<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties open_access?><?properties manuscript?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">8704773</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">1656</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Am J Prev Med</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Am J Prev Med</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American journal of preventive medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0749-3797</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1873-2607</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">29153118</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5836318</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA945835</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comorbidity Status and Annual Total Medical Expenditures in U.S. Hypertensive Adults</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname><given-names>Chanhyun</given-names></name><degrees>PhD, MPharm, MEd</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Jing</given-names></name><degrees>MD, MS</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hawkins</surname><given-names>Nikki A.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Guijing</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees></contrib><aff id="A1">Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="FN1">Address correspondence to: Chanhyun Park, PhD, MPharm, MEd, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta GA 30341. <email>muz6@cdc.gov</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>26</day><month>2</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>05</day><month>3</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>53</volume><issue>6 Suppl 2</issue><fpage>S172</fpage><lpage>S181</lpage><!--elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.014--><permissions><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><license-p><!--CREATIVE COMMONS-->This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ext-link>).</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><sec id="S1"><title>Introduction</title><p id="P1">The purpose of this study is to investigate comorbidity status and its impact on total medical expenditures in non-institutionalized hypertensive adults in the U.S.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><title>Methods</title><p id="P2">Data from the 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis code for hypertension, were aged &#x02265;18 years, and were not pregnant during the study period (N=26,049). The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index was modified to add hypertension-related comorbidities. The outcome variable was annual total medical expenditures, and a generalized linear model regression (gamma distribution with a log link function) was used. All costs were adjusted to 2014 U.S. dollars.</p></sec><sec id="S3"><title>Results</title><p id="P3">Based on the modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, 14.0% of patients did not have any comorbidities, 23.0% had one, 24.4% had two, and 38.7% had three or more. The five most frequent comorbidities were hyperlipidemia, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, and chronic pulmonary disease. Estimated mean annual total medical expenditures were $3,914 (95% CI= $3,456, $4,372) for those without any comorbidity; $5,798 (95% CI=$5,384, $6,213) for those with one comorbidity; $8,333 (95% CI=$7,821, $8,844) for those with two comorbidities; and $13,920 (95% CI=$13,166, $14,674) for those with three or more comorbidities. Of the 15 most frequent comorbidities, the condition with the largest impact on expenditures for an individual person was congestive heart failure ($7,380). Hypertensive adults with stroke, coronary heart disease, diabetes, renal diseases, and hyperlipidemia had expenditures that were $6,069, $6,046, $5,039, $4,974, and $4,851 higher, respectively, than those without these conditions.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Conclusions</title><p id="P4">Comorbidities are highly prevalent among hypertensive adults, and this study shows that each comorbidity significantly increases annual total medical expenditures.</p></sec></abstract></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro" id="S5"><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p id="P5">Hypertension is a highly prevalent health condition; approximately one third of U.S. adults have this problem.<sup><xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref></sup> Previous studies have provided estimates of the economic burden of hypertension<sup><xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref></sup>; the American Heart Association estimated that the national annual direct and indirect costs of hypertension were $47.3 billion and $3.9 billion (average annual 2012&#x02013;2013).<sup><xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref></sup> Annual costs for the treatment of hypertension were estimated to be $812 per adult in 2014.<sup><xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref></sup> However, most adults have been diagnosed with more than one chronic condition, and relatively few suffer from hypertension exclusively.<sup><xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup> Additionally, hypertension is a major risk factor for many costly chronic conditions, such as heart disease and stroke.</p><p id="P6">Multimorbidity is considered the presence of multiple diseases in an individual.<sup><xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref></sup> A study found that approximately one fourth of the population had multimorbidity.<sup><xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">17</xref></sup> Multimorbidity is an issue for the management of hypertension. Among elderly patients with hypertension, 43% had two or fewer coexisting chronic conditions, 34% had three to four, and 23% had five or more such conditions.<sup><xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref></sup></p><p id="P7">Although earlier studies have estimated the economic burden of hypertension, little is known about the effect of having multiple comorbidities on medical expenditures in adults with hypertension. The objectives of the present study are to describe comorbidity status among non-institutionalized adults with hypertension and to estimate annual medical expenditures according to the presence of comorbidities in this population.</p></sec><sec sec-type="methods" id="S6"><title>METHODS</title><p id="P8">Data from the 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used for this analysis. MEPS is a nationally representative survey of the U.S. civilian non-institutionalized population that provides comprehensive information on healthcare utilization and costs under the U.S. healthcare system. MEPS data have been used extensively for studying medical expenditures for various health conditions, including hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD).<sup><xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">18</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">22</xref></sup> The MEPS data on medical conditions were used to define hypertension and comorbidities based on ICD-9 codes. The MEPS full-year consolidated data were employed to define medical expenditures and patient characteristics.</p><sec id="S7"><title>Study Population</title><p id="P9">Adults with hypertension were included if they met all of the following criteria: any diagnosis codes for hypertension (ICD-9 codes: 401&#x02013;405); age &#x02265;18 years; and were not pregnant during the study period. Among pregnant women, hypertension and gestation hypertension might affect the use and cost of medical services differently from the general population. A total of 26,049 persons were included.</p></sec><sec id="S8"><title>Measures</title><p id="P10">Various comorbidity indices have been developed to measure important coexisting medical conditions. The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (EI) is one of the most frequently used and validated comorbidity indices, and the original EI includes a set of 30 conditions that are coded as present or absent to produce 30 binary variables.<sup><xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">23</xref></sup> In addition, the score version of the EI has also been validated.<sup><xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">24</xref>,<xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">25</xref></sup> The score version of the EI was used to measure comorbidity because it is better than the original version for exploring individual comorbidity status and the impact of individual comorbidity on medical expenditures. In addition, using the score version of the EI has been validated by its ability to outperform the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the most commonly used comorbidity index.<sup><xref rid="R26" ref-type="bibr">26</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R34" ref-type="bibr">34</xref></sup></p><p id="P11">The authors expanded the EI to better analyze the impact of hypertension-related comorbidities on medical expenditures by including a broader range of CVD-related conditions than the original EI. First, 27 conditions from the original version of the EI indicators were obtained. These modifications included excluding hypertension; combining two types of diabetes (diabetes with complication and diabetes without complication) into one condition (diabetes); and combining two types of anemia (blood loss anemia and deficiency anemia) into one condition (anemia). Second, three conditions were added: coronary heart disease (CHD); stroke; and hyperlipidemia. Finally, two conditions were redefined: renal failure to renal disease, and arrhythmia to heart rhythm disorders. In sum, a total of 30 possible comorbidities were included, as follows:</p><list list-type="bullet" id="L1"><list-item><p id="P12">CVD and hypertension-related conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF), heart rhythm disorders, valvular disease, CHD, stroke, hyperlipidemia, pulmonary circulation disorders, peripheral vascular disorders, diabetes, renal disease, obesity, and depression; and</p></list-item><list-item><p id="P13">other conditions: paralysis, neurologic disorders, hypothyroidism, liver disease, peptic ulcer, HIV/AIDS, lymphoma, metastatic cancer, solid tumor, rheumatoid arthritis, coagulopathy, weight loss, fluid and electrolyte disorders, anemia, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, psychoses, and chronic pulmonary disease.</p></list-item></list><p id="P14">The modified EI score was defined as the sum of each of the 30 comorbidities, with a possible range of 0&#x02013;30. Depression was included in the CVD and hypertension-related conditions based on the results of previous meta-analyses on the association of hypertension with depression.<sup><xref rid="R35" ref-type="bibr">35</xref>,<xref rid="R36" ref-type="bibr">36</xref></sup>
<xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Appendix Table 1</xref> (available online) shows the list of the comorbidities and the ICD-9 code for each condition.</p><p id="P15">The outcome variable was annual total medical expenditures that were not specifically related to hypertension diagnosis or management. The expenditures included those for inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, office-based physician visits, home healthcare visits, and prescription medications. The annual medical expenditures included the total of all expenditures paid by all payers, including Medicare, Medicaid, other public insurance, private insurance, and payments made by the adult with hypertension or that person&#x02019;s family during the calendar year. In terms of cost of illness studies, the perspective for this study was that of the healthcare sector as a whole, with expenditures used as a proxy for costs. All costs were adjusted to 2014 U.S. dollars using the personal consumption expenditure index&#x02013;health by function. Ten covariates were included: age group, gender, race/ethnicity, U.S. region, insurance type, marital status, education level, poverty level, smoking status, and health status.</p></sec><sec id="S9"><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p id="P16">Bivariate analyses were conducted to assess the associations between personal characteristics and the EI. Chi-square tests were used for the categorical variables for the population&#x02019;s characteristics, and ANOVA was used for the continuous variables. Descriptive statistics were employed to describe the frequencies of comorbidities.</p><p id="P17">A generalized linear model regression (gamma distribution with a log link function) was used to estimate the associations between the modified EI and total medical expenditures while controlling for covariates. A log link and gamma distribution was selected because the distribution of medical expenditures was positively skewed, and 99% of the sample had positive medical expenditures. Mean annual medical expenditures by the EI score were predicted using the average marginal effects method from the model. All analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.3, and Stata/SE, version 14.</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="S10"><title>RESULTS</title><p id="P18">A total of 26,049 patients were included in this study. <xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref> shows the characteristics of U.S. hypertensive adults by the modified EI. The weighted average estimate of the number of U.S. hypertensive adults was 64,147,867 per year, and the weighted percentage of hypertension in the population of interest was 27.8%.</p><p id="P19">In all, 14.0% of U.S hypertensive adults did not have any comorbidity (<italic>n</italic>=4,073), whereas 23.0% had one (<italic>n</italic>=6,135); 24.4% had two (<italic>n</italic>=6,310); and 38.7% had three or more (<italic>n</italic>=9,531). <xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref> shows the percentages of the 15 most frequent comorbidities in U.S hypertensive adults, which were hyperlipidemia, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, chronic pulmonary disease, CHD, hypothyroidism, renal disease, solid tumor, heart rhythm disorders, stroke, neurologic disorders, fluid and electrolyte disorders, CHF, and valvular heart disease.</p><p id="P20"><xref rid="T2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref> shows the estimated total medical expenditures by personal descriptors and the number of comorbidities in U.S. hypertensive adults. Overall, the mean annual medical expenditure was $9,841 (95% CI=$9,464, $10,218). The comorbidity score was positively associated with the estimated mean annual total medical expenditures. Estimates were $3,914 (95% CI=$3,456, $4,372) for those without any comorbidity; $5,798 (95% CI=$5,384, $6,213) for those with one; $8,333 (95% CI= $7,821, $8,844) for those with two; and $13,920 (95% CI=$13,166, $14,674) for those with three or more comorbidities. <xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Appendix Table 2</xref> (available online) describes generalized linear model estimates and associated <italic>p</italic>-values for total medical expenditures.</p><p id="P21"><xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref> shows the estimated medical expenditures by the presence of nine hypertension-related comorbidities among the 15 most frequent comorbidities. The impact of comorbidities on medical expenditures varied by type, with CHF associated with the largest impact on expenditures. Annual total medical expenditures were $17,063 (95% CI=$16,224, $17,902) in persons with CHF versus $9,683 (95% CI=$9,313, $10,053) in persons without CHF, a difference of $7,380. The increased medical expenditures from specific comorbidities were $6,069 for stroke, $6,046 for CHD, $5,093 for heart rhythm disorders, $4,851 for hyperlipidemia, and $4,453 for valvular disease. Diabetes, renal disease, and depression each increased expenditures by &#x02245;$5,000. <xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Appendix Table 3</xref> (available online) describes the differences in estimated annual medical expenditures by the presence of comorbidities.</p></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="S11"><title>DISCUSSION</title><p id="P22">The present study used a nationally representative sample of the U.S. population to estimate medical expenditures in hypertensive adults according to comorbidity status. To the authors&#x02019; knowledge, this is the first study that provides insight into the economic burden of hypertension by comorbidity status. Overall, as expected, the study found that a higher comorbidity score was associated with higher total medical expenditures in adults with hypertension. In addition, the differences in expenditures varied by type of comorbidity.</p><p id="P23">Also as expected, having incrementally more total comorbidities was associated with increasing medical expenditures. In non-hypertensive adults without any of the listed comorbidities, annual total medical expenditures were $1,656 (authors&#x02019; calculation from the 2011&#x02013;2014 MEPS), which could reflect the use of preventive services or medical services for other conditions that were not included in the modified EI. Thus, having hypertension alone added $2,258 per year, because annual medical expenditures were $3,914 in hypertensive adults without any comorbidities included in the EI, and this figure increased to $13,920 in those with three or more comorbidities included in the EI. The findings of the present study extend this work to pinpoint even further which American adults with hypertension generally incur the highest expenses for medical care.</p><p id="P24">Hyperlipidemia, CHD, heart rhythm disorders, CHF, valvular disease, and stroke were classified in this study as comorbidities related to CVD. Notably, all six CVD-related comorbidities emerged in the list of the 15 most frequent comorbidities in the population of interest.</p><p id="P25">Hyperlipidemia was the most frequent comorbidity in adults with hypertension in this study, indicating more than half of adults with hypertension had hyperlipidemia. Similarly, a study using 2009 MEPS data also found that hypertension and hyperlipidemia was the most frequent dyad.<sup><xref rid="R37" ref-type="bibr">37</xref></sup> Based on the 2012 edition of the chartbook, 52.9% of Medicare beneficiaries had both hypertension and hyper-lipidemia.<sup><xref rid="R38" ref-type="bibr">38</xref></sup> The present study found that having hyper-lipidemia added $4,851 in medical expenditures per year at the individual level, albeit this marginal increase was lower than it was for the other CVD-related comorbidities except for valvular disease ($4,453). This is a substantial economic burden to society because of the high prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Because hypertension and hyperlipidemia are major CVD risk factors and often coexist, adults with hypertension and hyperlipidemia should adopt healthier lifestyles and adhere to prescribed medications to reduce their risk of CVD.<sup><xref rid="R39" ref-type="bibr">39</xref></sup></p><p id="P26">In this study, having CHF was associated with the highest incremental medical expenditure in hypertensive adults for the 15 most common comorbidities. Annual total medical expenditures were $17,063 in persons with CHF and $9,683 in those without CHF, a difference of $7,380. Stroke and CHD were ranked as the third and fourth most costly comorbidities among the 15 most frequent, each adding approximately $6,000. Among Medicare beneficiaries, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and ischemic heart disease, together, was the most prevalent triad with a prevalence of 33.7%.<sup><xref rid="R38" ref-type="bibr">38</xref></sup> In addition, approximately 55% of Medicare beneficiaries with stroke and heart failure had five or more additional chronic health conditions. As such, a patient with stroke or heart failure also had many other conditions contributing to the overall difference in expenditures.<sup><xref rid="R38" ref-type="bibr">38</xref></sup> Hypertension is an independent risk factor for both stroke and CHD. Moreover, appropriate hypertension treatment has been found to reduce the incidence of CHF by &#x0003e;50%, of stroke by 30%&#x02013;40%, and of myocardial infarction by 20%&#x02013;25%.<sup><xref rid="R40" ref-type="bibr">40</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R42" ref-type="bibr">42</xref></sup> Thus, the appropriate management of hypertension, by itself, can reduce the economic burdens to society. Furthermore, such management can decrease the prevalence of these CVDs and reduce overall medical expenditures incurred.</p><p id="P27">Diabetes is closely related to hypertension. Indeed, hypertension and diabetes share several biological and environmental risk factors, and they frequently occur together.<sup><xref rid="R43" ref-type="bibr">43</xref></sup> In this study, diabetes was the second most common comorbidity; 27.3% of hypertensive adults also had diabetes. Similarly, in a study using 2009 MEPS data, diabetes with hypertension and hyperlipidemia was the most frequent triad.<sup><xref rid="R37" ref-type="bibr">37</xref></sup> In addition, a previous study found that the prevalence of diabetes in a hypertensive population was 27%.<sup><xref rid="R44" ref-type="bibr">44</xref></sup> In the whole population, a previous study using the MEPS data reported that the prevalence of diabetes was 8%.<sup><xref rid="R45" ref-type="bibr">45</xref></sup> Thus, the prevalence of diabetes in hypertensive adults seems to be roughly three times that seen in the general population. Because of the higher prevalence of diabetes in persons with hypertension, managing diabetes and hypertension together could be an effective way to reduce the economic burden on society. A community health workers program may be a good example.<sup><xref rid="R46" ref-type="bibr">46</xref></sup></p><p id="P28">Hypertension and renal disease are interrelated, and hypertension may cause or result from renal disease.<sup><xref rid="R47" ref-type="bibr">47</xref>,<xref rid="R48" ref-type="bibr">48</xref></sup> In previous studies, although the prevalence of hypertension varied in patients with renal disease, hypertension was present in up to 90% of such patients.<sup><xref rid="R49" ref-type="bibr">49</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R51" ref-type="bibr">51</xref></sup> Management of hypertension is more difficult when there is poorer renal function. This study found that renal disease is not only a frequent comorbidity but also a costly problem in hypertensive adults. Implementing effective awareness and prevention programs for renal disease could help to reduce costs in hypertensive adults with renal disease and respond to public health demand.<sup><xref rid="R52" ref-type="bibr">52</xref></sup></p><p id="P29">In this study, depression was the fourth most common comorbidity in adults with hypertension, affecting one fourth of this population. This result is quite similar to that obtained by a meta-analysis published in 2015 that found the prevalence of depression to be 26.8% in patients with hypertension.<sup><xref rid="R53" ref-type="bibr">53</xref></sup> Depression is known to have a negative impact on health outcomes in patients with hypertension.<sup><xref rid="R21" ref-type="bibr">21</xref>,<xref rid="R54" ref-type="bibr">54</xref>,<xref rid="R55" ref-type="bibr">55</xref></sup> The present study found that the presence of depression increased expenditures by just under $5,000. Thus, effective screening for depression and appropriate monitoring of this disorder is important in caring for hypertensive patients. In addition, education in self-management can be a solution to empowering patients to reduce blood pressure and reduce stress and depressive feelings.</p><p id="P30">Efforts to prevent and control hypertension are critical because hypertension is a major risk factor for heart disease, stroke, and renal disease. In this study, CHF, stroke, CHD, and renal disease were all in the top expenditures category. Hypertension can be better controlled by several approaches, including diet, nutritional supplements, lifestyle modification, and conventional antihypertensive medications.<sup><xref rid="R56" ref-type="bibr">56</xref></sup> The Community Guide has found several strategies to be effective for hypertension prevention and control, including self-measured blood pressure, community health workers, clinical decision support systems, reducing out-of-pocket costs for clinical services, and team-based care.<sup><xref rid="R57" ref-type="bibr">57</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R59" ref-type="bibr">59</xref></sup> In addition, managing obesity could be one of the effective ways for controlling of hypertension and other chronic conditions.