<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">101201960</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">34216</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Immunotoxicol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Immunotoxicol</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of immunotoxicology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1547-691X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1547-6901</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24164313</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4652645</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/1547691X.2013.843620</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA737103</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Immune stimulation following dermal exposure to unsintered indium tin oxide</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Brock</surname><given-names>Kristie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>Stacey E.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Lukomska</surname><given-names>Ewa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>Carrie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>Katie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname><given-names>Nikki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Meade</surname><given-names>B. Jean</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label>Case Western University, ARC Veterinary Services, Cleveland, OH, USA</aff><aff id="A2"><label>2</label>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Morgantown, WV, USA</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1">Address for correspondence: Stacey E. Anderson, PhD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1095 Willowdale Drive, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. Tel: 304-285-6174. Fax: 304-285-6126. <email>sanderson4@cdc.gov</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>13</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>10</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>Jul-Sep</season><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>19</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>268</fpage><lpage>272</lpage><!--elocation-id from pubmed: 10.3109/1547691X.2013.843620--><abstract><p id="P1">In recent years, several types of pulmonary pathology, including alveolar proteinosis, fibrosis, and emphysema, have been reported in workers in the indium industry. To date, there remains no clear understanding of the underlying mechanism(s). Pulmonary toxicity studies in rats and mice have demonstrated the development of mediastinal lymph node hyperplasia and granulomas of mediastinal lymph nodes and bronchus-associated lymphoid tissues following exposure to indium tin oxide. Given the association between exposure to other metals and the development of immune-mediated diseases, these studies were undertaken to begin to investigate the immuno-modulatory potential of unsintered indium tin oxide (uITO) in a mouse model. Using modifications of the local lymph node assay, BALB/c mice (five animals/group) were exposed topically via intact or breached skin or injected intradermally at the base of the ear pinnae with either vehicle or increasing concentrations 2.5&#x02013;10% uITO (90:10 indium oxide/tin oxide, particle size &#x0003c;50 nm). Dose-responsive increases in lymphocyte proliferation were observed with a calculated EC3 of 4.7% for the intact skin study. Phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells following intradermal injection with 5% uITO yielded a profile consistent with a T-cell-mediated response. These studies demonstrate the potential for uITO to induce sensitization and using lymphocyte proliferation as a biomarker of exposure, and demonstrate the potential for uITO to penetrate both intact and breached skin.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Immune stimulation</kwd><kwd>immunotoxicity</kwd><kwd>unsintered indium tin oxide</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro" id="S1"><title>Introduction</title><p id="P2">Numerous metals are known to induce hypersensitivity responses resulting in dermal, respiratory, and systemic diseases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Occupational exposure to these metals results in varying levels of morbidity and mortality from chronic allergic contact dermatitis to potentially fatal pulmonary disease or anaphylaxis. Recently, attention has been drawn to the occurrence of a rare pulmonary disease, characterized by severe alveolar proteinosis, seen in workers exposed to indium-tin oxide (ITO). Indium is a rare metal recovered for commercial use via extraction from other mined metals, most often zinc. It is refined primarily in China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and Canada (<xref rid="R20" ref-type="bibr">POLINARES, 2012</xref>). The predominant use of indium is in the production of ITO. Because of its electrical conductive properties, thin-film coatings of ITO have historically been used in the production of solar panels, solders, alloys, and semiconductors. More recently, ITO usage has increased with the popularity of touch-screen computer and liquid crystal display technologies, which also use the electrically conductive and light transparent ITO coatings (<xref rid="R24" ref-type="bibr">U.S. Geological Survey, 2013</xref>). Potential worker exposure to indium and indium compounds occurs during mining, production, and reclamation processes.</p><p id="P3">In addition to pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, other pathologies including pulmonary fibrosis, emphysema, and granulomas with associated cholesterol clefts have been diagnosed in indiumexposed workers in the US, China, and Japan (<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">Cummings et. al., 2012</xref>). Although a possible mechanism related to autoimmuneinduced dysfunction of macrophages has been proposed (<xref rid="R6" ref-type="bibr">Cummings et al., 2010</xref>), the pathophysiology and natural history of indium-induced pulmonary disease(s) have not been elucidated. Given the potential of other metals to induce hypersensitivity responses and the lack of a complete understanding of the pathophysiology of the observed pulmonary disease in ITO-exposed workers, these animal studies were undertaken to evaluate the potential of unsintered ITO (uITO) to induce immune stimulation.