Conceived and designed the experiments: KAL LR WA JG JCM GF FM SJO AMF. Performed the experiments: AE KAL LR WA JG JCM GF FM. Analyzed the data: KAL WA AE JG JCM LR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KAL WA AE SJO AMF. Wrote the paper: KAL WA JG FM SJO AMF LR.
A new influenza A (H1N1) virus was first found in April 2009 and proceeded to cause a global pandemic. We compare the epidemiology and clinical presentation of seasonal influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pH1N1) using a prospective surveillance system for acute respiratory disease in Guatemala.
Patients admitted to two public hospitals in Guatemala in 2008–2009 who met a pneumonia case definition, and ambulatory patients with influenza-like illness (ILI) at 10 ambulatory clinics were invited to participate. Data were collected through patient interview, chart abstraction and standardized physical and radiological exams. Nasopharyngeal swabs were taken from all enrolled patients for laboratory diagnosis of influenza A virus infection with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. We identified 1,744 eligible, hospitalized pneumonia patients, enrolled 1,666 (96%) and tested samples from 1,601 (96%); 138 (9%) had influenza A virus infection. Surveillance for ILI found 899 eligible patients, enrolled 801 (89%) and tested samples from 793 (99%); influenza A virus infection was identified in 246 (31%). The age distribution of hospitalized pneumonia patients was similar between seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1 (
Small sample sizes may limit the power of this study to find significant differences between seasonal influenza A and pH1N1. In Guatemala, influenza, whether seasonal or pH1N1, appears to cause severe disease mainly in infants; targeted vaccination of children should be considered.
In April 2009, a new influenza A (H1N1) virus with a unique combination of gene segments not previously identified among influenza viruses was reported from the United States and Mexico
Comparisons of the epidemiology and clinical presentation of seasonal influenza and pH1N1 can be complicated by the use of case series from different years, as this might introduce biases due to changes in practices or procedures as a result of the pandemic. There have been few reports of concurrent comparisons of the epidemiology of seasonal influenza and pH1N1
In Guatemala, we have been conducting prospective, population-based surveillance for severe acute respiratory disease and influenza-like illness (ILI) since 2007. We recently reported on the epidemiologic and clinical presentation of pH1N1 and described a younger population than that affected by this virus in other parts of the world
All patients 18 years of age or older were asked for verbal consent for screening and, if they met the case definition, written, informed consent to participate in the surveillance study. Relatives of adult patients who were unconscious or unable to provide consent on enrollment were asked to provide written, informed consent for their relative to participate, and this consent was renewed directly with the patient on regaining consciousness. Parents or guardians of children <18 years old were asked for verbal consent to screen their child to determine eligibility, after which written, informed consent was requested from the parents or guardians and written, informed assent from children aged 7 to 17 years old. The protocol received approval from the institutional review boards of the Universidad del Valle de Guatemala (UVG; Guatemala City, Guatemala) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC; Atlanta, GA) and approval from the Guatemalan Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare (MSPAS; Guatemala City, Guatemala). All positive pH1N1 results were reported immediately to the MSPAS, who informed the local public health authorities and patients in each site. The policy of the MSPAS was to provide oseltamivir treatment free of charge to all patients confirmed with pH1N1, although few patients received timely antiviral treatment due to limited stocks and delays in reporting results.
Guatemala, with a population over 14 million, has a gross national income per capita of $2680 and is considered a middle-income country by the World Bank (
A description of the surveillance system for hospitalized pneumonia and ambulatory ILI in Guatemala has been presented previously
Surveillance for ILI in public ambulatory clinics began in Santa Rosa in November 2007 in one health center (staffed by at least one physician) and was then expanded to five additional health posts (staffed by nurses) in June 2009 in response to the pH1N1 pandemic. Surveillance for ILI in ambulatory clinics in Quetzaltenango began in July 2009 in three health centers and one health post. Health care is also provided free of charge at these ambulatory clinics.
