Matern Child Health JMaternal and Child Health Journal1092-78751573-6628Springer USBoston1681699715921629810.1007/s10995-006-0098-7Original PaperPreconception Care and Women with or at Risk for Diabetes: Implications for Community InterventionOwensMichelle D.
mowens1@cdc.gov
1
KiefferEdith C.2ChowdhuryFarah M.1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, N.E., MSK-10, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA University of Michigan, School of Social Work, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1106 USA
1720069200610Suppl 1137141© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006KeywordsPreconception careWomenDiabetesissue-copyright-statement© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006
Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic and, often, disabling disease, which has reached epidemic proportions in America and worldwide. When a person has diabetes their body cannot produce or properly use insulin – a hormone needed to convert sugar, starches, and other foods into energy. This leads to high levels of sugar in the bloodstream, which can result in serious complications and premature death, if diabetes is not controlled. There are three main types of diabetes [1]. In type 1 diabetes, the body does not produce any insulin; daily injections of insulin are required for survival. Typically beginning in childhood or young adulthood, type 1 accounts for approximately 5–10% of all cases of diabetes. Autoimmune, genetic, and environmental factors influence type 1 diabetes risk [1].

In type 2 diabetes, which accounts for 90–95% of all diagnosed cases, the body’s cells do not secrete or use insulin adequately. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes include obesity, physical inactivity, family history of diabetes, and history of gestational diabetes (GDM). GDM, defined as diabetes that develops or is first recognized during pregnancy, is the third type of diabetes. Risk factors for GDM include obesity, pregnancy weight gain, age, and family history of diabetes [15].

In the weeks after pregnancy, 5–10% of women who had GDM are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes [1]. Subsequently, women with a history of GDM have a 20–50% chance of developing type 2 diabetes five to 10 years after the index pregnancy, with a lifetime risk near 80% [1, 47]. Both type 2 diabetes and GDM are diagnosed more frequently in African Americans, Hispanic/Latino Americans, and American Indians compared to non-Hispanic whites [1].

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III data for nonpregnant women aged 20–49 years indicate that during the period 1988–1994, 27.6% of Mexican American women and 22.4% of African American women of childbearing age had diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance, in comparison to 10.1% of non-Hispanic white women [8]. Approximately one third of women of childbearing age have undiagnosed diabetes [9]. Additionally, between 3 and 8% of pregnant women have gestational diabetes (GDM) [2, 3, 9, 10].

A study of women with pregestational diabetes (type 1 and type 2) found that 60% of the women had suboptimal glucose control before conception [11]. Women who had a poor outcome in a previous pregnancy were more likely to enter a subsequent pregnancy with poor glucose control then were women with good outcomes [11].

Diabetes during pregnancy is associated with increased risk for miscarriages, stillbirth, macrosomia and obstetric complications [1216], intrauterine developmental and growth abnormalities, birth and neonatal complications, and later development of obesity and type 2 diabetes [3, 1015, 17, 18]. Treatment to normalize maternal blood glucose prior to conception and throughout pregnancy is necessary to reduce the likelihood of maternal, obstetric, and infant complications [1216]. While treatment and monitoring are common practice during prenatal care, many women and their families may not know about the importance or even the existence of preconception care interventions for women of childbearing age who have or are at risk for diabetes.

Greater awareness of the potential contribution of preconception care to diabetes prevention and control may help reduce the devastating impact of diabetes and its complications on the lives of women and their families. The objectives of this paper are to: 1) review barriers that can impede a woman’s ability to receive preconception care, and 2) recommend novel interventions to reach reproductive-aged women with or at risk for diabetes.

Prevention trials have demonstrated that type 2 diabetes and its complications can be prevented or at least delayed through healthful dietary practices, regular moderate physical activity, weight loss, and medication use [19, 20]. The clinical practice guidelines of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists [21] and the American Diabetes Association [15] suggest that preconception care is an ideal primary prevention opportunity during which modifiable risk factors can be identified and reduced.

