Vascular disease is promoted by systemic inflammation that can arise from sites distal to the affected vessels. We sought to characterize the net inflammatory potential of serum from patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) using cultured endothelial cells as a cumulative biosensor.
Serum samples from CAD patients (N = 45) and healthy control subjects (N = 48) were incubated with primary human coronary artery endothelial cells at a 1:10 dilution for 4 h, followed by isolation of the cellular RNA. Alteration of inflammation-responsive elements (adhesion molecules and cytokines) was assessed by gene expression. Specific indicators included intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and interleukin-8 (IL-8). Additionally, the cytokine levels in serum samples from all subjects were quantified. Serum from CAD subjects induced greater endothelial ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IL-8 expression compared to healthy control serum (p < 0.001 for each analysis). The three indicators of inflammatory potential (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IL-8 mRNA) trended independently of each other and also of serum inflammatory biomarkers. IL-8 expression correlated negatively with serum HDL levels but positively correlated with VLDL, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and C-reactive protein. Interestingly, serum levels of cytokines in CAD patients were not statistically different from healthy control subjects. A year of follow-up in a sub-group of CAD subjects revealed relatively stable measures.
As yet unidentified circulating factors in the serum of CAD patients appear to activate endothelial cells, leading to upregulation of adhesion molecules and chemokines. This cumulative assay performed well in terms of discriminating patients with CAD compared to healthy subjects, with greater range and specificity than specific inflammatory markers.
Vascular disease is an inflammatory condition wherein activated endothelial cells mediate the recruitment of immune cells into damaged areas of the vessel wall, promoting oxidative injury, pathological lesion growth and increased histological complexity [
We have developed a novel, less biased approach to assess what we believe to be a functional index of the total inflammatory potential of the serum [
Thus, the value of this assay paradigm remains uncertain with respect to clinical outcomes. Many questions remain unanswered, such as whether elevations in net serum inflammatory potential contribute to chronic cardiovascular disease and whether such measures have predictive or diagnostic value. The present study conducted a side-by-side comparison of stabilized coronary artery disease patients on standard-of-care medication with a separate cohort of healthy subjects.
Patients with CAD were recruited while hospitalized at the University of New Mexico Hospital for an acute coronary syndrome event (unstable angina, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-elevation myocardial infarction) to participate in a health outcomes study designed to assess the benefit of an interdisciplinary cardiovascular risk reduction clinic (CRRC), as compared to usual care. The study was approved by the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center Human Research Review Committee and all study patients provided informed consent.
As part of the study, blood samples were collected from all patients for assessment of a variety of traditional and non-traditional risk factors (lipids, HbA1c, homocysteine, malondialdehyde [MDA], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) and a portion of the samples were stored for future use. Patients randomized to the CRRC were evaluated by both a cardiologist and a clinical pharmacist, who devised an appropriate treatment plan based upon identified cardiovascular disease risk factors. Patients randomized to usual care received follow-up at the discretion of their primary care providers and/or specialist providers.
The majority of CAD patients were on standard-of-care pharmacotherapy, including strategies to reduce cholesterol, glucose, blood pressure, platelet aggregation, and tobacco cessation where appropriate. The serum samples used in this analysis were collected at the initial outpatient follow-up study visit to the CRRC.
Healthy control subjects were recruited through the University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science Center for routine health screens. Subjects were recruited by newspaper or radio advertisements from the community. Exclusion criteria included - 1) history of diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or anorexia nervosa; 2) use of statin class of drugs; 3) current smoking or having quit smoking within previous two months; 4) pregnancy and nursing state; 5) presence of lung diseases other than asthma; 6) stroke in prior 3 months; 7) aortic aneurysm; and 8) failure to expectorate adequate-quality sputum in response to induction. In addition, all tests were delayed in the event of an acute infection or surgery within the prior 4 weeks and respiratory tract infections or asthma exacerbations within the prior 8 weeks to minimize the effect of these factors on measurements. For actively menstruating women, the testing was done within 3–14 days following the cessation of menstrual flow (a period of high estrogen and low progesterone) to standardize the effect of sex hormones.