Prior to the pandemic, surveillance was limited to residents of the catchment area of each facility, but this geographic restriction was lifted in May 2009 to assist with monitoring the pandemic.
A case of pneumonia was defined as a patient admitted to the hospital with at least one sign of acute infection and at least one respiratory sign or symptom from the respective columns in
| Fever (≥38°C) | Tachypnea |
| Hypothermia (<35.5°C) | <2 months: ≥60 respiration rate (RR) |
| Abnormal white blood cell count (WBC) | 2 to 11 months: ≥50 RR |
| <5 years: <5500 or >15000 | 12 to 59 months: ≥40 RR |
| ≥5 years: <3000 or >11000 | 5 years and older: ≥20 RR |
| Abnormal white blood cell differential | Cough |
| Sputum production | |
| Pleuritic chest pain | |
| Hemoptysis | |
| Difficulty breathing | |
| Shortness of breath | |
| Sore throat | |
| For children <2 years old only | |
| Child pauses repeatedly while breastfeeding or drinking | |
| Chest indrawing | |
| Nasal flaring | |
| Noisy breathing |
*Pneumonia case definition: at least one sign of acute infection and at least one symptom of respiratory disease.
In the hospital, clinical and epidemiologic data were collected from both patient interviews and chart reviews. The highest temperature (axillary) documented in the first 24 hours after admission was recorded. A standard review of chest radiographs was undertaken by a study radiologist, and a standard pulmonary physical exam was performed by a study physician. Oxygen saturation was measured by study nurses with a pulse oximeter. Patients were asked whether they had been diagnosed with any of the following chronic conditions: asthma, other lung disease, diabetes, cancer, chronic cardiovascular disease (hypertension or heart disease), liver disease, kidney disease or any immunocompromised condition (including HIV/AIDS).
In the ambulatory clinics, axillary temperature was measured by study nurses and all other clinical and epidemiologic data were collected through patient interview. In both the hospital and ambulatory clinics, care sought for the current illness episode prior to hospital admission or presentation to the ambulatory clinic was reported by the patient or caregiver, along with any medicines taken prior to admission or presentation. Diarrhea was defined as three or more liquid or loose stools in a 24-hour period during the last seven days. Trained study nurses took nasopharyngeal swabs (NP) from all eligible and consenting patients with pneumonia and ILI, whereas oropharyngeal (OP) swabs were also taken from pneumonia patients; NP and OP swabs were put into one tube with viral transport media and stored at 4°C until they could be processed and sent to the laboratory at the UVG.
All patients with hospitalized pneumonia were asked to return three to six weeks after discharge for a follow-up visit. Patients who did not return by six weeks were followed with a phone call to determine their vital status.
A laboratory-confirmed case of influenza A was defined as a case of pneumonia or ILI with influenza A virus infection as determined by real-time reverse transcription polymerase-chain reaction (rRT-PCR). Subtyping for influenza A to differentiate viruses as seasonal H1N1 and H3N2 and pH1N1 was conducted using a standardized CDC protocol
Data were collected using preprogrammed, hand-held personal digital assistants. Only data from 2008 and 2009 were included in this report. SAS v. 9.1 (Cary, NC) was used for analysis. The case fatality proportion (CFP) was calculated as the number of deaths among the cases of influenza A that occurred during hospitalization or within six weeks of discharge divided by the total number of cases of influenza A among hospitalized pneumonia patients. For non-normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney U-test was used when two influenza subtypes were compared, and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of ranks was used when three influenza subtypes were compared. Pearson's chi-square statistic or Fisher's exact test were used to test for differences in categorical variables between patients infected with different influenza A virus subtypes and a
Between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009, we identified 1744 eligible hospitalized pneumonia patients and enrolled 1666 (96%) in the surveillance system; respiratory samples were obtained and tested from 1602 (96%) of those enrolled. During the same period, we identified 899 eligible ILI patients, enrolled 801 (89%), and obtained and tested samples from 793 (99%) of those enrolled. There were no significant differences in either sex or age distributions between the eligible pneumonia or ILI patients who consented to enrollment and those who did not, or between those enrolled pneumonia or ILI patients who agreed to have a respiratory specimen taken and those who declined (data not shown).
