87047731656Am J Prev MedAm J Prev MedAmerican journal of preventive medicine0749-37971873-260726526162480335210.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.041NIHMS764678ArticleTobacco Product Use Among Sexual Minority AdultsFindings From the 2012–2013 National Adult Tobacco SurveyJohnsonSarah E.PhD1Holder-HayesEnverMPH1TessmanGreta K.MA1KingBrian A.PhD, MPH2AlexanderTesfaPhD3ZhaoXiaoquanPhD34Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MarylandOffice on Smoking and Health, CDC, Atlanta, GeorgiaOffice of Health Communication and Education, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MarylandDepartment of Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VirginiaAddress correspondence to: Sarah E. Johnson, PhD, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products, Office of Science, Building 75, Room 4550, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring MD 20993-0002. sarah.johnson@fda.hhs.gov.113201631102015420160142016504e91e100Introduction
A growing body of evidence reveals higher rates of tobacco use among sexual minority populations relative to non-minority (“straight”) populations. This study seeks to more fully characterize this disparity by examining tobacco use by distinct sexual identities and gender to better understand patterns of: (1) cigarette smoking and smoking history; and (2) use of other tobacco products including cigars, pipes, hookah, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco.
Methods
Data from the 2012–2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey, a random-digit dialed landline and cellular telephone survey of U.S. adults aged ≥18 years, were analyzed in 2014. A sexual minority category was created by combining gay, lesbian, and bisexual responses, along with those who selected an option for other non-heterosexual identities.
Results
Smoking prevalence was higher among sexual minority adults (27.4%) than straight adults (17.3%). Cigarette smoking was particularly high among bisexual women (36.0%). Sexual minority women started smoking and transitioned to daily smoking earlier than their straight peers. Use of other tobacco products was higher among sexual minority women: prevalence of e-cigarette (12.4%), hookah (10.3%), and cigar use (7.2%) was more than triple that of their straight female peers (3.4%, 2.5%, and 1.3%, respectively). Likewise, prevalence of sexual minority men’s e-cigarette (7.9%) and hookah (12.8%) use exceeded that of straight men (4.7% and 4.5%, respectively).
Conclusions
Tobacco use is significantly higher among sexual minority than straight adults, particularly among sexual minority women. These findings underscore the importance of tobacco control efforts designed to reach sexual minorities and highlight the heterogeneity of tobacco use within this population.
Introduction
Evidence suggests that sexual minority populations, including lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals, and gender minority (e.g., transgender) individuals (collectively, LGBT), experience disproportionate negative health outcomes and exhibit higher rates of health risk behaviors relative to non-minority (non-gender variant heterosexual) individuals.1,2 Comprehensive data collection on these groups in national surveys has been limited and challenged by a lack of consensus about the most appropriate measures to identify them.1 The limited availability of comprehensive, systematic data collection has hindered full characterization of such health disparities. Still, a growing body of evidence finds an especially troubling pattern of elevated tobacco use prevalence among sexual minority individuals relative to straight individuals.2–7
Evidence from both nationally representative and smaller-scale surveys shows that sexual minority individuals use tobacco at higher rates than straight individuals.2–12 Most recently, data from the 2012–2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS) found that 27.7% of LGB adults reported current cigarette use compared with 17.3% of straight adults.5 Sexual minority smokers are also more likely than their straight peers to smoke menthol cigarettes,12 and other data suggest this pattern extends beyond cigarettes, showing higher prevalence of cigar, e-cigarette, and hookah use among sexual minorities.5,9
Tobacco use takes an immense toll on physical health and remains the primary cause of preventable disease and death in the U.S., making this a critical public health issue. Cigarette smoking alone results in >480,000 premature deaths and $289 billion in direct healthcare expenditures and productivity losses from premature death each year.7 With an estimated 2.3 million LGBT people currently using tobacco in the U.S., tobacco use is considered one of the biggest threats to the health of this community.13
Explanations for the health disparities evident in this population rely heavily on social factors, such as stigma and discrimination.14–18 Indeed, a meta-analysis on the etiology of the tobacco disparity highlighted the role of stressors, such as internalized homophobia.3 These risk factors may be exacerbated by targeted marketing efforts,19–23 exemplified by Project Subculture Urban Marketing,24 implemented in the mid-1990s by R.J. Reynolds to target LGB communities and homeless people in San Francisco.25
The LGBT population, though often talked about as a collective, comprises an amalgam of distinct groups.1 Until recently, the extent to which tobacco use patterns might vary among groups within this population has remained largely unexamined: Few studies have parsed the LGB category to assess behavior by distinct sexual identities.9,26 Furthermore, only recently have data been reported by both sexual identity and gender.11,27,28 Whereas some data suggest female sexual minorities might be at greater risk of smoking than their male counterparts,28 other data show similar smoking prevalence for male and female sexual minorities.11 By contrast, among the general population, the prevalence of tobacco use is consistently greater among men compared with women.6
Given the mixed findings from existing data, further research is needed to identify whether and how patterns of use differ among these distinct groups. To date, no study has examined the use of tobacco products other than cigarettes by both sexual identity and gender. As the tobacco product marketplace becomes increasingly diverse—with the advent and rise of novel products, including e-cigarettes29—it is imperative to examine tobacco use across the full spectrum of products.