</p></sec><sec sec-type="methods" id="S2"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="S3"><title>Animals</title><p id="P4">Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY) at 6&#x02013;8 weeks-of-age and were allowed to acclimate for a minimum of 5 days before they were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Animals were weighed and individually identified via tail markings using a permanent marker, and an analysis of variance on body weights was performed to ensure homogeneous distribution of animals across treatment groups. Mice were housed five per cage in ventilated plastic shoebox cages with hardwood chip bedding, and provided <italic>ad libitum</italic> access to NIH-31 modified 6% irradiated rodent diet (Harlan Teklad, Frederick, MD) and tap water from water bottles. The temperature in the animal facility was maintained at 68&#x02013;72<sup>&#x000b0;</sup>F and the relative humidity at 36&#x02013;57%. The light/dark cycle was maintained on 12 h intervals. All animal experiments were performed in the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International accredited National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health animal facility in accordance with an animal protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Chemicals</title><p id="P5">Unsintered indium tin oxide, &#x0003c; 50 nm (CAS# 50926-11-9), vehicles including dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, CAS # 67-68-5) and USP grade phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), as well as a-hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA, CAS# 101-86-0) positive control were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).</p></sec><sec id="S5"><title>Toxicity study</title><p id="P6">An initial toxicity study was conducted to determine the test article concentrations to be used in the subsequent studies. Three animals were exposed topically to 10% uITO that was chosen based on the highest concentration that remained in suspension following 10 min of sonication. To increase bioavailability, each day before dosing and following cleaning the ear with 70% ethanol, the dorsal aspect of each ear pinna was breached using a Multi-Test II device (manufactured by Lincoln Diagnostics, Inc, Decatur, IL). This device is commonly used in clinical practice for allergy skin testing. Animals were then exposed on each ear to 25 &#x003bc;l of vehicle (DMSO) or 10% uITO for three consecutive days. Dosing suspensions were vortexed for &#x02248;5 s before being withdrawn from the dosing vial for exposures. Animals were observed daily for systemic signs of toxicity (ruffled fur, abnormal posture, isolation in the cage, abnormal exudates from eyes, nose, anus) and for local signs of irritation including erythema and swelling. Animals were weighed the day prior to the first exposure and on Day 6 prior to euthanasia.</p></sec><sec id="S6"><title>Modified local lymph node assay</title><p id="P7">To determine the potential for uITO to induce immune stimulation, local lymph node assays including modifications to routes of exposure were conducted following topical exposure via intact or breached skin or following intradermal injection. Given that there was concern for the potential of uITO to penetrate intact skin, the initial study consisted of dermal exposure on the dorsal surface of each ear (25 &#x003bc;l per ear) to groups of animals with either intact or breached skin. Breaching was accomplished using a Multi-Test II device as described above. To increase bioavailability, additional studies were conducted following 10 &#x003bc;l intradermal injections (using a 26-guage needle) of test article or PBS vehicle at the base of the ear pinna bilaterally. Based on the results of the toxicity study and the limits of uITO to go into suspension, dose response studies were conducted with concentrations of 2.5%, 5%, and 10% (w/v) uITO. Five animals per group were used for all studies.</p><p id="P8">Following exposures, the LLNA was performed according to the method described in the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods Peer Review Panel report (<xref rid="R17" ref-type="bibr">NIEHS, 2010</xref>) with minor modifications. Briefly, mice (five per group) were exposed to vehicle, increasing concentrations of uITO, or positive control (30% HCA, for intact dermal exposure study) for three consecutive days. Animals were allowed to rest for 2 days following the last exposure. On Day 6, mice were injected intravenously via the lateral tail vein with 20 &#x003bc;Ci [<sup>3</sup>H]-thymidine (specific activity 2 Ci/mmol; Dupont NEN, Boston, MA). Five hours after thymidine injection, mice were euthanized via CO<sub>2</sub> asphyxiation, and the left and right cervical draining lymph nodes (DLN located at bifurcation of jugular vein) were excised and pooled for each animal. Single cell suspensions were made and incubated overnight in 5% trichloroacetic acid and samples were counted using a Packard Tri-Carb 2500TR liquid scintillation analyzer. Stimulation indices (SI) were calculated by dividing the mean disintegrations per minute (DPM) per test group by the mean DPM for the vehicle control group. EC3 values (concentration of chemical required to induce 3-fold increase over vehicle control) were calculated based on the equation from <xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">Basketter et al. (1999)</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="S7"><title>Phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells following intradermal exposure</title><p id="P9">To further evaluate the immune response to uITO exposure, phenotypic