<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">0375400</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">4942</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Med Entomol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J. Med. Entomol.</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of medical entomology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0022-2585</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1938-2928</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">28031346</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">5788314</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jme/tjw181</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA933174</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Insecticidal Activity of Thymoquinone and Related Compounds Against <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> (Diptera: Culicidae)</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Scott</surname><given-names>Mariah L.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref><!--<email>gni6@cdc.gov</email>--></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>Mary F.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref><!--<email>madams@what-wire.com</email>--></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Karchesy</surname><given-names>Joseph J.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref><!--<email>joe.karchesy@orst.edu</email>--></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>McAllister</surname><given-names>Janet C.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref><xref rid="FN1" ref-type="author-notes">3</xref><!--<email>jvm6@cdc.gov</email>--></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1">
<label>1</label>Arbovirus Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 3150 Rampart Rd., Fort Collins, CO 80521</aff><aff id="A2">
<label>2</label>Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331</aff><author-notes><corresp id="FN1"><label>3</label>Corresponding author, <email>jvm6@cdc.gov</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>10</day><month>1</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day><month>5</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>29</day><month>1</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>785</fpage><lpage>787</lpage><!--elocation-id from pubmed: 10.1093/jme/tjw181--><abstract><p id="P1">Insecticides based on botanical sources have taken on increased attention due to differing modes of action from current insecticides in use and the view that they may be environmentally friendly. Thymoquinone, a component in the essential oil of incense cedar heartwood, has been shown to have insecticidal action against adult mosquitoes. This study evaluated relative toxicities of thymoquinone, selected derivatives of thymoquinone, hydroquinone, and arbutin to determine if any had similar or better activity. The intrinsic toxicities of hydroquinone and thymohydroquinone were not significantly different from thymoquinone, while libocedrol and arbutin were significantly less toxic.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd><italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic></kwd><kwd>thymoquinone</kwd><kwd>botanical insecticide</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><p id="P2">Essential oils extracted from plants that repel insects were the principal means that people used for protecting themselves or their domestic animals prior to World War I. World War II opened the Modern Era of chemical control with the introduction of a new concept of insect control, synthetic organic insecticides, the first of which was DDT (<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">Novak and Gerberg 2005</xref>). Many of today&#x02019;s pesticides are designed using naturally derived chemistries. For example, pyrethroid insecticides are modeled after pyrethrins, which are natural, plant-derived poisons that have been used as insecticides for hundreds of years. Insect growth regulators mimic hormones that affect insect growth, but they have little effect on nontarget animals. These products and similar ones using bacteria, viruses, or other natural pest control agents are called &#x0201c;biorational&#x0201d; pesticides (<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">Ware and Whitacre 2004</xref>).</p><p id="P3">Biorational pesticides are becoming increasingly important as vector mosquitoes develop resistance to the few synthetic insecticides registered as existing broad-spectrum pesticides are being dropped from the market. Resistance of insects to insecticides is not a new phenomenon. At least 457 populations of <italic>Culex pipiens</italic> L. and <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> Say have been reported as resistant to over 40 different active ingredients according to the Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database (APRD) maintained by Michigan State University (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.pesticideresistance.com">http://www.pesticideresistance.com</ext-link>; accessed 11 November 2016).</p><p id="P4">Currently, four major types of botanical products are used for insect control including rotenone, neem, pyrethrum, and essential oils (<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">Isman 2006</xref>). Essential oils have been suggested as an alternative source of materials for arthropod control due to their broad source of bioactive constituents. The essential oil of incense cedar heartwood (<italic>Calocedrus decurrens</italic> (Torr.)) has been shown to have significant activity against adult <italic>Aedes aegypti</italic> L. (<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">Dolan et al. 2007</xref>). GC-MS analysis of that oil showed thymoquinone to be the major component along with a significant amount of carvacrol (<xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">Veluthoor et al. 2011</xref>). Lesser amounts of thymohydroquinone (a reduced form of thymoquinone) and libocedrol (a dimeric diterpene derivative) were also found. Thymoquinone, isolated from wild bergamot, <italic>Monarda fistulosa</italic> L., has been previously reported to have insecticidal activity against <italic>Ae. aegypti</italic> larvae (<xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">Johnson et al. 1998</xref>). In a more recent study, thymoquinone has been shown to have biological activity against four strains of <italic>Anopheles gambiae</italic> Giles mosquitos, exhibiting a different mode of action than what is found in currently used commercial mosquito control products (<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">McAllister and Adams 2010</xref>).