This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
Many polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) can cause DNA adducts and initiate carcinogenesis. Mixed exposures to coal dust (CD) and PAHs are common in occupational settings. In the CD and PAH-exposed lung, CD increases apoptosis and causes alveolar type II (AT-II) cell hyperplasia but reduces CYP1A1 induction. Inflammation, but not apoptosis, appears etiologically associated with reduced CYP1A1 induction in this mixed exposure model. Many AT-II cells in the CD-exposed lungs have no detectable CYP1A1 induction after PAH exposure. Although AT-II cells are a small subfraction of lung cells, they are believed to be a potential progenitor cell for some lung cancers. Because CYP1A1 is induced via ligand-mediated nuclear translocation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), we investigated the effect of CD on PAH-induced nuclear translocation of AhR in AT-II cells isolated from
Fourteen days after IT CD exposure and 1 day after the last intraperitoneal BNF injection, AhR immunofluorescence indicated that proportional AhR nuclear expression and the percentage of cells with nuclear AhR were significantly increased in rats receiving IT saline and BNF injections compared to vehicle controls. However, in CD-exposed rats, BNF did not significantly alter the nuclear localization or cytosolic expression of AhR compared to rats receiving CD and oil.
Our findings suggest that during particle and PAH mixed exposures, CD alters the BNF-induced nuclear translocation of AhR in AT-II cells. This provides an explanation for the modification of CYP1A1 induction in these cells. Thus, this study suggests that mechanisms for reduced PAH-induced CYP1A1 activity in the CD exposed lung include not only the effects of inflammation on the lung as a whole, but also reduced PAH-associated nuclear translocation of AhR in an expanded population of AT-II cells.
Studying mixed exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and foreign particles, such as coal dust (CD) is extremely important in occupational health. Exposure to CD is associated with lung scarring and inflammation [
CD does change PAH-induced CYP1A1 activity in a rodent model. In models of mixed exposure to respirable CD and PAHs, CD suppressed PAH-mediated cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) induction in rats [
CYP1A1 is induced through activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Mature AhR is usually located in the cytoplasm complexed with chaperones including: heat shock protein 90, AhR-interacting protein [
Male viral antigen negative, Sprague-Dawley (Hla:(SD)CVF) rats (220–270 g BW at exposure time) were purchased from Hilltop Labs (Scottdale, PA). Rats were kept in an AAALAC-approved barrier animal facility at NIOSH, where food and water were supplied
The experimental design was based upon 1) the lung burden of 10–25 mg CD/g lung wet weight identified in coal miners with coal workers pneumoconiosis [
Respirable CD was prepared from coal acquired at the Pittsburgh coal seam. The CD was characterized and fractionated to produce respirable CD particles as previously described [
Methylene chloride, hexane and DMSO extracts of 100 mg CD were analyzed using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Analysis was performed using an HP 5890 Series II GC with an HP 5972 Series MS as the detector. The GC/MS conditions are described in Table
The concentrations of different PAHs in CD.
| PAH | Concentration | Estimated Exposure per CD-exposed rat1 |
| Phenanthrene | 0.0300 | 1.200 |
| Naphthalene | 0.0139 | 0.556 |
| Pyrene | 0.0620 | 0.248 |
| Fluoranthene | 0.0580 | 0.232 |
| Fluorene | 0.0500 | 0.200 |
| Total identifiable PAHs2 | 0.0605 | 2.436 |
1CD-exposed rats in this study received 40 mg CD by IT instillation. The micrograms of PAH instilled represents the estimate concentration in the 40 mg of CD.
2In addition to be identified PAHs, multiple methyl substituted naphthalenes and phenanthrenes were identified. Theses could not be quantified because of an absence of matching standards. Other PAHs and substituted PAHs maybe present but were either not detected or the presence of interfering ions prevented unambiguous identification.