There were 138 (9%) hospitalized pneumonia and 246 (31%) ILI patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza A virus infection (
As a result of the small number of H3N2 in the hospitalized pneumonia patients, we have limited comparison of the characteristics of hospitalized pneumonia patients to those with seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1.
During 2008, surveillance for hospitalized pneumonia and ILI was underway only in Santa Rosa; all cases of seasonal influenza A during 2008 occurred between January and August, with the peak number of cases, both of hospitalized pneumonia (
Panel A: Hospitalized pneumonia patients. Panel B: Influenza-like illness patients.
Concomitant with the 2009 influenza pandemic was a significant increase in the number of RSV-associated respiratory infections, which peaked in July and August (
Panel A: Hospitalized pneumonia patients. Panel B: Influenza-like illness patients.
The median age of hospitalized pneumonia patients with influenza A was 3 years, and was lower for seasonal H1N1 (2 years) than for pH1N1 (4 years), but the difference was not statistically significant (
Panel A: Hospitalized pneumonia patients. Panel B: Influenza-like illness patients.
| All influenza A | Influenza A subtypeNo. (%) | |||
| Characteristics | N = 138 | Seasonal H1N1N = 38 | pH1N1N = 76 | P value |
| Age in years, median (IQR) | 3.0 (0.7–38) | 2.3 (0.7–25) | 4.2 (0.7–37) | 0.48 |
| Sex, F | 55 (40) | 14 (37) | 31 (41) | 0.68 |
| Previously sought care for this illness | 71 (56) | 20 (63) | 45 (59) | 0.75 |
| Days from symptom onset to admission, median (IQR) | 5 (3–8) | 4 (3–8) | 5 (4–8) | 0.27 |
| Took any medication before admission | 88 (64) | 26 (68) | 53 (70) | 0.89 |
| Took antipyretics before admission | 67 (50) | 22 (58) | 40 (55) | 0.76 |
| Took antivirals before admission | 3 (2) | 0 (0) | 3 (4) | 0.55 |
| Clinical signs and symptoms at admission | ||||
| Cough | 129 (95) | 33 (92) | 75 (99) | 0.06 |
| Difficulty breathing | 115 (85) | 31 (86) | 66 (87) | 0.91 |
| Shortness of breath | 67 (82) | 16 (80) | 38 (83) | 0.80 |
| Sputum production | 96 (71) | 28 (78) | 52 (68) | 0.31 |
| Sore throat | 49 (65) | 11 (65) | 32 (73) | 0.54 |
| Fever | 97 (70) | 32 (84) | 47 (62) | 0.01 |
| Rhinorrhea | 85 (62) | 23 (62) | 50 (66) | 0.71 |
| Wheezing | 84 (62) | 25 (66) | 44 (60) | 0.51 |
| Headache | 51 (61) | 14 (64) | 29 (63) | 0.70 |
| Pleuritic chest pain | 42 (59) | 10 (53) | 26 (65) | 0.36 |
| Tachypnea | 76 (56) | 27 (71) | 42 (57) | 0.14 |
| Pulse ox <90% | 57 (51) | 14 (58) | 37 (53) | 0.64 |
| Myalgia | 37 (47) | 9 (41) | 24 (52) | 0.68 |
| Chills | 58 (43) | 15 (40) | 34 (45) | 0.26 |
| Diarrhea | 25 (18) | 10 (26) | 13 (17) | 0.25 |
| Chest radiograph consistent with pneumonia | 47 (64) | 14 (56) | 27 (71) | 0.22 |
| Underlying medical conditions | ||||
| One or more conditions | 26 (19) | 8 (16) | 14 (18) | 0.93 |
| Asthma | 10 (8) | 4 (9) | 4 (5) | 0.47 |
| Lung disease | 3 (2) | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 0.84 |
| Diabetes | 5 (4) | 3 (7) | 1 (1) | 0.13 |
| Chronic cardiovascular diseasê | 7 (5) | 2 (5) | 5 (7) | 0.37 |
| Immunocompromised | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | — |
| Pregnancy | 2 (29) | 0 (0) | 2 (17) | 0.53 |
| Current smoker | 7 (13) | 2 (20) | 5 (16) | 0.98 |
| Coinfection with other respiratory virus | 31 (22) | 7 (18) | 17 (22) | 0.63 |
| Respiratory syncytial virus | 16 (12) | 0 (0) | 11 (15) | 0.01 |
| Adenovirus | 14 (10) | 5 (14) | 7 (9) | 0.49 |
| Coinfection with | 11 (22) | 2 (22) | 6 (19) | 1.0 |
Note: IQR = interquartile range.