analysis of DLN was conducted using flow cytometry as previously described with minor modifications (<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">Franko et al., 2012</xref>). Mice (10 per group) were injected intradermally with PBS or 5% uITO at the base of each ear (10 &#x003bc;l per ear) for three consecutive days. Five animals per group were allowed to rest for 2 days and euthanized by CO<sub>2</sub> inhalation on Day 6 to coincide with the time course of the lymphocyte proliferation assay and the remaining five animals per group were allowed to rest for 7 days after the final exposure and then euthanized on Day 10 by CO<sub>2</sub> inhalation. Day 10 has previously been identified as the optimal day for the identification of IgE<sup>+</sup>/B220<sup>+</sup> cells (<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">Manetz &#x00026; Meade, 1999</xref>). Draining lymph nodes were collected (left and right nodes/animal) in 2 ml PBS and dissociated using frosted ends of two microscope slides. Cell counts were performed using a Coulter Counter (Z2 model, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and 10<sup>6</sup> cells/sample were added to wells of a 96-well plate. Cells were washed in PBS and then incubated with Live/Dead Fixable Far Red Dead Cell Stain (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) in PBS for exclusion of non-viable cells. Cells were washed using flow staining buffer (1% bovine serum albumin/0.1% sodium azide in PBS) and then incubated with F<sub>c</sub> block (clone 2.4G2). The cells were then incubated on ice in flow staining buffer with a combination of the following antibody conjugates: anti-CD45R/B220 (V500 or Alexa Fluor 700, clone RA3-6B2, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-CD3 (V500, clone 500A2, or APC, clone 145-2C11, BD), anti-CD4 (PE-Cy7, clone GK1.5, eBioscience, San Diego, CA), anti-CD8 (APC-H7 or PE, clone 53-6.7, BD), and anti-IgE (FITC, clone R35-72, BD). Cells were washed and fixed in cell fixation buffer (BD). For analysis, cells were re-suspended in staining buffer and analyzed on a BD Biosciences LSR II flow cytometer. All data were analyzed using FloJoe software. A minimum of 10 000 events per sample was collected.</p></sec><sec id="S8"><title>Total serum IgE</title><p id="P10">Following euthanasia of animals used in the 10-day phenotypic analysis assay, blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture; sera were separated by centrifugation and frozen at &#x02013;20 <sup>&#x000b0;</sup>C for subsequent analysis of serum IgE. A standard colorimetric sandwich ELISA was performed as previously described (<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">Franko et al., 2012</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="S9"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p id="P11">Data were first tested for homogeneity using the Barlett&#x02019;s ChiSquare test. If homogeneous, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted. If the ANOVA showed significance at <italic>p</italic> &#x02264; 0.05, the Dunnett&#x02019;s Multiple Range t-test was used to compare treatment groups with the control group. For dose response studies, linear trend analysis was performed to determine if uITO had exposure concentration-related effects for specific end-points. Differences were considered to be significant if <italic>p</italic>+0.05 as compared to vehicle controls. A Student&#x02019;s <italic>t</italic>-test was used when comparisons were made between two groups.</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="S10"><title>Results</title><sec id="S11"><title>Toxicity study</title><p id="P12">Exposure of breached skin to 10% uITO in DMSO produced no changes in body weight, systemic signs of toxicity, or visual signs of inflammation at the exposure sites (data not shown).</p></sec><sec id="S12"><title>Lymphocyte proliferation following dermal exposure to uITO</title><p id="P13">A dose-responsive increase (Linear Trend Test; <italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01) in proliferation was observed in animals exposed to increasing concentrations of uITO through both intact and breached skin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Similar levels of lymphocyte proliferation &#x02013; as represented by [<sup>3</sup>H]-thymidine incorporation &#x02013; were observed for the high dose groups (10% uITO) following exposure to intact and breached skin (2072 and 2036 dpm, respectively). However, the stimulation indices (SI) for these two exposures differed considerably with an SI of 5.7 following exposure to 10% uITO for the intact skin group and 1.8 for the breached skin group. The difference in SI following the two methods of dermal exposure can be explained by the increased proliferation observed following DMSO exposure to breached skin compared to intact skin (1134 vs 365 dpm, <italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01). Using data from the intact exposure groups, the calculated EC3 value for uITO was 4.7%. The positive control group (HCA) had an SI of 27, within the historical range for our laboratory (data not shown).</p></sec><sec id="S13"><title>Lymphocyte proliferation following intradermal exposure to ITO</title><p id="P14">Given the variability in response between studies following dermal exposure, additional studies were conducted following intradermal administration of the test article in PBS to eliminate the DMSO effect and to increase bioavailability. A significant response (<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01) resulting in an SI of 6.1 was seen following exposure to 5% uITO, with no further increase in proliferation observed in the 10% dose group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). No signs of systemic toxicity including body weight changes were observed in any of the mice in the study. There was a visibly noted dose-responsive erythema at the injection site, with no erythema in mice exposed to 2.5% uITO, a majority of mice exposed to the 5% dose demonstrating mild erythema, and mice exposed to a 10% level having mild-to-moderate erythema. In all cases, the erythema resolved by the day of euthanasia. At euthanasia, intradermal deposits of test article were visible in all mice exposed to any concentration of uITO.