Samera</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Mueller</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">b</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name><surname>Kirkcaldy</surname><given-names>Robert D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">a</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>a</label>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA</aff><aff id="A2"><label>b</label>Entasis Therapeutics, 35 Gatehouse Drive Suite E0, Waltham, MA 02451, USA</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1"><label>*</label>Corresponding author. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE, Mail Stop A-12, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Fax: +1 404 693 3976. <email>jwp6@cdc.gov</email> (J.R. Papp).</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>13</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>7</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>23</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>328</fpage><lpage>330</lpage><!--elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.05.018--><abstract id="ABS1"><p id="P1">Antimicrobial resistance in <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> has severely limited the number of treatment options, and the emergence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistance threatens the effectiveness of the last remaining recommended treatment regimen. This study assessed the in vitro susceptibility of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> to ETX0914, a novel spiropyrimidinetrione that inhibits DNA biosynthesis. In vitro activity was determined by agar dilution against 100 <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates collected from men presenting with urethritis in the USA during 2012&#x02013;2013 through the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that inhibited growth in 50% (MIC<sub>50</sub>) and 90% (MIC<sub>90</sub>) of isolates was calculated for each antimicrobial agent. ETX0914 demonstrated a high level of antimicrobial activity against <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic>, including isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance to currently available agents. The ability of ETX0914 to inhibit the growth of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> was similar to ceftriaxone, which is currently recommended in combination with azithromycin to treat gonorrhoea. The data presented in this study strongly suggest that ETX0914 should be evaluated in a clinical trial for the treatment of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic>.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd><italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic></kwd><kwd>Gonorrhoea</kwd><kwd>Antimicrobial susceptibility</kwd><kwd>Novel drug</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="S1"><label>1.</label><title>Introduction</title><p id="P2">Gonorrhoea is a global health concern highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as a bacterial infection with few remaining treatment options [<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>]. The development of antimicrobial resistance among <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> has required frequent changes in therapeutic management from the early use of sulfonamides to third-generation cephalosporins [<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>]. Most countries currently recommend a combination of ceftriaxone and azithromycin to treat <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> infections [<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">6</xref>]. Combination drug therapy involving two distinct antimicrobial classes with different mechanisms of action has been recommended in an attempt to slow down the progression of resistance to cephalosporins [<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>]. However, there continues to be an upward trend in the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cephalosporins, particularly cefixime, among <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates collected and tested in countries with established antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems [<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>,<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>]. The likelihood that chemotherapeutic options currently recommended and used to treat gonorrhoea will become less effective over time has heightened the necessity to identify new antimicrobial agents for treatment.</p><p id="P3">Existing antimicrobial agents that inhibit the growth of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> impair bacterial DNA replication, protein synthesis or bacterial cell wall development. Ciprofloxacin had been recommended for the treatment of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> in the USA from 1993 to 2004, but the gradual emergence and spread of resistant strains facilitated its removal as a primary therapeutic option [<xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>]. Strains acquired resistance to ciprofloxacin through mutations in the <italic>gyrA</italic> and <italic>parC</italic> genes that encode DNA gyrase and DNA topoisomerase, respectively, which are enzymes critical for DNA replication and decatenation [<xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>]. A novel spiropyrimidinetrione, ETX0914 (Entasis Therapeutics, Waltham, MA), previously referred to as AZD0914, inhibits bacterial DNA biosynthesis through inhibition of type II topoisomerases, which includes DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV[<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>]. The compound stabilises the cleaved covalent of DNA gyrase and prevents religation of DNA bound to the topoisomerase tetramer [<xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>]. Although ETX0914 and ciprofloxacin both target DNA gyrase, the distinct binding modes are functionally sufficient for ETX0914 to inhibit the growth of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains [<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>,<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>].</p><p id="P4">In this study, the in vitro activity of ETX0914 against a well characterised panel of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates collected from contemporary clinical infections in the USA was examined.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><label>2.</label><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="S3"><label>2.1.</label><title>Neisseria gonorrhoeae <italic>isolates</italic></title><p id="P5">The antimicrobial susceptibility test panel consisted of 100 <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates collected between 2012 and 2013 for the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) in the USA. Briefly, GISP is a US-based sentinel surveillance system used to monitor trends in <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> antimicrobial susceptibility and to inform national treatment recommendations [<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>]. Isolates are collected from consecutive visits of men presenting with urethral discharge at 1 of 25&#x02013;30 sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics across the USA. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using agar plate dilution is performed at five CDC-funded reference laboratories, and isolates determined to be resistant or less susceptible to azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone or ciprofloxacin are shipped to the CDC for confirmation of the reference laboratory results and for archival storage at &#x02212;70 &#x000b0;C in trypticase soy broth with 20% glycerol. The quality of the MIC data was assured using <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> quality reference strains ATCC 49226, F-28, P681E, CDC 10328, CDC 10329, SPL-4 and SPJ-15 with each antimicrobial susceptibility test run. MIC results were only accepted if the values of the seven quality control strains were within range [<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>]. Selection of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates for testing against ETX0914 was based on those that were considered to be resistant or had reduced susceptibility to one or more of these antimicrobial agents. For ETX0914 testing, quality control strains WHO F, WHO G and WHO K were included to ensure data accuracy.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><label>2.2.</label><title>Agar dilution for minimum inhibitory concentration determination</title><p id="P6">The procedures set forth by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for agar plate dilution were followed to determine the MICs for all isolates [<xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>]. Briefly, a bacterial suspension equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared following an overnight culture on chocolate agar and was used to inoculate doubling dilutions of antimicrobial agents incorporated into GC II agar supplemented with 1% IsoVitaleX&#x02122;. Following overnight incubation at 37 &#x000b0;C with 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, the MIC was recorded. The antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate to azithromycin, cefixime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, penicillin and tetracycline was determined first at a GISP reference laboratory and was confirmed at the CDC. For ETX0914, all susceptibility testing was performed at the CDC with a dilution range from 0.002 to 32 &#x003bc;g/mL. Ciprofloxacin susceptibility was repeated at the CDC using the range of0.002&#x02013;32 &#x003bc;g/mL during ETX0914 testing to assess the reproducibility of the test and to ensure quality. <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> strains WHO F, WHO G and WHO K were selected for ETX0914 and repeat ciprofloxacin susceptibility testing. The MICs that inhibited 50% (MIC<sub>50</sub>) and 90% (MIC<sub>90</sub>) of isolates were calculated for each antimicrobial agent. Isolates were also grouped by low or high MICs or by CLSI interpretative criteria where applicable. The modal MICs for isolates within each grouping were calculated and were compared with the ETX0914 modal value from that grouping.</p></sec></sec><sec id="S5"><label>3.</label><title>Results</title><p id="P7">All isolates tested had relatively low MICs to ETX0914 and a wide range of values to other antimicrobial agents (<xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). The highest ETX0914 MIC was 0.25 &#x003bc;g/mL, which was less than the highest recorded for ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin. Eleven isolates had ceftriaxone MICs of 0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL and all had an ETX0914 MIC of0.06 &#x003bc;g/mL. One isolate with a ceftriaxone MIC of 0.5 &#x003bc;g/mL had a corresponding ETX0914 MIC of 0.008 &#x003bc;g/mL. The MIC<sub>90</sub> value for ETX0914 was 0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL, which was comparable with ceftriaxone and cefixime at 0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL and 0.25 &#x003bc;g/mL, respectively. In contrast, the MIC<sub>90</sub> values for azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin and tetracycline were considerably higher. The MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> values for azithromycin were 1 &#x003bc;g/mL and 8 &#x003bc;g/mL, respectively. One isolate with an azithromycin MIC of 256 &#x003bc;g/mL had an ETX0914 MIC of0.06 &#x003bc;g/mL. For ciprofloxacin, both the MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> values were 16 &#x003bc;g/mL. All quality control strains were within range for ciprofloxacin and had reproducible results.</p><p id="P8">Comparing the modal MIC values between isolates of various MIC groupings (i.e. resistant versus susceptible, and high versus low MIC) revealed a consistent modal MIC of 0.06 &#x003bc;g/mL for ETX0914 regardless of the modal MIC for any other antimicrobial agent (<xref rid="T2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). The ETX0914 modal value was one dilution lower than the ceftriaxone modal of 0.125 &#x003bc;g/mL for the high ceftriaxone MIC grouping. There were 70 ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (MIC &#x02265; 1.0 &#x003bc;g/mL) (ciprofloxacin-resistant MIC range, 2&#x02013;32 &#x003bc;g/mL; modal MIC 16 &#x003bc;g/mL); the ETX0914 modal value was 0.06 &#x003bc;g/mL when tested with these ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates.</p></sec><sec id="S6"><label>4.</label><title>Discussion</title><p id="P9">The continual progress towards antimicrobial resistance among<italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> challenges healthcare providers faced with treating this highly prevalent global STD [<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>,<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>]. A total of 350,062 gonorrhoea cases in the USA were reported to the CDC in 2014 [<xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>]. The rate of reported cases in the USA increased from 105.3 per 100,000 in 2013 to 110.7 per 100,000 in 2014. Currently recommended combination therapy with ceftriaxone and azithromycin remains effective in treating gonorrhoea, although MICs have increased slightly [<xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref>]. Furthermore, sporadic cases of failed therapy have been reported in various countries [<xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>]. If untreated, <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> infections can progress to serious sequelae such as pelvic inflammatory disease, urethritis and disseminated gonococcal infection.