10157392039705J Acad Nutr DietJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2212-26722212-267222709703337898710.1016/j.jand.2011.11.013NIHMS367141ArticleParent support and parent-mediated behaviors are associated with children’s sugary beverage consumptionLopezNanette V.MS/MSDoctoral StudentSan Diego State University & University of California, San Diego, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, 9245 Sky Park Court, Suite 224, San Diego, CA 92123, Tel: 858-336-5809, Fax: 619-594-2998nlee@projects.sdsu.eduAyalaGuadalupe X.PhD, MPHProfessorSan Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, 9245 Sky Park Court, Suite 220, San Diego, CA 92123, Tel: 619-594-6686, Fax: 619-594-2998ayala@mail.sdsu.eduCorderKirstenPhDResearch AssociateCentre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Box 296, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK, Tel: +44(0) 1223 330315, Fax: +44(0)1223 330316Klc29@medschl.cam.ac.ukEisenbergChristina M.MPH, ATCResearch AssistantInstitute for Behavioral and Community Health, 9245 Sky Park Court, Suite 221, San Diego, CA 92123, Tel: 619-594-5568, Fax: 619-594-2998ceisenberg@projects.sdsu.eduZiveMichelle M.MS, RDConsultant Network for a Healthy California, Division of Child Development and Community Health, 4305 University Ave, Suite 590, San Diego, CA 92105, Telephone: 619-681-0663, Fax: 619-681-0666mzive@ucsd.eduWoodChristineMDPediatric ConsultantEl Camino Pediatrics, 477 N. El Camino Real, Suite B105, Encinitas, CA 92024, Telephone: 760-753-7143, Fax: 858-794-7610drwood@kidseatgreat.comElderJohn P.PhD, MPHDistinguished Professor of Public HealthSan Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, 9245 Sky Park Court, Suite 221, Tel: 619-594-2997, Fax: 619-594-2998jelder@mail.sdsu.edu7420124201201420131124541547© 2012 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.2012

Consumption of sugary beverages has been identified as a contributor to childhood obesity. Studies have established the importance of specific parenting practices to children’s beverage consumption; however, no study has examined multiple operationalizations of parenting to better understand where to focus future interventions. The present study examined the relationship between children’s sugary beverage consumption and a parenting model that included household food rules, parent modeling of food rules, parent-mediated behaviors, and parent support. Baseline data from Project MOVE/me Muevo were used. Participants included 541 children, aged five to eight years old, and their parents. Parents completed a 45-minute self-administered survey in Spanish or English, providing information about their child’s dietary intake, as well as their parenting practices. Children’s sugary beverage consumption included non-diet soda, non-carbonated sugary drinks, and sports drinks. Household food rules and parent modeling of food rules were assessed with seven items each. Parent-mediated behaviors consisted of four behaviors. Parent support was assessed with five items. Parent support and parent-mediated behaviors, including total screen time and eating at fast food restaurants at least weekly, were associated with greater consumption of sugary beverages in children. No other parenting variables were significant. Encouraging caregivers to promote healthy dietary behaviors and provide healthy choices, limiting children’s television and computer use, and reducing fast food consumption may contribute to reductions in sugary beverage consumption among children.

sugary beveragesparenting modelparent supportparent-mediated behaviors
INTRODUCTION

Consumption of sugary beverages is a contributor to childhood obesity (1,2,3,4). The American Dietetic Association recommends that total added sugars not exceed 25% of a child’s total daily caloric intake (5). In addition, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends limiting fruit juice consumption to four to six oz/day for children ages one through six years and eight to 12 oz/day for older children (6).

Within an ecological framework, parents play a role in children’s behaviors. In particular, parents are ultimately responsible for their children’s food and beverage choices since young children have little control over these purchases. Given their importance, researchers have examined ways in which parents may influence beverage consumption (7,8,9). Specific parenting practices include rule setting (10), parent modeling of or adherence to rules (11), parent-mediated behaviors (12), and parent support (13).

