Serum samples from 26 suspected CA cases were evaluated for LF toxemia, seroconversion to anti-PA IgG and serum toxin neutralization activity (TNA) and compared with culture and direct observation diagnostic tests for anthrax. Acute stage samples were collected from 1 to 14 days after symptom onset and convalescent stage samples from 16 to 28 days. Antimicrobial use was reported in 11 individuals from 2 to 7 days prior to collection of the first available (acute) sample. In the remaining 15 case patients, antimicrobial treatment commenced with the acute sample collection (Table 1).

Of the 26 suspected CA cases in this study, there were 6 (pab4, pab16, pab23, pab25, pab27, and pab30) for which a sample was not available for analysis by culture/IHC/M’Fadyean (culture/observation) (Table 1). Of the 20 case patients for which a lesion sample was available, 6 (pab1, pab3, pab5, pab12, pab18, and pab21) were confirmed by culture/IHC/M’Fadyean (Figures 1 and 2). Serum from these 6 individuals was also reactive for LF toxemia, anti-PA IgG, and serum TNA. The LF concentrations for these 6 CA cases ranged from 0.041 to 1.26 ng/mL. There was not a consistent trend between the magnitude of toxemia and eschar reactivity by culture/IHC/M’Fadyean. One case patient (pab20) that was indeterminate by culture/IHC/M’Fadyean was nonreactive by any test except the anti-PA IgG ELISA. However, this individual was classified as indeterminate as there was not a 4-fold increase in anti-PA IgG between acute (<LLOQ) and convalescent (4.0 μg/mL) sera. There were 13 case patients (pab2, pab7, pab8, pab9, pab10, pab11, pab13, pab14, pab15, pab19, pab29, pab31,and pab32) for which there was a sample available but that were by negative for culture observation by either culture, IHC or M’Fadyean.

Twelve case patients (pab2, pab4, pab7, pab8, pab9, pab10, pab11, pab13, pab14, pab15, pab31, and pab32) were reactive by toxemia and serology only (Table 1). Three of these (pab14, pab31, and pab32) were reactive but did not meet the required 4-fold change between acute and convalescent paired sera for anti-PA and 1 (pab8) did not meet the ≥4-fold increase required for TNA reactivity. For pab14 and pab31, anti-PA IgG levels increased from <LLOQ to 10 μg/mL and from 4.0 μg/mL to 12.3 μg/mL between acute and convalescent sera, respectively. Thus, they did not meet the criterion for seroconversion. Pab32 had a high level of anti-PA IgG in the acute serum (679.5 μg/mL) and convalescent serum (487.2 μg/mL) and therefore also did not achieve a 4-fold change in anti-PA required for seroconversion. Serum TNA for these 3 cases increased from <LLOQ to an ED50 titer of 40 and 45 for pab14 and pab31, respectively, and from 58 to 487.2 for pab32. LF levels in pab14, pab31 and pab32 were 0.040, 0.035, and 0.086 ng/mL, respectively. Case pab8, although not reactive by TNA assay, had measureable levels of both LF (0.11 ng/mL) and anti-PA antibody (convalescent, 26.8 μg/mL), indicating that this also was a true infection. The combined data from all 3 serological tests indicate that these were true infections.

Four case patients (pab3, pab15, pab31, and pab32) had detectable levels of anti-PA IgG in their acute stage sera. Acute stage samples for pab3, pab15, and pab31 were obtained at days 8, 3, and 5 after reported onset of symptoms, respectively. The onset of an anti-PA antibody response in these 4 individuals was earlier than the day 12 onset reported previously for bioterrorism associated cutaneous anthrax [8]. The acute stage sample for pab32 was obtained at day 14 and had a high level of anti-PA IgG (679.5 μg/mL), which declined to 487.2 μg/mL in the convalescent serum (day 25). This demonstrates that the immune response to infection had passed its peak level and that exposure may have been considerably earlier than assessed from the development of the cutaneous lesion. Of note is that this was the only case for which an acute serum sample had a detectable TNA titer and the titer increased ≥4-fold as discussed above. Linear regression analysis indicated a positive correlation (r² = 0.41) between log10 transformed TNA ED50 titer and anti-PA IgG concentration for all values ≥ LLOQ (Figure 3). This correlation is lower than that reported previously for inhalation anthrax (r² = 0.83). The reason for this difference is unclear and may be a consequence of the different disease presentations. Of particular interest to note is that no convalescent stage sample contained detectable LF and all case patients that seroconverted to anti-PA had detectable acute stage toxemia.

There are few opportunities to compare laboratory diagnostic data for human anthrax. We compared the anti-PA responses for naturally acquired CA in this study with those previously reported for bioterrorism (BT) associated CA [8]. The BT and naturally acquired CA samples were evaluated using the same validated anti-PA ELISA, reference standards, and QC criteria. The long-term performance stability of this assay has also been described [17] and provides confidence in the comparison. Comparisons were made using first the Shapiro-Wilk statistic test for normality, followed by the t test for normally distributed data. Both the bioterrorism-acquired and the naturally acquired maximum anti-PA IgG values were normally distributed in log space. The maximum measured anti-PA IgG level was significantly lower in BT associated CA than in naturally acquired CA (25.0 μg/mL [n = 13] vs 52.6 μg/mL [n = 21] [P = .046, 2-sided unequal variance] (Figure 4).