<sup><xref rid="R60" ref-type="bibr">60</xref></sup> Furthermore, appropriate hypertension management strategies should be developed for hypertensive adults with rheumatoid arthritis, depression, and chronic pulmonary diseases. Although these conditions are not directly associated with hypertension, these are frequent comorbidities in hypertensive adults. Nevertheless, little is known about the evidence on hypertension management strategies with these comorbidities.</p><p id="P31">This study had several strengths. First, the sample used was large, with a nationally representative database. The large sample enabled exploration into detailed comorbidity status and its impact on medical expenditures. Second, this study used a modified EI, expanding the list of CVD-related diseases to include such disorders as CHD, stroke, and hyperlipidemia. To the authors&#x02019; knowledge, this is the only study focusing on issues of comorbidity among hypertensive adults. Finally, a rigorous empirical approach that specified various regression models for the estimation was employed, which were able to control for various covariates.</p><sec id="S12"><title>Limitations</title><p id="P32">This study had several limitations. First, the data used were cross-sectional, and thus the authors can only claim that the medical expenditures were disease-associated although acknowledging that they may not have been the treatment costs for each specific disease. Furthermore, the impact of each comorbidity on the total medical expenditures cannot be interpreted as hypertension-associated. The purpose of this study was to determine how much the comorbidity increased the annual total medical expenditures in hypertensive adults. Second, MEPS does not include institutionalized persons in its database. Such people may have many serious comorbidities, and thus this study no doubt underestimated the percentage of hypertensive adults in the U.S. with comorbidities and therefore the associated direct medical costs. Third, because MEPS is a national survey, there is a possibility of recall bias. Respondents might not be able to correctly provide certain types of information, such as medical history. Fourth, this study did not investigate indirect costs, such as caregiver burden and absenteeism. Further research may be needed to examine the impact of comorbidity on productivity loss and the associated indirect costs in adults with hypertension. Fifth, the outcome variable was annual total medical expenditures including any types of medical services. For future studies, analyzing the breakdown of total medical expenditures by the type of services, such as inpatient hospitalizations, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, office-based physician visits, home health-care visits, and prescription medications could provide additional insights about cost burdens and guide intervention efforts. Finally, it was found that being a current nonsmoker was associated with higher annual medical expenditures among hypertensive adults, compared with being a current smoker. However, it is previously known that smoking in hypertensive adults, including former smokers, was associated with increased medical expenditures.<sup><xref rid="R61" ref-type="bibr">61</xref></sup> In MEPS, there is no information about smoking history. The most likely explanation is that hypertensive adults who are sick, with higher expenditures, are more likely to quit smoking.</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions" id="S13"><title>CONCLUSIONS</title><p id="P33">Comorbidities were highly prevalent among U.S. hypertensive adults, and each successive comorbidity significantly increased the medical expenditures. The expenditure increases varied by the type and number of comorbidities. These findings illustrate the importance of looking at the impact of comorbidities and can be used to help develop and evaluate interventions for hypertension prevention and control.</p></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="S14"><title>Supplementary Material</title><supplementary-material content-type="local-data" id="SD1"><label>Appendix</label><media xlink:href="NIHMS945835-supplement-Appendix.pdf" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple" id="d36e410" position="anchor"/></supplementary-material></sec></body><back><ack id="S15"><p>Publication of this article was supported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an Agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research (APTR) Cooperative Agreement No. 1U36 OE000005.</p><p>The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.</p><p>No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.</p></ack><fn-group><fn id="FN2"><p><xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL</xref></p><p><xref rid="SD1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplemental material</xref> associated with this article can be found in the online version at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.014</ext-link>.</p></fn><fn id="FN3"><p>This article is part of a supplement issue titled The Economics of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><ref id="R1"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)</collab><article-title>Vital signs: prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension&#x02014;United States, 1999&#x02013;2002 and 2005&#x02013;2008</article-title><source>MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep</source><year>2011</year><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>103</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21293325</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayala</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hypertension-associated hospitalizations and costs in the United States, 1979&#x02013;2006</article-title><source>Blood Press</source><year>2014</year><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2013.814751">https://doi.org/10.3109/08037051.2013.814751</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23885763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benjamin</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Blaha</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Chiuve</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Heart disease and stroke statistics&#x02013;2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association</article-title><source>Circulation</source><year>2017</year><volume>135</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>e146</fpage><lpage>e603</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485">https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28122885</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><source>Expenditures for Hypertension among adults age 18 and older, 2010: estimates for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population. Statistical Brief 404</source><publisher-loc>Rockville, MD</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</publisher-name><month>4</month><year>2013</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Weaver</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Clement</surname><given-names>FM</given-names></name><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Healthcare costs attributable to hypertension: Canadian population-based cohort study</article-title><source>Hypertension</source><year>2015</year><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>502</fpage><lpage>508</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05702">https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05702</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26169049</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheppard</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Fletcher</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>McManus</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Mant</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prevalence and costs of treating uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis</article-title><source>Br J Gen Pract</source><year>2014</year><volume>64</volume><issue>627</issue><fpage>e641</fpage><lpage>e648</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681817">https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681817</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25267050</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leone</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Landini</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Leone</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epidemiology and costs of hypertension-related disorders</article-title><source>Curr Pharm Des</source><year>2011</year><volume>17</volume><issue>28</issue><fpage>2955</fpage><lpage>2972</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211798157739">https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211798157739</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21861839</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayala</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hospitalization costs associated with hypertension as a secondary diagnosis among insured patients aged 18&#x02013;64 years</article-title><source>Am J Hypertens</source><year>2010</year><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>281</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2009.241">https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2009.241</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20010701</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duh</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Fulcher</surname><given-names>NM</given-names></name><name><surname>White</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Costs associated with cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension in U.S. managed care settings</article-title><source>J Am Soc Hypertens</source><year>2009</year><volume>3</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>403</fpage><lpage>415</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2009.09.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2009.09.001</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20409983</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cohen</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hypertension epidemiology and economic burden: refining risk assessment to lower costs</article-title><source>Manag Care</source><year>2009</year><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>58</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arredondo</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Out-of-pocket costs to users: medicine options for hypertension</article-title><source>Am J Hypertens</source><year>2008</year><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>492</fpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2008.150">https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2008.150</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18437138</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mullins</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Sikirica</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Seneviratne</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahn</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Akhras</surname><given-names>KS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparisons of hypertension-related costs from multinational clinical studies</article-title><source>Pharmacoeconomics</source><year>2004</year><volume>22</volume><issue>15</issue><fpage>1001</fpage><lpage>1014</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422150-00004">https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422150-00004</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15449964</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berto</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lopatriello</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Long-term social costs of hypertension</article-title><source>Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res</source><year>2003</year><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.3.1.33">https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.3.1.33</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19807493</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="web"><collab>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</collab><article-title>Mean Expenses per Person with Care for Selected Conditions by Type of Service: United States, 2014. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component Data</article-title><source>Generated interactively</source><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/tables_compendia_hh_interactive.jsp?_SERVICE=MEPSSocket0&#x00026;_PROGRAM=MEPSPGM.TC.SAS&#x00026;File=HCFY2014&#x00026;Table=HCFY2014%5FCNDXP%5FCA">https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/tables_compendia_hh_interactive.jsp?_SERVICE=MEPSSocket0&#x00026;_PROGRAM=MEPSPGM.TC.SAS&#x00026;File=HCFY2014&#x00026;Table=HCFY2014%5FCNDXP%5FCA</ext-link></comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bell</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Saraf</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epidemiology of Multimorbidity in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease</article-title><source>Clin Geriatr Med</source><year>2016</year><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>215</fpage><lpage>226</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2016.01.013</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27113142</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valderas</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Starfield</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Sibbald</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Salisbury</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Roland</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Defining comorbidity: implications for understanding health and health services</article-title><source>Ann Fam Med</source><year>2009</year><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>357</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.983">https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.983</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19597174</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barnett</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Mercer</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name><name><surname>Norbury</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Watt</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyke</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Guthrie</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study</article-title><source>Lancet</source><year>2012</year><volume>380</volume><issue>9836</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22579043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Estimated annual direct expenditures in the United States as a result of inappropriate hypertension treatment according to national treatment guidelines</article-title><source>Clin Ther</source><year>2009</year><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>1581</fpage><lpage>1594</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.010</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19695408</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Moloney</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Economics of suboptimal drug use: cost-savings of using JNC-recommended medications for management of uncomplicated essential hypertension</article-title><source>Am J Manag Care</source><year>2003</year><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>529</fpage><lpage>536</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12921230</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ayala</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>George</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hypertension-associated expenditures for medication among U.S. adults</article-title><source>Am J Hypertens</source><year>2013</year><volume>26</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1295</fpage><lpage>1302</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpt079">https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpt079</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23727748</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R21"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>MU</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Evaluating excessive burden of depression on health status and health care utilization among patients with hypertension in a nationally representative sample from the Medial Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS 2012)</article-title><source>J Nerv Ment Dis</source><year>2017</year><volume>205</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>404</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000618">https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000618</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28107250</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R22"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balu</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname><suffix>3rd</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Incremental expenditure of treating hypertension in the United States</article-title><source>Am J Hypertens</source><year>2006</year><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>810</fpage><lpage>816</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.12.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.12.013</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16876679</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R23"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elixhauser</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Steiner</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Harris</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name><name><surname>Coffey</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>1998</year><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004">https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9431328</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R24"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>YN</given-names></name><name><surname>Uzzo</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>Beck</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Egleston</surname><given-names>BL</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Why summary comorbidity measures such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>2015</year><volume>53</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>e65</fpage><lpage>e72</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318297429c">https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e318297429c</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23703645</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R25"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Dalton</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A new Elixhauser-based comorbidity summary measure to predict in-hospital mortality</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>2015</year><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>374</fpage><lpage>379</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000326">https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000326</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25769057</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R26"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mnatzaganian</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ryan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Norman</surname><given-names>PE</given-names></name><name><surname>Hiller</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality</article-title><source>J Clin Epidemiol</source><year>2012</year><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>107</fpage><lpage>115</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.014</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21803545</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R27"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>YT</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>YY</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of different comorbidity measures for use with administrative data in predicting short- and long-term mortality</article-title><source>BMC Health Serv Res</source><year>2010</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>140</fpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-140">https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-140</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20507593</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R28"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Walraven</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Jennings</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Forster</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>2009</year><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>626</fpage><lpage>633</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5">https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819432e5</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19433995</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R29"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Livingston</surname><given-names>EH</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of bariatric surgery-specific risk assessment tool</article-title><source>Surg Obes Relat Dis</source><year>2007</year><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.10.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.10.009</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17196436</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R30"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kurichi</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Stineman</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwong</surname><given-names>PL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bates</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Reker</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Assessing and using comorbidity measures in elderly veterans with lower extremity amputations</article-title><source>Gerontology</source><year>2007</year><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>255</fpage><lpage>259</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000101703">https://doi.org/10.1159/000101703</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17435390</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R31"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Sundararajan</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Halfon</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>2005</year><volume>43</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1130</fpage><lpage>1139</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83">https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16224307</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R32"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneeweiss</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Avorn</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Glynn</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in Medicare populations</article-title><source>Health Serv Res</source><year>2003</year><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>1103</fpage><lpage>1120</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00165">https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00165</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12968819</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R33"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stukenborg</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Wagner</surname><given-names>DP</given-names></name><name><surname>Connors</surname><suffix>Jr</suffix></name></person-group><article-title>Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalizations</article-title><source>Med Care</source><year>2001</year><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>727</fpage><lpage>739</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200107000-00009">https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200107000-00009</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11458137</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R34"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menendez</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name><name><surname>Neuhaus</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>van