</p></sec><sec id="S14"><title>Phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells and total serum IgE levels following intradermal exposure to uITO</title><p id="P15">Phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells was undertaken to begin to understand the mechanism of immune activation following exposure to uITO. Based on the results of the LLNA intradermal exposure study, a concentration of 5% uITO was chosen for this study. Consistent with lymphocyte proliferation data measured by incorporation of [<sup>3</sup>H]-thymidine, total cell numbers were significantly elevated (<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.05) at the Day 6 timepoint (5.7 [&#x000b1;0.3] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> for uITO-exposed vs 2.4 [&#x000b1;0.1] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> for VH-exposed animals). By Day 10, total cell numbers increased (<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01), with counts reaching 14.0 [&#x000b1;1.8] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> in uITO mice compared to 3.5 [&#x000b1;0.7] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> for the vehicle hosts. Consistent with results from well characterized T-cell-mediated sensitizers, at Day 10 an increase in absolute numbers (3.1 [&#x000b1;0.4] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> vs 0.5 [&#x000b1;0.1] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup>; <italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01) and percentage (23.3 [&#x000b1;0.9]% vs 12.5 [&#x000b1;0.9]%; <italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01) of B220<sup>+</sup> cells and a moderate increase in absolute numbers (<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01) with a decrease (<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.05) in the percentage of both CD4<sup>+</sup> (6.4 [&#x000b1;0.8] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> {48.4 [&#x000b1;0.7]%} vs 1.9 [&#x000b1;0.4] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> {55.1 [&#x000b1;2.3]%}) and CD8<sup>+</sup> (3.3 [&#x000b1;0.5] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> {24.8% &#x000b1; 0.6%) vs 1.1 [&#x000b1;0.3] &#x000d7; 10<sup>6</sup> {29.7 [&#x000b1;1.2]%}) T-cells were observed in mice exposed to 5% uITO compared to in vehicle control counterparts. No significant increases in B220<sup>+</sup>/IgE<sup>+</sup> cell absolute numbers/percentages or total serum IgE levels was noted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="S15"><title>Discussion</title><p id="P16">Given the recent recognition of lung pathology associated with exposure and the lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease process, these studies were undertaken to begin to investigate the potential immunomodulatory effects of ITO. A dermal model based on the LLNA was chosen to initiate the investigations based on the large LLNA database available for chemicals inducing both T-helper (T<sub>H</sub>)-1 and T<sub>H</sub>2 cell-mediated responses following this route of exposure and concern for the role of dermal exposure in development of the sensitization phase of several T-cell-(e.g., chronic beryllium disease; <xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">Tinkle et al., 2003</xref>; <xref rid="R5" ref-type="bibr">Cummings et al., 2007</xref>; <xref rid="R22" ref-type="bibr">Thomas et al., 2013</xref>) and IgE-(i.e., based on responses to latex (allergy); <xref rid="R25" ref-type="bibr">Woolhiser et al., 2000</xref>; <xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">Howell et al., 2002</xref>), acid anhydrides (<xref rid="R26" ref-type="bibr">Zhang et al. 2004</xref>), or isocyanates (<xref rid="R19" ref-type="bibr">Petsonk et al., 2000</xref>) mediated pulmonary diseases. Additionally, the easily isolated lymph node draining the ear provides a source of cells for mechanistic studies (<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">Manetz &#x00026; Meade, 1999</xref>).</p><p id="P17">Based on information provided by the supplier (Sigma), the uITO used in these studies was &#x02264; 50 nm. Although reports on the potential for nanoparticles to penetrate the skin have been mixed (reviewed by <xref rid="R4" ref-type="bibr">Crosera et al., 2009</xref>), using a static in <italic>vitro</italic> diffusion system, <xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">Larese et al. (2009)</xref> demonstrated penetration of silver nanoparticles (ranging from 9.8&#x02013;48.8 nm) through both intact and damaged full-thickness human skin. To simulate a more realistic workplace exposure paradigm, using an <italic>in vitro</italic> model with addition of mechanical flexion of the skin, <xref rid="R23" ref-type="bibr">Tinkle et al. (2003)</xref> demonstrated epidermal penetration of particles as large as 1.0 &#x003bc;m. Penetration into the epidermal layer allows for Langerhans cells (skin antigen-presenting cell) activation and immune activation. In these <italic>in vivo</italic> studies, using lymphocyte proliferation as a biomarker of exposure, data support a potential for uITO nanoparticles to penetrate both breached and intact skin.