942153027360J AgromedicineJ AgromedicineJournal of agromedicine1059-924X1545-081325635741452434510.1080/1059924X.2014.976729HHSPA698953ArticleFarm Work-Related Asthma Among US Primary Farm OperatorsMazurekJacek M.WhiteGretchen E.RodmanChadSchleiffPatricia L.Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USAAddress correspondence to: Jacek M. Mazurek, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, MS HG 900.2, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA (JMazurekl@cdc.gov)2472015201504820152013142

The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of current asthma and the proportion of current asthma that is related to work on the farm among primary farm operators. The 2011 Farm and Ranch Safety Survey data were used to produce estimates and prevalence odds ratios. An estimated 5.1% of farm operators had asthma. Of these, 15.4% had farm work-related asthma. Among operators with farm work-related asthma, 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.8%–68.2%) had an asthma attack in the prior 12 months and 33.3% (95% CI: 21.2%–45.4%) had an asthma attack that occurred while doing farm work. Of those who had an asthma attack that occurred while doing farm work, 65.0% associated their asthma attack with plant/tree materials. This study provides updated information on asthma and the proportion of current asthma that is related to work on the farm and identifies certain groups of farm operators that might benefit from workplace asthma prevention intervention.

Agricultureasthmaepidemiologyhealth surveysoccupational health
INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most common diseases in the United States. In 2010, 8.2% (18.7 million) of adults aged 18 years and older had current asthma.1 Asthma is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality, and cost.13 In 2007, there were 7.2 million physician office visits, 1.1 million emergency department visits, 299,000 hospitalizations, and 3,262 deaths related to asthma in adults.4 Among currently employed adults who had at least one asthma attack in the past 12 months, asthma was associated with an average annual 14.2 million lost work days in 2008.4 In 2007, the total cost of asthma to society was estimated at $56 billion.3

Work-related asthma includes occupational asthma (new-onset asthma or the recurrence of previously quiescent asthma induced by exposures at work) and work-exacerbated asthma (preexisting or concurrent asthma worsened by factors in the workplace).5 Work-related asthma is associated with serious adverse economic and health consequences.68 Adults with work-related asthma have higher unemployment rates than adults without asthma, higher mean number of days with asthma symptoms, trouble sleeping because of asthma, and activity limitation due to asthma.7,9 Persons with work-related asthma may need to change or leave employment and thus lose income and benefits. In addition to socioeconomic consequences, work-related asthma has been associated with disability, poor health-related quality of life, and mortality.8,10,11 A review of population-based studies estimates that 7% to 51% (median 17.6%) of adult-onset asthma is attributable to occupational exposures such as vapors, gas, dust, and fumes.12 Work-related asthma is associated with over 400 causative agents.13

Work on a farm is associated with exposure to a variety of irritants and allergens that can cause or aggravate respiratory symptoms and diseases, including asthma. Organic and inorganic dusts, particulate matter, microbial agents, gasses, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), cleaning agents, fertilizers, and feed additives are frequently present in agricultural settings.14

In 2007, there were 2.2 million farms and 3.3 million farm operators in the United States.15 Historical data from the US Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988–1994 indicated that asthma prevalence for the farm-related occupations (i.e., farm operators, managers, and supervisors; and farm and nursery workers) was 3.6%.16 Based on data collected in 1993 from California farm operators, Schenker et al. documented that 7.8% of operators had current doctor-diagnosed asthma.17 Using data from the 2006 Farm and Ranch Safety Survey, we previously reported that 4.9% of primary farm operators have current asthma and that 24.8% of primary farm operators with current asthma had asthma that may be related to work on the farm.18

In 2006, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) sponsored the Farm and Ranch Safety Survey to better understand the magnitude and scope of adult agricultural injuries. The survey was conducted as part of the NIOSH Agricultural Injury and Health Initiative and the NIOSH Childhood Agricultural Injury Prevention Initiative. It collected information on asthma, asthma attacks and attacks that occurred while doing farm work, and asthma-related unscheduled health care visits, including hospitalizations and emergency room visits. In 2011, the Farm and Ranch Safety Survey was repeated and included additional questions on asthma attacks on the farm and associated tasks and exposures.

The National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) is a partnership program conducted by NIOSH to stimulate innovative research and improved workplace practices. The NORA plan for the US agriculture, forestry, and fishing industries focuses on surveillance; vulnerable populations; and outreach, communication, and partnerships.19 Of the nine strategic goals, the surveillance-related goal seeks to “describe: the nature, extent, and economic burden of occupational illnesses, injuries, and fatalities; occupational hazards; and worker populations at risk for adverse health outcomes.” To address this NORA goal, we estimate the prevalence of current asthma and the proportion of current asthma that is related to work on the farm among US primary farm operators using data from the 2011 Farm and Ranch Safety Survey.