Increasing consumption of sugary beverages warrants examination of correlates to prevent further increases. Numerous studies have identified the importance of specific parenting practices to children’s sugary beverage consumption. This study extends this research by testing a parenting model for children’s sugary beverage consumption. In this study, sugary beverages included non-diet soda, non-carbonated sugary drinks, and sports drinks. Davison and Campbell (2010) identified four categories of parenting related to children’s obesity risk behaviors: beliefs and knowledge, modeling, accessibility, and shaping (14). We specifically examined the relationship between children’s sugary beverage consumption and four parenting categories: household food rules, parent modeling of food rules, parent-mediated behaviors, and parent support for healthy eating.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used baseline data from Project MOVE/me Muevo, a recreation center-based obesity prevention intervention for children. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from San Diego State University. Participants included 541 children, aged five to eight years old, and their parents living in San Diego County. Parents were required to be the participating child’s legal guardian or primary caregiver. Between November 2006 and May 2008, families were recruited through targeted phone calls and at public locations, community events, and the 30 participating recreation centers. One parent/legal guardian provided written informed consent, with the child providing verbal assent.

Procedures

Parents completed a 45-minute self-administered survey in Spanish or English. All measures were conducted between April 2007 and May 2008.

Children’s Sugary Beverage Intake

Children’s sugary beverage intake was assessed using a previously validated scale (15) and included non-diet soda, non-carbonated sugary drinks, and sports drinks. Response options consisted of common beverage portions and cup sizes. For example, soda consumption was assessed according to frequency of consumption using a 12 oz. can/glass: never/less than 1 per month, 1–3 cans/glasses per month, 1 can/glass per week, 2–6 cans/glasses per week, 1 can/glass per day, or 2 or more cans/glasses per day. Item responses were converted to mean daily servings and then summed, with higher scores representing greater daily consumption of sugary beverages.

Household Food Rules

Household food rules regarding diet were assessed using five items from Active Where (16) plus two developed by the study team using data from Aventuras para Niños (17) (Table 1). “Sometimes” responses were recoded into “yes” responses since any enforcement of rules could affect a child’s diet. Table 1 lists the test-retest reliability data for the five household rules used from Active Where (18). A final score was computed by summing affirmative responses with a higher score indicating more household food rules.

Parent Modeling of Food Rules

Parents were assessed on whether they followed the same seven household food rules set for their children, modified to reflect parent behavior. The same response options and recoding were used.

Parent-Mediated Behaviors

Four parent-mediated behaviors were examined: the frequency of family dinner eaten together, frequency of eating away-from-home meals, frequency of the child eating or snacking while watching TV, and total amount of screen time per day.

Frequency of family dinner eaten together was assessed using one item from a previous study conducted with the target population (19) (Table 1). Responses were recoded into mean times per week. For example, “5–7 times a week” was recoded into 6 times a week. “Less than once a week” and “1–2 times a week” were collapsed into one response in order to approximate equal distribution between response categories. This grouping resulted in the creation of three response categories: 2 or less times per week, 3.5 times per week, and 6 times per week.

Frequency of eating away-from-home meals was assessed using three items from a previous study targeting the same population (20) (Table 1). For each item, five response options were provided and recoded as “never/less than once a week” or “once a week or more”, based on evidence that at least weekly consumption of prepared foods purchased outside the home is associated with poorer diet quality (20).

Weekly frequency of the child eating or snacking while watching television was assessed using three items from a previous study targeting the same population (21) (Table 1). Responses were recoded into mean times per week. Responses to all three questions were used to create a summary score, such that a higher score indicated a greater number of days per week engaged in these behaviors.

Total daily screen time was assessed using three items used in the Active Where study (16) (Table 1). A total sum score of daily screen time was computed with higher scores reflecting more minutes of screen time. Table 1 lists the test-retest reliability for the screen time variables used in Active Where (18).

Parent Support

Social support was assessed with five items used in the PACE+ study (22) (Table 1). Response options and recoding were identical to those for weekly frequency of the child eating or snacking while watching television. Responses were collapsed into one summary score, such that a higher score indicated a greater number of days of parent support in a typical week.

Demographics

Parent/primary caregiver and child demographics included age, gender, and ethnicity, with parents/primary caregivers reporting monthly family income before taxes from all sources and highest level of education completed. Parent/primary caregiver’s and child’s ethnicity was assessed by asking whether or not he/she considered himself/herself and his/her child Latino, Hispanic, Mexican/Mexican American, or of Spanish origin. Total monthly family income before taxes was recoded into $0–$2000, $2001–$3500, $3501–$5000, and $5001 or more. Caregiver education level was categorized as middle school or less, high school, some college, college graduate, and post-graduate work.