Dijk</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Ring</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery</article-title><source>Clin Orthop Relat Res</source><year>2014</year><volume>472</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>2878</fpage><lpage>2886</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3686-7</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24867450</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R35"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Hui</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Depression increases the risk of hypertension incidence: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies</article-title><source>J Hypertens</source><year>2012</year><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>842</fpage><lpage>851</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835080b7">https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835080b7</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22343537</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R36"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Tian</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Hypertension and risk of depression in the elderly: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies</article-title><source>J Hum Hypertens</source><year>2015</year><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>478</fpage><lpage>482</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2014.112">https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2014.112</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25411056</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R37"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Machlin</surname><given-names>SR</given-names></name><name><surname>Soni</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Health care expenditures for adults with multiple treated chronic conditions: estimates from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2009</article-title><source>Prev Chronic Dis</source><year>2013</year><volume>10</volume><fpage>E63</fpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120172">https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120172</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23618543</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R38"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="web"><collab>U.S. Centers for Medicare &#x00026; Medicaid Services</collab><source>Chronic Conditions Chartbook: 2012 Edition</source><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Chronic-Conditions/2012Ch-artBook.html">www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Chronic-Conditions/2012Ch-artBook.html</ext-link></comment><date-in-citation>Accessed April 17, 2017</date-in-citation></element-citation></ref><ref id="R39"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Njie</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Finnie</surname><given-names>RK</given-names></name><name><surname>Acharya</surname><given-names>SD</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Reducing medication costs to prevent cardiovascular disease: a community guide systematic review</article-title><source>Prev Chronic Dis</source><year>2015</year><volume>12</volume><fpage>E208</fpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150242">https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.150242</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26605708</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R40"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Neal</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>MacMahon</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Chapman</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><collab>Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration</collab><article-title>Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials</article-title><source>Lancet</source><year>2000</year><volume>356</volume><issue>9246</issue><fpage>1955</fpage><lpage>1964</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03307-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03307-9</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11130523</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R41"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karnes</surname><given-names>JH</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper-DeHoff</surname><given-names>RM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Antihypertensive medications: benefits of blood pressure lowering and hazards of metabolic effects</article-title><source>Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther</source><year>2009</year><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>689</fpage><lpage>702</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1586/erc.09.31">https://doi.org/10.1586/erc.09.31</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19505284</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R42"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boan</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Lackland</surname><given-names>DT</given-names></name><name><surname>Ovbiagele</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Lowering of blood pressure for recurrent stroke prevention</article-title><source>Stroke</source><year>2014</year><volume>45</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>2506</fpage><lpage>2513</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.003666">https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.003666</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24984744</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R43"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Campbell</surname><given-names>NR</given-names></name><name><surname>Gilbert</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Leiter</surname><given-names>LA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Hypertension in people with type 2 diabetes: update on pharmacologic management</article-title><source>Can Fam Physician</source><year>2011</year><volume>57</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>997</fpage><lpage>1002</lpage><fpage>e347</fpage><lpage>e353</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21918140</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R44"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chahoud</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Mrad</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Semaan</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Asmar</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among patients with essential arterial hypertension</article-title><source>J Med Liban</source><year>2015</year><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>74</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12816/0012554">https://doi.org/10.12816/0012554</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26164975</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R45"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>American Diabetes Association</collab><article-title>Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007</article-title><source>Diabetes Care</source><year>2008</year><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>596</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9017">https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-9017</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18308683</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R46"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mirambeau</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruggles</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Dunet</surname><given-names>DO</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A cost analysis of a community health worker program in rural Vermont</article-title><source>J Community Health</source><year>2013</year><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>1050</fpage><lpage>1057</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9713-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9713-x</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23794072</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R47"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lea</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholas</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Diabetes mellitus and hypertension: key risk factors for kidney disease</article-title><source>J Natl Med Assoc</source><year>2002</year><volume>94</volume><issue>suppl 8</issue><fpage>7S</fpage><lpage>15S</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12152917</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R48"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Horowitz</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Miskulin</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zager</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Epidemiology of hypertension in CKD</article-title><source>Adv Chronic Kidney Dis</source><year>2015</year><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2014.09.004">https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2014.09.004</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25704344</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R49"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sarafidis</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharpe</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wood</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prevalence, patterns of treatment, and control of hypertension in predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease</article-title><source>Nephron Clin Pract</source><year>2012</year><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>c147</fpage><lpage>c155</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000337571">https://doi.org/10.1159/000337571</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22678150</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R50"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jancova</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Vankova</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Honsova</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prevalence and risk of hypertension in renal disease&#x02014;data from the Czech Registry of Renal Biopsies</article-title><source>Kidney Blood Press Res</source><year>2008</year><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000126736">https://doi.org/10.1159/000126736</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18418004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R51"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valika</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Peixoto</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Hypertension management in transition: from CKD to ESRD</article-title><source>Adv Chronic Kidney Dis</source><year>2016</year><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>255</fpage><lpage>261</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2016.02.002">https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2016.02.002</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27324679</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R52"><label>52</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perico</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Remuzzi</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Chronic kidney disease: a research and public health priority</article-title><source>Nephrol Dial Transplant</source><year>2012</year><volume>27</volume><issue>suppl 3</issue><fpage>iii19</fpage><lpage>iii26</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs284">https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs284</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22764188</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R53"><label>53</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><name><surname>Hechmati</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Fakih</surname><given-names>MG</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Cost-minimization analysis of panitumumab compared with cetuximab for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer</article-title><source>J Med