</p><p id="P5">It was observed that mortality produced by thymoquinone was not immediate, suggesting some metabolism might be necessary for the toxic effect to be achieved (<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">McAllister and Adams 2010</xref>). The purpose of this study was to compare the toxicities of thymoquinone, arbutin, thymohydroquinone, hydroquinone, and libocedrol (<xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>) against <italic>Cx. quinquefasciatus</italic> to determine if any were more toxic than thymoquinone and thus have greater potential as new insecticides.</p><sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="S1"><title>Materials and Methods</title><p id="P6">The susceptible <italic>Cx. quinquefasciatus</italic> Sebring strain was used. This strain was originally collected from Sebring, FL, in 1988 (<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">Vanlandingham et al. 2008</xref>), and has been colonized at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Fort Collins, CO) since 2004. Adult mosquitoes were maintained at 27.5 &#x000b0;C and 70&#x02013;80% relative humidity on a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h in environmental chambers. Adult mosquitoes were exposed to compounds at 5&#x02013;7 d posteclosion.</p><p id="P7">The compounds tested were thymoquinone, arbutin, thymohydroquinone, hydroquinone, and libocedrol. Hydroquinone and arbutin were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Thymoquinone and its derivatives thymohydroquinone and libocedrol were isolated from the steam distillation of incense cedar essential oil. Each compound was serially diluted for a total of five concentrations, producing a range of 3&#x02013;99% mortality. Twenty-six female <italic>Cx. quinquefasciatus</italic> mosquitoes, 6&#x02013;7 d old, were exposed to CO<sub>2</sub> for 5 s then placed on a chill table (BioQuip Products, Rancho Dominguez, CA) maintained between &#x02212;1 to &#x02212;7&#x000b0;C. Each female was treated with 0.2 &#x003bc;l of the compound or acetone, which served as the control, on the dorsal thorax using a syringe and repeating dispenser (Hamilton, Reno, NV). Assays were replicated four times. After all individuals were treated for a particular concentration, they were weighed and an average weight per mosquito was calculated. Mosquitoes were maintained on 5% sucrose for 24 h using the same conditions as the colonies. Mortality was recorded after 24 h.</p><p id="P8">Arbutin is water soluble and did not adhere to the mosquitoes. Several different solvents including acetone, ethanol, and a detergent, tween-20, were combined with the compound. Each female was treated with 0.2 &#x003bc;l of arbutin and the selected solvent and detergent, but no droplet would form that was absorbed by the cuticle. It was determined that the only way to test arbutin was to feed it via a sucrose solution. Sucrose was removed from the mosquitoes 12 h before the assay. Twenty-five mosquitoes were anesthetized with CO<sub>2</sub>, so they could be weighed before placing in individual cups. Five different concentrations of arbutin were dissolved in 3 ml 5% sucrose solution and provided to 6&#x02013;7-d-old females for a 24-h period before mortality was recorded. Dose mortality (LD) data were evaluated using probit analysis generated using SAS software. (Copyright 2002&#x02013;2010 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).</p></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="S2"><title>Results</title><p id="P9">The toxicities on adult <italic>Cx. quinquefasciatus</italic> are presented in <xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>. The LD<sub>50</sub> for thymoquinone was 7.51 &#x003bc;g/mg (CI 7.13&#x02013;7.88) and hydroquinone was 7.79 &#x003bc;g/mg (CI 7.16&#x02013;8.43). While these values fall within the confidence interval (CI) of each other, the LD<sub>95</sub> of these two compounds did not overlap and their slopes are different. Although three of the four related compounds exhibited some level of insecticidal activity, on the basis of both LD<sub>50</sub> and LD<sub>95</sub> values, only hydroquinone was similar in toxicity to thymoquinone. Hydroquinone was the most toxic metabolite to <italic>Cx. quinquefasciatus</italic>, followed by thymohydroquinone, libocedrol, and arbutin. Arbutin proved ineffective, as not enough of the compound could be dissolved in the sucrose solution to induce mortality without forming a paste.</p></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="S3"><title>Discussion</title><p id="P10">The essential oil of incense cedar heartwood, <italic>C. decurrens</italic>, was previously found to be toxic to three medically important arthropods, <italic>Ae. aegypti</italic> mosquitoes, <italic>Ixodes scapularis</italic> (Say) ticks, and <italic>Xenopsylla cheopis</italic> (Rothchild) fleas (<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">Dolan et al. 2007</xref>). Thymoquinone and carvacrol, which are the major components of this oil, are viable compounds for vector control and commercial development (<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">McAllister and Adams 2010</xref>). The related compounds of thymoquinone that were evaluated in this study were not as effective as thymoquinone. This suggests that the quinone moiety of thymoquinone is key to its toxicity and derivatization significantly reduces toxicity. Hydroquinone could have the potential for controlling vector mosquitoes, as the LD<sub>50</sub> only varied 0.28 &#x003bc;g/mg from thymoquinone.