Environ Health PerspectEnvironmental Health Perspectives0091-6765126341451241298sc271_5_1835Research ArticleMeasurement of p-nitrophenol in the urine of residents whose homes were contaminated with methyl parathion.BarrDana BTurnerWayman EDiPietroEmilyMcClureP CherylBakerSamuel EBarrJohn RGehleKimberlyGrissomRaymond EJrBravoRobertoDriskellW JackPattersonDonald GJrHillRobert HJrNeedhamLarry LPirkleJames LSampsonEric JNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. dbarr@cdc.gov122002110Suppl 610851091

During the last several years, illegal commercial application of methyl parathion (MP) in domestic settings in several U.S. Southeastern and Midwestern States has affected largely inner-city residents. As part of a multiagency response involving the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and state and local health departments, our laboratory developed a rapid, high-throughput, selective method for quantifying p-nitrophenol (PNP), a biomarker of MP exposure, using isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We measured PNP in approximately 16,000 samples collected from residents of seven different states. Using this method, we were able to receive sample batches from each state; prepare, analyze, and quantify the samples for PNP; verify the results; and report the data to the health departments and ATSDR in about 48 hr. These data indicate that many residents had urinary PNP concentrations well in excess of those of the general U.S. population. In fact, their urinary PNP concentrations were more consistent with those seen in occupational settings or in poisoning cases. Although these data, when coupled with other MP metabolite data, suggest that many residents with the highest concentrations of urinary PNP had significant exposure to MP, they do not unequivocally rule out exposure to PNP resulting from environmental degradation of MP. Even with their limitations, these data were used with the assumption that all PNP was derived from MP exposure, which enabled the U.S. EPA and ATSDR to develop a comprehensive, biologically driven response that was protective of human health, especially susceptible populations, and included clinical evaluations, outreach activities, community education, integrated pest management, and decontamination of homes.