Statistical Analysis

Analyses were conducted using PASW Statistics 18.0 (Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics included means and standard deviations for continuous data and frequencies for categorical data. Bivariate analyses examined correlations between individual scale items and children’s sugary beverage consumption, with no variations found in the direction of associations among items within the same construct. Therefore, a multiple linear regression analysis determined the relative contribution of household food rules, parent modeling of food rules, parent-mediated behaviors, and parent support to children’s sugary beverage consumption. The dependent variable was not normally distributed so the variable was log plus one transformed. The regression analysis included five blocks of variable groupings in accordance with the proposed parent model. The first block consisted of demographics such as caregiver’s age and education, and child gender. The second block included Household Food Rules, the third block included Parent Modeling of Food Rules, the fourth block included Parent-Mediated Behaviors, and the final block included Parent Support. The fifth block was used to interpret the independent associations of the variable groups and of the total model. Blocks were ordered based upon the relative contribution to children’s beverage consumption. For example, household food rules, followed by parent modeling of food rules, and parent support were found to have a decreasing effect on the BMI of girls in a 5-year longitudinal study (23).

RESULTS and DISCUSSION

Caregiver demographics indicated 93% were female, 41% were Latino/Hispanic and they had an average age of 37.6 (± 6.5) years. Among the caregivers, 30.1% completed high school or less while 43.1% completed college or post graduate work. Child demographics indicated 55.1% were female, 46.0% were Latino/Hispanic, and they had an average age of 6.7 (± 0.7) years. Descriptive statistics indicated children consumed a 0.51 (± 0.58) mean daily servings of sugary beverages and spent 108.0 (± 86.2) minutes in total daily screen time. Parent household food rules, modeling of household food rules, and parent support sum scores were 4.7 ± 1.8, 5.2 ± 1.7, and 5.2 ± 1.5, respectively. Results from the hierarchical regression analysis examining correlates of the log transformed sugary beverage consumption are in Table 2. Due to missing data on some of the parenting variables included in the regression analysis, the final analytic sample was 539. In the demographics block, significant negative associations were found between sugary beverage consumption and caregiver education (p≤ 0.01) such that with more education, caregivers reported less consumption of sugary beverages in their children. In Block 2, having more household food rules was negatively associated with sugary beverage consumption; however, this association was no longer significant in the full model. In Block 4, a significant positive association was found between sugary beverage consumption and weekly visits to fast food restaurants (p≤ 0.05) and total screen time (p≤ 0.05). In Block 5, a significant negative association was found between sugary beverage consumption and parent support (p≤ 0.001). The positive associations between sugary beverage consumption and weekly visits to fast food restaurants and total screen time remained in Block 5. Greater parent support was associated with less consumption of sugary beverages. Eating away-from-home meals at fast food restaurants at least weekly and more screen time were both associated with greater consumption of sugary beverages. No other relationships were significant.

This study tested the relationship between a parenting model that included household food rules, parent modeling of food rules, parent-mediated behaviors, and parent support with children’s sugary beverage consumption. Children consumed on average, half a serving of sugary beverages per day, less than an elementary school sample reporting an average of 1 daily serving (24). Consumption in the present study may be lower due to the younger age of the children compared with the elementary school sample. As children age, sugary beverage consumption increases (25). Total mean daily screen time was 108.0 minutes, with 30.3% of the caregivers reporting their child spent two hours or more in front of a screen. These children accumulated less daily screen time compared to national data that indicated nearly 50% of girls and 55% of boys aged 6–11 years old spend two or more hours in front of a screen every day (26). This could be due to the larger age range in the national sample since children engage in more screen time as they get older (27).

Regression analyses indicated that parent-mediated behaviors were associated with greater consumption of children’s sugary beverages. These results match previous studies that showed TV viewing was associated with consumption of high-energy drinks among six-year-old Australians (28). In a cross-sectional study with school-aged children living in Maryland, results indicated that those who lived in high TV viewing families consumed 5% more of their total daily energy intake from soda (29). This may be due to the effects of television advertising (30). Data from a 2008 study indicated that all 27 beverage advertisements shown during Saturday morning children’s programming promoted choices that do not meet nutrition standards (31).

In addition to total screen time, eating away-from-home meals at fast food restaurants was positively associated with children’s sugary beverage consumption. This supports previous findings in which eating away-from-home meals at least once a week or more was associated with greater consumption of sugary beverages (20). Additional research indicates that visits to fast food restaurants are positively associated with sugary beverage consumption (32, 33).