Preconception care may be defined as a window of opportunity for comprehensive health care to: 1) identify conditions that may have detrimental effects on the mother or fetus, and 2) recommend necessary medical, behavioral, and educational interventions for increasing the likelihood of achieving optimal pregnancy outcomes. A major goal of preconception care for women with diabetes is to reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications by obtaining the lowest possible glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C [a measure of glucose control]) without significant episodes of hypoglycemia [15].

Women with diabetes who receive preconception care obtain intensive treatment to assist them with developing diabetes self-management skills, and obtaining nutritional, physical activity, and medical support needed to promote optimal glucose control and health status before becoming pregnant. During interconception periods, diabetes education, postpartum glucose testing, and ongoing support to reduce postpartum weight retention and maintain a healthy weight and glucose control may also help reduce risk factors for subsequent morbidity [3, 19, 24].

Previous studies have found that women with diabetes who received preconception care demonstrated improved glucose control during pregnancy, their offspring had fewer congenital anomalies, and the women’s hospital stays were shorter in comparison with women who did not receive preconception care [2527]. Although these findings are very positive and they support the importance of preconception care for women with diabetes, other studies have indicated that many women who could benefit from preconception care are not receiving this intervention [25, 28].

Barriers to receiving preconception care

At every health care encounter, a woman of childbearing age should be informed about the importance of preconception care and, if she has diabetes, the steps required to maintain appropriate blood glucose control [15, 28, 29]. Unfortunately, however, reaching women who may be in need of preconception care has proven to be difficult, with only a quarter to a third of women with diagnosed diabetes receiving this care [25, 28].

There are many barriers to providing and/or receiving preconception care. Among them are: 1) Many women with diabetes do not know that they have the illness and, thus, they are undiagnosed [1], 2) Approximately 50% of all pregnancies are unintended [28, 30, 31], 3) Even among women planning to become pregnant, lack of health insurance or a regular care primary care or obstetric provider reduces contact with the health care system [3234], 4) Many primary care practices do not have or use established guidelines for providing preconception care, or identifying women with risk factors [32, 34], 5) Some women and health care providers may not know about about the existence or the importance of preconception care or do not see it as a high priority [15, 32, 34, 35], and 6) Women with incomplete health care coverage, lack of child care or transportation, geographic isolation, distrust of health care providers or other social and economic challenges have additional barriers to receiving preconception care [15, 32, 3436].

Women are more likely to receive preconception care if they are married or in a stable relationship, are comparatively older, are nonsmokers, are non-Hispanic whites, are more educated, have annual incomes above $20,000, have private medical insurance, and have a positive bond with their prepregnancy care provider [25, 26, 28, 33, 35]. Younger women with diabetes and those who are single, have low income, or are less educated may be particularly vulnerable to unplanned pregnancies, which greatly reduces the chances that they will receive any form of diabetes-related preconception counseling [16, 32, 36].

Interventions to reach women of childbearing age with diabetes

Since the establishment of preconception care programs, health care centers have employed numerous marketing approaches geared toward physicians, and for patients in need of preconception care intervention. Janz et al. [28] identified marketing approaches which were employed in five Michigan medical centers to encourage the use of preconception care programs in treating high-risk women. These included journal advertisements, newsletters, brochures, flyers, posters, and patient education programs. However, the results of these outreach efforts were “generally disappointing [28].”

In a Maine study, a diabetes registry was developed to promote the availability of preconception care programs [27]. In addition, health care providers formed a network to enhance the care of pregnant women using locally developed patient care guidelines. From 1987–1990, there were a total of 185 pregnancies in women with diagnosed diabetes. Of the total pregnancies, only 34% of these women received preconception care. These findings support those of Janz et al. [28], which demonstrate that very few women with diabetes are receiving preconception care. Additional innovative strategies are needed to increase awareness of the availability of preconception care.

