8101110429Am J Ind MedAm. J. Ind. Med.American journal of industrial medicine0271-35861097-027422715102453049410.1002/ajim.22085HHSPA712320ArticleThe Upper Midwest Health Study: Industry and Occupation of Glioma Cases and ControlsRuderAvima M.PhD1*WatersMartha A.PhD, CIH2CarreónTaniaPhD1ButlerMary A.PhD2CalvertGeoffrey M.MD, MPH1Davis-KingKaren E.MPH1WatersKathleen M.BS1SchultePaul A.PhD3MandelJack S.PhD, MPH4MortonRoscoe F.MD, FACP5RedingDouglas J.MD, MPH, FACP6RosenmanKenneth D.MD, MPH7the Brain Cancer Collaborative Study GroupDivision of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OhioDivision of Applied Research Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OhioEducation and Information Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OhioUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MinnesotaMercy Medical Center, Des Moines, IowaNational Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WisconsinMichigan State University, East Lansing, MichiganCorrespondence to: Avima M. Ruder, PhD, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Mailstop R-16, Cincinnati, OH 45226. amr2@cdc.gov1820151962012920121082015559747755Background

Understanding glioma etiology requires determining which environmental factors are associated with glioma. Upper Midwest Health Study case–control participant work histories collected 1995–1998 were evaluated for occupational associations with glioma. “Exposures of interest” from our study protocol comprise our a priori hypotheses.

Materials and Methods

Year-long or longer jobs for 1,973 participants were assigned Standard Occupational Classifications (SOC) and Standard Industrial Classifications (SIC). The analysis file includes 8,078 SIC- and SOC-coded jobs. For each individual, SAS 9.2 programs collated employment with identical SIC-SOC coding. Distributions of longest “total employment duration” (total years worked in jobs with identical industry and occupation codes, including multiple jobs, and non-consecutive jobs) were compared between cases and controls, using an industrial hygiene algorithm to group occupations.

Results

Longest employment duration was calculated for 780 cases and 1,156 controls. More case than control longest total employment duration was in the “engineer, architect” occupational group [16 cases, 10 controls, odds ratio (OR) 2.50, adjusted for age group, sex, age and education, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–5.60]. Employment as a food processing worker [mostly butchers and meat cutters] was of borderline significance (27 cases, 21 controls, adjusted OR: 1.78, CI: 0.99–3.18).

Conclusions

Among our exposures of interest work as engineers or as butchers and meat cutters was associated with increased glioma risk. Significant associations could be due to chance, because of multiple comparisons, but similar findings have been reported for other glioma studies. Our results suggest some possible associations but by themselves could not provide conclusive evidence.

gliomacase–control studiesoccupationindustryoccupational exposure
INTRODUCTION

The ultimate goal of analyses of disease incidence by occupation and/or industry is the identification of an agent or condition, exposure to which increases the risk of developing the disease. This goal may be difficult to achieve as workers in many occupations and industries are exposed to a large number of agents, and many agents are used in a large number of industries. Associating rare diseases with specific agents is especially difficult unless a disease cluster occurs in an industrial setting, for example, liver cancer among workers exposed to vinyl chloride.

In 1995, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) initiated the Upper Midwest Health Study (UMHS), a population-based case–control study of glioma (brain cancer) risk in a non-metropolitan population [Davis-King et al., 1994]. The main focus of the study was farming and associated rural risk factors [Ruder et al., 2004, 2006, 2009b; Carreón et al., 2005]. The four study states—Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin—have large farm populations and higher than average brain cancer incidence. The questionnaire also included a complete occupational history so associations with non-farming employment duration could be assessed. This study evaluated associations between risk of glioma and occupation and industry of the longest duration of employment (combining jobs with the same 2-digit SIC and SOC codes) held by each of 798 cases and 1,175 population-based controls, adult (18–80) non-metropolitan residents of Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin.

Despite a number of studies of glioma, occupation and industry, the only agent conclusively associated with glioma is ionizing radiation [Wrensch et al., 2002]. Based on the literature, we designated “exposures of interest” (Table I) on which to focus. These exposures of interest were our a priori hypotheses of exposures possibly associated with increased risk of glioma. Comprehensive evaluations have been completed only for the highest priority exposures—pesticides and solvents [Hein et al., 2008, 2010; Ruder et al., 2009a; Yiin et al., 2012], for which exposure assessment for questionnaire responses was done, and for farm activities, based on a comprehensive questionnaire [Ruder et al., 2009b].

Our objective for this specific study was to characterize the spectrum of industries and occupations associated with glioma in our study population, especially those industries and occupations for which detailed questionnaire responses were not available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample and design have been described previously [Ruder et al., 2006]. Using the glioma distribution by sex and age at diagnosis (by 10-year age groups) during a 3-year period (1989–1992) in the four study states, we selected potential controls (2:1 to projected number of cases), who resided in eligible non-metropolitan counties on January 1, 1995, from state driver’s license records (ages 18–64 years) or from Health Care Financing Administration’s (HCFA) Medicare data tapes (ages 65–80 years). Sampling randomly within sex–age strata, we chose a pool of potential controls as the case enrollment period began. Cases and controls reporting a prior malignancy other than a glioma (6.4% of cases, 20.6% of controls) were not excluded.