METHODS

The US Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) conducted a random telephone survey of active farm operations for NIOSH in 2011. Of the 25,000 farm operations selected for the survey, 7,497 (30.0%) could not be reached by telephone during the survey period and 5,103 (20.4%) refused to participate in the survey. After excluding 1,190 (4.8%) nonactive farms, the remaining 11,210 (44.8%) active farm operations were surveyed. Data were self-reported either by the primary farm operator or the operator’s spouse; no children were interviewed. Primary farm operator was defined as the individual who runs the farm, making day-to-day management decisions.20 The adjusted survey response rate, excluding noncontacts, was 70.8%. The data are owned and retained by the US Department of Agriculture.

Definitions

Survey participants were determined to have lifetime asthma if they have ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that they had asthma. Operators with lifetime asthma were further asked about age at asthma diagnosis and if they currently have asthma. Those with current asthma were asked whether a doctor, nurse, or other health professional ever told them that their asthma was related to their work on the farm. If the answer was “yes,” operators were considered to have farm work-related asthma. They were also asked whether they have had one or more asthma attacks requiring the use of an inhaler or other medical treatment in the last 12 months and, if so, whether the asthma attack occurred while doing farm work. Those who reported an asthma attack were asked to describe what they were doing when the asthma attack occurred. We used this information to categorize exposures associated with asthma attacks according to the Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) Exposure Code System (available at http://www.aoecdata.org/Default.aspx).

Current smokers were defined as those who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and smoked cigarettes either every day or some days at the time of the survey. Former smokers were those who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but are no longer smokers. Nonsmokers included those who smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime.

Survey participants were asked about their farm acreage and value of sales and responses were categorized by the NASS coders. Farms were classified based on the largest source of revenue for the farm. Farm operators reporting their largest source of revenue from swine, dairy, beef cattle, sheep or goats, equine, poultry, aquaculture, and other animals were classified as operating livestock farms. Farm operators reporting their largest source of revenue from grains, tobacco, cotton, vegetables, fruits or nuts, nursery or greenhouse, cutting Christmas trees, and other crops or hay were classified as operating crop farms.

Statistical Analysis

Population-based estimates were calculated using survey weights to account for unequal selection probabilities, unit nonresponse, and poststratification. Farms were stratified within census regions of the United States, and post-stratified by value of sales according to the NASS sampling methodology. Prevalence and proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Weighted bivariate analyses were performed using the Rao-Scott chi-square test of independence to test the differences in the distribution of proportions. Using multivariate logistic regression, we estimated prevalence odds ratios (PORs) for the associations between current asthma that may be farm work-related and age, sex, second job, census region, farm acreage, value of sales, and farm type. In the model we included second job because of its potential as a second source of agents that could cause or exacerbate asthma and farm type because of the differences in farm location by census region.2123 Marital status and smoking status were not included in the logistic regression model because the estimated numbers of operators with farm work-related asthma in these two groups were not reliable (the relative standard error for the estimates >50%). All tests were two-sided, with P < .05 considered significant. Analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

In 2011, of the 2.2 million primary farm operators, 94.7% were over 40 years old (mean age: 59.9 years), 83.7% were males, 83.5% were married or living with a partner, 60.3% were nonsmokers, and 51.7% did not have a second job. Operators were approximately equally divided between managing livestock (51.1%) and crop (48.9%) farms and were more likely to manage smaller farms with less than 101 acres (63.7%) and less than $10,000 in value of sales (55.0%) (Table 1).

An estimated 2.5% of primary farm operators had unknown or missing information on asthma. Compared with those who provided information, operators with missing data on asthma were slightly older (mean age: 66.0 years versus 59.8 years; P < .0001) and more likely to have a second job (72.2% versus 48.6%; P < .0001).

An estimated 5.1% of primary farm operators had current asthma. The mean age at current asthma diagnosis was 33.9 (range: 1–84) years. Current asthma prevalence was significantly higher among female than male operators (7.3% versus 4.6%; P = .0009) and among operators managing farms in the West than in the Midwest (6.6% versus 4.3%; P = .001) (Table 1).

Among primary farm operators with current asthma, an estimated 51.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.3%–56.7%) had an asthma attack in the prior 12 months. The proportion of operators having an asthma attack was higher among operators who were former smokers than current or nonsmokers, those who had a second job than those who did not have a second job, those who managed farms in the North than in other regions, those who managed farms with <101 acres than >101 acres, and those who managed farms with <$10,000 value of sales than farms with ≥$10,000 value of sales, but these differences were not statistically significant (Table 2).