Novel interventions to reach reproductive-aged women with or at risk of diabetes

The National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s Health (cosponsored by the American Diabetes Association, the American Public Health Association, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) is a partnership devoted to increasing public and provider awareness of the importance of interventions such as preconception care in the prevention and management of diabetes for women [37, 38]. Using a life stage approach, the Initiative’s cosponsors and partners developed and disseminated a national action plan, The National Agenda for Public Health Action [39], to identify 10 priority action steps to improve the lives of women with or at risk of diabetes, from adolescence to the older years (see Table 1). The National Agenda serves as a blueprint to guide the nation in implementing strategies related to diabetes and women’s health. Given the devastating effects that diabetes can have on women’s health, the National Agenda recognizes and identifies the need for effective interventions, such as quality health care and programs, public health research and surveillance, and specific policies to address the burden of this chronic illness on the lives of women and their families [37, 38].

The National Agenda’s 10 priority recommendations for action

1. Encourage and support diabetes prevention and control programs   in state health departments to develop prevention programs for all   women and establish efficient links for women at risk for type 2   diabetes
2. Expand community-based health promotion, education, activities,   and incentives for all ages in a wide variety of settings—schools,   workplaces, senior centers, churches, and other locations where   women live, learn, work, and play
3. Strengthen advocacy on behalf of women with or at risk for   diabetes
4. Fortify community programs for women with sufficient training,   tools, and materials
5. Expand population-based surveillance to monitor and understand:
 a. Variations in the distribution of diagnosed and undiagnosed   diabetes
 b. The factors—cultural, racial, ethnic, geographic, demographic,   socioeconomic, and genetic factors—that influence the risk for   diabetes and complications among women at all life stages
6. Educate community leaders about diabetes and its management   and about the value of healthy environments
7. Encourage healthcare providers to promote risk assessment,   quality care, and self-management for diabetes and it   complications in their practice settings
8. Ensure access to trained healthcare providers who offer quality   services consistent with established healthcare guidelines
9. Encourage healthcare coverage and incentives for recommended   diabetes prevention management practices by:
 a. Promoting partnerships between insurers and workplaces or   labor communities and encouraging employers and employees to   discuss needed diabetes benefits in offered health care packages
 b. Working with health insurers and policymakers to expand   coverage and reimbursement policies to include prevention   services for women throughout their lives
10. Conduct public health research to further our knowledge about   the epidemiological, socioenvironmental, behavioral,   translational, and biomedical factors that influence diabetes and   women’s health

Several of the National Agenda’s recommendations support the need for preconception care and follow-up care for women with or at risk for diabetes through community intervention efforts and policy development. These recommendations identify the need to: 1) expand our outreach to communities where women live, learn, work, and play by offering health promotion, education, activities and other incentives; 2) provide sufficient funding, tools, training, and materials to fortify community programs that focus on women’s health needs; 3) educate community members and leaders about diabetes prevention and control and the roles that they can play in promoting healthy environments; 4) encourage healthcare providers to promote risk assessment and quality care for women, including preconception care; and 5) conduct public health research to better understand multiple factors that influence diabetes and women’s health.

Community intervention and the involvement of community health workers

One of the community-focused strategies from the National Agenda, is the need to “identify and develop links with community agencies that interface with women at greatest risk for diabetes, including organizations in the non-health related sectors [39].” Given that preconception care programs have had difficulty reaching high-risk women, nontraditional approaches to outreach and preconception care should be explored [32, 36].

Community health organizations and community health workers (CHWs) appreciate and understand the social, political, environmental, and cultural factors that affect individuals within their own neighborhoods and have the potential to influence the consumers’ relationship with the health care system [33]. They serve as “bridges”—connecting community members who have traditionally lacked access to the appropriate services needed [40, 41]. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends supporting the use of CHWs. The IOM identifies CHWs as an integral component of the health care system that help to address racial and ethnic disparities in access to care [41, 42].