Parent support was negatively associated with consumption of sugary beverages; in other words, greater parent support for healthy eating was associated with less sugary beverage consumption. Home availability is one aspect of parental social support. One study found a positive relationship between availability of soft drinks in the home and consumption of soft drinks in a sample of 8–13 year old children (11). Unfortunately, additional research examining social support between parents and elementary school aged children is unavailable.

Results from the current study were inconsistent with previous studies. For example, previous research shows that eating dinner together as a family (34) and less frequent television watching while eating meals (35) are associated with less consumption of sugary beverages among children. These associations were not observed in the present study and could be explained by the fact that the current study involved younger children compared to those in previous studies. Nevertheless, the current study supports the lack of associations found between other parenting constructs such as household rules and parent modeling of rules and sugary beverage consumption among children (28).

Current study limitations include a cross-sectional study design, a finite number of categories for beverage serving sizes which prevents detailed measurement, limitations in what parents/caregivers know about what children are consuming throughout the day, and potential self-report bias, resulting from recall issues and social desirability. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine if the constructs are individually or collectively predictive of children’s beverage consumption. Parent report serves as a proxy for child beverage consumption, screen time, and family meal behaviors due to the children’s young age, with parents possibly having difficulty recalling consumption of all beverages due to consumption of beverages while away from the parent or inability to accurately report quantities (36). More precise measures of overall diet include direct observation, doubly labeled water, 24-hour recall and food frequency questionnaires. The only method used to assess diet in the current study was a survey.

Study strengths include a large sample size (n=541) and an ethnically diverse sample (41% Latino), consistent with San Diego County census data which indicated that 31% of residents are of Hispanic/Latino origin (37). Additionally, in terms of primary caregiver education, 24.6% reported graduating from college compared with 34.0% of county residents who are college graduates. Although median income in San Diego County is $60,103, this sample reflects an overall lower median income of $42,000–$48,000 as reported by primary caregivers. This lower income level may be due to the lower percentage of college graduates in the current study. Research indicates that mothers with less education have higher emotional feeding scores compared to mothers with more education (38) meaning they provide food as a form of comfort in the absence of hunger. This may contribute to consumption of unhealthy foods and beverages in children with less educated mothers.

CONCLUSIONS

Current study results can inform future interventions by highlighting correlates of sugary beverage consumption, which is related to childhood obesity. Parent behaviors, including limiting screen time and eating away-from-home meals at fast food restaurants, were associated with sugary beverage consumption and may be promising avenues for obesity prevention. The AAP recommends limiting screen time to two hours or less per day for children 2 years of age and older (39). Public health advocates can use these guidelines to inform parents about their children’s screen time behaviors. Parent support, including reducing the availability and accessibility of sugary beverages, could also limit opportunities for sugary beverage consumption.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