In addition, the methylene chloride extract of CD was analyzed using an HPLC clean-up method. The column used for this method was a Jordi Gel DVB 500 A 500 mm × 10 mm column supplied by Alltech (Cat # 100567). After contaminants were eluted off the column the PAHs can be eluted and collected using a six-port Valco valve. This fraction was then concentrated. The flow rate for the HPLC method is 1.5 ml/min and fractions are collected based on retention time and a fluorescent detector with an excitation wavelength of 254 nm and an emission wavelength of 400 nm. The HPLC system used was a GBC HPLC system consisting of the pump GBC LC1150, photodiode array GBC #LC5000, autosampler GBC #LC1650, inline degasser GBC #LC1460, and a Schimadzu fluorescence detector #RF-551. The software used to control the system and collect data was WinChrome v.1.32. For each run, 200 μl of sample was injected onto the column.
CD suspensions were made up daily from heat-sterilized samples using nonpyrogenic sterile 0.9% saline (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). Suspensions were vortexed directly after preparation and shaken well before instillation. The CD particles were suspended in sterile saline at a concentration of 133.3 mg/ml as previously described [
To prepare the BNF (Sigma Adrich Co., St. Louis, MO) suspension, the corn oil (Mazola) vehicle was sterilized by filtering with non-pyrogenic Acrodisc (Pall Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI) 25 mm syringe filter (0.2 μm in diameter). Solutions of 5% BNF (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in sterilized corn oil (50 mg/ml) were prepared 24 h before injection. The suspension was vortexed and then sonicated for 15 minutes using an Ultronics sonicator (Mahwa, NJ). Rats received BNF daily for 3 days prior to euthanasia.
Rats were euthanized by IP injection of sodium pentobarbital (Sleepaway®, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, IA). The abdomen was opened by incision along the midline and the lungs and attached organs, including tracheobronchial lymph node, thymus, heart, aorta, and esophagus, were removed.
To assure that both normal and hypertrophied AT-II cells were isolated in this study, AT-II cells were isolated using a well-established method based upon cell attachment, rather than cell size [
The purity of AT-II cells was determined by staining the lamellar bodies with the lipophilic fluorescent Phosphine 3R dye (Roboz Surgical Instrument, Washington, DC) as previously described [
Fresh AT-II cell suspension (containing 1 million cells) was used for electron microscopy while the rest was fixed in freshly prepared 2% paraformaldehyde. Later on the same day, cytospin slides were prepared from the fixed cells using 50,000 cells/slide. Cytospin slides were stored in the refrigerator until stained.
The percentage viability of AT-II cells was determined by trypan blue exclusion as previously described [
Freshly prepared AT-II suspensions (containing 106 cells) were used for electron microscopic identification of AT-II cells as previously described [
Quantitative indirect immunofluorescence with co-localization is a quantitative procedure which allows the measurement of the amount of one fluorochrome that is within the same spacial location as a second fluorochrome using digital images [
Slides were stained using indirect immunofluorescence to detect and quantify AhR to determine its nuclear and cytoplasmic localization in isolated AT-II cells exposed to CD and then to PAH. Indirect immunofluorescence was conducted as previously described [
A polyclonal rabbit anti-rat AhR antibody (BioMol Research Laboratories, Inc., Plymouth, PA) was diluted 1:20 with 1% BSA and 100 μl of the solution was applied on each cytospin slide for 1 h. For the negative control, the primary antibody was replaced by normal rabbit serum. Then 100 μl of an Alexa Fluor® 594 donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted 1:20 with PBS was applied on each cytospin slide for 1 h in the dark. Therefore, the antigen sites for AhR fluoresced red under a fluorescence microscope. The slides were then washed using distilled water and covered with anti-fade gel mount (Biomeda Corp., Foster City CA) before applying a cover slip.
In order to identify nuclear AhR, the nucleus was stained with a green color using Cytox Green stain according to the manufacturer's direction (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR).