Many community-based projects funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have included CHWs in community-based programs aimed at health intervention for people with diabetes [43]. Programs employing CHWs have reported that they improve access and health outcomes for persons with chronic diseases, including diabetes, particularly in minority and underserved populations [4448]. Although, no empirical studies have been published that assess the effectiveness or impact of CHWs in providing preconception care services for women with diabetes, CHWs have also played an important role in maternal and child health care. Thus, studying the methods for, and outcomes of an expanded role for CHWs with preconception outreach and education for women with, or at risk for diabetes, is recommended.

Community health workers could play a vital role in linking women to preconception care services in the following manner: 1) increasing women’s awareness about the importance of preconception care programs, 2) providing culturally and linguistically appropriate diabetes-related health information and education, 3) reminding women about scheduled health provider visits, 4) providing a communication bridge linking women and providers in terms of patients’ needs and providers’ recommendations.

The prevalence of diabetes among women of childbearing age is rising, particularly in communities with ethnic minorities and low resources [4, 8]. There is a strong relationship between these conditions and adverse maternal, child and subsequent adult health outcomes. Assessing the processes and effects of preconception care interventions implemented by providers and CHWs, especially in those communities with varied ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds, is a critical first step toward identifying and promoting effective preconception care [18, 4955].

Acknowledgements

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency.

ReferencesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: General information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States, 2005. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.KiefferECarmanWGillespieBNolanGWorleySGuzmanRObesity and gestational diabetes among African American and Latinas in Detroit: Implications for disparities in women’s healthJ Am Med Womens Assoc2001561817Kieffer E, Carman W, Gillespie B, Nolan G, Worley S, Guzman R. Obesity and gestational diabetes among African American and Latinas in Detroit: Implications for disparities in women’s health. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2001;56:181–7. 11759788American Diabetes AssociationGestational diabetes mellitus (Position statement)Diabetes Care200427Suppl 1S8890American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus (Position statement). Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S88–90. 14693936KjosSLPetersRKXiangAHenryOAMontoroMBuchananTAPredicting future diabetes in Latino women with gestational diabetes: utility of early postpartum glucose tolerance testingDiabetes1995445869110.2337/diabetes.44.5.586Kjos SL, Peters RK, Xiang A, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA. Predicting future diabetes in Latino women with gestational diabetes: utility of early postpartum glucose tolerance testing. Diabetes 1995;44:586–91. 7729620BuchananTAXiangAKjosSLGestational diabetes: Antepartum characteristics that predict postpartum glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes in Latino womenDiabetes19984713021010.2337/diabetes.47.8.1302Buchanan TA, Xiang A, Kjos SL, et al. Gestational diabetes: Antepartum characteristics that predict postpartum glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes in Latino women. Diabetes 1998;47:1302–10. 9703332KimCNewtonKMKnoppRHGestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: A systematic reviewDiabetes Care2002101862810.2337/diacare.25.10.1862Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Care 2002;10:1862–8. 12351492MetzgerBENelsonLNiznikCDooleySLUpdate on gestational diabetesWomens Health20062211216Metzger BE, Nelson L, Niznik C, Dooley SL. Update on gestational diabetes. Womens Health 2006;2:211–6. HarrisMIFlegalKMCowieCCEberhardtMSGoldsteinDELittleRRPrevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994Diabetes Care1998215182410.2337/diacare.21.4.518Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in US adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Diabetes Care 1998;21:518–24. 9571335Beckles GLA, Thompson-Reid P. Diabetes and Women’s Health Across the Life Stages: A Public Health Perspective. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes Translation; 2001.KiefferEWillisSArellanoNGuzmanRPerspectives of Pregnant and Postpartum Latino Women on Diabetes, Physical Activity and HealthHealth Educ Beh2002295425610.1177/109019802237023Kieffer E, Willis S, Arellano N, Guzman R. Perspectives of Pregnant and Postpartum Latino Women on Diabetes, Physical Activity and Health. Health Educ Beh 2002;29:542–56. CaseleHLLaiferSAFactors influencing preconception control of glycemia in diabetic womenObstet Gynecol Surv19995487910.1097/00006254-199902000-00005Casele HL, Laifer SA. Factors influencing preconception control of glycemia in diabetic women. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:87–9. BrodySCHarrisRLohrKScreening for gestational diabetes: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceObstet Gyneco20031013809210.1016/S0029-7844(02)03057-0Brody SC, Harris R, Lohr K. Screening for gestational diabetes: A summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Obstet Gyneco 2003;101:380–92. AlbaredaMCaballeroABadellGPiquerSOrtizADe LeivaACorcoyRDiabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in women with previous gestational diabetesDiabetes Care2003261199120510.2337/diacare.26.4.1199Albareda M, Caballero A, Badell G, Piquer S, Ortiz A, De Leiva A, Corcoy R. Diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1199–1205. 12663597GabbeSGGravesCRManagement of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancyObstetGynecol200310285768Gabbe SG, Graves CR. Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy. ObstetGynecol 2003;102:857–68. American Diabetes AssociationPreconception care of women with diabetesDiabetes Care20032691S3S10.2337/diacare.26.7.2194American Diabetes Association. Preconception care of women with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26: 91S–3S. KitzmillerJLThomasTAKjosSCombsCARatnerREPrec-conception care of diabetes, congenital malformations, and spontaneous abortionsDiabetes Care19961951441Kitzmiller JL, Thomas TA, Kjos S, Combs CA, Ratner RE. Prec-conception care of diabetes, congenital malformations, and spontaneous abortions. Diabetes Care 1996;19:514–41. 8732721DabeleaDSnell-BergeonJKHartsfieldCLBischoffKJHammanRFMcDuffieRSIncreasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohortDiabetes Care2005285798410.2337/diacare.28.3.579Dabelea D, Snell-Bergeon JK, Hartsfield CL, Bischoff KJ, Hamman RF, McDuffie RS. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort. Diabetes Care 2005;28:579–84. 15735191SilvermanBLRizzoTAChoNHMetzgerBELong-term effects of intrauterine environment: The Northwestern University Diabetes in Pregnancy CenterDiabetes Care199821B1429Silverman BL, Rizzo TA, Cho NH, Metzger BE. Long-term effects of intrauterine environment: The Northwestern University Diabetes in Pregnancy Center. Diabetes Care 1998;21:B142–9. 