Of operators with current asthma, 15.4% were ever told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that their asthma was related to their work on the farm (Table 2). The proportion of current asthma that may be farm work related was significantly higher among nonsmokers than former smokers, operators managing farms with ≥1,000 acres than farms <101 acres or 101–999 acres, and managing farms with an annual value of sales ≥$100,000 than farms with <$10,000 or $10,000–$99,999 value of sales (Table 2).

Multivariate associations between farm work-related asthma and second job, census region, farm acreage, value of sales, and farm type among primary farm operators with current asthma are shown in Table 2. After controlling for other variables, proportion of current asthma that may be farm work related remained associated with region, farm acreage, and value of sales.

The mean age of farm operators with farm work-related asthma was 59.7 (range: 34–84) years and their mean age at asthma diagnosis was 31.6 years. Most operators with farm work-related asthma were males (83.9%), married or living with a partner (87.2%), nonsmokers (77.5%), had a second job (51.2%), and operated livestock farms (52.5%). Significantly more operators with farm work-related asthma managed farms located in the South or West than in the North, farms with <101 or 101–999 acres than with ≥1,000 acres, and farms with <$10,000 or with $10,000–$99,999 in value of sales than with ≥$100,000 value of sales (Table 3).

Among operators with farm work-related asthma, 54.8% (95% CI: 41.4%–68.2%) had an asthma attack in the prior 12 months and 33.3% (95% CI: 21.2%–45.4%) had an asthma attack that occurred while doing farm work. Of operators who had an asthma attack that occurred while doing farm work, 65.0% reported that plant/tree materials triggered their asthma attacks. Farm work reported during these asthma attacks included baling hay or straw, handling grain or animal feed, bush/brush hogging, corn planting, or cutting grass/weeds. Other exposures were reported by a small number of operators (estimated proportions of attacks associated with these exposures were not reliable) and include miscellaneous chemicals, physical factors, animal material, and mold.

DISCUSSION

This cross-sectional study indicates that 5.1% of primary farm operators had current asthma. Similar asthma prevalence among farmers and rural populations has been reported from other studies.2427 Within these studies, prevalence of current asthma among farmers ranged from 2.7% to 7.7%. This finding is similar to that previously reported using the 2006 Farm Safety Survey data (4.9%; 95% CI: 4.4%–5.4%) and is lower than the estimated national prevalence of current asthma among adults employed at any time in the prior 12 months (7.2%).18,28 Several factors have been proposed that may explain the lower prevalence of asthma in farmers and include the healthy worker effect among farmers (i.e., susceptible persons may leave dusty work areas early in the course of the job, leaving behind a relatively less susceptible group of workers who are potentially more able to tolerate the work environment)17,29 and the “hygiene” hypothesis (i.e., early in life exposure to bacterial and viral agents through contact with other children or farm animals result in a reduced incidence of atopy and asthma).3036

In this study, over half of the primary farm operators with current asthma had an asthma attack requiring the use of an inhaler or other medical treatment in the last 12 months. These results are consistent with other studies reporting that 49.1% of adults with current asthma had an asthma attack in 2010.2

Of primary farm operators with current asthma, 15.4% had asthma that may be related to work on the farm. This proportion is greater than the proportion of current asthma that is work-related asthma among all ever-employed adults that was estimated using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Asthma Call-back Survey conducted in 38 states and the District of Columbia (9.7%) and lower than that previously reported using the 2006 Farm and Ranch Safety Survey data (24.8%).7,18 Although some of the differences between the populations may be due to differences in survey methodologies, both BRFSS and Farm and Ranch Safety Survey used similar question on health care professional diagnosis of work-related asthma (BRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey questionnaires are available at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/index.htm). Thus, it is unlikely that differences in methodologies can explain the substantially greater proportion of asthma that may be work related in farm operators. The differences can be explained, in part, by the presence of exposures (e.g., dusts, agricultural chemicals, bacteria, fungi, toxic gases) at substantially higher concentrations in agriculture than in other industries.14,30 The reason for the lower proportion of current asthma that may be farm work related found in this study is unclear. Longitudinal follow-up studies of children of farmers or new farmers could confirm this change.

