We examined whether race and age, risk factors for obesity and hypertension, affect the association of obesity with elevated blood pressure (BP). Using electronic medical record data, we conducted a cross-sectional study of adult patients seen at 6 Maryland primary care clinics from September 2011 through June 2012. The risk for higher BP among patients younger than 65 years and in an elevated weight category was greater for both races but was higher for whites than blacks. For patients aged 65 years or older, weight had little impact on systolic BP, suggesting that approaches involving weight loss to address elevated BP should focus on populations younger than 65.
Blacks have higher BP levels than whites and are disproportionately overweight compared with whites, increasing their risk for uncontrolled BP (
We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adult patients (≥18 years) whose primary care provider (PCP) was located at one of 6 Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) sites or who were seen at one site most of the time if they lacked a PCP. We used data from the most recent visit that occurred from September 10, 2011, through June 24, 2012, during which BP was measured and data used to calculate body mass index (BMI) were collected. The clinics serve patients from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds; 4 practices are in underserved areas. Johns Hopkins Medicine institutional review board and JHCP’s clinical research committee approved the study. Patient informed consent was waived.
Clinic staff measured BP with automated BP measurement devices (Omron HEM-907XL), following a standard protocol. This device inflates the BP cuff after a 3-minute rest period and displays the mean of 3 measurements each separated by 30 seconds. We categorized those who reported their race or ethnicity to be Hispanic as Hispanic. For those who did not report ethnicity as Hispanic, we categorized those who reported race as “Caucasian” or “Black or African American” as non-Hispanic white or non-Hispanic black. We categorized those reporting any other race and those with missing race and ethnicity data as “other/unknown.” We calculated age using self-reported birthdate. Height and weight measures from the electronic medical record were used to calculate BMI. We excluded underweight patients (BMI<18.5), a heterogeneous group at greater or lower risk for poor outcomes.
Frequencies and percentages summarized and χ2 tests compared demographic characteristics, overall and stratified by BMI category. We used general linear models regression analysis to assess associations of BMI category with systolic and diastolic BP while adjusting for age and diabetes status. We repeated the analysis, stratifying by race, age category, and both race and age. We created an ordinal variable for BMI category to test for trend and assess effect modification of the BMI-BP association with race and age. Analyses were performed by using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc). All
We examined the demographic characteristics of the patient sample, overall and by BMI category (
| Characteristic | All Patients | BMI Category, kg/m2
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Overweight | Obese Class I | Obese Class II | Obese Class III | |||
| 18.5–24.9 | 25.0–29.9 | 30.0–34.9 | 35.0–39.9 | ≥40.0 | |||
|
n (%) | |||||||
|
| <.001 | ||||||
| Female | 25,154 (62.1) | 6,606 (68.1) | 6,743 (54.5) | 5,314 (57.9) | 3,315 (66.4) | 3,176 (74.8) | |
| Male | 15,339 (37.9) | 3,099 (31.9) | 5,627 (45.5) | 3,862 (42.1) | 1,678 (33.6) | 1,073 (25.2) | |
|
| |||||||
| Hispanic | 951 (2.4) | 248 (2.6) | 334 (2.7) | 216 (2.4) | 99 (2.0) | 54 (1.3) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 16,605 (41.0) | 2,802 (28.9) | 4,544 (36.7) | 4,206 (45.8) | 2,580 (51.7) | 2,473 (58.2) | |
| Non-Hispanic white | 20,908 (51.6) | 5,835 (60.1) | 6,796 (54.9) | 4,449 (48.5) | 2,185 (43.8) | 1,643 (38.7) | |
| Other/unknown | 2,029 (5.0) | 820 (8.4) | 696 (5.6) | 305 (3.3) | 129 (2.6) | 79 (1.9) | |
|
| |||||||
| <65 years | 32,742 (80.9) | 7,838 (80.8) | 9,526 (77.0) | 7,400 (80.7) | 4,211 (84.3) | 3,767 (88.7) | <.001 |
| ≥65 years | 7,751 (19.1) | 1,867 (19.2) | 2,844 (23.0) | 1,776 (19.4) | 782 (15.7) | 482 (11.3) | |
|
| |||||||
| Medicaid | 4,168 (10.3) | 910 (9.4) | 968 (7.8) | 909 (9.9) | 633 (12.7) | 748 (17.6) | <.001 |
| Private | 28,322 (69.9) | 6,951 (71.6) | 8,726 (70.5) | 6,460 (70.4) | 3,433 (68.8) | 2,752 (64.8) | |
| Medicare | 6,786 (16.8) | 1,569 (16.2) | 2,258 (18.2) | 1,524 (16.6) | 785 (15.7) | 650 (15.3) | |
| Uninsured | 775 (1.9) | 159 (1.6) | 287 (2.3) | 178 (1.9) | 99 (2.0) | 52 (1.2) | |
| Unknown | 442 (1.1) | 116 (1.2) | 131 (1.1) | 105 (1.1) | 43 (0.9) | 47 (1.1) | |
|
| |||||||
| Yes | 6,135 (15.2) | 588 (6.1) | 1,489 (12.0) | 1,685 (18.4) | 1,199 (24.0) | 1,174 (27.6) | <.001 |
| No | 34,358 (84.8) | 9,117 (93.9) | 10,881 (88.0) | 7,491 (81.6) | 3,794 (76.0) | 3,075 (72.4) | |
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Before 2011, the electronic medical record did not include a field for ethnicity. Those who were recorded as Hispanic race or Hispanic ethnicity were coded here as Hispanic. Those whose race was recorded as “Caucasian” and “Black or African American” and did not report ethnicity as Hispanic were categorized as non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black.