The study focused on histologically confirmed primary intracranial gliomas, rather than all brain neoplasms, to reduce heterogeneity among the case participants. A brain glioma was defined as a neoplasm having an ICD-O code 938–948 [Percy et al., 1990]. Cases diagnosed from January 1, 1995, through January 31, 1997, were identified through participating medical facilities and neurosurgeon offices. Case ascertainment, assessed by comparison with respective state tumor registry ascertainment for eligible counties, was 78% overall [Ruder et al., 2006]. Physician consent was obtained before contacting cases or their next of kin. Cases interviewed in person (n = 438) were interviewed an average of 196 days after diagnosis; proxy case interviews (n = 360) occurred an average of 420 days after diagnosis (partly due to waiting some time after a case death before approaching family members). Proxy interviews were also conducted for 34 ill or deceased controls. Among cases, 59% had a diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme (equivalent to Stage 4 glioma); 22%, astrocytoma; 11%, oligodendroglioma; 8%, other glioma.

Potential participants were sent a letter of invitation, followed up with telephone calls to request participation. Informed consent was solicited from all potential participants. Among eligible potential participants, 70.4% of 1,669 controls and 91.5% of 872 cases (or their next-of-kin) agreed to participate, resulting in a study population of 1,175 controls and 798 cases [Ruder et al., 2006]. This study was approved by the NIOSH Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB 94-DSHEFS-08) and review boards of all participating institutions.

The structured questionnaire, modified from one developed by the National Cancer Institute [Chen et al., 2002], included a complete occupational history, and was administered (most in person, a few by telephone) by trained interviewers [Ruder et al., 2006]. Respondents were asked about all jobs from age 16 years through the end of 1992 held at least 1 year, including employer name (if known), industry, job title, job tasks, materials used, processes, and activities. All interviews were conducted from 1995 to 1998.

The jobs dataset contained 12,145 records (participant-jobs) for 1,967 of the 1,973 participants (6 participants were 16 years of age in 1993 with no jobs recorded), including over 4,000 records of gaps in the work histories. Each of the 8,078 actual jobs was evaluated by an experienced industrial hygienist, very familiar (>15 years experience) with a variety of industrial processes and occupations, blinded to participant case status, and assigned a 4-digit Standard Occupational Code (SOC) [U.S. Department of Commerce, 1980] and a 4-digit Standard Industrial Code (SIC) [Office of Management and Budget, 1987]. For quality control, 10% of the initial coding for both industry and occupation was performed independently by two certified industrial hygienists (CIHs) and reconciled through discussion. The remaining 90% of coding was performed by one CIH with a 1% review by the second CIH followed by reconciliation of coding and wholesale application of any changes to other similar records in the data base.

All analyses used SAS 9.2 software. We determined, for each participant with valid occupational coding, his or her longest “total employment duration,” defined as the number of years a participant worked in a job or jobs with the same industry and occupation codes, including multiple jobs and non-consecutive jobs. We converted SIC and SOC codes to the equivalent Census codes so an algorithm to group comparable SOCs by potential exposures to make larger categories could be used [U.S. Census Bureau, 1980; Schnitzer et al., 1995]. Results are presented only for those occupational groups which included longest “total employment duration” for at least five case and five control participants.

The single longest “total employment duration” for each participant was used in our analyses. For each occupational group, the distribution of cases and controls was compared with the distribution for all other ever-employed cases and controls. We repeated the analyses restricted to jobs with “total employment duration” of >5 years, restricted to “total employment duration” that had started by 1975, and restricted to “total employment duration” that had started by 1985. Analyses used unconditional logistic regression models, adjusted for frequency-matching variables (age group, sex) and age and education. which generated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Because 40% of our case occupational histories were provided by proxies, we wanted to know how accurate proxy respondents could be. We compared original case participant and second interviewee responses for 111 cases for whom we had two questionnaires (a second interview, with a close relative, had been conducted approximately a year after the death of the original respondent). Jobs reported in these second interviews were not included in the main analysis. We compared assigned SIC and SOC codes for these questionnaires (the coders were blinded to the relationship between the questionnaires), ignoring differences in years worked (both start and stop years and total number of years). In some cases, although the information supplied was virtually identical the jobs were not SIC and SOC coded identically, resulting in a “false negative” mismatch. If either the original respondent or the second respondent included a job not matched by the other, that counted as a job but not a match. In some cases, a “job” had more than one record in either the original or second questionnaire (e.g., a job as a soldier during WW2 that was split into three jobs in the original, by base where stationed, but was only one job (but same total number of years) in the second questionnaire. In such cases, each of the original jobs was rated as having been matched. This increased the number of matches.