LudwigDSPetersonKEGortmakerSLRelation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: A prospective, observational analysisLancet20013579255505811229668CollisonKSZaidiMZSubhaniSNAl-RubeaanKShoukriMAl-MohannaFASugar-sweetened carbonated beverage consumption correlates with BMI, waist circumference, and poor dietary choices in school childrenBMC Public Health20101023420459689FioritoLMMariniMFrancisLASmiciklas-WrightHBirchLLBeverage intake of girls at age 5 y predicts adiposity and weight status in childhood and adolescenceAm J Clin Nutr20099093594219692492DuboisLFarmerAGirardMPetersonKRegular sugar-sweetened beverage consumption between meals increases risk of overweight among preschool-aged childrenJ Am Diet Assoc200710792493417524711NicklasTAJohnsonRPosition of the American Dietetic Association: Dietary guidance for healthy children ages 2 to 11 yearsJ Am Diet Assoc2004104466067715054355Committee on NutritionThe use and misuse of fruit juice in pediatricsPediatrics200110751210121311331711van der HorstKKremersSFerreiraISinghAOenemaABrugJPerceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescentsHealth Educ Res200722229530416908496KremersSPJvan der HorstKBrugJAdolescent screen-viewing behaviour is associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: The role of habit strength and perceived parental normsAppetite20074833455017126451de BruijnGJKremersSPJde VriesHvan MechelenWBrugJAssociations of social-environmental and individual-level factors with adolescent soft drink consumption: Results from the SMILE studyHealth Educ Res200722222723716880219SpurrierNJMagareyAAGolleyRCurnowFSawyerMGRelationships between the home environment and physical activity and dietary patterns of preschool children: A cross-sectional studyInt J Behav Nutr Phys Act20083053118513416GrimmGCHarnackLStoryMFactors associated with soft drink consumption in school-aged childrenJ Am Diet Assoc200410481244915281041AyalaGXElderJPCampbellNRLongitudinal intervention effects on parenting of the aventuras para niñosAm J Prev Med201038215416220117571BaranowskiTWatsonKMissaghianMSocial support is a primary influence on home fruit, 100% juice, and vegetable availabilityJ Am Diet Assoc200810871231123518589035DavisonKKCampbellKCrawfordDJefferyRWOpportunities to prevent obesity in children within families: An ecological approachObesity Prevention and Public Health1New York, NYOxford University Press2005208RockettHRHBreitenbachMFrazierALValidation of a youth/adolescent food frequency questionnairePrev Med19972668088169388792FormanHKerrJNormanGJReliability and validity of destination-specific barriers to walking and cycling for youthPrev Med200846431131618206220ArredondoEMElderJPAyalaGXCampbellNBaqueroBDuerksenSIs parenting style related to children’s healthy eating and physical activity in Latino familiesHealth Educ Res200621686287117032706JoeLActive where?Individual item reliability statistics parent/child survey (N=97)Dr. James Sallis, PhD. www.drjamessallis.sdsu.edu/Documents/AW_item_reliability_ParentAdo.pdfAccessed April 20, 2011AndayaAAArredondoEMAlcarazJELindsaySPElderJPThe association between family meals, TV viewing during meals, and fruit, vegetables, soda, and chips intake among Latino childrenJ Nutr Educ Behav201143530831520965787AyalaGXRogersMArredondoEMAway-from-home food intake and risk for obesity: Examining the influence of contextObesity20081651002818309297ZiveMMFrank-SpohrerGCSallisJFDeterminants of dietary intake in a simple of White and Mexican-American childrenJ Am Diet Assoc199898128212899813584ProchaskaJJRodgersMWSallisJFAssociation of parent and peer support with adolescent physical activityRes Q Exerc Sport200273220621012092896CrawfordDClelandVTimperioAThe longitudinal influence of home and neighbourhood environments on children’s body mass index and physical activity over 5 years: The CLAN studyIntl J Obes20103411771187BlumJWJacobsenDJDonnellyJEBeverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year periodJ Am Coll Nutr2005242939815798075StoreyMLForsheeRAAndersonPABeverage consumption in the US populationJ Am Diet Assoc2006577–8494511GableSChangYKrullJLTelevision watching and frequency of family meals are predictive of overweight onse and persistence in a national sample of school-aged childrenJ Am Diet Assoc20071071536117197271HandsBPChiversPTParkerHEBeilinLKendallGLarkinDThe associations between physical activity, screentime and weight from 6 to 14 yrs: The Raine StudyJ Sci Med Sport201114539740321531620CampbellKJCrawfordDABallKFamily food environment and dietary behaviors likely to promote fatness in 5–6 year-old childrenInt J Obes200630812721280CoonKAGoldbergJRogersBLTuckerKLRelationships between use of television during meals and children’s food consumption patternsPediatrics20011071E711134471RobinsonRNTelevision viewing and childhood obesityPediatr Clin North Am20014841017102511494635BatadaASeitzMDWootanMGStoryMNine out of 10 food advertisements shown during Saturday morning children’s television programming are for foods high in fat, sodium, or added sugars, or low in nutrientsJ Am Diet Assoc2008108467367818375225BowmanSAGortmakerSLEbbelingCBPereiraMALudwigDSEffects of fast-food consumption on energy intake and diet quality among children in a national household surveyPediatrics20041131 Pt 111211814702458WiechaJLFinkelsteinDTropedPJFragalaMPetersonKESchool vending machine use and fast-food restaurant use are associated with sugar-sweetened beverage intake in youthJ Am Diet Assoc2006106101624163017000195GillmanMWRifas-ShimanSLFrazierALFamily dinner and diet quality among older children and adolescentsArch Fam Med20009323524010728109LiangTKuhleSVeugelersPJNutrition and body weights of Canadian children watching television and eating while watching televisionPublic Health Nutr200912122457246319405988LinnemanCHesslerKNanneySSteger-MayKHuynhAHaire-JoshuDParents are accurate reporters of their preschoolers’ fruit and vegetable consumption under limited conditionsJ Nutr Educ Behav200436630530815617612US Census BureauState and county quickfacts: San Diego Countyhttp://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/06073.html. Updated October 27, 2011Accessed September 14, 2011SaxtonJCarnellSVan JaarsveldCHMWardleJMaternal education is associated with feeding styleJ Am Diet Assoc200910989489819394477Committee on Public EducationChildren, adolescents, and televisionPediatrics2001107242342611158483