</p><p id="P18">Although animal studies investigating the potential for uITO to induce hypersensitivity responses have not previously been published, following pulmonary exposure to sintered ITO, toxicity studies have demonstrated hyperplasia of mediastinal lymph nodes with increased areas of lymphoid follicles and increased numbers of lymphocytes in mice (<xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">Nagano et al., 2011b</xref>) and the development of granulomas in bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue and mediastinal lymph nodes in rats (<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">Nagano et al., 2011a</xref>,<xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">c</xref>). The cumulative results from the studies presented here support the potential for uITO to induce T-cell-mediated sensitization. Following dermal exposure to uITO, a dose-responsive increase in lymphocyte proliferation was observed (reaching statistical significance and SI &#x0003e;3 at both 5% and 10% levels). The EC3 calculated for uITO was 4.7%, resulting in its classification as a mild sensitizer (<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">Loveless et al., 2010</xref>). This classification is similar to other metals including nickel, which are known human sensitizers. Nickel chloride has been reported to have an EC3 of 3.5% (<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">Basketter et al., 1994</xref>) and an EC3 of 2.5% has been reported for nickel sulfate (<xref rid="R21" ref-type="bibr">Ryan et al., 2002</xref>). Providing additional support for a T<sub>H</sub>1-mediated mechanism, phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells was consistent with that observed following exposure to well characterized T-cellmediated sensitizers with an increase in the %B220<sup>+</sup> cells and a decrease in the %CD4<sup>+</sup> and %CD8<sup>+</sup> cells and no significant elevation in IgE<sup>+</sup>/B220<sup>+</sup> cells (<xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">Manetz &#x00026; Meade, 1999</xref>). This was further supported by absence of an elevation in total serum IgE in the uITO-exposed mice.</p><p id="P19">In addition to pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and other lung pathology, analysis of clinical, radiological, and histopathological data from cases of workers with indium lung disease revealed an increased cellularity of broncho-alveolar lavage fluid with a predominance of lymphocytes and the presence of granulomas associated with cholesterol clefts (<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">Cummings et al., 2012</xref>). Previous findings in animal studies combined with these data demonstrating the potential for uITO to induce a T-cell mediated response in mice, raise concern for the potential for immunologically-mediated disease following occupational exposure to ITO. These studies provide further support for the need to better understand the natural history and pathophysiology of ITO mediated pulmonary disease.</p></sec></body><back><fn-group><fn id="FN1"><p id="P20"><bold>Declaration of interest</bold></p><p id="P21">The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="R1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basketter</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lea</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Dickens</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses</article-title><source>J. Appl. Toxicol</source><year>1999</year><volume>19</volume><fpage>261</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10439340</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basketter</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name><name><surname>Scholes</surname><given-names>EW</given-names></name><name><surname>Kimber</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test</article-title><source>Food Chem. Toxicol</source><year>1994</year><volume>32</volume><fpage>543</fpage><lpage>547</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8045461</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bu&#x000fc;dinger</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hertl</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immunologic mechanisms in hyper-sensitivity reactions to metal ions: An overview</article-title><source>Allergy</source><year>2000</year><volume>55</volume><fpage>108</fpage><lpage>115</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10726725</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crosera</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Bovenzi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Maina</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Nanoparticle dermal absorption and toxicity: A review of the literature</article-title><source>Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health</source><year>2009</year><volume>82</volume><fpage>1043</fpage><lpage>1055</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19705142</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cummings</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Deubner</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Enhanced preventive program at a beryllium oxide ceramics facility reduces beryllium sensitization among new workers</article-title><source>Occup. Environ. Med</source><year>2007</year><volume>64</volume><fpage>134</fpage><lpage>140</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17043076</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cummings</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Donat</surname><given-names>WE</given-names></name><name><surname>Ettensohn</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in workers at indium processing facility</article-title><source>Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med</source><year>2010</year><volume>181</volume><fpage>458</fpage><lpage>464</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20019344</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cummings</surname><given-names>KJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakano</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Omae</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Indium lung disease</article-title><source>Chest</source><year>2012</year><volume>141</volume><fpage>1512</fpage><lpage>1521</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22207675</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franko</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Jackson</surname><given-names>LG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hubbs</surname><given-names>AF</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Evaluation