RESULTS

The distribution of cases and controls and key demographics are presented in Table II.

Longest employment duration for 515 female controls (12 had no codable employment duration) averaged 18.5 ± 13 years, for 641/648 male controls, 23 ± 11.6 years; for 330/342 female cases, 16.5 ± 11 years; and for 450/456 male cases, 23 ± 12 years.

Distribution across industries differed more by gender than by case status: 59% of women’s longest “total employment duration” was in trade and services sectors; men’s were in manufacturing and construction.

Among the 1,973 study participants, 1,936 (748, 94% of 798 cases; 1,132, 96% of 1,175 controls) had a SIC-SOC-codable “total employment duration.” OR, adjusted for frequency-matching variables (age group, sex) and age and education, by industrial sector for longest total employment duration found no sector associated with an increased risk of glioma (results not shown). There were 15 cases and 44 controls in the finance–insurance–real estate sector, with a statistically significant adjusted OR: 0.50 (CI: 0.28–0.91) reduced risk of glioma.

Table III presents the results by all industry-occupation categories, a priori and others, that defined the longest “total employment duration” for at least five cases and five controls. The analyses used the occupational grouping algorithm developed by Schnitzer et al. [1995] for a study of paternal exposures and birth defects. The algorithm captured 1,800 of the 1,936 longest “total employment durations.” Among occupations with potential exposure to our a priori hypothesized agents, the only group statistically significantly associated with glioma was “engineers, architects” (16 cases, 10 controls, adjusted OR: 2.50, CI: 1.12–5.60). Fourteen cases and six controls had a self-described job title of engineer. The others in this group were draftsmen and designers; none was an architect. Employment as a food processing worker was of borderline significance (27 cases, 20 controls, adjusted OR: 1.78, CI: 0.99–3.18). In analyses by longest duration 5 years or more and longest duration starting by 1985 analyses, the positive associations between employment in food processing and increased risk of glioma were statistically significant: 5+ year duration, 27 cases, 20 controls, adjusted OR: 1.88, CI: 1.04–3.40; starting by 1985, 25 cases, 17 controls, adjusted OR: 2.06, CI: 1.10–3.87.

Among occupational groups assumed not to have potential exposure to our a priori hypothesized exposures of interest, only teachers whose employment started by 1975, 20 years before the first of our cases were diagnosed, were at statistically significant reduced risk: 15 cases, 48 controls, adjusted OR: 0.48, CI: 0.25–0.90).

We repeated the analyses using 2-digit SOC and SIC codes to group the responses. Results (not shown) were similar. For an exposure to have a meaningful relationship with cancer initiation, it should have begun before disease onset. We did analyses limited to longest “total employment duration” that had begun by 1985, 10 years before our first glioma diagnoses, and by 1975, 20 years before our first glioma diagnoses, and analyses limited to “total employment duration” at least 5 years long. Results (not shown) were similar to those presented in Table III.

In our analysis, comparing original (from study participants) and repeat (from second interviewees) occupational responses, we found that the original and repeat respondents were more likely to concur on SIC and SOC codes if the study participant was female (concordance by SOC 0.45 for female, 0.38 for male; concordance by SIC 0.52 for female 0.41 for male, P < 0.02). Men had more jobs (mean 7.9 vs. 7.1 for women) but that difference was not statistically significant. The SIC and SOC concordance was generally highest for the oldest participants who also, as one would expect, had had more jobs (mean 8.0 for those born in the 1920s, mean 8.06 for those born in the 1930s, mean 6.8 for those born in the 1940s, mean 6 for those born in the 1950s, and mean 6.7 for those born in the 1960s).

DISCUSSION

Our results are suggestive of some possible associations but by themselves could not provide conclusive evidence for a causal glioma–occupation association. Recent studies point to physicians, firefighters, and chemical and other industrial workers as occupations at higher risk [Ohgaki, 2009], to petrochemical workers [Wrensch et al., 2002] and to the possible effect of non-ionizing radiation and magnetic fields [Villeneuve et al., 2002; Coble et al., 2009].

Analyses of occupation in recent glioma case–control studies have not consistently found similar associations. A large Canadian study found increased risk for “engineers, architects, and surveyors,” as we did, but also for teachers, who in our study population had reduced risk of glioma [Pan et al., 2005]. Exposures the Canadian “engineers, architects, and surveyors” might have had were not specified; 87.5% of our case participants in this category were engineers. The German Interphone Study looked at six occupational sectors (encompassing different occupations and industries than our sectors) and concluded that none was associated with increased risk of glioma [Samkange-Zeeb et al., 2010]. Among cases and controls in the San Francisco Bay area, grouped by an occupational classification similar to the one we used [Schnitzer et al., 1995], a statistically significant increased risk was found for legal and social service workers with 10 years latency and employment, while we found no association with glioma for these workers (Table III) [Carozza et al., 2000].