To address these gaps, the current study uses data from the 2012–2013 NATS to examine prevalence of tobacco use by sexual identity, and to consider sexual identity in the context of gender and other characteristics. In addition to current cigarette smoking, smoking history and use of other tobacco products (cigars, pipes, hookah, e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco) were examined. Further characterization of tobacco use among sexual minority adults will inform a more accurate description of this disparity, which in turn could enable future tobacco prevention and cessation efforts to target the groups most at risk.
Methods
The 2012–2013 NATS is a stratified, random-digit dialed telephone survey of non-institutionalized adults aged ≥18 years. The sample comprised 75% landline and 25% cell phone–only house-holds. A total of 60,192 interviews, including 57,994 full interviews and 2,198 partial interviews, were completed from October 2012 to July 2013, yielding an overall response rate of 44.9%. This study was based on analysis of de-identified, secondary data and was exempt from IRB review. A total of 2,026 respondents identified as lesbian/gay, bisexual, or “something else.”
Measures
The 2012–2013 cycle of NATS included a new measure of sexual identity (replacing the former measure of sexual orientation).30 Sexual identity is one of three components, along with attraction and behavior, that comprise the construct sexual orientation, and reflects an individual’s personal and social identity based on their attraction and behavior toward men, women, or both sexes.1 The measure was designed to minimize misclassification and error to yield more accurate identification.31,32 To assess sexual identity, participants were asked: Do you identify yourself as… and provided with the following response options:
gay (male participants)/lesbian or gay (female participants);
straight, that is, not gay;
bisexual; or
something else.
Individuals who selected something else were further probed (By something else, do you mean that…) and read seven response options. Those who indicated they still meant something else (one of the response options) or responded don’t know/not sure to the primary question were further probed and respondents provided a response in their own words.31 In this analysis, sexual minority individuals are defined as those who have a sexual identity that is not exclusively heterosexual.1 Thus, a sexual minority category was created by combining gay, lesbian or gay, and bisexual responses along with those who selected the first option for the something else follow-up question, which denoted a non-heterosexual identity (You are not straight, but identify with another label such as queer, trisexual, omnisexual, or pansexual). Because this measure was designed to ascertain sexual identity, and not gender identity, it does not identify transgender individuals. Consequently, the present analysis focuses on sexual minority individuals only.
Current cigarette smoking was determined using a series of two questions: Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life? and Do you now smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all? Respondents who reported smoking ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetime and reported now smoking every day or some days were recoded as current smokers. Age of first cigarette, age of daily smoking, and cigarettes per day were assessed using open-response questions. Daily smoking was defined as those who reported smoking every day in response to the current use question or reported smoking every day for at least 6 months. Quit attempts were defined based on an affirmative response to the item: During the past 12 months, have you stopped smoking for 24 hours or more because you were trying to quit? Current menthol use was based on the question: Currently, when you smoke cigarettes, how often do you smoke menthol cigarettes…? Response options ranged from 1 (all of the time) to 5 (never). Those who responded all of the time or most of the time were categorized as menthol users; all others were coded as non-menthol users.
In addition to cigarettes, use of other tobacco products, including cigars, regular pipes, hookah, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco, was assessed. For each product, participants were asked about ever use and current use. Those who met the threshold for lifetime use, which varied by product type (cigars and pipes, at least 50 times; hookah, at least 1 time; e-cigarettes, at least 1 time; and smokeless tobacco, at least 20 times for chew, snuff, or dip and at least 1 time for snus and dissolvables) were asked about frequency of current use.33 Current use of each product type was assessed with the following item (one item per product): Do you now smoke [cigars, “cigars, cigarillos, or little filtered cigars”]; [e-cigarettes, “electronic cigarettes”]; [hookah, “tobacco in a hookah”]; [regular pipe, “a regular pipe filled with tobacco”]; or [smokeless tobacco, “use chewing tobacco, snuff, dip, snus, and dissolvables”] every day, some days, rarely or not at all? Because use tends to be occasional for certain products, responses of every day, some days, and rarely were coded as current use of the product.5
Statistical Analysis
SAS-callable SUDAAN, version 11.0.1 was used for statistical analyses performed in 2014. Data were weighted to produce nationally representative estimates.34 Proportion of sample by sexual identity and corresponding 95% CIs for Table 1 were calculated overall and by demographic characteristics, including gender (male and female), age group (18–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–64, and ≥65 years), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic other), annual household income (<$20,000, $20,000–$49,999, $50,000–$99,999, ≥$100,000, and unspecified), education (high school diploma/equivalent or less, some college, and bachelor’s degree or higher) and U.S. Census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Prevalence estimates of current smoking stratified by gender and sexual identity were calculated by these same demographic characteristics; some categories were further collapsed owing to small sample sizes. Finally, means and corresponding 95% CIs stratified by gender and sexual identity were calculated for age of first cigarette, age of daily smoking, and cigarettes smoked per day; prevalence estimates and 95% CIs were calculated for frequency of cigarette use, quit attempt in the past 12 months, and current use of menthol cigarettes; and t-tests were used to assess whether differences among groups were statistically significant (p<0.05). Prevalence estimates with a relative SE ≥30%, or denominator <50, were omitted.