</p><p id="P10">The data in this report strongly suggest that ETX0914 is highly effective at inhibiting the in vitro growth of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic>. The panel of isolates tested against ETX0914 was selected based on multidrug resistance and/or decreased susceptibility to contemporary therapeutic options. The MIC range for ETX0914 remained low irrespective of MICs for all other tested antimicrobial agents. Ceftriaxone, considered as one of the final treatment choices for gonorrhoea, had MICs that were similar to ETX0914. In addition to lower MICs, ETX0914 is administered orally, which compares favourably with the need for intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone. A previous study reported that ETX0914 was effective against <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> growth using a panel of European isolates [<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>]. Collectively, ETX0914 may be an international option for the treatment of gonorrhoea and is currently in a phase 2 clinical trial.</p><p id="P11">The hallmark of resistance, genetic alteration through spontaneous mutations or acquired genetic material, implies that any organism capable of mutating will selectively adapt to render chemotherapeutic agents less effective. Recent recommendations for treating gonorrhoea with combination therapy involving antimicrobial agents with different mechanisms of action are based on the low likelihood that <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> would develop simultaneous resistance [<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">4</xref>]. The data in the current study demonstrated ETX0914 MICs that were similar to current therapeutic options for gonorrhoea. Although ETX0914 has a similar mechanism of action as ciprofloxacin in targeting DNA gyrase, the binding modes are sufficiently distinct [<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>] that ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates are highly susceptible to ETX0914. ETX0914 shows promise for treatment of gonococcal infections, including ciprofloxacin-resistant infections, and particularly as part of combination therapy with a second antimicrobial agent [<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">19</xref>,<xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">20</xref>].</p><p id="P12">Research and discovery of new antimicrobial agents for the treatment of gonorrhoea are critical for the prevention of potentially life-altering disease. ETX0914 has excellent activity against a multidrug-resistant panel of <italic>N. gonorrhoeae</italic> and is currently being further evaluated in a clinical trial for the treatment of gonorrhoea.</p></sec></body><back><ack id="S7"><p id="P13"><italic>Funding</italic>: This study was funded by Entasis Therapeutics (Waltham, MA) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the Material Transfer Agreement NCHHSTP-V147666&#x02013;0.</p></ack><fn-group><fn id="FN1"><label>&#x02606;</label><p id="P14">Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).</p></fn><fn fn-type="COI-statement" id="FN2"><p id="P15"><italic>Competing interests</italic>: KL and JM are employed by Entasis Therapeutics, which owns ETX0914. All other authors declare no competing interests.</p></fn><fn id="FN3"><p id="P16"><italic>Ethical approval</italic>: Not required.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="R1"><label>[1]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>
<source>Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae</source>. <publisher-loc>Geneva, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>WHO</publisher-name>; <year>2012</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><label>[2]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <source>Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013</source>. <publisher-loc>Atlanta, GA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CDC, US Department of Health and Human Services</publisher-name>; <year>2013</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><label>[3]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Unemo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Shafer</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name>. <article-title>Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future</article-title>. <source>Clin Microbiol Rev</source>
<year>2014</year>;<volume>27</volume>:<fpage>587</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>613</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24982323</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><label>[4]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <source>Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines</source>. <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CDC, US Department of Health and Human Services</publisher-name>; <year>2015</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><label>[5]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>Public Health Agency of Canada</collab>. <source>Canadian guidelines on sexually transmitted infections: gonococcal infections</source>. <publisher-loc>Ottawa, ON, Canada</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Public Health Agency of Canada</publisher-name>; <year>2013</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><label>[6]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>British Association for Sexual Health and HIV</collab>. <source>BASHH clinical effectiveness group guidelines</source>. <publisher-loc>Macclesfield, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>BASHH</publisher-name>; <year>2015</year> &#x0003c;<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.bashh.org/BASHH/Guidelines/Guidelines/BASHH/Guidelines/Guidelines.aspx">http://www.bashh.org/BASHH/Guidelines/Guidelines/BASHH/Guidelines/Guidelines.aspx</ext-link></comment>&#x0003e; [<comment>accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>23.05.16</date-in-citation>].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><label>[7]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <source>Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP)</source>. <publisher-loc>Atlanta, GA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CDC</publisher-name>; <year>2015</year> &#x0003c;<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/default.htm">http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/default.htm</ext-link></comment>&#x0003e; [<comment>accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>23.05.16</date-in-citation>].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><label>[8]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Ison</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Town</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Obi</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chisholm</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hughes</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Livermore</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins among gonococci: data from the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) in England and Wales, 2007&#x02013;2011</article-title>. <source>Lancet Infect Dis</source>