Unlike De Roos et al. [2003], who analyzed occupational associations in the National Cancer Institute glioma study, we observed no association between farming and glioma (Table III). This discrepancy could be due to differences in the study populations (ours, non-urban with population-based controls, 245 having farming as their longest job; theirs, urban with hospital controls, 15 having worked at least 5 years in farming). Like them, we found an elevated risk for butchers and meat cutters (Table III).

A population-based case–control study in Iowa (drawing cases from different years than ours did) also found an association among women between brain cancer and exposure to meat products [Zheng et al., 2001]. A hospital-based case–control study in northeast China found statistically significant increased risk of glioma among those with occupational exposures to microwaves or to pesticides [Hu et al., 1998], while to date we have seen no association between pesticides and glioma in our study population [Ruder et al., 2004; Carreón et al., 2005; Yiin et al., 2012].

Analyses by industries and occupations group jobs to increase power at the risk of increasing exposure misclassification. The groupings in Table III used knowledge about exposures in various industries and occupations to create more meaningful clusters [Schnitzer et al., 1995], but the categories are still diverse. For example, our engineers include electrical, mechanical, and civil engineers. To explore this finding, engineer-job-specific analyses and increasing the sample size by doing collaborative analyses would be appropriate.

We used the 1987 Standard Industrial Code (SIC) for industry coding rather than the more recent North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). This choice should not have affected the findings in this study. A study of occupational coding using different coding schemes showed that recoding to a different scheme led to substantial disagreement between codes in the absence of full job descriptions, yet the associated exposures with the job code were unaffected [Kromhout and Vermeulen, 2000]. A similar result would be expected for industry coding.

Coding reliability and quality control are important issues for all studies with industry and occupation coding. Reliability is related to both the extent and quality of the information collected and the training and expertise of the coder. This study collected detailed information for each job via interviewer-administered questionnaires. Interviewers went through extensive training, which has been shown to be an important factor in the quality and accuracy of the information collected [Pastides and Goldberg, 1992]. For this study, the use of an expert coder and duplicate coding of the first 10% of the jobs and industries with subsequent reconciliation helped minimize the effect of coding errors on reliability.

Strengths of this study include the size, the participation rate, histological confirmation of diagnoses, and the quality of the industry and occupation coding. Limitations include the large proportion of proxy responses for cases, as well as possible memory loss by case respondents [Weitzner, 1999; Robbins et al., 2000]. Our comparison of original and proxy responses for the 111 cases for whom we collected two occupational histories found only about 50% agreement for SIC and SOC codes. This is less than the 65% (current job) and 76% (last job) repeatability of work history for jobs of 10 years or more found in a European study [Rona and Mosbech, 1989]. However, in our study, we asked about all jobs of a year or more. In addition, the original occupational history would not necessarily be a “gold standard” because of the nature of the participants’ illness.

Although recall bias is a concern for all questionnaire and interview-based retrospective studies, no preferential recall bias would be expected from the control participants since they were unaware that this was a brain cancer study. Cases may have assumed it was a brain cancer study but that should not have influenced their responses to questions about “job tasks, materials used, processes, and activities” since the only established environmental risk factor for glioma is ionizing radiation. It was not possible to confirm tumors reported by controls against medical records; some of these may have been medical conditions other than cancer. Since the controls were generally older than the cases, and since risk of cancer increases with age, one would expect the percentage of cancer in controls to be higher. Whether or not the reported tumors were actually cancers, they do not appear to have adversely affected the employability of the controls, who generally worked more years and had more jobs than did the cases.

While selection bias must also be considered, the random selection of controls within strata and the high participation rates for both cases and controls make it less of a factor in this study [Ruder et al., 2006]. The greatest limitation in this study is the use of “industry” and “occupation”; crude stand-ins for exposures. This limitation shadows all studies based on industry and occupation, but does not invalidate their worth for hypothesis generation.

Among the a priori “exposures of interest” (Table I) that we hypothesized would be associated with increased risk of glioma only exposure to meat and possible exposure to non-ionizing radiation (by engineers) were so associated. Our a priori “exposures of interest” were based on the glioma literature through 1994. Close to 20 years later, there are still no strong, universally accepted occupational risk factors for glioma other than ionizing radiation.

CONCLUSION

Significant associations could be due to chance, because of the number of comparisons, but similar findings have been reported for other glioma studies. Our results are suggestive of some possible associations but by themselves could not provide conclusive evidence for a causal glioma occupation association. Our objective for this specific study was to characterize the industries and occupations significantly associated with glioma in our study population. UMHS analyses using comprehensive exposure assessment across all jobs will be reported separately. Collaborative studies with other research groups, including questionnaire responses and biological specimens, may then have sufficient power to identify gene–environment associations strongly associated with glioma. Such studies should pool data on occupational and environmental exposures and genetic polymorphisms, especially in the genes coding enzymes that process toxicants.