Results
Of the 60,192 adult respondents, 95.2% provided responses to the sexual identity question. Of these, 2.4% were refusals, 0.4% reported don’t know/not sure, and 2.7% indicated they did not understand the question; these responses were classified as missing and excluded from the remainder of the analyses. Table 1 presents the sample characteristics by sexual identity and demographic characteristics. Overall, 2.0% of the sample identified as lesbian/gay, 1.7% identified as bisexual, 95.8% identified as straight, and 0.6% reported something else.
Overall, current cigarette smoking was higher among sexual minorities (27.4%) than straight individuals (17.3%) (p<0.001). Among men, the prevalence of cigarette smoking was 27.0% for those who identified as gay and 25.9% for those who identified as bisexual, compared with 21.3% for those who identified as straight (Table 2).
Among women, prevalence of current cigarette smoking was 22.2% for those who identified as lesbian or gay, 36.0% for those who identified as bisexual, and 14.3% for women who identified as straight. Bisexual women reported higher prevalence of smoking than both their lesbian/gay and straight female counterparts. Small sample sizes and suppressed estimates limit comparison of patterns across most demographic characteristics for men and women.
Among men, sexual minority and straight men reported similar behaviors in terms of age of first cigarette, age of transitioning to daily use, prevalence of daily use, number of cigarettes per day, and prevalence of menthol cigarette use (Table 3). Although not statistically significant, fewer sexual minority male smokers reported a past-year quit attempt (45.2%) than did straight men (54.8%).
Among women, sexual minority female smokers reported smoking their first cigarette at an earlier age (mean=14.8 years) than straight female smokers (mean=16.0 years). Likewise, sexual minority women reported transitioning to daily smoking 1 year earlier than straight women (17.6 versus 18.6 years). The two groups reported similar prevalence of daily use and pastyear quit attempts. However, more sexual minority female smokers reported menthol use (45.1%) compared with their straight female counterparts (34.4%).
Among men, prevalence of cigar and regular pipe use were similar between sexual minority and straight individuals (Table 4). However, prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher among sexual minority men (7.9%) compared with straight men (4.7%). Likewise, sexual minority men were more likely to report hookah use (12.8%) than straight men (4.5%). By contrast, prevalence of smokeless tobacco use was higher among straight men (7.4%) than sexual minority men (3.8%).
Few straight women reported use of cigars (1.3%), e-cigarettes (3.4%), and hookah (2.5%). However, among sexual minority women, prevalence was more than three times higher for e-cigarettes (12.4%), and four and five times higher for hookah (10.3%) and cigar use (7.2%), respectively.
Discussion
The current findings confirm tobacco use disparities among sexual minority adults, showing that tobacco use prevalence is significantly higher among members of these groups compared with straight adults. In addition, by examining distinct identities within the sexual minority category, some interesting patterns emerged that have heretofore been masked by the use of broader categories. These findings underscore the importance of tobacco control efforts that successfully reach sexual minorities and highlight the heterogeneity within this population.
In terms of cigarette smoking, bisexual women exhibited the highest smoking prevalence compared with most other groups—more than 2.5 times higher than their straight female counterparts. Moreover, results revealed that sexual minority women smoked earlier, progressed to daily smoking sooner, and were more likely to smoke menthol cigarettes, compared with their straight peers. Notably, nearly half (45%) of sexual minority women smokers reported they currently smoked menthol cigarettes. These patterns are consistent with previous research,28 including an analysis of data from the 2009–2010 NATS, which also reported higher nicotine dependence among bisexual women compared with straight women.27 By contrast, sexual minority men were far more similar to their straight male peers on smoking behavior outcomes. Finally, use of other tobacco products—including, hookah, and e-cigarettes—echoed the patterns of smoking: Sexual minority adults used these products at higher rates than their straight counterparts. Indeed, for sexual minority women, their use of cigars, hookah, and e-cigarettes was more than triple the rate among straight women.
In sum, these findings reveal that the tobacco use disparity among sexual minorities is particularly pronounced among the women of this group. This is consistent with evidence showing sexual minority women also report high rates of behavioral correlates of tobacco use including alcohol and other drug use.35–37 Although more information is needed to fully understand these disparities, theory and evidence highlight the role of social and structural factors.3,14,15 Despite a common identification with the larger category of “LGBT,” the social context experienced by subgroups within this population can vary widely.1 Indeed, evidence suggests that bisexual women—who comprise the majority of this group of women—may face unique challenges related to their identity38,39 and may be particularly vulnerable to negative outcomes.2,40–43 Similarly, it is also important to consider sexual identity in the context of racial/ethnic identity to account for the consequences of bearing multiple stigmatized identities.17,44,45 The challenge for future research is to identify the risk and protective factors18,46,47 that can most effectively be addressed through intervention.
Taken together, the evidence of elevated prevalence of tobacco use among sexual minority adults highlights the importance of targeted public health interventions, such as high-impact public education campaigns, like CDC’s existing Tips campaign48 and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s public education efforts. Although there have been few campaigns designed specifically to reach sexual minorities to date,49 such efforts have been proven to increase intention to quit, increase quit attempts, and reduce risk of initiation among a number of subpopulations.50 These findings can help prioritize the focus of future efforts by identifying the groups most at risk (e.g., sexual minority women), and the specific tobacco use behaviors to address.