*Percentages are a proportion of non-missing data.
**Includes 17 patients with influenza A that could not be subtyped, and seven patients with influenza A (H3N2).
Only assessed in patients ≥2 years old.
Measured temperature ≥38°C within first 24 hours of admission.
Only evaluated in females ≥14 and <45 years old.
^Only evaluated in those ≥15 years old.
¥Only evaluated in those ≥10 years old.
The age distribution of the ILI patients with influenza A differed from that of hospitalized pneumonia patients (
| All influenza A | Influenza A SubtypeNo. (%) | ||||
| Characteristics | N = 246 | Seasonal H1N1N = 51 | H3N2 | pH1N1 | P value |
| Age, median (IQR) | 8 (4–15) | 7 (3–14) | 7 (3–22) | 9 (5–15) | 0.24 |
| Sex, Female | 116 (47) | 26 (51) | 12 (57) | 72 (44) | 0.45 |
| Previously sought care for this illness | 50 (23) | 11 (32) | 4 (31) | 34 (21) | 0.61 |
| Days from symptom onset to presentation, median (IQR) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–3) | 0.11 |
| Clinical signs and symptoms at presentation | |||||
| Fever | 246 (100) | 51 (100) | 21 (100) | 162 (100) | 1.0 |
| Cough | 233 (95) | 49 (96) | 18 (86) | 155 (96) | 0.13 |
| Headache∼ | 193 (87) | 44 (92) | 14 (88) | 125 (86) | 0.82 |
| Sore throat∼ | 191 (86) | 45 (92) | 15 (94) | 121 (84) | 0.22 |
| Myalgia∼ | 169 (77) | 39 (81) | 13 (81) | 109 (75) | 0.65 |
| Chills | 181 (74) | 39 (77) | 15 (71) | 117 (75) | 0.94 |
| Rhinorrhea | 168 (69) | 39 (78) | 13 (62) | 111 (69) | 0.31 |
| Sputum production | 121 (50) | 30 (60) | 13 (62) | 75 (47) | 0.14 |
| Pleuritic chest pain∼ | 97 (45) | 30 (64) | 10 (67) | 53 (37) | 0.001 |
| Difficulty breathing | 101 (41) | 30 (59) | 12 (57) | 55 (34) | 0.002 |
| Shortness of breath∼ | 53 (24) | 11 (23) | 4 (25) | 35 (25) | 0.97 |
| Diarrhea | 21 (9) | 7 (14) | 1 (5) | 11 (7) | 0.24 |
| Coinfection with respiratory virus | 29 (12) | 7 (14) | 3 (14) | 15 (9) | 0.57 |
| Respiratory syncytial virus | 18 (7) | 0 (0) | 2 (10) | 12 (7) | 0.12 |
| Adenovirus | 7 (3) | 5 (10) | 0 (0) | 2 (1) | 0.005 |
Note: IQR = interquartile range.