</p><p id="P11">Thymoquinone has been indicated as having other biological activities of interest for human use. Thymoquinone is the bioactive constituent of the oil of black cumin (<italic>Nigella sativa</italic>, L.), which has been used since antiquity in the Middle East for treatment of many human diseases (<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">Padhye et al. 2008</xref>). This compound has been shown to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and promising anticancer activities in both in vitro and in vivo studies (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">Gali-Mahtasib et al. 2006</xref>, <xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">Sutton et al. 2014</xref>). It has also been studied as an immune enhancer in <italic>Aedes caspius</italic> (Pallas) to control disease agents in a novel way (<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">Ahmed et al. 2010</xref>). Hydroquinone is commonly used as a skin whitening agent in cosmetics (<xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">Tse 2010</xref>).</p><p id="P12">The prospective of using the same application strategies as current commercial insecticides with the compounds evaluated is probably unlikely since they are less toxic than thymoquinone. Many essential oils are known to exhibit repellent, antifeeding, and insecticidal activities against various arthropod species (<xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">Isman 2006</xref>). The compounds tested here may serve better as natural repellants than insecticides, and should be further evaluated. The benefit of researching and developing natural products based on plant essential oils may result in relatively low-cost production, be environmentally friendly as compared to commercial insecticides, have public favorability, and have different modes of action. However, additional biological activity needs to be considered before insecticide development.</p></sec></body><back><ack id="S4"><p>We wish to thank the deployed war fighter protection program for funding this project.</p></ack><fn-group><fn id="FN2"><p>The views of the authors do not necessarily reflect the position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Wood Science and Engineering, Oregon State University.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References Cited</title><ref id="R1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Olayan</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Aboul-Soud</surname><given-names>MAM</given-names></name><name><surname>Al-Khedhairy</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>The immune enhancer, thymoquinone, and the hope of utilizing the immune system of <italic>Aedes caspius</italic> against disease agents</article-title><source>Afr J Biotechnol</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>3183</fpage><lpage>3195</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dolan</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Dietrich</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Panella</surname><given-names>NA</given-names></name><name><surname>Montenieri</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Karchesy</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Biocidal activity of three wood essential oils against <italic>Ixodes scapularis</italic> (Acari: Ixodidae), <italic>Xenopsylla cheopis</italic> (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), and <italic>Aedes aegypti</italic> (Diptera: Culicidae)</article-title><source>J Med Entomol</source><volume>100</volume><fpage>662</fpage><lpage>625</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gali-Mahtasib</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Roessner</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schneider-Stock</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Thymoquinone: a promising anti-cancer drug from natural sources</article-title><source>Int J Biochem Cell Biol</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1249</fpage><lpage>1253</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Isman</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world</article-title><source>Annu Rev Entomol</source><volume>51</volume><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16332203</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name><name><surname>Rogers</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkire</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>McCloud</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name><name><surname>McLaughlin</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>Bioactive monoterpenes from <italic>Monarda fistulosa</italic> (Lamiaceae)</article-title><source>Nat Prod Lett</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>241</fpage><lpage>250</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McAllister</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>Mode of action for natural products isolated from essential oils of two trees is different from available mosquito adulticides</article-title><source>J Med Entomol</source><volume>41</volume><fpage>1123</fpage><lpage>1126</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Novak</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerberg</surname><given-names>EJ</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Natural-based repellent products: efficacy for military and general public uses</article-title><source>J Am Mosq Control</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>7</fpage><lpage>11</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Padhye</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Banerjee</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarkar</surname><given-names>FH</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>From