9704242Diabetes Prevention Program Research GroupReduction in the incidence of Type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metforminN Eng J Med200234639340310.1056/NEJMoa012512Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of Type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Eng J Med 2002;346:393–403. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupThe effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusN Engl J Med19933299778610.1056/NEJM199309303291401The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–86. 8366922Guidelines for Perinatal Care. (5th Ed). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; Washington, DC: American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists; 2002.AllaireADCefaloRCPreconceptional health care modelEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol19987816316810.1016/S0301-2115(98)00062-1Allaire AD, Cefalo RC. Preconceptional health care model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;78:163–8. 9622313CefaloRCMoosMKPreconceptional health care: A practical guide1995St LouisMosbyCefalo RC, Moos MK. Preconceptional health care: A practical guide. St Louis: Mosby; 1995. GregoryKDKjosSLPetersRKCost of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: Implications for preventionObstet Gynecol1993817826Gregory KD, Kjos SL, Peters RK. Cost of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: Implications for prevention. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:782–6. 8469472DunneFPBrydonPSmithTEssexMNicholsonHDunnJPre-conception diabetes care in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusQJM199992175610.1093/qjmed/92.3.175Dunne FP, Brydon P, Smith T, Essex M, Nicholson H, Dunn J. Pre-conception diabetes care in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. QJM 1999;92:175–6. 10326077HermanWHJanzNKBeckerMPCharron-ProchownikDDiabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costsJ Reprod Med199944338Herman WH, Janz NK, Becker MP, Charron-Prochownik D. Diabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs. J Reprod Med 1999;44:33–8. 9987737WillhoiteMBBennertHWPalomakiGEThe impact of preconception counseling on pregnancy outcomes: the experience of the Maine Diabetes in Pregnancy ProgramDiabetes Care199316450510.2337/diacare.16.2.450Willhoite MB, Bennert HW, Palomaki GE, et al. The impact of preconception counseling on pregnancy outcomes: the experience of the Maine Diabetes in Pregnancy Program. Diabetes Care 1993;16:450–5. 8432216JanzNHermanWHBeckerMPCharron-ProchownikDShaynaVLLesnickTGDiabetes and pregnancy: Factors associated with seeking prec-conception careDiabetes Care1995181576510.2337/diacare.18.2.157Janz N, Herman WH, Becker MP, Charron-Prochownik D, Shayna VL, Lesnick TG, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy: Factors associated with seeking prec-conception care. Diabetes Care 1995;18:157–65. 7729291KlinkeJATothELPreconception care for women with type 1 diabetesCan Fam Physician20034976973Klinke JA, Toth EL. Preconception care for women with type 1 diabetes. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:769–73. 12836865HeyesTLongSMathersNPreconception care practice and beliefs of primary care workersFam Pract20042122710.1093/fampra/cmh106Heyes T, Long S, Mathers N. Preconception care practice and beliefs of primary care workers. Fam Pract 2004;21:22–7. 14760039HenshawSKUnintended pregnancy in the United StatesInt Fam Plann Perspect1998302429,4610.2307/2991522Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24–29,46. KorenbrotCCSteinbergABenderCNewberrySPreconception care: A systematic reviewMatern Child Health J20026758810.1023/A:1015460106832Korenbrot CC, Steinberg A, Bender C, Newberry S. Preconception care: A systematic review. Matern Child Health J 2002;6:75–88. 12092984BernaskoJContemporary management of type 1 diabetes mellitus in pregnancyObstet Gynecol Surv20045962863610.1097/00006254-200408000-00024Bernasko J. Contemporary management of type 1 diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:628–36. 15277897March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. March of Dimes Updates: Is early prenatal care too late? Contemporary OB/GYN. March 1, 2002. March of Dimes. Accessed September 14, 2005. http://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/obgyn/article.KendrickJMPreconception care of women with diabetesJ Perinat Neonatal Nurs20041811425Kendrick JM. Preconception care of women with diabetes. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2004;18(1):14–25. 15027665HolingEVBeyerCSBrownZAConnellFAWhy don’t women with diabetes plan their pregnancies?Diabetes Care1998218899510.2337/diacare.21.6.889Holing EV, Beyer CS, Brown ZA, Connell FA. Why don’t women with diabetes plan their pregnancies? Diabetes Care 1998;21:889–95. 