Limitations
Although these data enhance our understanding of tobacco use among sexual minorities, this study is subject to several limitations. First, the data are not inclusive of the entire LGBT population. The employed measure only assessed sexual identity and was not designed to identify transgender individuals.51 To date, the inclusion of gender identity measures on national surveys has been very limited.52 This gap is of concern because evidence suggests this segment of the LGBT community may face the most significant barriers and social stigma.53 However, recent progress includes:
emerging recommendations for measurement approaches for identifying transgender individuals54; and
inclusion of gender identity on forthcoming waves of data collection for U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study.55
Second, the prevalence of sexual minorities in this sample, though comparable to previous NATS implementations,8 and higher than National Health Interview Survey 2013, was still lower than might be expected based on more comprehensive demographic surveys.56 The National Health Interview Survey 2013 implementation of this measure yielded lower than expected rates of identification,30 causing concern in the public health and advocacy arenas regarding this measure.57,58 Although it is difficult to fully account for such variability in estimates, it is possible that measurement characteristics and features of survey administration may be contributing factors.
Third, small sample sizes limited the ability to examine patterns of use by certain demographic characteristics, including race/ethnicity. Research suggests that tobacco use might vary by race/ethnicity within the LGBT community, and thus is something that should be examined further.59,60 Moreover, owing to the small sample size, many estimates had wide CIs, so results should be interpreted with appropriate caution. Together, these limitations emphasize the need for continued efforts to identify LGBT populations in large-scale data collection efforts, and to increase efforts to power subgroup comparisons. At the same time, the limitations inherent to studying sexual minority populations in general population surveys reinforce the value of complementing these efforts with studies focused on the target population.
Conclusions
The current findings confirm existing evidence regarding tobacco use disparities among sexual minority adults and extend our understanding of this disparity in several important ways. Examination of distinct groups revealed that this disparity is particularly evident among sexual minority women in terms of both cigarette smoking and use of other tobacco products. These findings support the call to action to continue to monitor and address these disparities, highlight the need to appreciate the heterogeneity within the sexual minority population, and offer a reminder of the importance of considering tobacco products beyond conventional cigarettes. Finally, these findings reaffirm the importance of comprehensive data collection that can accurately identify and characterize this population.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or CDC. The authors acknowledge Bridget Ambrose, PhD, Hannah Day, PhD, and Deborah Neveleff, MBA, from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Tobacco Products and S. Sean Hu, MD and Kimberly Nguyen, MS from CDC, Office on Smoking and Health.
No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
ReferencesIOMThe Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding2011The National Academies PressWashington, DCBlosnichJRFarmerGWLeeJGLSilenzioVMBBowenDJHealth inequalities among sexual minority adults: evidence from ten U.S. States, 2010Am J Prev Med2014464337349http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.11.01024650836BlosnichJLeeJGHornKA systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minoritiesTob Control20132226673http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-05018122170335LeeJGGriffinGKMelvinCLTobacco use among sexual minorities in the USA, 1987 to May 2007: a systematic reviewTob Control2009184275282http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.02824119208668AgakuITKingBAHustenCGTobacco product use among adults—United States, 2012-2013MMWR2014632554254724964880JamalAAgakuITO’ConnorECurrent cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005-2013MMWR201463471108111225426653Surgeon General’s Report: The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progressCDC websitewww.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/50th-anniversary/. Accessed December 5, 2014KingBADubeSRTynan MACurrent tobacco use among adults in the United States: findings from the National Adult Tobacco SurveyAm J Public Health. 201210211e93e100http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301002RathJMVillantiACRubensteinRAVallone DMTobacco use by sexual identity among young adults in the United StatesNicotine Tob Res. 2013151118221831http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntt062RyanHWortleyPMEastonAPedersonLGreenwood GSmoking among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals: a review of the literatureAm J Prev Med. 2001212142149http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00331-2WardBWDahlhamerJMGalinskyAMJoestleSSSexual orientation and health among U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2013Natl Health Stat Report201477www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr077.pdfFallinAGoodinAJKingBAMenthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adultsAm J Prev Med2015 4819397http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.04425245795Saving 1 Million Lives for Pride: Surgeon General releases LGBT smoking videoLGBT HealthLink websitehttp://blog.lgbthealthlink.org/2014/06/27/saving-1-million-lives-for-pride-surgeon-general-releases-lgbt-smoking-video/. Accessed August 22, 2014HatzenbuehlerMLPhelanJCLinkBGStigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalitiesAm J Public Health20131035813821http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.30106923488505HatzenbuehlerMLHow does sexual minority stigma “get under the skin”? A psychological mediation frameworkPsychol