<year>2013</year>;<volume>13</volume>:<fpage>762</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23764300</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><label>[9]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)</collab>. <article-title>Update to CDC&#x02019;s sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2006: fluoroquinolones no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections</article-title>. <source>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</source>
<year>2007</year>;<volume>56</volume>:<fpage>332</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17431378</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><label>[10]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Belland</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Morrison</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ison</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name>. <article-title><italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> acquires mutations in analogous regions of <italic>gyrA</italic> and <italic>parC</italic> in fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates</article-title>. <source>Mol Microbiol</source>
<year>1994</year>;<volume>14</volume>:<fpage>371</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>80</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7830580</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><label>[11]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Basarab</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kern</surname><given-names>GH</given-names></name>, <name><surname>McNulty</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Mueller</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lawrence</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Vishwanathan</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Responding to the challenge of untreatable gonorrhea: ETX0914, a first-in-class agent with a distinct mechanism-of-action against bacterial type II topoisomerases</article-title>. <source>Sci Rep</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>5</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><label>[12]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Alm</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lahiri</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kutschke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Otterson</surname><given-names>LG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>McLaughlin</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Whiteaker</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Characterization of the novel DNA gyrase inhibitor AZD0914: low resistance potential and lack of cross-resistance in <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic></article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>59</volume>:<fpage>1478</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>86</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25534723</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><label>[13]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kern</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Palmer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ehmann</surname><given-names>DE</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Shapiro</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Andrews</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Basarab</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Inhibition of <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> type II topoisomerases by the novel spiropyrimidinetrione AZD0914</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>290</volume>:<fpage>20984</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>94</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26149691</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><label>[14]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention</collab>. <source>Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) protocol</source>, &#x0003c;<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/gisp-protocol-oct&#x02212;2014.pdf">http://www.cdc.gov/std/gisp/gisp-protocol-oct&#x02212;2014.pdf</ext-link></comment>&#x0003e;; <year>2015</year> [<comment>accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>23.05.16</date-in-citation>].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><label>[15]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><chapter-title>Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute</chapter-title>
<source>Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fifth informational supplement</source>. <publisher-loc>Wayne, PA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CLSI</publisher-name>; <year>2015</year>
<comment>Document M100-S25.</comment></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><label>[16]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>
<source>Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections&#x02014;2008</source>. <publisher-loc>Geneva, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>WHO</publisher-name>; <year>2012</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><label>[17]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gonorrhea statistics</collab>. <publisher-loc>CDC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Atlanta, GA</publisher-name>; <year>2015</year> &#x0003c;<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/stats.htm">http://www.cdc.gov/std/gonorrhea/stats.htm</ext-link></comment>&#x0003e; [<comment>accessed</comment>
<date-in-citation>23.05.16</date-in-citation>].</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><label>[18]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kirkcaldy</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hook</surname><given-names>IIIEW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Soge</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name>, <name><surname>del Rio</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kubin</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Zenilman</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Changing trends in <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> susceptibility to cephalosporins and its implications for gonorrhea treatment: sentinel surveillance data from the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, United States, 2006&#x02013;June 2014</article-title>. <source>JAMA</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>314</volume>:<fpage>1869</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>71</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26529166</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><label>[19]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Unemo</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ringlander</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wiggins</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Fredlund</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jacobsson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Cole</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>. <article-title>High