Insurance type was categorized as Medicaid if patient had any Medicaid insurance, then private if patient had any private insurance, then Medicare if patient had Medicare, then uninsured if coded as self-pay. If none of these were coded, then insurance type was categorized as unknown.
| Patients | BMI Category, kg/m2
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Overweight | Obese Class I | Obese Class II | Obese Class III | ||
| 18.5–24.9 | 25.0–29.9 | 30.0–34.9 | 35.0–39.9 | ≥40.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| All patients | 122.6 (0.19) | 124.9 (0.17) | 125.9 (0.18) | 126.6 (0.23) | 126.6 (0.25) | <.001 |
| Age <65 years | 120.5 (0.22) | 123.4 (0.20) | 124.3 (0.21) | 125.3 (0.25) | 125.1 (0.26) | <.001 |
| Age ≥65 years | 131.7 (0.46) | 131.8 (0.36) | 133.0 (0.44) | 132.4 (0.66) | 132.8 (0.84) | .07 |
| Non-Hispanic white | 121.9 (0.25) | 124.3 (0.23) | 125.0 (0.26) | 125.4 (0.34) | 125.7 (0.38) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 124.9 (0.35) | 126.1 (0.28) | 127.0 (0.28) | 127.7 (0.34) | 127.4 (0.35) | <.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 119.4 (0.29) | 122.7 (0.28) | 123.4 (0.30) | 124.4 (0.37) | 124.2 (0.40) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 123.2 (0.39) | 124.7 (0.32) | 125.4 (0.31) | 126.0 (0.37) | 125.9 (0.36) | <.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 130.3 (0.57) | 130.6 (0.46) | 131.4 (0.57) | 129.7 (0.84) | 131.8 (1.14) | .40 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 134.0 (0.83) | 133.6 (0.62) | 135.2 (0.72) | 136.4 (1.08) | 134.1 (1.27) | .16 |
|
| ||||||
| All patients | 69.1 (0.13) | 72.7 (0.12) | 75.5 (0.13) | 77.3 (0.16) | 78.5 (0.17) | <.001 |
| Age <65 years | 70.4 (0.15) | 74.0 (0.14) | 76.7 (0.15) | 78.5 (0.18) | 79.5 (0.18) | <.001 |
| Age ≥65 years | 67.5 (0.27) | 68.3 (0.22) | 69.8 (0.26) | 70.3 (0.40) | 71.0 (0.51) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic white | 67.7 (0.17) | 71.4 (0.16) | 74.3 (0.18) | 75.8 (0.23) | 77.2 (0.26) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 71.5 (0.24) | 74.1 (0.19) | 76.4 (0.20) | 78.4 (0.24) | 79.3 (0.24) | <.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 69.0 (0.20) | 73.0 (0.19) | 75.6 (0.21) | 77.5 (0.26) | 78.4 (0.28) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 73.1 (0.28) | 75.3 (0.22) | 77.5 (0.22) | 79.2 (0.26) | 80.3 (0.26) | <.001 |
|
| ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white | 66.5 (0.35) | 67.2 (0.28) | 68.9 (0.35) | 68.4 (0.52) | 70.2 (0.70) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic black | 69.0 (0.48) | 69.9 (0.37) | 70.8 (0.42) | 72.8 (0.63) | 72.1 (0.74) | <.001 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure.
Results presented are least squares means and standard error of the means adjusted for age (in years) and diabetes.
Among patients younger than 65, the association of BMI with blood pressure (both systolic and diastolic) persisted (
The association of BMI with both systolic and diastolic BP was positive among non-Hispanic blacks and whites. The interaction of BMI and race was significant (
Among patients younger than 65, the association of BMI with systolic and diastolic BP was positive among non-Hispanic blacks and whites (
The association of BMI with systolic BP was positive and significant among patients younger than 65, stronger among whites than blacks, and not observed among patients 65 or older. The association of BMI with diastolic BP was positive and significant among patients of all ages and among both blacks and whites.
One potential explanation for the weaker association of weight with systolic BP at older ages is that obesity-related arterial stiffening may occur faster at younger ages, slowing as people age. Another explanation may be healthy survival bias — overweight people who survive beyond age 65 may be as healthy as their normal-weight counterparts. Another explanation may be greater use of health care through Medicare for blacks and whites aged 65 or older, which may increase access to care for obesity-related conditions (
One limitation of this study is that the data are cross-sectional. Causal inferences cannot be made; obesity may have led to higher BP or higher BP may have led to increased BMI. The latter is unlikely because high BP is typically asymptomatic and has little effect on other risk factors for obesity. Second, this sample may not be generalizable. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data show that our study population has a higher percentage of women, black people, people younger than 65, and non-Hispanic people than is in the United States population (
This study suggests that weight loss approaches to reduce systolic BP should focus on black and white populations younger than 65. Approaches targeting older populations may need to focus on other factors, such as health system barriers or broader social determinants of health. However, weight loss interventions may lower the diastolic BP of blacks and whites, regardless of age.
Thanks to Jennifer Halbert and Joy Mays for their administrative support. This work is supported by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL0105187 and K24HL083113).
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.