Bull20091355707730http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a001644119702379MeyerIHMinority stress and mental health in gay menJ Health Soc Behav19953613856http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/21372867738327MeyerIHPrejudice as stress: conceptual and measurement problemsAm J Public Health2003932262265http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.2.26212554580RosarioMSchrimshawEWHunterJCigarette smoking as a coping strategy: negative implications for the subsequent psychological distress among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youthsJ Pediatr Psychol2011367731742http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp14120123704DilleyJASpignerCBoysunMJDentCWPizacaniBADoes tobacco industry marketing excessively impact lesbian, gay and bisexual communities?Tob Control2008176385390http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.02421618723561OffenNSmithEAMaloneREFrom adversary to target market: the ACT-UP boycott of Philip MorrisTob Control2003122203207http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.2.20312773732SmithEAMaloneREThe outing of Philip Morris: advertising tobacco to gay menAm J Public Health2003936988993http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.6.98812773366SmithEAThomsonKOffenNMaloneRE“If you know you exist, it’s just marketing poison”: meanings of tobacco industry targeting in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communityAm J Public Health20089869961003http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.11817418445800WashingtonHABurning love: big tobacco takes aim at LGBT youthsAm J Public Health200292710861095http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.7.108612084686Project SCUMWinston-Salem, NC: RJ Reynolds, 1995University of California, San Francisco Industrial Documents Digital Library websitehttps://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/id=sfck0098. Accessed October 31, 2014StevensPCarlsonLMHinmanJMAn analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: strategies for mainstream tobacco control and preventionHealth Promot Pract200453 suppl129S134Shttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152483990426461715231106MarshalMPFriedmanMSStallRNThompsonALIndividual trajectories of substance use in lesbian, gay and bisexual youth and heterosexual youthAddiction20091046974981http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02531.x19344440FallinAGoodinALeeYOBennettKSmoking characteristics among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adultsPrev Med201574123130http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.02625485860CorlissHLWadlerBMJunH-JSexual-orientation disparities in cigarette smoking in a longitudinal cohort study of adolescentsNicotine Tob Res2013151213222http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts11422581940PepperJKBrewerNTElectronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic reviewTob Control2014235375384http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-05112224259045DahlhamerJMGalinskyAMJoestlSSWardBWSexual orientation in the 2013 National Health Interview Survey: a quality assessmentVital Health Stat 2201416913225510624MillerKRyanJMDesign, Development and Testing of the NHIS Sexual Identity Question2011National Center for Health Statistics Questionnaire Design Research LaboratoryAtlanta, GACainVSImproving measurement of sexual orientation in US Health SurveysEuropean Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, 2012www.q2012.gr/articlefiles/sessions/29.1_%20Cain_Sexual%20Orientation%20CAIN.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2014National Health Interview Survey 2000Cancer Module2001ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Survey_Questionnaires/NHIS/2000/qcancerx.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2015CDC2012-2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey weighting specificationswww.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/surveys/nats/pdfs/2012_13_ weighting_methodology.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2015TrockiKFDrabbleLAMidanikLTTobacco, marijuana use and sensation-seeking: comparisons across gay, lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual groupsPsychol Addict Behav2009234620631http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a001733420025368MatthewsAKRileyRBEverettBHughesTLArandaFJohnsonTA longitudinal study of the correlates of persistent smoking among sexual minority womenNicotine Tob Res201416911991206http://dx. doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu05124727370KingMSemlyenJTaiSSA systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual peopleBMC Psychiatry2008870http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-7018706118BalsamKFMohrJJAdaptation to sexual orientation stigma: a comparison of bisexual and lesbian/gay adultsJ Counsel Psych2007543306319http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.306BostwickWAssessing bisexual stigma and mental health status: a brief reportJ Bisex2012122214222http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2012.67486024683314PompiliMLesterDForteABisexuality and suicide: a systematic review of the current literatureJ Sex Med20141119031913http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsm.1258124839908Fredriksen-GoldsenKIKimHJBarkanSEBalsamKFMincerLSDisparities in health-related quality of life: a comparison of lesbians and bisexual womenAm J Public Health20101001119031913http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.177329PrzedworskiJMMcAlpineDDKaraca-MandicPVanKimNAHealth and health risks among sexual minority women: an examination of 3 subgroupsAm J Public Health2014104610451047http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.30173324825204ConronKJMimiagaMJLandersSJA population-based study of sexual orientation identity and gender differences in adult healthAm J Public Health20101001019531960http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.17416920516373Cole ERIntersectionality and research in psychologyAm Psychol2009643170180http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a001456419348518KendzorDEBusinelleMSReitzelLREveryday discrimination is associated with nicotine dependence among African American, Latino, and white smokersNicotine Tob Res2014166633640http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntt19824302634NewcombMEHeinzAJBirkettMMustanskiBA longitudinal examination of risk and protective factors for cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youthJ Adolesc Health2014545558564http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.20824388111SeilKSDesaiMMSmithMVSexual orientation, adult connectedness, substance use, and mental health outcomes among adolescents: findings from the 2009 New York City Youth Risk Behavior SurveyAm J Public Health20141041019501956http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.30205025121812Tips from former smokers: lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)CDC websitewww.