in vitro susceptibility to the novel spiropyrimidinetrione ETX0914 (AZD0914) among 873 contemporary clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from 21 European countries from 2012 to 2014</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>59</volume>:<fpage>5220</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26077246</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><label>[20]</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Foerster</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Golparian</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Jacobsson</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hathaway</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Low</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Shafer</surname><given-names>WM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Genetic resistance determinants, in vitro time&#x02013;kill curve analysis and pharmacodynamic functions for the novel topoisomerase II inhibitor ETX0914 (AZD0914) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>
<year>2015</year>;<volume>6</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25653648</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="P17">Comparison of the minimum inhibition concentrations (MICs) of 100 <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> isolates tested against various antimicrobial agents.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Antimicrobial agent</th><th rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Concentration range tested (&#x003bc;g/mL)</th><th colspan="3" align="left" valign="top" style="border-bottom: solid 1px" rowspan="1">MIC (&#x003bc;g/mL)</th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Range</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">MIC<sub>50</sub></th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">MIC<sub>90</sub></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">ETX0914</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.008&#x02013;0.25</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Azithromycin</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.032&#x02013;256</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125&#x02013;256</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ceftriaxone</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004&#x02013;0.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cefixime</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.001&#x02013;4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015&#x02013;1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Ciprofloxacin</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.002&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Penicillin</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004&#x02013;64</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25&#x02013;8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Tetracycline</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.032&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><p id="P18">MIC<sub>50/90</sub>, MIC that inhibited growth in 50% (MIC<sub>50</sub>) and 90% (MIC<sub>90</sub>) of isolates.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="P19">Comparison of <italic>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</italic> modal minimum inhibition concentrations (MICs) between various antimicrobial agents and ETX0914.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Antimicrobial agent</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">MIC range (&#x003bc;g/mL)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">MIC interpretation<sup><xref rid="TFN2" ref-type="table-fn">a</xref></sup></th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">No. of isolates</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Modal MIC (&#x003bc;g/mL)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Modal ETX0914 MIC(&#x003bc;g/mL)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Azithromycin</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125&#x02013;0.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">40</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1&#x02013;256</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reduced susceptibility</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">60</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Cefixime</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015&#x02013;0.125</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">39</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25&#x02013;1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reduced susceptibility</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">61</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Ceftriaxone</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004&#x02013;0.06</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">88</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125&#x02013;0.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Reduced susceptibility</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.125</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Ciprofloxacin</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.004&#x02013;0.03</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">30</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.015</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Resistant</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">70</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Penicillin</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25&#x02013;1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2&#x02013;8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Resistant</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">68</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2" align="left" valign="top" colspan="1">Tetracycline</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.25&#x02013;1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Susceptible</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">19</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2&#x02013;32</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Resistant</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">81</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.06</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN2"><label>a</label><p id="P20">Interpretative criteria are based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints or Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) alert values where applicable. For azithromycin, arbitrary breakpoints were set in the absence of CLSI breakpoints. For ceftriaxone and cefixime, GISP alert values were used since they are one dilution below the CLSI breakpoint and suggest a trend towards reduced susceptibility.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>