Disclosure Statement: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Mention of trade names does not imply endorsement by the US government.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank study participants, physicians, participating institutions and staff, NIOSH staff who assisted, and intramural and extramural reviewers for helpful comments. Our thanks to Ellen Heineman for the questionnaire we modified for use in this study, to Patricia Schnitzer and Patricia Stewart for providing the algorithms for their occupation-grouping schemes, and to Diana Echeverria and Jim Catalano of Battelle for coding the occupational histories for occupation and industry. This study was funded in part by the NIOSH Initiative for Cancer Control Projects for Farmers and in part by CDC/NIOSH operating funds. The NIOSH Human Subjects Review Board (HSRB 94-DSHEFS-08) and review boards from all participating institutions approved the study, which was conducted in accordance with Subsection (m) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) and Section 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 242m).

REFERENCESAhlbomANavierILNorellSOlinRSpannareBNonoccupational risk indicators for astrocytomas in adultsAm J Epidemiol198612423343373728449AnttilaAHeikkilaPNykyriEKauppinenTPukkalaEHernbergSHemminkiKRisk of nervous system cancer among workers exposed to leadJ Occup Environ Med19963821311368673517BlairACancer risks associated with agriculture: Epidemiologic evidenceBasic Life Sci198221931117150208BlairAHayesHMJrMortality patterns among US veterinarians, 1947–1977: An expanded studyInt J Epidemiol19821143913977152791BlairAMalkerHCantorKPBurmeisterLWiklundKCancer among farmers. A reviewScand J Work Environ Health19851163974073912986BlewJOJrPreservative treatment of wood for farm use1965Madison, WIU.S Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory112Report nr FPL-085.BurchJDCraibKJChoiBCMillerABRischHAHoweGRAn exploratory case-control study of brain tumors in adultsJ Natl Cancer Inst19877846016093104645CantorKPSontagJMHeidMFPatterns of mortality among plumbers and pipefittersAm J Ind Med198610173893740068CarozzaSEWrenschMMiikeRNewmanBOlshanAFSavitzDAYostMLeeMOccupation and adult gliomasAm J Epidemiol2000152983884611085395CarreónTButlerMARuderAMWatersMADavis-KingKECalvertGMSchultePAConnallyLBSandersonWWardEMHeinemanEFMandelJSMortonRFRedingDJRosemmanKDTalaskaGGliomas and farm pesticide exposure in women: The Upper Midwest Health StudyEnviron Health Perspect2005113554655115866761ChenHWardMHTuckerKLGraubardBIMcCombRDPotischmanNAWeisenburgerDDHeinemanEFDiet and risk of adult glioma in eastern Nebraska, United StatesCancer Causes Control200213764765512296512CobleJBDosemeciMStewartPABlairABowmanJFineHAShapiroWRSelkerRGLoefflerJSBlackPMOccupational exposure to magnetic fields and the risk of brain tumorsNeuro Oncol200911324224919234232CooperWCEpidemiologic study of vinyl chloride workers: Mortality through December 31, 1972Environ Health Perspect1981411011067199425Davis-KingKECalvertGMHeinemanEIhryTRuderAMSandersonWTSchultePATalaskaGWallDWardEMProtocol: A case-control study of primary intracranial brain gliomas among rural residents: The Upper Midwest Health Study1994Cincinnati, OHDHHS1304De RoosAJStewartPALinetMSHeinemanEFDosemeciMWilcoskyTShapiroWRSelkerRGFineHABlackPMInskipPDOccupation and the risk of adult glioma in the United StatesCancer Causes Control200314213915012749719FinchamSHansonJBerkelJPatterns and risks of cancer in farmers in AlbertaCancer1992695127612851739927FloderusBPerssonTStenlundCWennbergAOstAKnaveBOccupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in relation to leukemia and brain tumors: A case-control study in SwedenCancer Causes Control1993454654768218879FloderusBTornqvistSStenlundCIncidence of selected cancers in Swedish railway workers, 1961–79Cancer Causes Control1994521891948167266HeinMJWatersMAvan WijngaardenEDeddensJAStewartPAIssues when modeling benzene, toluene, and xylene exposures using a literature databaseJ Occup Environ Hyg200851364718041643HeinMJWatersMARuderAMStenzelMRBlairAStewartPAStatistical modeling of occupational chlorinated solvent exposures for case-control studies using a literature-based databaseAnn Occup Hyg201054445947220418277HuJJohnsonKCMaoYGuoLZhaoXJiaXBiDHuangGLiuRRisk factors for glioma in adults: A case-control study in northeast ChinaCancer Detect Prev19982221001089544430KromhoutHVermeulenRLong-term trends in occupational exposure: Are they real? What causes them? What shall we do with them?Ann Occup Hyg200044532532710930496LawhorneLThe health of farmersJ Iowa Med Soc19766610409418987116LoomisDPSavitzDAMortality from brain cancer and leukaemia among electrical workersBr J Ind Med19904796336382207035LoomisDPWolfSHMortality of workers at a nuclear materials production plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1947–1990Am J Ind Med19962921311418821356LynchDWLewisTRMoormanWJBurgJRGrothDHKhanAAckermanLJCockrellBYCarcinogenic and toxicologic effects of inhaled ethylene oxide and propylene oxide in F344 ratsToxicol Appl Pharmacol19847669846484993MallinKRubinMJooEOccupational cancer mortality in Illinois white and black males, 1979–1984, for seven cancer sitesAm J Ind Med19891566997172665480MancusoTFEpidemiological