here to eternity &#x02013; the secret of Pharaohs: therapeutic potential of black cumin seeds and beyond</article-title><source>Cancer Ther</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>495</fpage><lpage>509</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19018291</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sutton</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Greenshields</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoskin</surname><given-names>DW</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><article-title>Thymoquinone, A bioactive component of black caraway seeds, causes G1 phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells with mutant p53</article-title><source>Nutr Cancer</source><volume>66</volume><fpage>408</fpage><lpage>418</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24579801</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tse</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>Hydroquinone for skin lightening: safety profile, duration of use and when should we stop?</article-title><source>J Dermatol Treat</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>272</fpage><lpage>275</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vanlandingham</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>McGee</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Klingler</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Galbraith</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Barrett</surname><given-names>ADT</given-names></name><name><surname>Higgs</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>Short report: comparison of oral infectious dose of West Nile virus isolates representing three distinct genotypes in <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic></article-title><source>Am J Trop Med Hyg</source><volume>79</volume><fpage>951</fpage><lpage>954</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19052310</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Veluthoor</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelsey</surname><given-names>RG</given-names></name><name><surname>Gonzalez-Hernandez</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Panella</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Dolan</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Karchesy</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Composition of the heartwood essential oil of incense cedar (<italic>Calocedrus decurrens</italic> Torr.)</article-title><source>Holzforschung</source><volume>65</volume><fpage>333</fpage><lpage>336</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ware</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name><name><surname>Whitacre</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><source>The pesticide book</source><edition>6</edition><publisher-name>MeisterPro Information Resources</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Willoughby, OH</publisher-loc></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>Thymoquinone and related structures tested on <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> Sebring mosquitoes.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms933174f1"/></fig><table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Lethal doses of compounds tested on <italic>Culex quinquefasciatus</italic> Sebring mosquitoes</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chemical</th><th valign="middle" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>N</italic></th><th valign="middle" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Slope</th><th valign="middle" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LD<sub>50</sub> (95% CI) &#x003bc;g/mg</th><th valign="middle" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1">LD<sub>95</sub> (95% CI) &#x003bc;g/mg</th><th valign="middle" align="center" rowspan="1" colspan="1"><italic>&#x003c7;</italic><sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Thymoquinone</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">625</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.86</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.51 (7.13&#x02013;7.88)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12.77 (11.96&#x02013;13.87)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8.11</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hydroquinone</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">503</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.52</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.79 (7.16&#x02013;8.43)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.50 (14.94&#x02013;18.76)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Thymohydroquinone</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">384</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.26</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9.57 (7.05&#x02013;12.08)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">27.25 (21.72&#x02013;40.12)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15.69</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Libocedrol</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">493</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.24</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16.03 (14.66&#x02013;17.94)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">34.77 (31.22&#x02013;40.01)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13.55</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Arbutin</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02013;</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02013;</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02013;</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02013;</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02013;</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></floats-group></article>