*The total number of patients with influenza A includes one mixed pH1N1 and H3N2 infection, and 11 influenza A samples that could not be subtyped.
**Unless indicated otherwise, percentages are a proportion of non-missing data.
Does not include one patient with a mixed pH1N1 and H3N2 infection.
Measured temperature >38°C.
Only assessed in patients ≥2 years old.
Children <5 years old admitted with pneumonia and found to have influenza A were more likely to have sought care previously (42/67, 63%) than persons ≥5 years old (29/61, 48%), but the difference was not statistically significant (
Among ILI patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza A, children <5 years old (12/56, 21%) were no more likely to have sought care elsewhere prior to presentation at the ambulatory clinic than persons ≥5 years old (33/139, 24%;
About 40% of the influenza A cases were females, and there was no significant difference in sex between pH1N1 and seasonal H1N1 (
Clinical presentation of hospitalized pneumonia patients with influenza A was similar between patients infected with seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1; cough, difficulty breathing and shortness of breath were the most common symptoms reported by patients with both subtypes (
As reported previously
Almost a quarter (22%) of hospitalized pneumonia patients with influenza A were admitted to the ICU (
| All influenza A | Influenza A subtypeNo. (%) | |||
| Outcome | N = 138 | Seasonal H1N1N = 38 | pH1N1N = 76 | P value |
| Admitted to the ICU | 30 (22) | 7 (18) | 21 (28) | 0.28 |
| Mechanical ventilation | 9 (7) | 1 (3) | 8 (11) | 0.14 |
| Death | 13 (9) | 2 (5) | 11 (15) | 0.14 |
| Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR) | 5 (3–7) | 5 (4–7) | 5 (2–9) | 0.41 |
| Symptom onset to death, days, median (IQR) | 9 (7–16) | 15.5 (15–16) | 9 (6–16) | 0.23 |
| Age in years at death, median (IQR) | 26 (0.9–54) | 56 (55–57) | 15 (0.9–50) | 0.07 |
Note: ICU = intensive care unit; IQR = interquartile range.
*Includes 17 patients with influenza A that could not be subtyped, and seven patients with influenza A (H3N2).
**Percentages are a proportion of non-missing data.
Includes two hospitalized pneumonia patients who died one day after being discharged from the hospital.
The CFP was three times higher for hospitalized pneumonia patients with pH1N1 (15%) compared to seasonal H1N1 (5%), but this difference was not statistically significant (
Coinfection with another respiratory virus was similar between hospitalized pneumonia patients with seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1 (
Among the 39 hospitalized pneumonia patients <5 years old with pH1N1, there was no difference in the proportion admitted to the ICU between those patients coinfected with RSV (3/10, 30%) than those not coinfected with RSV (9/29, 31%;
There was no difference in the proportion of children and adults ≥10 years old who were coinfected with
Less than a quarter (23%) of the ILI patients with influenza A sought care outside the home before presenting at the health center or health post, and this percentage did not differ significantly by influenza A subtype (
Clinical signs and symptoms of patients with ILI were similar across influenza A subtypes (
The proportion of ILI patients with influenza A who were coinfected with another respiratory virus was higher among ILI patients with seasonal H1N1 (14%) and H3N2 (14%) than pH1N1 (9%), but the difference was not statistically significant (
Although the 2009 influenza pandemic caused significant concern in Guatemala and helped to increase recognition of influenza as an important public health issue, the data we have presented here suggest that in Guatemala, the clinical presentation of pH1N1 was similar to that of the seasonal influenza viruses that were circulating before and during the pandemic.