Constructs and items used on baseline survey

ConstructItemResponse OptionsICC18
Household RulesCronbach α=0.68Limited Portion Sizes at Meals16Yes, No, Sometimes.608
No Meals with the TV/DVD on16.694
No Fried Snacks (such as potato chips) at home16.736
Must Eat Dinner with Family16.618
Limited Fast Food16.703
No Sugary Beverages17N/A
Must Finish All Food on Plate17N/A
Parent Modeling of RulesCronbach α=0.66Same items as above, modified to reflect parent behaviorYes, No, SometimesN/A
Parent-Mediated BehaviorsFrequency of Family Dinner Eaten Together19In a typical week, how often does your family eat dinner together?Less than once a week, 1–2 times a week, 3–4 times a week, 5–7 times a weekN/A
Cronbach α=0.68Frequency of Eating Away-From-Home Meals20How often does the family usually go out to eat or bring home ready-to-eat foods from…?:

relatives’ or friends’ homes,

fast food restaurants,

other restaurants including sit-down restaurants

Never, less than once a week, 1–2 times per week, 3–4 times per week, 5 or more times per weekN/A
Cronbach α=0.70Frequency of Child Eating or Snacking while Watching TV21

How often is the TV on when the family is eating dinner?

How often does your child eat snacks in front of the TV?

How often does your child eat meals in front of the TV?

Never, 1–2 days, 3–4 days, 5–6 days, EverydayN/A
Total Amount of Daily Screen Time Cronbach α=0.49On a typical weekday, how much time does your child spend…?16:

watching television/videos/DVDs

playing computer or video games (like Nintendo or Xbox),

using the internet, email, or other electronic media for leisure

None, 15 min, 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours or more

.665

.729

.715

Parent SupportCronbach α=0.68During a typical week, on how many days does an adult member of your household…?22:Never, 1–2 days, 3–4 days, 5–6 days, EverydayN/A
Encourage your child to eat fruits and vegetables
Provide fruits or vegetables for your child as a snack or part of a meal
Eat fruits and vegetables with your child
Encourage your child not to drink sugary beverages
Talk with your child about the correct portion sizes of the foods to eat

Hierarchical linear regression of natural log plus one transformed correlates of sugary beverage consumption (N = 539)

Standardized β
R2 ChangeBlock 1Block 2Block 3Block 4Block 5
Demographics R2=0.093

Child gender0.0670.0680.0660.0480.050
Caregiver age−0.028−0.036−0.037−0.047−0.046
High school education vs middle school−0.155*−0.166*−0.169**−0.194**−0.206**
Some college education vs middle school−0.195**−0.225**−0.222**−0.221**−0.225**
College graduate education vs middle school−0.312**−0.334**−0.331**−0.315**−0.316**
Post graduate education vs middle school−0.376**−0.398**−0.389**−0.349**−0.361**

R2=0.1370.045

Parent Household Rulesa−0.214**−0.156*−0.089−0.060

R2=0.1400.004

Parent Modeling of Rulesb−0.088−0.069−0.049

Parent Mediated Behaviors R2=0.1930.063

Eating dinner together (3.5 times per week vs not)0.0130.006
Eating dinner together (6 times per week vs not)−0.048−0.038
TV on during meals/snacks0.0750.073
Weekly eating away from home at family and friends0.0290.023
Weekly eating away from home at fast food restaurants0.113*0.095*
Weekly eating away from home at sit down restaurants0.0550.058
Screen time0.139*0.135*

R2=0.2090.016

Parent Support−0.142**

p≤0.05,

p≤0.001

Parent Rules includes the following seven household rules: limited portion sizes at meals, no meals while watching TV/DVDs, no fried snacks (such as potato chips) at home, must eat dinner with family, limited fast food, no sugary beverages, and must finish all food on plate.

Parent Modeling of Rules includes the extent to which caregivers followed the same seven household rules set for their children.