We found that female primary farm operators have a significant higher prevalence of current asthma than male farm operators. These findings are consistent with our previous report that an estimated 62.8% of ever-employed adults with asthma in 38 states and District of Columbia are females.11 In addition, although we found a higher proportion of asthma that is farm related for male operators than for female operators (16.9% versus 10.4%), this difference was not statistically significant. This was consistent with a report by Torén and Blanc where proportion of asthma that could be attributed to occupational exposures was 9.1% for males and 11.5% for females.12 Moreover, we found that among operators with farm work-related asthma 83.9% were males. This finding is slightly higher than previously reported results from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey work-related surveillance systems where 68.6% of individuals with work-related asthma in the agriculture, forestry, and fishing industry were males.37 Other studies from work-related asthma surveillance systems reported that more of the work-related asthma patients are females.38,39 However, in these reports no separate results for men and women by industry and occupation were presented.

The prevalence of current asthma among primary farm operators was not associated with the farm size or annual value of sales. However, the proportion of farm operators with current asthma that may be farm work related increased with increasing farm size and value of sales. In addition, more operators with asthma that may be farm work related operated farms located in the North. No information on possible factors (e.g., farm operator’s recognition of the asthma work-relatedness, opportunities to discuss asthma work-relatedness with health care providers, access and barriers to medical care, health insurance, income, presence of occupational health medical surveillance on the farm, number of hours spent doing farm activities) that might explain these differences was available. More research is needed to better understand the current findings that the proportion of current asthma that may be farm work related is greater among operators managing larger farms, farms with greater value of sales, and farms located in the North.

In this study, smoking prevalence among farm operators was 9.2% and was lower than the 2011 estimate for all US working adults (19%) and for all working adults in the agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting industry (18.5%).40 Lower smoking prevalence among farmers and other agricultural industry workers has been previously reported.26 It is likely that some operators use smokeless tobacco. In 2005, an estimated 8.8% of working adults in the agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting industry used smokeless tobacco.41 No data were available to assess smokeless tobacco use among farm operators in this study.

Early identification of persons with work-related asthma is essential for preventing worsening of symptoms and outcomes. Patients with sensitizer-induced work-related asthma may need to be removed from exposure in addition to other asthma management. For those with irritant-induced asthma management should aim at optimizing treatment and reducing the exposure to workplace triggers. Moreover, the diagnosis of work-related asthma should be considered an occupational sentinel health event and serve as a warning signal that other workers in the same workplace may also be exposed and that implementation of primary preventive measures may be warranted (eg, elimination, substitution, process modification, respirator use, and engineering control).5 If elimination of exposures is not feasible, other preventive measures play an important role in reducing exposures. Studies showed that providing education on occupational health and safety (e.g., safety training, familiarity with material safety data sheets, knowledge of legislation) and asthma causes and prevention (e.g., recognition of respiratory hazards, work/environmental hygiene practices, use of respirators) is feasible and effective, and has a positive effect on farmer health and farm practices.4246 In addition, in workplaces with high prevalence and incidence of work-related asthma, implementation of medical surveillance (i.e., secondary prevention) may assist in measuring the impact of primary prevention and, in work environments with potential exposure to sensitizers, in early detection of sensitized workers.5,47

This cross-sectional study has some limitations. The Farm and Ranch Safety Survey was designed to collect data only on primary farm operators and no information on other farm workers was available. Diagnosis of asthma or asthma in relation to farm work was not validated; thus, estimates may be subject to misclassification. Also, information on race/ethnicity or family income was not available to assess their associations with asthma and asthma attacks. Moreover, the survey was designed to allow for both self- and proxy report. No information was available to assess the number of proxy responses and their potential bias. In addition, although the survey asked for information on asthma attack in the prior 12 months, some respondents may report events outside this time frame, thus overestimating our results.48 Finally, because of small sample sizes resulting in unreliable estimates, we could not include marital status and smoking status in the logistic regression models, estimate the prevalence of current asthma by specific farm type, and examine associations between asthma attack and specific exposures on the farm.

This study documents the prevalence of current asthma and farm work-related asthma among US primary farm operators in 2011. The results suggest that the proportion of farm operators with current asthma that may have farm work-related asthma is higher than the proportion of US ever-employed adults with current asthma who have work-related asthma. In addition, the proportion of farm work-related asthma varies by farm size, value of sales, and region, indicating that certain groups of farm operators might experience greater benefits than others from work-related asthma prevention interventions. Future studies should examine operators’ asthma history and work-related factors to fully characterize the burden of work-related asthma among primary farm operators.

The authors thank Kitty J. Hendricks, MA, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for her active role as the Project Officer for the Farm and Ranch Safety Survey and Michael E. Goldcamp, PhD, and Larry A. Layne, MA, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for their assistance in Farm and Ranch Safety Survey planning, questionnaire development, and data collection and preparation for public use. The authors also thank Paul K. Henneberger, ScD, and Michael Humann, PhD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for thoughtful comments.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

This article not subject to US copyright law.