Despite reports of significant differences in the age distributions of seasonal influenza A and pH1N1 in both temperate
Although not statistically significant, all indicators of severity (i.e., admission to an ICU, mechanical ventilation and CFP) were higher among hospitalized pneumonia patients with pH1N1 as compared with seasonal H1N1. Because our study combined pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, we analyzed whether changes in practices or procedures could have resulted in findings of greater severity for pH1N1 than seasonal influenza. The proportion of hospitalized pneumonia patients admitted to the ICU was similar before and after the pandemic began, and although use of antivirals was rare, treatment with antivirals only occurred during the pandemic period. There was no difference between hospitalized pneumonia or ILI patients in time to presentation at a health facility by influenza A subtype.
There have been three other concurrent comparisons of seasonal influenza and pH1N1 in hospitalized patients that reported on severe outcomes; none found any significant differences in the ICU admission rates or CFP by influenza subtype, but all occurred in well-resourced settings where antivirals would have been available for treatment
One possible explanation for the higher CFP from pH1N1 in Guatemala is the increase in RSV transmission during the pandemic period. Viral coinfection, especially with RSV, has been hypothesized to reduce the T helper cell 1 response, thereby increasing disease severity
Clinical symptoms of hospitalized pneumonia patients were similar between seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1, except for measured temperature ≥38°C in the first 24 hours after hospital admission, which was significantly less frequent among patients with pH1N1. We looked for differences in treatment seeking behaviors and treatments taken before admission that could explain this finding, but the use of any medication, and antipyretics in particular, did not differ between hospitalized pneumonia patients with seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1. A difference in fever has not been noted in any other concurrent comparison of patients with seasonal influenza A and pH1N1
Although there have been many reports of a higher proportion of pH1N1 ILI patients with gastrointestinal symptoms
A recent comparison of seasonal influenza and pH1N1 cases in Philadelphia found more lower respiratory tract symptoms (i.e., cough and pleuritic chest pain) among pH1N1 than seasonal influenza cases
This study has several important strengths. Case definitions, laboratory diagnostics and procedures for data collection did not change during the time period covered in this report; this eliminates the possibility that findings were related to changes in surveillance methodology as a result of the pandemic, which can be a problem when using historical controls. A broad case definition permitted inclusion of influenza cases that might otherwise go undetected; for example, requirement of fever in the case definition for severe acute respiratory disease could miss a significant proportion of serious illness associated with both seasonal H1N1 and pH1N1.
The main limitation of this study is the relatively small number of cases of influenza that could be analyzed, which limits the power to detect differences in characteristics and clinical presentation. Because the sample size was small, it is possible that we were not able to identify important differences between seasonal influenza A viruses and pH1N1 influenza that might appear in a larger data set, especially related to signs of severity which were consistently elevated with pH1N1 but were not statistically significant. This limitation has been noted for least one other similar study
In conclusion, the epidemiology of pH1N1 in Guatemala was not significantly different from that associated with the seasonal influenza subtypes circulating locally before and during the pandemic in terms of the age groups most affected and clinical signs and symptoms. In Guatemala, influenza is largely a disease of children, with the most severe disease in infants, and targeted use of influenza vaccine in children may be warranted. The 2009 influenza pandemic raised awareness of the burden of disease caused by influenza in the tropics; increased attention should be extended to monitoring and addressing the morbidity and mortality associated with seasonal influenza.
We would like to thank the Guatemala National Epidemiology Center, the Health Areas of Santa Rosa and Quetzaltenango, the National Hospital of Cuilapa and the Western Regional Hospital for their cooperation. We are grateful to Gerard Lopez, Fredy Muñoz and their team of programmers for the development of the Questionnaire Mobile program for data entry on PDAs. The authors would like to thank the following individuals for administrative and scientific support: Isabella Danel, Robert Pinner, Celia Cordón-Rosales, Stacy Kopka, Dean Erdman, Jonas Winchell, Barry Fields, Agnes Warner, Ryan Dare, Jay Wenger, and Nivaldo Linares. We are very thankful for the active participation of the residents of Santa Rosa and Quetzaltenango. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.