study of tumors of the central nervous system in OhioAnn N Y Acad Sci198238117396953787MusiccoMFilippiniGBordoBMMelottoAMorelloGBerrinoFGliomas and occupational exposure to carcinogens: Case-control studyAm J Epidemiol198211657827907148804MusiccoMSantMMolinariSFilippiniGGattaGBerrinoFA case-control study of brain gliomas and occupational exposure to chemical carcinogens: The risk to farmersAm J Epidemiol198812847787853421243Office of Management and BudgetStandard Industrial Classification Manual1987Washington, D.COffice of Management and BudgetOhgakiHEpidemiology of brain tumorsMethods Mol Biol200947232334219107440PanSYUgnatAMMaoYGroup CCREROccupational risk factors for brain cancer in CanadaJ Occup Environ Med200547770471716010197PastidesHGoldbergRJCase-control studies in pediatric epidemiology: Parent surrogates and potential pitfalls of inaccurate and selective recallSoz Praventivmed199237122261414002PercyCVan HoltenVMuirCInternational Classification of Diseases for Oncology1990Geneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health OrganizationPreston-MartinSMackWHendersonBERisk factors for gliomas and meningiomas in males in Los Angeles CountyCancer Res19894921613761432790826RobbinsJMWolfsonCMBergmanHClarfieldAMKleimanSBilkerWBaumgartenMAgreement between older subjects and proxy informants on history of surgery and childbirthJ Am Geriatr Soc200048897597910968305RonaRJMosbechJValidity and repeatability of self-reported occupational and industrial history from patients in EEC countriesInt J Epidemiol19891836746792807673RuderAMWatersMAButlerMACarreonTCalvertGMDavis-KingKESchultePASandersonWTWardEMConnallyLBHeinemanEFMandelJSMortonRFRedingDJRosenmanKDTalaskaGGliomas and farm pesticide exposure in men: The Upper Midwest Health StudyArch Environ Health2004591265065716789473RuderAMWatersMACarreonTButlerMADavis-KingKECalvertGMSchultePAWardEMConnallyLBLuJWallDZivkovichZHeinemanEFMandelJSMortonRFRedingDJRosenmanKDThe Upper Midwest Health Study: A case-control study of primary intracranial gliomas in farm and rural residentsJ Agric Saf Health200612425527417131948RuderAMButlerMASandersonWCarreónTWatersMAZivkovichZThe NIOSH Retrospective Pesticide Reference DatabaseJ Agric Saf Health2009a15214315619496343RuderAMCarreonTButlerMACalvertGMDavis-KingKEWatersMASchultePAMandelJSMortonRFRedingDJRosenmanKDExposure to farm crops, livestock, and farm tasks and risk of glioma: The Upper Midwest Health StudyAm J Epidemiol2009b169121479149119403843Samkange-ZeebFSchlehoferBSchuzJSchlaeferKBerg-BeckhoffGWahrendorfJBlettnerMOccupation and risk of glioma, meningioma and acoustic neuroma: Results from a German case-control study (interphone study group, Germany)Cancer Epidemiol2010341556120061201SandersonWTTalaskaGZaebstDDavis-KingKCalvertGPesticide prioritization for a brain cancer case-control studyEnviron Res19977421331449339226SchnitzerPGTeschkeKOlshanAFA classification scheme for aggregating U.S. census occupation and industry codesAm J Ind Med19952821851918585516SinksTSteeleGSmithABWatkinsKShultsRAMortality among workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenylsAm J Epidemiol199213643893981415158SwaenGMvan VlietCSlangenJJSturmansFCancer mortality among licensed herbicide applicatorsScand J Work Environ Health19921832012041615295ThériaultGProvencherSMortality study of oil refinery workers: Five-year follow-upJ Occup Med19872943573603585568ThomasTLWaxweilerRJBrain tumors and occupational risk factorsScand J Work Environ Health198612115ThomasTLFonthamETNormanSAStemhagenAHooverRNOccupational risk factors for brain tumors. A case-referent death-certificate analysisScand J Work Environ Health19861221211273726493ThomasTLStolleyPDStemhagenAFonthamETBleeckerMLStewartPAHooverRNBrain tumor mortality risk among men with electrical and electronics jobs: A case-control studyJ Natl Cancer Inst19877922332383474455U.S. Census Bureau1980 Census of Population: Classified Index of Industries and Occupations1980Washington, DCU.S. Department of CommerceU. S. Department of CommerceStandard Occupational Classification Manual1980Washington D.COffice of Federal Statistical Policy and StandardsVilleneuvePJAgnewDAJohnsonKCMaoYBrain cancer and occupational exposure to magnetic fields among men: Results from a Canadian population-based case-control studyInt J Epidemiol200231121021711914323WaxweilerRJStringerWWagonerJKJonesJFalkHCarterCNeoplastic risk among workers exposed to vinyl chlorideAnn N Y Acad Sci197627140481069531WaxweilerRJAlexanderVLeffingwellSSHaringMLloydJWMortality from brain tumor and other causes in a cohort of petrochemical workersJ Natl Cancer Inst198370175816571925WeitznerMAPsychosocial and neuropsychiatric aspects of patients with primary brain tumorsCancer Invest199917428529110225009WrenschMMinnYChewTBondyMBergerMSEpidemiology of primary brain tumors: Current concepts and review of the literatureNeuro Oncol20024427829912356358YiinJRuderAMWatersMAStewartPACarreonTButlerMACalvertGMDavis-KingKESchultePAMandelJSMortonRFRedingDJRosenmanKDThe Upper Midwest Health Study: Risk of glioma among farm pesticide applicatorsEnviron Health2012113922691464ZhengTCantorKPZhangYKeimSLynchCFOccupational risk factors for brain cancer: A population-based case-control study in IowaJ Occup Environ Med200143431732411322092