MoormanJEAkinbamiLJBaileyCMNational Surveillance of Asthma: United States, 2001–2010Vital Health Statistics2012335Hyattsville, MDNational Center for Health StatisticsAvailable at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03_035.pdfAccessed June 16, 2014AkinbamiLJMoormanJEBaileyCZahranHSKingMJohnsonCALiuXTrends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001–2010NCHS Data Brief20121822617340BarnettSBNurmagambetovTACosts of asthma in the United States: 2002–2007J Allergy Clin Immunol201112714515221211649AkinbamiLJMoormanJELiuXAsthma Prevalence, Health Care Use, and Mortality: United States, 2005–2009National Health Statistics Reports32Hyattsville, MDNational Center for Health Statistics2011Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr032.pdfAccessed June 16, 2014TarloSMBalmesJBalkissoonRDiagnosis and management of work-related asthma: American College of Chest Physicians Consensus StatementChest20081341S41S18779187VandenplasOTorenKBlancPDHealth and socioeconomic impact of work-related asthmaEur Respir J20032268969714582924WhiteGEMazurekJMMoormanJEWork-related asthma and employment status—38 states and District of Columbia, 2006–2009J Asthma20135095495923889492OrtegaHGKreissKSchillDPWeissmanDNFatal asthma from powdering shark cartilage and review of fatal occupational asthma literatureAm J Ind Med200242505412111690KnoellerGEMazurekJMMoormanJEAsthma symptoms among adults with work-related asthmaJ Asthma20135016617323259750ChesterDAHannaEAPickelmanBGRosenmanKDAsthma death after spraying polyurethane truck bed-linerAm J Ind Med200548788415940723KnoellerGEMazurekJMMoormanJEHealth-related quality of life among adults with work-related asthma in the United StatesQual Life Res20132277178022661107TorénKBlancPDAsthma caused by occupational exposures is common—a systematic analysis of estimates of the population-attributable fractionBMC Pulm Med20099719178702MaloJLChan-YeungMAgents causing occupational asthmaJ Allergy Clin Immunol200912354555018951622MayJJSchenkerMBAgricultureHarberPSchenkerMBBalmesJROccupational and Environmental Respiratory DiseaseSt. LouisMosby1995617636US Department of AgricultureCensus of AgricultureDemographic Fact SheetAvailable at: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/Demographics/index.aspAccessed June 16, 2014ArifAADelclosGLWhiteheadLWTortoleroSRLeeESOccupational exposures associated with work-related asthma and work-related wheezing among U.S. workersAm J Ind Med20034436837614502764SchenkerMBFarrarJAMitchellDCAgricultural dust exposure and respiratory symptoms among California farm operatorsJ Occup Environ Med2005471157116616282877MazurekJMSchleiffPLPhysician recognition of work-related asthma among US farm operatorsFam Med20104240841320526908National Occupational Research Agenda Agriculture, Forestry and Forestry Sector CouncilNational Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Agenda122008Washington, DCNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthAvailable at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nora/comment/agendas/agforlish/pdfs/AgForFishDec2008.pdfAccessed June 16, 2014US Department of AgricultureFarm Household Economics and Well-Being, GlossaryAvailable at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topies/farm-economy/farm-household-well-being/glossary.aspxAccessed June 16, 2014HoppinJAUmbachDMLondonSJAlavanjaMCSandlerDPDiesel exhaust, solvents, and other occupational exposures as risk factors for wheeze among farmersAm J Respir Crit Care Med20041691308131315070818HoppinJAUmbachDMLondonSJPesticides and atopic and nonatopic asthma among farm women in the Agricultural Health StudyAm J Respir Crit Care Med2008177111817932376US Department of AgricultureCensus of Agriculture. Production Fact SheetAvailable at: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Online_Highlights/Fact_Sheets/Production/Accessed June 16, 2014EduardWOmenaasEBakkePSDouwesJHeederikDAtopic and non-atopic