of furfuryl alcohol sensitization potential following dermal and pulmonary exposure: Enhancement of airway responsiveness</article-title><source>Toxicol. Sci</source><year>2012</year><volume>125</volume><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>115</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22003193</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Howell</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Weissman</surname><given-names>DN</given-names></name><name><surname>Jean Meade</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Latex sensitization by dermal exposure can lead to airway hyperreactivity</article-title><source>Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol</source><year>2002</year><volume>128</volume><fpage>204</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12119502</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Larese</surname><given-names>FF</given-names></name><name><surname>D&#x02019;Agostin</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Crosera</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Human skin penetration of silver nanoparticles through intact and damaged skin</article-title><source>Toxicology</source><year>2009</year><volume>255</volume><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18973786</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Loveless</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Api</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Crevel</surname><given-names>RW</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Potency values from the local lymph node assay: Application to classification, labeling, and risk assessment</article-title><source>Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol</source><year>2010</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19733604</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makrilia</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Syrigou</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaklamanos</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Hypersensitivity reactions associated with platinum antineoplastic agents: A systematic review</article-title><source>Metal-Based Drugs</source><year>2010</year><volume>1</volume><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>11</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Manetz</surname><given-names>TS</given-names></name><name><surname>Meade</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of a flow cytometry assay for the identification and differentiation of chemicals with the potential to elicit irritation, IgE-mediated, or T-cell-mediated hyper sensitivity responses</article-title><source>Toxicol. Sci</source><year>1999</year><volume>48</volume><fpage>206</fpage><lpage>217</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10353312</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagano</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Gotoh</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kasai</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Two- and 13-week inhalation toxicities of indium-tin oxide and indium oxide in rats</article-title><source>J. Occup. Health</source><year>2011a</year><volume>53</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21233592</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagano</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishizawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Eitaki</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Pulmonary toxicity in mice by 2- and 13-week inhalation exposures to indium-tin oxide and indium oxide aerosols</article-title><source>J. Occup. Health</source><year>2011b</year><volume>53</volume><fpage>234</fpage><lpage>239</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21422720</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nagano</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Nishizawa</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Umeda</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Inhalation carcinogenicity and chronic toxicity of indium-tin oxide in rats and mice</article-title><source>J. Occup. Health</source><year>2011c</year><volume>53</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>187</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21471693</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R17"><element-citation publication-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences)</collab></person-group><source>ICCVAM (Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods) Test Method Evaluation Report on Using the Local Lymph Node Assay for Testing Pesticide Formulations, Metals, Substances in Aqueous Solutions, and Other Products: The results of an independent peer review evaluation coordinated by the ICCVAM and the NICEATM</source><year>2010</year><comment>NIH Publication No. 10&#x02013;7512. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.iccvam.niehs.nih.gov">http://www.iccvam.niehs.nih.gov</ext-link> [last accessed 25 Apr 2013]</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="R18"><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nordberg</surname><given-names>GF</given-names></name><name><surname>Fowler</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Nordberg</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Fridberg</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><source>Handbook on Toxicology of Metals</source><year>2011</year><publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Burlington, MA</publisher-loc><edition>3rd</edition></element-citation></ref><ref id="R19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petsonk</surname><given-names>EL</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Asthma-like symptoms in wood product plant workers exposed to methylene diphenyl diisocyanate</article-title><source>Chest</source><year>2000</year><volume>118</volume><fpage>1183</fpage><lpage>1193</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11035694</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R20"><element-citation