Exposures of Interest Associated With Glioma Risk*

ExposureRelevant occupationsReferences
PesticidesFarmers, pesticide applicatorsAhlbom et al. [1986], Blair, [1982], Blair et al. [1985], Fincham et al. [1992], Musicco et al. [1982], Musicco et al. [1988], Swaen et al. [1992]
SolventsDry cleaners, metalworkersBlair et al. [1985], Thériault and Provencher [1987], Thomas et al. [1986], Waxweiler et al. [1983]
Organic and inorganic dustsFarmersBlair et al. [1985], Fincham et al. [1992], Lawhorne [1976]
Polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbonsPetrochemical workersThériault and Provencher [1987], Waxweiler et al. [1983]
Cutting oils and metalworking fluidsMetalworkersThomas et al. [1986], Thomas and Waxweiler [1986]
PaintsPainters, artistsThomas et al. [1986], Thomas and Waxweiler [1986]
Gasoline and diesel exhaustTruckers, miners, farmersFincham et al. [1992]
GasolineGasoline station attendants, farmersBlair et al. [1985]
Raw meat (animals)Farmers, meat-processing workers, veterinariansBlair and Hayes [1982], Lawhorne [1976]
LeadGasoline station attendants, battery reclamation workers, plumbers, glass workersAnttila et al. [1996], Cantor et al. [1986], Mallin et al. [1989]
Wood preservativesFarmers, railroad tie, and telephone pole maintenance workersBlew [1965], Sanderson et al. [1997]
Ionizing radiationRadiologists, nuclear manufacturing workers, X-ray techniciansLoomis and Wolf [1996], Preston-Martin et al. [1989]
Non-ionizing radiationWelders, engineersFloderus et al. [1993], Floderus et al. [1994], Loomis and Savitz [1990], Thomas et al. [1987]
Biological aerosols (bacteria, viruses, fungi endotoxins)Farmers, meat-processing workers, veterinarians, health-care workersBlair et al. [1985], Lawhorne [1976]
Polychlorinated biphenylsCapacitor and transformer manufacturing workers, electrical workers, construction workersLoomis and Savitz [1990], Sinks et al. [1992]
FertilizersFarmersFincham et al. [1992], Musicco et al. [1982], Musicco et al. [1988]
N-nitroso compoundsRubber manufacturing workersAhlbom et al. [1986], Mancuso [1982]
NitratesFarmersBurch et al. [1987], Lawhorne [1976]
Hair dyesHairdressersBurch et al. [1987]
Vinyl chloridePVC manufacturing workersCooper [1981], Waxweiler et al. [1976]
Ethylene oxideSterilizersLynch et al. [1984]

The study protocol [Davis-King et al., 1994] provides extended rationales for these exposures of interest.