For all immunofluorescence studies, five images were captured by a researcher blinded to the exposure status. The slides were first examined with an Olympus fluorescence photomicroscope (Olympus AX70; Olympus American Inc., Lake Success, NY) using two filters: (i) a green cube (460–500 nm excitation) and (ii) a red cube (532.5–587.5 nm excitation). Criteria for specific staining were: (i) absence of staining in the negative controls, (ii) absence of background staining, and (iii) distinct cellular localization of AhR. Then, photomicrographs were acquired for quantitative morphometric analysis using a 40× objective and a Quantix cooled digital camera (Quantix Photometrics; Tucson, AZ) with QED camera plugin software (QED Imaging, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA). The digital camera settings for contrast, brightness and gamma were held constant during the capture time of all images.
Morphometric measurements were made using commercial morphometry software (Metamorph Universal Image Corp., Downingtown, PA). By using this software, the area of fluorescence for AhR in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus of AT-II cells was measured and expressed as μm2. The most important parameters deduced by the aid of morphometric analysis included the following:
1) The proportional nuclear AhR expression is the area of AhR expression in the nucleus relative to the total AT-II cell nuclear area (areas where Cytox green is present). This measurement is calculated from the following formula:
where,
P is the proportional AhR localization in the nucleus (Cytox green).
R is the percentage of AhR colocalized within the Cytox green nuclear matrix.
T is the total AhR area (in the nucleus and cytosol).
G is the total nuclear area (Cytox green).
2) The proportional cytosolic AhR expression is the area of AhR expression in the cytoplasm relative to the total nuclear area (areas where Cytox green is present). This measurement is calculated from the following formula:
where,
L is the proportional AhR localization in cytoplasm determined by the equation.
M is the percentage of AhR area not colocalized with the cytox green nuclear marker.
T is the total AhR area (in the nucleus and cytosol).
G is the total nuclear area (Cytox green) determined by Metamorph software.
This measurement is important because it determines the amount of AhR remaining in the cytoplasm after induction by the CYP1A1 inducer, BNF.
3) The percentage of AT-II cells with AhR localized in the nucleus was manually calculated from distinct images. The AT-II cells with AhR localized in their nucleus and the total number of AT-II cells was counted in 5 images per rat. The cells expressing AhR in the nucleus have a yellow color due to colocalization of green and red fluorochromes.
4) The total area of AhR expression per AT-II cell. The total expression area (in nucleus and cytoplasm) of AhR was measured as micrometers squared and was divided by the number of AT-II cells.
All analyses were performed with SAS/STAT software, Version 8.2 utilizing the Proc Mixed procedure. Dependent variables were analyzed using two-factor analysis of variance using two-factor mixed model analysis of variance (CD/Saline by Oil/BNF). All pairwise comparisons where appropriate were performed with Fisher's LSD. All results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Several PAHs were identified in the CD including phenanthrene, naphthalene, pyrene, fluoranthene and fluorine (Table
AT-II cells stained with phosphine 3R contained bright green lamellar bodies that are absent in other pulmonary cell types (Figure
Using transmission electron microscopy, lamellar bodies were also visualized within AT-II cells (Figure
The fluorochrome used for detection of AhR was Alexa Fluor® 594 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), which fluoresced red at the sites of expression. Cytox green produced green nuclear fluorescence. Therefore, nuclear expression of AhR produced yellow fluorescence (Figure
BNF caused an increase in proportional AhR nuclear localization in rats without CD exposure (
The proportional AhR expression in AT-II cell cytosol showed non-significant reductions in rats receiving BNF compared to rats without BNF exposure in both the saline and CD groups (Figure
In rats that received IT saline instead of CD, the percentage of AT-II cells with AhR localized in the nucleus was significantly increased by BNF (P = 0.0008). However, in rats that received IT CD, the percentage of AT-II cells with AhR localized in the nucleus was not significantly affected by BNF (Figure
By morphometric analysis, the proportional area of AhR in the cytoplasm was greater than the proportional area in the nucleus in all treatment groups (Figures