publication-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>POLINARES (EU Policy on Natural Resources)</collab></person-group><source>Fact sheet: Indium</source><year>2012</year><comment>Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.polinares.eu/docs/d21/polinares_wp2_annex2_factsheet5_v1_10.pdf">http://www.polinares.eu/docs/d21/polinares_wp2_annex2_factsheet5_v1_10.pdf</ext-link> [last accessed 20 Mar 2013]</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="R21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryan</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Cruse</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Skinner</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Examination of a vehicle for use with water-soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay</article-title><source>Food Chem. Toxicol</source><year>2002</year><volume>40</volume><fpage>1719</fpage><lpage>1725</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12176099</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Deubner</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Stanton</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Long-term efficacy of a program to prevent beryllium disease</article-title><source>Am. J. Ind. Med</source><year>2013</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>733</fpage><lpage>741</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23450749</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tinkle</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Antonini</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Rich</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Skin as a route of exposure and sensitization in chronic beryllium disease</article-title><source>Environ. Health Perspect</source><year>2003</year><volume>111</volume><fpage>1202</fpage><lpage>1208</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12842774</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R24"><element-citation publication-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>USGS. United States Geological Survey</collab></person-group><source>Mineral Commodity Summaries</source><year>2013</year><comment>U.S. Department of the Interior. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/">minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/</ext-link> [last accessed 20 Mar 2013]</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="R25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Woolhiser</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Munson</surname><given-names>AE</given-names></name><name><surname>Meade</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Immunological responses of mice following administration of natural rubber latex proteins by different routes of exposure</article-title><source>Toxicol. Sci</source><year>2000</year><volume>55</volume><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>351</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10828266</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="R26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>XD</given-names></name><name><surname>Fedan</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Siegel</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Asthma-like biphasic airway responses in Brown Norway rats sensitized by dermal exposure to dry trimellitic anhydride powder</article-title><source>J. Allergy Clin. Immunol</source><year>2004</year><volume>113</volume><fpage>320</fpage><lpage>326</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14767449</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig id="F1" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Lymphocyte proliferation. Proliferation was assessed by [<sup>3</sup>H]-thymidine incorporation into draining lymph node cells following dermal intact or breached skin exposure to vehicle (DMSO) or uITO. Bars represent means &#x000b1; SE of five mice/group. Numbers appearing above the bars are the stimulation indices for respective concentration tested. Levels of statistical significance are denoted by *<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.05 and **<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01 as compared to corresponding vehicle; #designates significant difference between animals exposed to DMSO or the same concentration of test article through breached vs intact skin. An EC3 of 4.7% was calculated for exposure to intact skin.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-737103-f0001"/></fig><fig id="F2" orientation="portrait" position="float"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Lymphocyte proliferation. Proliferation was assessed by [<sup>3</sup>H]-thymidine incorporation into draining lymph node cells following intradermal exposure to vehicle (PBS) or uITO. Bars represent means &#x000b1; SE of five mice/group. Numbers appearing above the bars are the stimulation indices for respective concentration tested. Levels of statistical significance are denoted by *<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.05 and **<italic>p</italic>&#x0003c;0.01 as compared to vehicle control.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-737103-f0002"/></fig><table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Examples of known hypersensitivity responses to metals.