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/groups/lgbt.html. Accessed October 31, 2014MatthewsAKBalsamKHottonAKuhnsLLiC-CBowenDJAwareness of media-based antitobacco messages among a community sample of LGBT individualsHealth Promot Pract2014156857866http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152483991453334324801020National Cancer InstituteThe Role of the Media in Promoting and Reducing Tobacco UseTobacco Control Monograph No. 192008U.S. DHHS, Public Health Service, NIH, National Cancer InstituteBethesda, MDNIH Publication No. 07-6242The GenIUSS GroupHermanJLBest Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based SurveysLos Angeles, CA2014The Williams InstituteChalabiMWhy we don’t know the size of the transgender populationFiveThirtyEightLife websitehttp://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-we-dont-know-the-size-of-the-transgender-population/. Accessed August 6, 2014GrantJMMottetLATanisJInjustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey2011National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task ForceWashington, DCIOMCollecting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data in Electronic Health Records: Workshop Summary2013The National Academies PressWashington, DCU.S. DHHS. Advancing LGBT Health & Well-Being: 2014 ReportHHS LGBT Issues Coordinating Committeewww.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/dhhs-lgbt2014annualreport.pdf. Accessed January 12, 2015GatesGJNewportFSpecial report: 3.4% of U.S. adults identify as LGBTGallup websitewww.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx. Accessed October 31, 2014HoffmanJHow many Americans are lesbian, gay, or bisexual?The New York Times2172014http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/07/21/how-many-americans-are-lesbian-gay-or-bisexual/?emc=eta1&_r=1. Accessed July 25, 2014SomashekharSGay-rights groups dispute federal survey’s estimate of populationThe Washington Post182014www.washington post.com/national/gay-rights-groups-dispute-federal-surveys-estimate-of-population/2014/07/31/6e614f62-1731-11e4-9349-84d4a85be981_ story.html. Accessed August 8, 2014BlosnichJRJarrettTHornKRacial and ethnic differences in current use of cigarettes, cigars, and hookahs among lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adultsNicotine Tob Res2011136487491http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq26121330283HughesTLJohnsonTPMatthewsAKSexual orientation and smoking: results from a multisite women’s health studySubst Use Misuse2008438-912181239http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1082608080191417018649240
Sample Characteristics by Sexual Identity—National Adult Tobacco Survey, U.S., 2012–2013
Characteristics
% (95% CI)
Lesbian/gay
Bisexual
Heterosexual/straight
Something else
Overall
2.0 (1.8, 2.2)
1.7 (1.5, 1.8)
95.8 (95.5, 96.0)
0.6 (0.5, 0.7)
Sex
Male
2.7 (2.4, 3.0)
1.1 (1.0, 1.3)
95.6 (95.2, 95.9)
0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Female
1.3 (1.1, 1.5)
2.2 (1.9, 2.4)
96.0 (95.6, 96.3)
0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
Age group (years)
18–29
2.4 (2.0, 2.9)
3.4 (2.8, 4.0)
92.9 (90.5, 92.3)
1.3 (1.0, 1.8)
30–39
2.2 (1.8, 2.8)
2.0 (1.6, 2.5)
95.4 (94.6, 96.0)
0.3 (0.2, 0.6)
40–49
2.3 (1.9, 2.8)
1.3 (1.0, 1.6)
96.1 (95.5, 96.6)
0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
50–64
2.0 (1.7, 2.2)
1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
96.6 (96.3, 96.9)
0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
65+
0.9 (0.8, 1.1)
0.7 (0.6, 0.9)
98.0 (97.8, 98.3)
0.3 (0.2, 0.4)
Race/ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
2.0 (1.8, 2.2)
1.5 (1.3, 1.7)
96.0 (95.7, 96.3)
0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
Black, non-Hispanic
1.8 (1.3, 2.5)
1.3 (0.9, 1.9)
96.3 (95.4, 97.0)
0.6 (0.3, 1.0)
Asian, non-Hispanic
2.9 (1.7,5.0)
–
b
94.2 (91.8, 95.9)
–
b
Hispanic
1.6 (1.2, 2.1)
2.1 (1.4, 2.5)
95.8 (94.9, 96.5)
–
b
Other, non-Hispanic
2.2 (1.6, 3.0)
3.1 (2.4, 4.1)
93.8 (92.5, 94.8)
0.9 (0.6, 1.4)
Annual household income ($)
<20,000
2.2 (1.6, 2.9)
2.4 (1.8, 3.1)
94.5 (93.5, 95.4)
0.9 (0.6, 1.3)
20,000–49,999
1.7 (1.5, 2.1)
1.9 (1.6, 2.2)
95.9 (95.4, 96.3)
0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
50,000–99,999
2.0 (1.7, 2.4)
1.5 (1.2, 1.8)
96.2 (95.7, 96.6)
0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
≥100,000
2.7 (2.3, 3.2)
1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
95.6 (95.1, 96.1)
0.5 (0.3, 0.8)
Unspecified
1.2 (0.9, 1.6)
1.8 (1.3, 2.4)
96.0 (95.2, 96.7)
1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Education
High school diploma/equivalent or less
1.4 (1.1, 1.7)
1.6 (1.3, 1.9)
96.5 (96.0, 96.9)
0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Some college
2.0 (1.7, 2.4)
2.0 (1.7, 2.4)
95.3 (94.8, 95.8)
0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Bachelor’s degree or higher
2.8 (2.5, 3.1)
1.3 (1.2, 1.5)
95.5 (95.1, 95.8)
0.5 (0.3, 0.6)
U.S. Census regiona
Northeast
2.1 (1.8, 2.6)
1.7 (1.4, 2.2)
95.3 (94.6, 95.9)
0.8 (0.6, 1.2)
Midwest
1.5 (1.3, 1.9)
1.7 (1.4, 2.1)
96.1 (95.6, 96.6)
0.6 (0.4, 0.9)
South
1.9 (1.7, 2.3)
1.4 (1.1, 1.6)
96.3 (95.8, 96.6)
0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
West
2.3 (2.0, 2.7)
2.1 (1.7, 2.5)
95.1 (94.6, 95.6)
0.5 (0.4, 0.7)
Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Estimate was omitted; the relative SE was >30% or denominator <50.