asthma in a farming and a general populationAm J Ind Med20044639639915376208HeinonenOPHorsmanheimoMVohlonenITerhoEOPrevalence of allergic symptoms in rural and urban populationsEur J Respir Dis Suppl198715264693499348JenkinsPLEarle-RichardsonGBellEMMayJJGreenAChronic disease risk in central New York dairy farmers: results from a large health survey 1989–1999Am J Ind Med200547202615597357RadonKMonsoEWeberCPrevalence and risk factors for airway diseases in farmers—summary of results of the European Farmers’ ProjectAnn Agric Environ Med2002920721312498590MazurekJMStoreyEPhysician-patient communication regarding asthma and workAm J Prev Med201243727522704750Le MoualNKauffmannFEisenEAKennedySMThe healthy worker effect in asthma: work may cause asthma, but asthma may also influence workAm J Respir Crit Care Med200817741017872490OmlandOHjortCPedersenOFMillerMRSigsgaardTNew-onset asthma and the effect of environment and occupation among farming and nonfarming rural subjectsJ Allergy Clin Immunol201112876176521752438Braun-FahrlanderCEnvironmental exposure to endotoxin and other microbial products and the decreased risk of childhood atopy: evaluating developments since April 2002Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol2003332532914501429Dimich-WardHChowYChungJTraskCContact with livestock—a protective effect against allergies and asthma?Clin Exp Allergy2006361122112916961711EduardWDouwesJOmenaasEHeederikDDo farming exposures cause or prevent asthma? Results from a study of adult Norwegian farmersThorax20045938138615115863PortengenLSigsgaardTOmlandOHjortCHeederikDDoekesGLow prevalence of atopy in young Danish farmers and farming students born and raised on a farmClin Exp Allergy20023224725311929489RadonKSchulzeANowakDInverse association between farm animal contact and respiratory allergies in adulthood: protection, underreporting or selection?Allergy20066144344616512806von MutiusEPro: the increase in asthma can be ascribed to cleanlinessAm J Respir Crit Care Med20011641106110711673189WhiteGESeamanCFiliosMSGender differences in work-related asthma: surveillance data from California, Massachusetts, Michigan, and New Jersey, 1993–2008J Asthma20145169170224673105AndersonNJReeb-WhitakerCKBonautoDKRauserEWork-related asthma in Washington StateJ Asthma20114877378221851158FletcherAMLondonMAGelbergKHGreyAJCharacteristics of patients with work-related asthma seen in the New York State Occupational Health ClinicsJ Occup Environ Med2006481203121117099457SyamlalGMazurekJMMalarcherAMCurrent cigarette smoking prevalence among working adults—United States, 2004–2010MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2011601305130921956406MazurekJMSyamlalGKingBACastellanRMSmokeless tobacco use among working adults—United States, 2005 and 2010MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep20146347748224898164DresselHGrossCde la MotteDSultzJJorresRANowakDEducational intervention in farmers with occupational asthma: long-term effect on exhaled nitric oxideJ Invest Allergol Clin Immunol2009194953KimJArrandaleVHKudlaIMardellKLougheedDHolnessDLEducational intervention among farmers in a community health care settingOccup Med (Lond)20126245846122851738DresselHGrossCde laMDSultzJJorresRANowakDEducational intervention decreases exhaled nitric oxide in farmers with occupational asthmaEur Respir J20073054554817766632LandsittelDPMurphyDJKiernanNEHardDLKassabCEvaluation of the effectiveness of educational interventions in the Pennsylvania Central Region Farm Safety Pilot ProjectAm J Ind Med20014014515211494342MpofuDLockingerLBidwellJMcDuffieHHEvaluation of a respiratory health program for farmers and their familiesJ Occup Environ Med2002441064107412448358PachecoKATarloSMWork-related asthma: a case-based approach to managementImmunol Allergy Clin North Am20113172946vi21978854GaskellGDWrightDBO’MuircheartaighCATelescoping of landmark events: implications for survey researchPublic Opin Q200064778910810077