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Metal</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Hypersensitivity <break/>response</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Associated disease</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Platinum<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN1">a</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type I, Type IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Urticaria, Asthma</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Nickel<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">b</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis, <break/>&#x02003;Asthma</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cobalt<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV, Type I</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis, <break/>&#x02003;Asthma</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Beryllium<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV, Type I</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chronic beryllium disease</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chromium<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gold<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Types II, III, IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis, <break/>&#x02003;&#x02018;burning mouth syndrome&#x02019; <break/>&#x02003;in those with gold dental <break/>&#x02003;restorations, autoimmune <break/>&#x02003;thrombocytopenia</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Palladium<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mercury<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Type IV</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Allergic contact dermatitis</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><label>a</label><p id="P22"><xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">Makrilia et al. (2010)</xref>;</p></fn><fn id="TFN2"><label>b</label><p id="P23"><xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">B&#x000fc;dinger and Hertl (2000)</xref>;</p></fn><fn id="TFN3"><label>c</label><p id="P24"><xref rid="R18" ref-type="bibr">Nordberg et al. (2011)</xref>.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Phenotypic and total serum IgE analysis.</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th colspan="2" align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1">Day 6<hr/></th><th colspan="2" align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1">Day 10<hr/></th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">End-point</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Vehicle</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5% uITO</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Vehicle</th><th align="center" valign="bottom" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5% uITO</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Cell counts</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Total (&#x000d7;10<sup>6</sup> )</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.4 &#x000b1; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.7 &#x000b1; 0.3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref></td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.5 &#x000b1; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">14.0 &#x000b1; 1.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">**</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;B220<sup>+</sup> cells absolute <break/>&#x02003;&#x02003;(&#x000d7;10<sup>6</sup> ) (%)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3 &#x000b1; 0.0 <break/>12.4 &#x000b1; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.1 &#x000b1; 0.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref>
<break/>19.0 &#x000b1; 1.2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref></td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.5 &#x000b1; 0.1 <break/>12.5 &#x000b1; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.1 &#x000b1; 0.4<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">**</xref>
<break/>23.3 &#x000b1; 0.9<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">**</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;IgE<sup>+</sup>B220<sup>+</sup> cells, %</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not Tested</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not Tested</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.6 &#x000b1; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7.1 &#x000b1;5.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;CD4<sup>+</sup> cells absolute <break/>&#x02003;&#x02003;(&#x000d7;10<sup>6</sup>) (%)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.4 &#x000b1; 0.07 <break/>58.7 &#x000b1; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.9 &#x000b1; 0.1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref>
<break/>50.4 &#x000b1; 1.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref></td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.9 &#x000b1; 0.4 <break/>55.1 &#x000b1; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.4 &#x000b1;0.8<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">**</xref>
<break/>48.4 &#x000b1;0.7<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;CD8<sup>+</sup> cells absolute <break/>&#x02003;&#x02003;(&#x000d7;10<sup>6</sup>) (%)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.9 &#x000b1; 0.4 <break/>29.1 &#x000b1; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.7 &#x000b1; 0.0<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref>
<break/>29.6 &#x000b1; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.1 &#x000b1; 0.3 <break/>29.7 &#x000b1; 1.2</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.3 &#x000b1; 0.5<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">**</xref>
<break/>24.8 &#x000b1; 0.6<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Total serum IgE <break/>&#x02003;&#x02003;(ng/ml)</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not Tested</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Not Tested</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">329 &#x000b1; 94</td><td align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">394 &#x000b1; 85</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Values represent the mean &#x000b1; SE from five animals per group. Statistical significance is designated as</p><fn id="TFN4"><label>*</label><p id="P25"><italic>p</italic> &#x02264; 0.05</p></fn><fn id="TFN5"><label>**</label><p id="P26"><italic>p</italic> &#x02264;0.01.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></floats-group></article>