Prevalence of Current Cigarette Smokinga Stratified by Gender, Sexual Identity, and Demographic Characteristics—National Adult Tobacco Survey, U.S., 2012–2013
Characteristics
Prevalence of current cigarette smoking, % (95% CI)
Male
Female
Gay
Bisexual
Heterosexual/ straight
Lesbian/gay
Bisexual
Heterosexual/ straight
Overall
26.1 (21.3, 31.5)*
20.7 (14.9, 28.0)
20.5 (19.7, 21.3)
22.2 (16.8, 28.8)*
36.0 (30.2, 42.3)**
14.3 (13.7, 14.9)
Age group (years)
18–29
30.9 (20.9, 43.0)
–
b
23.5 (21.6, 25.5)
25.7 (14.0, 42.2)
39.3 (30.2, 49.2)**
14.8 (13.2, 16.7)
30–44
26.3 (17.2, 38.2)
36.8 (22.1, 54.4)
24.9 (23.6, 26.8)
24.0 (13.9, 38.1)
44.5 (33.4, 56.1)**
16.6 (15.2, 18.1)
45–64
25.7 (19.0, 33.8)
20.9 (12.5, 32.9)
20.5 (19.3, 21.7)
20.7 (13.5, 30.4)
24.7 (15.9, 36.2)
16.8 (15.9, 17.8)
65+
–
b
–
b
9.4 (8.5, 10.4)
–
b
–
b
6.5 (5.9, 7.2)
Race/ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic
24.4 (19.0, 30.8)
20.4 (13.0, 30.5)
19.2 (18.4, 20.2)
25.6 (18.7, 33.9)*
37.2 (30.1, 45.0)**
14.6 (13.9, 15.4)
Black, non-Hispanic
–
b
–
b
25.1 (22.4, 28.2)
–
b
–
b
14.9 (13.0, 17.2)
Hispanic
38.1 (23.4, 55.4)*
–
b
20.0 (17.6, 22.5)
–
b
–
b
9.3 (7.8, 11.0)
Other, non-Hispanic
–
b
–
b
25.0 (22.4, 27.8)
–
b
52.7 (36.9, 68.0)**
18.1 (15.9, 20.5)
Annual household income ($)
<20,000
38.2 (23.2, 55.7)
–
b
32.8 (29.7, 36.0)
–
b
43.0 (28.8, 58.3)**
23.4 (21.3, 25.6)
20,000–49,999
30.8 (21.0, 42.7)
25.6 (15.7, 38.9)
27.1 (25.4, 28.8)
20.4 (12.5, 31.6)
33.9 (24.5, 44.7)**
19.0 (17.7, 20.4)
50,000–99,999
24.7 (16.8, 34.9)
–
b
18.9 (17.5, 20.4)
22.5 (12.3, 37.6)
37.8 (26.3, 50.8)**
12.0 (11.0, 13.1)
≥100,000
18.3 (11.0, 29.0)
–
b
10.3 (9.2, 11.6)
–
b
–
b
6.9 (6.0, 8.1)
Unspecified
–
b
–
b
18.6 (16.6, 20.9)
–
b
37.0 (23.1, 53.5)**
10.6 (9.3, 12.1)
Education
High school diploma/equivalent or less
36.6 (25.8, 48.9)
–
b
27.8 (26.4, 29.4)
30.2 (17.8, 46.4)
39.7 (29.8, 50.4)**
19.1 (17.9, 20.4)
Some college
31.8 (23.1, 42.0)*
23.1 (13.5, 36.7)
21.7 (20.4, 23.1)
27.7 (17.8, 40.5)*
41.6 (32.1, 51.7)**
16.0 (15.0, 17.0)
Bachelor’s degree or higher
13.3 (9.2, 18.9)*
16.3 (9.6, 26.2)**
7.6 (7.0, 8.4)
12.8 (8.0, 19.8)*
12.5 (7.4, 20.4)**
5.4 (4.9, 6.0)
U.S. Census regionc
Northeast
19.5 (12.2, 29.8)
–
b
18.9 (17.1, 21.0)
–
b
29.0 (18.2, 42.9)**
13.8 (12.4, 15.3)
Midwest
29.3 (17.8, 44.3)
_b
21.7 (20.1, 23.5)
32.0 (19.2, 48.2)*
42.9 (29.7, 57.2)**
16.1 (14.8, 17.5)
South
30.1 (21.9, 39.9)
29.9 (17.4, 46.4)
22.4 (21.2, 23.8)
21.6 (12.7, 34.3)
35.7 (25.9, 46.9)**
15.3 (14.3, 16.4)
West
23.3 (15.3, 33.9)
17.5 (9.8, 29.3)
17.3 (15.9, 18.8)
17.3 (10.0, 28.2)
35.3 (25.4, 46.5)**
11.4 (10.3, 12.5)
Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance
statistically significant difference between lesbian/gay estimate and heterosexual/straight estimate within gender [p<0.05];
statistically significant difference between bisexual estimate and heterosexual/straight estimate within gender [p<0.05]).