Econ</source><year>2015</year><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>619</fpage><lpage>628</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2015.1035659">https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2015.1035659</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25822327</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R54"><label>54</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsartsalis</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Dragioti</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kontoangelos</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The impact of depression and cardiophobia on quality of life in patients with essential hypertension</article-title><source>Psychiatriki</source><year>2016</year><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>192</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.192">https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.192</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27837573</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R55"><label>55</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Comorbidity of depression and anxiety disorders in patients with hypertension</article-title><source>J Hypertens</source><year>2016</year><volume>34</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>397</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000850">https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000850</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26818922</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R56"><label>56</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caligiuri</surname><given-names>SPB</given-names></name><name><surname>Pierce</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>A review of the relative efficacy of dietary, nutritional supplements, lifestyle, and drug therapies in the management of hypertension</article-title><source>Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr</source><year>2017</year><volume>57</volume><issue>16</issue><fpage>3508</fpage><lpage>3527</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1142420">https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2016.1142420</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27494115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R57"><label>57</label><element-citation publication-type="web"><collab>The Community Guide</collab><source>Cardiovascular disease</source><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="www.thecommunityguide.org/topic/cardiovascular-disease">www.thecommunityguide.org/topic/cardiovascular-disease</ext-link></comment><date-in-citation>Accessed June 16, 2017</date-in-citation></element-citation></ref><ref id="R58"><label>58</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kravetz</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name><name><surname>Walsh</surname><given-names>RF</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Team-based hypertension management to improve blood pressure control</article-title><source>J Prim Care Community Health</source><year>2016</year><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>272</fpage><lpage>275</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916645580">https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916645580</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27106631</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R59"><label>59</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><collab>Community Preventive Services Task Force</collab><article-title>Team-based care to improve blood pressure control: recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Task Force</article-title><source>Am J Prev Med</source><year>2014</year><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.03.003</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24933493</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R60"><label>60</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Malik</surname><given-names>VS</given-names></name><name><surname>Willett</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name><name><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications</article-title><source>Nat Rev Endocrinol</source><year>2013</year><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>13</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.199">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.199</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23165161</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R61"><label>61</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakamura</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Okamura</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayakawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Medical expenditures of men with hypertension and/or a smoking habit: a 10-year follow-up study of National Health Insurance in Shiga, Japan</article-title><source>Hypertens Res</source><year>2010</year><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>802</fpage><lpage>807</lpage><comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2010.81">https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2010.81</ext-link></comment><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20505676</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Fifteen most frequent comorbid conditions in U.S. hypertensive adults, 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (<italic>n</italic>=26,049).</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms945835f1"/></fig><fig id="F2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Estimated annual medical expenditures (2014 USD) for nine hypertension-related comorbid conditions among the 15 most frequent comorbid conditions in U.S. hypertensive adults, 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.</p><p><italic>Note:</italic> Mean annual total healthcare expenditures were estimated using the average marginal effects method from the generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma distribution.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms945835f2"/></fig><table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Sample Characteristics of U.S. Hypertensive Adults by Modified Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (EI), 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (<italic>n</italic>=26,049)</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="rows"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="left" colspan="1">Variable/category</th><th colspan="5" valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1">Number (weighted %)</th><th valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="center" colspan="1"><italic>p</italic>-value</th></tr><tr><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=0</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=1</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=2</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI&#x02265;3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">26,049 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,073 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,135 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,310 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,531 (100.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Age (years)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;18&#x02013;44</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,470 (11.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,074 (25.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">978 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">754 (11.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">664 (5.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;45&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,029 (43.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,100 (51.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,097 (49.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,926 (44.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,906 (37.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;&#x02265;65</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,550 (44.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">899 (23.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,060 (35.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,630 (44.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,961 (56.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Gender</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Male</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,772 (49.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,022 (56.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,871 (50.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,908 (50.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,971 (44.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Female</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,277 (51.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,051 (43.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,264 (49.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,402 (49.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,560 (55.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Race/ethnicity</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,855 (9.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">874 (12.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,171 (10.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,244 (10.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,566 (8.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;White, non-Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,969 (69.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,377 (59.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,634 (67.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,885 (70.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,073 (75.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Black, non-Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,081 (14.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,462 (21.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,740 (15.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,612 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,267 (11.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Asian/Other, non-Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,144 (6.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">360 (6.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">590 (7.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">569 (6.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">625 (4.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Region</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Northeast</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,267 (17.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">635 (16.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,017 (18.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,055 (18.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,560 (17.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.038</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Midwest</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,023 (22.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">683 (20.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,106 (20.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,196 (22.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,038 (23.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;South</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,046 (40.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,866 (43.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,588 (40.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,583 (39.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,009 (40.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;East</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,713 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">889 (19.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,424 (20.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,476 (19.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,924 (18.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Insurance</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Any private</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,899 (62.