Select Characteristics of Primary Farm Operators and Prevalence of Current Asthma

CharacteristicNo. in sampleaEstimated primary farm operators
Current asthma prevalence
No. (in 1,000s)%b (95% CI)%b (95% CI)
Total11,2102,181100.05.1 (4.5–5.6)
Age group (years)
 16–396261135.3 (4.7–5.9)3.8(1.9–5.6)
 40–646,4271,27059.6 (58.3–60.8)5.0 (4.2–5.8)
 65–993,90974935.1 (33.9–36.3)5.5 (4.6–6.5)
Sex
 Male9,5381.82383.7 (82.8–84.7)4.6 (4.1–5.2)c
 Female1,65335416.3(15.3–17.2)7.3(5.6–9.1)
Marital status
 Married or living with a partner9,2641,80283.5 (82.6–84.5)5.0 (4.4–5.7)
 Widowed, divorced, separated1,30426612.4(11.5–13.2)5.3 (3.7–6.9)
 Single, never married533894.1 (3.6–4.6)5.3 (2.7–8.0)
Smoking status
 Current smoker8722009.4(8.6–10.2)6.1 (3.8–8.4)
 Former smoker3,06964530.3(29.1–31.5)5.5 (4.5–6.5)
 Nonsmoker6,9851,28160.3(59.0–61.5)4.7 (4.1–5.4)
Second job
 Yes4,8791,04148.3 (47.0–49.6)4.8 (4.0–5.7)
 No6,2161,11451.7(50.4–53.0)5.3(4.6–6.1)
Regiond
 North2,8661426.5 (—e)5.4 (4.4–6.4)
 Midwest2,52079636.5 (—)4.3 (3.4–5.2)f
 South2,85191642.0 (—)5.2 (4.2–6.2)
 West2,97332715.0 (—)6.6 (5.6–7.5)
Farm acreage
 <1015,9071,38963.7 (62.8–64.6)5.3(4.5–6.1)
 101–9994,36866630.5 (29.6–31.4)4.6 (3.8–5.4)
 ≥ 1,0009351265.8(5.4–6.1)5.1 (3.4–6.7)
Farm value of sales
 <$10,0003,4511,20155.0 (53.1–57.0)5.3 (4.4–6.2)
 $10,000–$99,9994,82760027.5 (26.9–28.2)5.3 (4.5–6.0)
 ≥$100,0002,93238017.4(16.8–18.1)4.2 (3.3–5.0)
Farm typeg
 Livestock5,4501,11351.1 (49.8–52.3)5.3(4.5–6.1)
 Crop5,7601,06848.9 (47.7–50.2)4.9 (4.1–5.7)

Note. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

Unweighted sample size. Differences between the total number of subjects and the 11,210 participants in the survey resulted from missing data (248 for age, 19 for sex, 109 for marital status, 284 for smoking status, 115 for second job, 280 for current asthma).

Weighted to the national population of primary farm operators using the survey sample weights for each participant.

Males versus females, P = .0009.

North: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Texas, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

Farm counts considered a population measure, no confidence interval calculated.

Midwest versus West, P = .001.

Livestock farm type includes swine, dairy, beef cattle, sheep/goats, equine, poultry, aquaculture, and other animal; crop farm type includes grains, tobacco, cotton, vegetables, fruits/nuts, nursery/greenhouse, cut Christmas trees, and other crops/hay.

Prevalence of Asthma Attacks and Proportion of Current Asthma That Is Farm Work Related Among Primary Farm Operators With Current Asthma

CharacteristicAsthma attack prevalenceProportion of current asthma that is farm work relatedCurrent asthma that is farm work related versus asthma that is non-farm related



%a(95% CI)%a(95% CI)PORb (95% CI)P
Total51.0(45.3–56.7)15.4(11.5–19.2)
Age group (years)
 16–3947.9(23.1–72.7)16.8(2.5–31.1)1.00 (Ref)
 40–6455.1(47.5–62.8)17.1(11.7–22.5)0.97 (0.31–3.07)1.00
 65–9944.9(36.1–53.6)12.4(6.7–18.2)0.67 (0.19–2.42).55
Sex
 Male51.1(44.7–57.5)16.9(12.3–21.6)1.55 (0.68–3.56).30
 Female50.7(38.4–63.0)10.4(4.3–16.4)1.00 (Ref)
Marital status
 Married or living with a partner51.3(45.0–57.5)16.3(11.9–20.7)b
 Widowed, divorced, separated50.5(35.2–65.9)11.4(2.1–20.7)c
 Single, never married48.3(22.6–74.0)d
Smoking status
 Current smoker41.3(22.0–60.7)2.9(0.0–5.8)c,eb
 Former smoker54.5(44.9–64.2)9.5(4.5–14.5)
 Nonsmoker50.8(43.5–58.2)21.1(15.2–27.1)
Second job
 Yes54.4(45.9–62.9)17.3(10.9–23.6)1.00 (Ref)
 No48.1(40.6–55.5)13.7(9.1–18.4)0.73 (0.34–1.58).43
Regionf
 North56.5(46.2–66.8)26.2(18.2–34.2)1.00 (Ref)
 Midwest53.0(43.8–62.3)15.7(8.6–22.7)0.32 (0.15–0.72).01
 South47.3(37.2–57.5)13.4(6.4–20.3)0.46 (0.22–0.95).04
 West49.6(41.8–57.5)15.2(9.8–20.6)0.41 (0.21–0.80).01
Farm acreage
 <10153.9(46.4–61.5)11.3(6.8–15.9)g0.21 (0.06–0.72).01
 101–99946.1(37.5–54.8)19.5(12.3–26.6)0.40 (0.15–1.08).07
 ≥1,00040.6(24.1–57.0)41.1(24.1–58.0)1.00 (Ref)
Farm value of sales
 <$10,00054.9(46.1–63.7)12.7(6.9–18.4)h0.60 (0.20–1.81).36
 $10,000–$99,99946.5(39.3–53.6)12.0(7.5–16.4)0.44 (0.21–0.90).03
 ≥ $100,00044.4(33.9–55.0)32.5(22.5–42.6)1.00 (Ref)
Farm typei
 Livestock52.0(44.2–59.7)15.2(9.7–20.7)1.00 (Ref)
 Crop49.9(41.6–58.1)15.5(10.2–20.9)0.94 (0.52–1.68).82