In rats that received IT saline, the total expression area (in nucleus and cytoplasm) of AhR (measured as square micrometer per AT-II cell) was significantly increased (P < 0.036) by BNF. In rats that received IT CD, this area was not significantly changed by BNF exposure (Figure
Previous data from our laboratory showed that exposure to foreign particles, such as CD and silica suppresses the PAH-mediated induction of CYP1A1 in rat lung [
AhR translocation is essential for CYP1A1 induction by PAHs. After being stimulated by an inducer, the AhR is translocated to nucleus and binds to another protein called AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) forming a heterodimeric protein complex [
Morphometric analysis of immunofluorescence staining in this study showed that the proportional AhR expression in AT-II cell nuclei, an indicator of AhR localization in the nucleus, was significantly increased in BNF-exposed rats compared with vehicle control rats. Moreover, the total area of AhR expression per AT-II cell showed a significant increase in BNF-exposed rats compared to vehicle controls. This finding is consistent with many studies involving BNF as a specific potent inducer for CYP1A1 through activation of AhR and served as a positive control for the immunofluorescent procedure used in our study [
Conversely, in CD exposed rats, the localization of AhR in AT-II cell nuclei, measured as a proportional AhR expression in the cell nucleus, was not significantly affected by BNF. In addition, in CD-exposed rats, the percentage of AT-II cells with nuclear AhR expression was not significantly affected by BNF. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of CD-induced inhibition of CYP1A1 induction may involve failure of the CD-exposed cells to translocate AhR after PAH exposure. One possible explanation for the alteration of AhR localization in AT-II cell nucleus of CD-exposed rats after being activated by BNF is AhR proteolysis. Since CD contains small amounts of PAHs and ligand-activated AhR is rapidly proteolyzed resulting in an immediate reduction of the AhR number [
The decreased AhR nuclear translocation in alveolar type II cells after CD exposure may well be a general response of alveolar type II cells to inflammation associated with lung-deposited particles, since CYP1A1 induction and its dependent activity (EROD) were inhibited by exposure to another type of occupational dust, crystalline silica, which does not contain PAH [
However, in both the silica and coal dust-exposed rat lungs, alveolar type II cells proliferate following pulmonary inflammation and are often refractory to CYP1A1 induction [
Since CYP1A1 induction is dependent upon AhR nuclear translocation [
Taken together, our results demonstrate that exposure of rats to CD modifies nuclear translocation of AhR in AT-II cells after subsequent BNF exposure. This provides an explanation for at least some of the diminished CYP1A1 induction observed in the particle-exposed lung upon subsequent BNF exposure.
AIP: AhR-interacting protein; AT-II: alveolar type II; AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor; AHRE1 and AhRE2: AhR responsive elements1 and 2; Arnt: AhR-nuclear translocator; Bax: BCL2-associated X protein; BNF: beta-naphthoflavone; CD: coal dust; CNSPE: cyanopropyl solid phase extraction; CYP1A1: cytochrome P4501A1; GC/MS: gas chromatography with mass spectrometry; HSP90: heat shock protein 90; IgG;: immunoglobulin-G; EROD: 7-ethoxyresorufin-
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
MG participated in the study design, conducted the experiments, and drafted the manuscript. LB planned many of the experiments, participated in the conduct of the experiments, and assisted in the manuscript preparation. BL planned, conducted, and wrote up the coal dust PAH analysis. VC and JN contributed to the experimental design, acquisition of funding and the writing of the manuscript. MK participated in the study design and the statistical analysis. AH conceived of the study, participated in its design, acquired the funding, supervised the conduct of the experiments and helped in the drafting the manuscript.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Diane Schwegler-Berry and Dr. Robert Mercer in the preparation and interpretation of AT-II cell electron microscopy. Appreciation is extended to Dr. Rania Kanj for assistance in AT-II cell isolation and Dr. Paul Siegel for expert assistance in analysis of PAHs in coal dust. This research was supported by an intramural project (39277263) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and was a part of graduate research conducted by MMG. Data analysis and interpretation were supported in part by a postgraduate research stipend from the Advanced Research foundation and the Egyptian Government (Benha University).