Respondents who reported smoking ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetime and reported now smoking every day or some days were recoded as current cigarette smokers.
Estimate was omitted; the relative SE was >30% or denominator <50.
Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Smoking Behaviors Among Current Cigarette Smokersa by Gender and Sexual Identity—National Adult Tobacco Survey, U.S., 2012–2013
Mean or % (95% CI)
Male
Female
Sexual minorityb
Heterosexual/ straight
Sexual minorityb
Heterosexual/ straight
Age at first cigarette
15.6 (14.7, 16.4)
15.3 (15.1, 15.5)
14.8 (14.0, 15.5)
16.0 (15.8, 16.2)
Age at first cigarette, daily
18.0 (17.1, 18.8)
17.9 (17.7, 18.1)
17.6 (16.8, 18.5)
18.6 (18.3, 18.8)
Number of cigarettes smoked per day
13.5 (11.3, 15.7)
13.8 (13.3, 14.3)
11.5 (9.5, 13.5)
11.7 (11.2, 12.1)
Frequency of use
Every day
76.5 (67.8, 83.4)
73.5 (71.5, 75.4)
74.1 (65.6, 81.1)
76.2 (74.1, 78.2)
Some days
23.5 (16.6, 32.2)
26.5 (24.6, 28.5)
25.9 (18.9, 34.4)
23.8 (21.8, 25.9)
Attempt to quit in past 12 months
Yes
45.2 (35.7, 54.9)
54.8 (52.6, 57.0)
54.9 (46.2, 63.3)
53.5 (51.2, 55.9)
No
54.8 (45.1, 64.3)
45.2 (43.0, 47.4)
45.1 (36.7, 53.8)
46.5 (44.1, 48.8)
Currently smoke menthol cigarettesc
Yes
32.5 (23.8, 42.7)
27.9 (25.8, 30.0)
45.1 (36.6, 53.9)
34.4 (32.2, 36.7)
No
67.5 (57.3, 76.2)
72.1 (70.0, 74.2)
54.9 (46.1, 63.4)
65.6 (63.3, 67.8)
Note: Boldface indicates statistically significant difference between sexual minority estimate and heterosexual/straight estimate within gender (p<0.05).
Respondents who reported smoking ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetime and reported now smoking every day or some days were recoded as current cigarette smokers.
Responses of “gay,” “lesbian or gay,” “bisexual,” and “something else: you are not straight, but identify with another label such as queer, trisexual, omnisexual or pansexual” were recoded into a sexual minority category.
Respondents who reported smoking menthol cigarettes "all of the time"or "most of the time" were recoded as “yes.” Respondents who reported smoking menthol cigarettes “some of the time,” “rarely,” or “none of the time” were recoded as “no.”
Prevalence of Use of Other Tobacco Products by Gender and Sexual Identity—National Adult Tobacco Survey, U.S., 2012–2013
% (95% CI)
Male
Female
Sexual minoritya
Heterosexual/straight
Sexual minoritya
Heterosexual/straight
Cigarsb
8.8 (6.3, 12.3)
10.3 (9.7, 10.9)
7.2 (5.0, 10.3)
1.3 (1.1, 1.5)
Regular pipec
–
d
2.2 (2.0, 2.5)
–
d
0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
Hookahe
12.8 (9.7, 16.6)
4.5 (4.1, 5.0)
10.3 (7.6, 13.8)
2.5 (2.2, 2.9)
Electronic cigarettesf
7.9 (5.5, 11.4)
4.7 (4.3, 5.2)
12.4 (9.6, 15.9)
3.4 (3.1, 3.7)
Smokeless tobaccog
3.8 (2.4, 6.0)
7.4 (6.9, 7.9)
–
d
0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
Note: Boldface indicates statistically significant difference between sexual minority estimate and heterosexual/straight estimate within gender (p<0.05).
Responses of “gay,” “lesbian or gay,” “bisexual” and “something else: you are not straight, but identify with another label such as queer, trisexual, omnisexual or pansexual” were recoded into a sexual minority category.
Respondents who reported smoking ≥50 cigars, cigarillos, or filtered little cigars in their lifetime and reported now smoking “every day,” “some days” or “rarely” were recoded as current cigar smokers.
Respondents who reported smoking a regular pipe filled with tobacco ≥50 times in their lifetime and reported now smoking “every day,” “some days” or “rarely” were recoded as current regular pipe smokers.
Estimate was omitted; the relative standard error was >30% or denominator <50.
Respondents who reported smoking tobacco in a hookah ≥1 time in their lifetime and reported now smoking it "every day," "some days" or "rarely" were recoded as current hookah smokers.
Respondents who reported smoking electronic cigarettes ≥1 time in their lifetime and reported now smoking it “every day,” “some days” or “rarely” were recoded as current electronic cigarette smokers.
Smokeless tobacco users were defined using three product types: (1) chewing tobacco, snuff, or dip; (2) snus; and (3) dissolvable tobacco products. Respondents who reported use of chewing tobacco, snuff, or dip ≥20 times in their lifetime and reported now using it “every day,” “some days,” or “rarely” were recoded as current smokeless tobacco users. Respondents who reported use of snus or dissolvable tobacco products ≥1 time in their lifetime and reported now using it “every day,” “some days” or “rarely” were recoded as current smokeless tobacco users.