Note. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; Ref = reference group.

Weighted to the national population of primary farm operators using the survey sample weights for each participant.

Prevalence odds ratio. In the model, the outcome variable was current asthma that may be farm work related, and the predictor variables were age, sex, second job, census region, farm acreage, value of sales, and farm type. Marital status and smoking status were not included in the logistic regression model because the numbers of operators with farm work–related asthma in these two groups were not reliable.

Estimated proportion may be unreliable because the relative standard error for the estimated number of operators with farm work–related asthma is 30%–50%.

Estimate suppressed because the relative standard error for the estimated number of operators with farm work–related asthma >50%.

Former versus never smokers, P = .007; current versus former/never smokers not assesses because the estimated proportion may be unreliable.

North: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Texas, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

Farms with <101 acres versus farms with ≥1,000 acres, P < .0001; farms with 101–999 acres versus farms with ≥1,000 acres, P = .01.

Farms with ≥$100,000 value of sales versus farms with <$10,000 value of sales, P < .001; farms with ≥$100,000 value of sales versus farms with $10,000–$99,999 value of sales, P < .001.

Livestock farm includes swine, dairy, beef cattle, sheep/goats, equine, poultry, aquaculture, other animal; crop farm includes grains, tobacco, cotton, vegetables, fruits/nuts, nursery/greenhouse, cut Christmas trees, other crops/hay.

Distribution of Primary Farm Operators With Farm Work-Related Asthma by Select Characteristics

Characteristic%a95% CI
Total100.0
Age group (years)
 16–394.4(0.7–8.1)b
 40–6464.7(64.7–77.5)
 65–9930.9(30.9–43.5)
Sex
 Male83.9(74.9–92.8)
 Female16.1(7.2–25.1)b
Marital status
 Married or living with a partner87.2(78.7–95.7)
 Widowed, divorced, separated9.8(1.8–17.8)b
 Single, never marriedc
Smoking status
 Current smoker2.0(0.1–3.9)b
 Former smoker20.5(10.3–30.6)d
 Nonsmoker77.5(67.2–87.8)
Second job
 Yes51.2(37.8–64.6)
 No48.8(35.4–62.2)
Regionc
 North12.0(7.1–16.8)f
 Midwest31.7(19.2–44.2)
 South36.7(22.3–51.1)
 West19.6(11.7–27.5)
Farm acreage
 <10149.0(35.5–62.5)g
 101–99935.2(22.8–47.6)
 ≥1,00015.8(7.5–24.1)
Farm value of sales
 <$10,00047.0(33.2–60.7)h
 $10,000–$99,99922.2(13.4–31.0)
 ≥$100,00030.8(19.9–41.7)
Farm typei
 Livestock52.5(39.2–65.9)
 Crop47.5(34.1–60.8)

Note. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval.

Weighted to the national population of primary farm operators using the survey sample weights for each participant.

Estimate may be unreliable because the relative standard error for the estimated number of operators with farm work–related asthma is 30%–50%.

Estimate suppressed because the relative standard error for the estimated number of operators with farm work–related asthma >50%.

Never smoker versus former smoker, P = .007; current versus former/never smokers not assesses because the estimate may be unreliable.

North: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Texas, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.

Farms in South versus farms in North, P = .03; farms in West versus farms in North, P = .02.

Farms with <101 acres versus farms with ≥1,000 acres, P < .0001; farms with 101–999 acres versus farms with ≥1,000 acres, P = .01.

Farms with ≥$100,000 value of sales versus farms with <$10,000 value of sales, P < .001; farms with ≥$100,000 value of sales versus farms with $10,000–$99,999 value of sales, P < .0001.

Livestock farm includes swine, dairy, beef cattle, sheep/goats, equine, poultry, aquaculture, other animal; crop farm includes grains, tobacco, cotton, vegetables, fruits/nuts, nursery/greenhouse, cut Christmas trees, other crops/hay.