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,518 (71.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,599 (68.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,375 (63.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,407 (55.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Public only</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,686 (30.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">919 (17.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,828 (23.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,320 (29.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,619 (40.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Uninsured</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,464 (6.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">636 (11.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">708 (8.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">615 (6.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">505 (3.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Marital status</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Married</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,482 (57.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,267 (61.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,357 (59.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,379 (59.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,479 (52.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Unmarried</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,567 (43.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,806 (38.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,778 (40.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,931 (41.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,052 (47.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Education</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Less than high school</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,932 (15.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">695 (11.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,268 (13.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,528 (16.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,441 (17.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;High school</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,382 (32.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,367 (30.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,887 (29.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,984 (31.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,144 (34.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;College or higher</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,454 (52.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,961 (58.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,915 (57.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,730 (52.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,848 (47.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Income</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Low or below</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,248 (32.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,505 (24.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,296 (27.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,660 (31.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,787 (39.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Middle</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,456 (28.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,283 (29.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,847 (29.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,787 (28.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,539 (28.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;High</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,345 (38.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,285 (45.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,992 (43.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,863 (40.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,205 (32.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Current smoker</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Yes</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,774 (15.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">534 (13.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">869 (15.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">873 (14.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,498 (16.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.021</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">19,775 (84.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,032 (86.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,639 (84.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,853 (86.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,251 (83.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Health status</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Excellent</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,401 (10.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">675 (18.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">723 (14.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">575 (11.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">428 (5.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Very good</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,389 (28.2)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,422 (40.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,856 (34.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,566 (28.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,545 (19.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Good</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,362 (35.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,463 (31.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,285 (35.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,417 (38.0)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,197 (35.8)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Fair/poor</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,795 (25.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">489 (8.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,245 (15.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,721 (21.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,340 (39.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Expenditure for medical care</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Yes</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">25,588 (98.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,855 (96.4)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,012 (98.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,227 (99.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,494 (99.7)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">461 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">218 (3.6)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">123 (1.5)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">83 (0.9)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">37 (0.3)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td colspan="7" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Medical expenditures (2014 USD), M (SE)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Overall adults</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,673 (189)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,167 (203)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,242 (191)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,986 (244)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,722 (384)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Adults with spending</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,785 (191)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,284 (211)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,320 (194)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,058 (245)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,762 (385)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x0003c;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;EI score</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.26 (0.02)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><p><italic>Note:</italic> Hypertensive was defined based on ICD-9 codes 401&#x02013;405. The following comorbid conditions were included: (1) congestive heart failure; (2) heart rhythm disorders; (3) valvular disease; (4) coronary heart disease; (5) stroke; (6) hyperlipidemia; (7) pulmonary circulation disorders; (8) peripheral vascular disorders; (9) chronic pulmonary disease; (10) diabetes; (11) renal disease; (12) obesity; (13) depression; (14) paralysis; (15) neurologic disorders; (16) hypothyroidism; (17) liver disease; (18) peptic ulcer; (19) HIV/AIDS; (20) lymphoma; (21) metastatic cancer; (22) solid tumor; (23) rheumatoid arthritis; (24) coagulopathy; (25) weight loss; (26) fluid and electrolyte disorders; (27) anemia; (28) alcohol abuse; (29) drug abuse; and (30) psychoses. The <italic>p</italic>-values were generated from &#x003c7;<sup>2</sup> tests for the categorical variables and ANOVA for the continuous variables. Percentages may not total 100% due to rounding.</p></fn><fn id="TFN2"><p>USD, U.S. dollar.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Estimated Annual Medical Expenditures (2014 USD) by Comorbidity Status for U.S. Hypertensive Adults, 2011&#x02013;2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (<italic>n</italic>=26,049)</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="rows"><thead><tr><th valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="left" colspan="1">Variable/category</th><th colspan="5" valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1">Medical expenditure, $ (95% CI)</th></tr><tr><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=0</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=1</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI=2</th><th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">EI&#x02265;3</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Overall</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,841 (9,464, 10,218)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,914 (3,456, 4,372)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,798 (5,384 6,213)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,333 (7,821, 8,844)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,920 (13,166, 14,674)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Age (years)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;18&#x02013;44</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,059 (7,107, 9,011)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,221 (2,716, 3,727)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,771 (4,119, 5,423)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,857 (6,036, 7,677)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,454 (10,013, 12,896)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;45&#x02013;64</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,893 (9,294, 10,492)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,954 (3,464, 4,445)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,857 (5,381, 6,333)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,417 (7,729, 9,105)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,061 (13,050, 15,072)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;&#x02265;65</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,125 (9,663, 10,586)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,047 (3,550, 4,543)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,994 (5,524, 6,465)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,615 (8,064, 9,165)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,391 (13,546, 15,236)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Gender</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Male</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,477 (8,991, 9,962)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,773 (3,311, 4,234)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,588 (5,145, 6,031)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,031 (7,444, 8,618)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,416 (12,578, 14,254)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Female</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,159 (9,651, 10,667)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,044 (3,555, 4,533)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,991 (5,522, 6,459)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,609 (8,035, 9,183)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,382 (13,455, 15,309)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Race/ethnicity</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Hispanic</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,368 (7,559, 9,177)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,337 (2,864, 3,810)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,943 (4,343, 5,544)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,104 (6,396, 7,812)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,867 (10,620, 13,114)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;White</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,264 (9,779, 10,749)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,093 (3,586, 4,601)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,063 (5,600, 6,526)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,713 (8,109, 9,317)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,556 (13,678, 15,433)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Black</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,149 (8,570, 9,729)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,649 (3,234, 4,063)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,405 (4,955, 5,855)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,767 (7,162, 8,373)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,975 (11,970, 13,980)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Asian/other</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,381 (7,419, 9,343)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,342 (2,827, 3,858)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,951 (4,304, 5,598)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,115 (6,216, 8,013)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,885 (10,459, 13,311)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Region</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Northeast</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,865 (9,937, 11,793)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,321 (3,730, 4,912)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,401 (5,790, 7,012)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,199 (8,283, 10,115)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,367 (13,900, 16,835)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Midwest</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,261 (9,459, 11,064)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,081 (3,466, 4,696)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,045 (5,373, 6,717)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,688 (7,888, 9,488)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,513 (13,343, 15,683)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;South</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,116 (8,623, 9,608)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,626 (3,213, 4,038)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,370 (4,980, 5,761)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,718 (7,174, 8,262)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,893 (11,977, 13,808)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;East</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,922 (8,995, 10,849)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,946 (3,380, 4,513)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,845 (5,167, 6,523)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,400 (7,516, 9,285)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,033 (12,637, 15,428)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Insurance</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Any private</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,390 (9,877, 10,903)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,143 (3,641, 4,645)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,137 (5,677, 6,596)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,819 (8,221, 9,417)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,733 (13,812, 15,654)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Public only</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,674 (9,122, 10,226)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,858 (3,380, 4,335)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,714 (5,195, 6,233)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,212 (7,622, 8,801)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,718 (12,771, 14,665)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Uninsured</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,973 (4,013, 5,932)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,983 (1,538, 2,427)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,937 (2,376, 3,498)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,221 (3,319, 5,122)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,051 (5,692, 8,410)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Marital status</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Married</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,554 (9,044, 10,065)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,804 (3,335, 4,273)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,634 (5,218, 6,050)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,097 (7,564, 8,630)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,526 (12,603, 14,449)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Unmarried</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,185 (9,601, 10,769)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,055 (3,553, 4,557)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,006 (5,463, 6,548)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,631 (7,930, 9,332)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,419 (13,466, 15,371)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Education</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Less than high school</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,991 (8,129, 9,853)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,567 (3,064, 4,071)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,284 (4,735, 5,833)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,594 (6,676, 8,512)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,686 (11,367, 14,005)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;High school</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,278 (8,731, 9,824)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,681 (3,191, 4,171)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,453 (4,967, 5,938)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,836 (7,261, 8,411)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,090 (12,207, 13,974)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;College or higher</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,521 (10,001, 11,042)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,175 (3,681, 4,668)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,184 (5,695, 6,672)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,887 (8,322, 9,451)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,845 (13,903, 15,788)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Income</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Low or below</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,076 (9,474, 10,679)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,009 (3,460, 4,558)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,938 (5,391, 6,485)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,533 (7,902, 9,165)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,255 (13,261, 15,249)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Middle</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,293 (8,700, 9,885)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,697 (3,248, 4,146)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,476 (5,057, 5,895)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,870 (7,222, 8,518)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,147 (12,137, 14,156)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;High</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,046 (9,418, 10,674)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,997 (3,514, 4,479)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,920 (5,400, 6,440)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,507 (7,836, 9,179)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,212 (13,182, 15,242)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Current smoker</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Yes</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,747 (7,859, 9,634)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,477 (3,014, 3,940)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,150 (4,548, 5,753)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,401 (6,674, 8,129)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,364 (10,952, 13,776)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;No</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,056 (9,665, 10,448)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,998 (3,515, 4,480)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,921 (5,493, 6,349)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,510 (7,951, 9,068)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,215 (13,468, 14,963)</td></tr><tr><td colspan="6" align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1">Health status</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Excellent</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,899 (5,240, 6,558)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,447 (2,173, 2,721)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,625 (3,203, 4,046)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,209 (4,569, 5,849)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,702 (7,614, 9,789)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Very good</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,871 (6,392, 7,350)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,850 (2,498, 3,202)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,222 (3,878, 4,566)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,067 (5,569, 6,565)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,135 (9,278, 10,992)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Good</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,159 (8,591, 9,727)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,799 (3,295, 4,303)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,628 (5,143, 6,112)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,088 (7,446, 8,730)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,511 (12,525, 14,496)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Fair/poor</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14,765 (14,031, 15,499)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,125 (5,329, 6,920)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,072 (8,274, 9,870)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,038 (12,122, 13,954)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">21,780 (20,528, 23,032)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN3"><p><italic>Note:</italic> The estimated annual medical expenditures were estimated using the average marginal effects method from the generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma distribution. As a comparator, for U.S. non-hypertensive adults (<italic>n</italic>=66,888), the mean annual medical expenditure was $3,633 (95% CI=$3479, $3736): $1,656 (95% CI=$1556, $1757) for those without any comorbid condition; $3,887 (95% CI=$3645, $4128) for those with one comorbidity, $3,547 (95% CI=$4917, $5776) for those with two comorbidities, and $7,952 (95% CI=$7348, $8556) for those with three or more comorbid conditions.</p></fn><fn id="TFN4"><p>EI, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index; USD, U.S. dollar.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>