More than 95% of all naturally occurring B. anthracis infections reported worldwide are cutaneous [7]. Cutaneous anthrax is associated with handling infected animals or contaminated items such as meat, wool, hides, leather, or hair products from infected animals [18]. Historically, case-fatality rates for this form of the disease are 20% without treatment and <1% with appropriate antimicrobial therapy [19]. The human serum samples in this study were all from suspect cutaneous anthrax cases associated with handling infected cattle and goats. Anthrax was confirmed by detection of B. anthracis in cutaneous lesions by culture, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and M’Fadyean staining (MFad). There were no fatalities (Chakraborty et al, submitted).

Standard diagnostic protocols for cutaneous anthrax include culture from vesicular fluid, swabs, or punch biopsy of the lesion. Culture from blood samples is recommended only if the patient has evidence of systemic anthrax and has not received antimicrobial agents (http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/anthrax/lab-testing/recommended_specimens.asp) [20]. The value of serological tests, including anti-LF antibody measurements, as retrospective diagnostic or epidemiologic tools in studies of cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and inhalation anthrax is well established [3, 8, 12, 19, 21, 22, 23]. However, the evaluation of toxemia in human cutaneous anthrax has not to our knowledge been previously reported. The mass spectrometry-based method used in this study for quantitative determination of LF toxemia is gaining increasing prominence as a high throughput, high sensitivity diagnostic tool [10, 24]. This method can provide confirmatory diagnosis up to 24 hours earlier than other methods in animal models and can detect and quantify LF for 12-days post-antimicrobial therapy and 7 days post-anthrax immune globulin intravenous (AIGIV) treatment in human clinical samples [13, 22]. The persistence of LF in serum after clearance of bacteremia by antimicrobial treatment is a key advantage of this method. Of particular interest from this study is that in all cutaneous anthrax cases confirmed by at least 1 other diagnostic test, LF toxemia was detectable up to day 14 after symptom onset (pab32) but was absent in all convalescent sera the earliest of which was obtained on day 16.

Measuring anti-PA antibody levels is valuable for confirming infection, because exposure to toxin requires spore germination and vegetative cell growth. This is demonstrated by the current data where all case patients that seroconverted also had detectable toxemia in their acute stage sera. As indicated for pab32, the magnitude of the antibody response and changes between acute and convalescent sera may be indicative of the onset of disease and need not always be concurrent with onset of discernable symptoms. In human cutaneous anthrax the peak anti-PA IgG response levels are considered to be significantly lower and take longer to develop than in inhalation anthrax [8]. In this study the maximum anti-PA antibody levels were significantly higher than those reported previously for bioterrorism associated cutaneous and inhalation anthrax. This may be a consequence of the different types of exposure to B. anthracis, the naturally acquired cases potentially having a greater degree of contact with more heavily contaminated materials.

The validated toxin neutralization assay (TNA) measures the ability of the antibodies present in serum to neutralize lethal toxin activity on a macrophage cell line [11]. Toxin neutralization activity (TNA) was observed only in sera from which anti-PA IgG was quantifiable by ELISA. In this study there was only a very low correlation (r² = 0.42) between serum anti-PA IgG concentration (μg/mL) and TNA ED50, which is in contrast to previous reports for bioterrorism associated inhalation anthrax [8]. The reason for these differences is not known, but it is tempting to speculate that it is related to the type of exposure and a lower level of antigen load that elicits production of lower affinity antibody that is less efficient at toxin neutralization. The single case patient (pab8) that was confirmed by at least 2 other tests but did not have detectable TNA is confirmation that 100% diagnostic sensitivity for an antibody-based diagnostic test for anthrax remains elusive. However, it must also be noted that in this study at least, the anti-PA ELISA produced no false positive or false negative results and only 1 indeterminate result.

In this study only 6 of 20 biopsy samples tested positive for the presence of B. anthracis by culture, M’Fadyean stain of vesicle/lesion smears, or IHC. This may be due in part to the use of antimicrobial therapy since 8 case patients with negative results had received antimicrobial therapy from 3 to 7 days prior to sample collection. In contrast, both acute LF and convalescent anti-PA were positive in 18 samples of which 9 had received antimicrobial agents from 2 to 7 days prior to first sample collection, showing little interference from antimicrobial use as observed previously [2, 22].

These results collectively indicate that while the infection may remain localized to the lesion during early cutaneous infection, in most cases toxins are secreted into the blood in sufficient quantity to be measured and subsequently induce effective toxin neutralizing antibody responses. This study reports the first documented evidence of measureable anthrax toxin LF in the blood during clinical cutaneous anthrax and illustrates a direct association of the presence of LF and the subsequent development of anti-PA and TNA. These results confirm the value of serological measurements for confirmation of anthrax, when B. anthracis cannot be cultured or visualized by staining methods.