9614603The Steering Committee of the National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s HealthThe national public health initiative on diabetes and women’s health: Leading the way for women with and at risk for diabetesJ Womens Health200413962710.1089/jwh.2004.13.962The Steering Committee of the National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s Health. The national public health initiative on diabetes and women’s health: Leading the way for women with and at risk for diabetes. J Womens Health 2004;13:962–7. The Steering Committee of the National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s HealthThe evolution of a national public health initiative on diabetes and women’s health: A model processJ Womens Health20031283984510.1089/154099903770948050The Steering Committee of the National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s Health. The evolution of a national public health initiative on diabetes and women’s health: A model process. J Womens Health 2003;12:839–45. Department of Health and Human Services. National Agenda for Public Health Action: The National Public Health Initiative on Diabetes and Women’s Health. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2003.WitmerACommunity health workers: Integral members of the health care work forceAm J Public Health19958510551058Witmer A. Community health workers: Integral members of the health care work force. Am J Public Health 1995;85:1055–1058. 7625495American Association of Diabetes EducatorsDiabetes community health workersDiabetes Educ2003298182410.1177/014572170302900511American Association of Diabetes Educators. Diabetes community health workers. Diabetes Educ 2003;29:818–24. 14603870Unequal treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care2002WashingtonInstitute of MedicineInstitute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Projects—Community Health Workers/Promotores de Salud: Critical Connections in Communities. February 24, 2005. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed March 25, 2006 http://www.cdc. gov/Diabetes/projects/comm.htm.BeamNTessaroIThe lay health advisor model in theory and practice: An example of an agency-based programFam Community Health1994177079Beam N, Tessaro I. The lay health advisor model in theory and practice: An example of an agency-based program. Fam Community Health 1994;17:70–9. LoveMBGardnerKLegionVCommunity health workers: Who they are and what they doHealth Educ Behav1997245102210.1177/109019819702400409Love MB, Gardner K, Legion V. Community health workers: Who they are and what they do. Health Educ Behav 1997;24:510–22. 9247828LorigKGonzalesVMCommunity-based diabetes self-management education: Definition and case studyDiabetes Spectrum200032348Lorig K, Gonzales VM. Community-based diabetes self-management education: Definition and case study. Diabetes Spectrum 2000;3:234–8. Two Feathers J, Kieffer E, Guzman R, Palmisano G, Heisler M, Anderson M, Sinco B et al. Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) Detroit Partnership: Improving diabetes-related outcomes among African American and Latino Adults. Am J Public Health (in press); 2005.HopperSVMillerPBirgeCSwiftJA randomized study of the impact of home health aides on diabetic control and utilization patternsAm J Public Health1984746002Hopper SV, Miller P, Birge C, Swift J. A randomized study of the impact of home health aides on diabetic control and utilization patterns. Am J Public Health 1984;74:600–2. 6721016OseiKGaillardTRSchusterDPHistory of gestational diabetes leads to distinct metabolic alterations in nondiabetic African American women with a parental history of type 2 diabetesDiabetes Care1998211250710.2337/diacare.21.8.1250Osei K, Gaillard TR, Schuster DP. History of gestational diabetes leads to distinct metabolic alterations in nondiabetic African American women with a parental history of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1250–7. 9702429DabeleaDHansonRLLindsayRSPettittDJImperatoreGGabirMMIntrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A study of discordant siblingsDiabetes20004922081110.2337/diabetes.49.12.2208Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, Pettitt DJ, Imperatore G, Gabir MM, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A study of discordant siblings. Diabetes 2000;49:2208–11. 11118027PettittDJKnowlerrWCLong-term effects of the intrauterine environment, birthweight and breastfeeding in Pima IndiansDiabetes Care199821B1384110.2337/diacare.21.11.1789Pettitt DJ, Knowlerr WC. Long-term effects of the intrauterine environment, birthweight and breastfeeding in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care 1998;21:B138–41. 9704241TroianoRPFrongilloEASobalJLevitskyDAThe relationship between body weight and mortality: A quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studiesInt J Obes Relat Metab Disord1996206375Troiano RP, Frongillo EA, Sobal J, Levitsky DA. The relationship between body weight and mortality: A quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996;20:63–75. 8788324NeufeldNDRaffelLJLandonCChenYVadheimCMEarly presentation of type 2 diabetes in Mexican-American youthDiabetes Care199821808610.2337/diacare.21.1.80Neufeld ND, Raffel LJ, Landon C, Chen Y, Vadheim CM. Early presentation of type 2 diabetes in Mexican-American youth. Diabetes Care 1998;21:80–6. 9538974RosenbloomALJoeJRYoungRSWinterWEEmerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes in youthDiabetes Care1999223455410.2337/diacare.22.2.345Rosenbloom AL, Joe JR, Young RS, Winter WE. Emerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes in youth. Diabetes Care 1999;22:345–54. 10333956HarrisSBZimnaBPrimary prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk populations [Editorial]Diabetes Care20002387988110.2337/diacare.23.7.879Harris SB, Zimna B. Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes in high-risk populations [Editorial]. Diabetes Care 2000;23:879–81. 10895832