Characteristics of Cases and Controls and Risk of Glioma, According to Respondent Status

Including proxy-only interviewsaExcluding proxy-only interviewsa


Cases (798)Controls (1,175)OR (95%CI)bCases (438)Controls (1,141)OR (95%CI)b
Ever non-farm job ≥1 year (vs. never)7621,1051.36 (0.89–2.08)4141,0761.05 (0.63–1.76)
Ever pesticides on non-farm job (vs. never)70/762119/1,1050.77 (0.56–1.06)36/414118/1,0760.64 (0.43–0.96)
Longest job
  Professional234345Referent141337Referent
  Trades2964120.97 (0.74–1.27)1463980.86 (0.61–1.20)
  Service2303460.94 (0.72–1.23)1253390.82 (0.59–1.13)
TV hours/day after age 18 yearsc, d2.7 ± 1.72.6 ± 1.41.05 (0.98–1.11)2.7 ± 1.62.6 ± 1.41.01 (0.94–1.10)
Hay fever/allergy prescription (vs. none)881430.82 (0.62–1.10)541390.78 (0.55–1.11)
Ever panoramic dental X-ray (vs. never)2303940.75 (0.61–0.92)1343880.67 (0.52–0.86)
White non-Latino (vs. all other)7831,1521.36 (0.70–2.66)4291,1191.43 (0.64–3.20)
Education
  College graduate132201Referent89199Referent
  High school graduate5227671.11 (0.87–1.43)3037511.0 (0.7–1.3)
  <12 years1442071.31 (0.95–1.82)461911.0 (0.6–1.5)
Smoking
  Never363526Referent222514Referent
  Former2364220.89 (0.71–1.11)994070.68 (0.51–0.91)
  Current (through 1 Jan. 1993)1992271.21 (0.94–1.55)1172201.02 (0.76–1.38)
Ever drank alcohol (vs. never)5829000.73 (0.59–0.92)3288810.73 (0.55–0.98)
Women
  Ever pregnant (vs. never)300/341458/5271.20 (0.75–1.93)169/196449/5161.31 (0.72–2.39)
  Number of pregnanciesd3.5 ± 2.03.9 ± 2.30.96 (0.89–1.03)3.4 ± 1.83.9 ± 2.31.00 (0.91–1.11)
  Menstruating through 1992 (vs. postmenopausal)1301590.64 (0.37–1.10)1121591.13 (0.59–2.19)

Based on Table 4 from Ruder et al. [2006].

Includes subject + proxy interviews for 137 cases and 49 controls.

Adjusted for age, 10-year age strata, education, state, and gender (except for women-only variables).

Continuous variable (mean, SD); OR is for 1 unit (year, hour, pregnancy).

Question asked only of participants 18 or older by 1992.

Longest Case and Control “Total Employment Duration” in Occupational Groups and Adjusted Odds Ratio of Glioma*

Longest total employment duration

Occupational groupsaCasesControlsAdjusted ORb (95% CI)
All workers7801,159
A priori occupations of interest
  Engineers, architects16102.50 (1.12–5.60)c
  Food processing workersd27211.78 (0.99–3.18)
  Farm managers, workers931550.91 (0.69–1.21)
  Welders, cutters580.89 (0.29–2.76)
  Electricians, electrical workers11240.69 (0.33–1.42)
  Carpenters, wood workers8160.67 (0.28–1.59)
  Painters781.27 (0.45–3.54)
  Material moving equipment operators17191.20 (0.61–2.36)
  Motor vehicle operators26380.97 (0.58–1.63)
  Vehicle mechanics20251.06 (0.58–1.93)
Occupational groups not of a priori interest
  Managers, administrators38521.11 (0.72–1.72)
  Mathematical, physical, computer scientists6120.72 (0.26–1.94)
  Nurses, health technicians28440.93 (0.57–1.52)
  Teachers, librarians30640.69 (0.43–1.11)
  Legal and social service workers11200.85 (0.40–1.80)
  Salesmen79961.28 (0.94–1.76)
  Clerks761001.25 (0.90–1.75)
  Shippers26251.45 (0.83–2.56)
  Messengers7170.67 (0.27–1.64)
  Electronic equipment operators8190.62 (0.27–1.44)
  Policemen, guards8111.03 (0.41–2.58)
  Janitors12240.68 (0.34–1.39)
  Personal service workers13300.64 (0.33–1.25)
  Textile workers661.51 (0.48–4.77)
  Food service workers33620.75 (0.48–1.18)
  Paper workers561.09 (0.33–3.60)
  Sheetmetal workers, etc.16310.73 (0.39–1.36)
  Construction workers15191.11 (0.55–2.22)
  Other (non-vehicle) mechanics12240.72 (0.35–1.45)
  Vehicle manufacturing workers1291.98 (0.90–4.73)

Occupational groups with potential exposure to a priori “exposures of interest” and occupational groups not of a priori interest are listed consecutively. Only those groups with at least five case and five control participants are presented.

Analyses used an occupational grouping algorithm developed for a study of paternal exposures and birth defects [Schnitzer et al., 1995].

Logistic regression analyses adjusted for frequency-matching variables (age group, sex) and age and education. Adj. OR = adjusted odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

P < 0.05.

In our study population, butchers and meat cutters comprised most of those working in food processing, with an occupation in precision production either in food manufacturing (4/8) or in food stores (9/11). For both industry–occupation combinations, there were too few participants to do separate calculations. Combining the two categories, for 12 cases and 6 controls this was the longest employment duration, with an elevated risk of glioma (adjusted OR: 2.73, CI: 1.01–7.39).