CAD participants were assessed for body composition in a fasting state using a Quantum II Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (RJL Systems, Clinton Township, MI) using the method described by Heyward [
The endothelial cell biosensor assay (Figure
Serum samples from healthy and CAD patients were analyzed using an electrochemiluminescence detection system (Meso Scale Discovery, Rockville, MD). The serum samples were analyzed for the presence of CRP, soluble ICAM-1, soluble VCAM-1, serum amyloid A (SAA), TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β using commercially-available kits.
Gene expression data were log10-transformed for normality. Data were analyzed between groups (CAD versus control) via Satterthwaite’s t-test (SAS v9.4). A multivariate analysis confirmed this difference between CAD and control outcomes after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. Correlational (Spearman) and multivariate analysis was carried out on the CAD patient outcomes relative to demographic and clinical data (SAS).
A total of 48 patients with CAD and 45 healthy control subjects were included in the study. Subjects were self-selected and inclusion criteria allowed for a wide range of CAD etiology and manifestations. Table
31.7 ± 13.5; 18-61 56.5 ± 7.9; 36-77
71% 41.7%
22.3 ± 1.7; 18.7-25.5 29.9 ± 6.4; 17.2-48.2
25.27 ± 6.5; 12.0-40.0 34.3 ± 10.5; 18.5-56.3
9.3% Native American/Alaskan 57.9% Hispanic 4.7% Asian 36.8% White 9.3% African 5.3% Other 76.7% Caucasian (29% Hispanic)
0% 58.3%
0% 22.9%
0% 50%
NA 20 (42%), 28 (58%)
NA 14 (29%), 21 (44%), 13 (27%)
149.9 39.4 76 241
88.6 31.7 34 175
40.2 12.1 25 88
9.3 4.9 4 32
30.9 7.9 18 56
22.0 8.3 12 64
9.8 3.2 5.6 20
18.1 46.2 7 341
156.1 74.8 5 323
6.8 3.9 3 17
8.4 5.5 1 24
115.8 37.5 81 265
7.63 1.88 5.4 11.4
9.25 4.00 4.6 24.6
14.09 8.02 2.4 43.5
363.2 89.8 231 660
15.1 13.1 0.1 50
77.1 271.6 0.6 1481.6
130 19 100 186
74 11 48 100
67 11 43 89
85.5 17.4 53.4 123.25
36.1 9.08 22.6 48.8
0.236 0.089 0.094 0.414
400 568 16 2748
75%
97.9%
25%
75%
68.8%
hCAECs treated with 10% serum from CAD subjects showed substantial increases in IL-8, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 expression, compared to hCAECs treated with serum from healthy control subjects (Figure
As many serum components can be acutely altered as a result of major cardiac events, or may trend with age and/or time, we examined the impact of temporality on serum-treated hCAEC mRNA expression in both the cross-sectional samples, as well as with a sub-cohort of longitudinally followed CAD subjects. All samples were obtained from patients with known CAD, either from having previously suffered an acute myocardial infarction or angina attack. The average time post-event was slightly greater than one year (400 days), but 5 subjects enrolled in the study within 2 months of the precipitating event and 6 subjects were greater than 2 years past their event. The earliest enrolled subject had an event 16 days prior to the initial visit. In general, this cross-sectional data set did not reveal strong trends of temporal resolution of the bioactivity of the serum (Figure
In a limited cohort of subjects (N = 11), four longitudinally obtained serum samples were available for approximately one year after the initial clinic visit (Figure
Medical records allowed for initial event categorization of CAD subjects. We therefore considered an intra-cohort comparison for subjects whose initial presentation was a myocardial infarction (with or without ST elevation) or unstable angina (Figure
Importantly, the significant differences in endothelial expression of IL-8, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 in response to patient serum remained significant even after adjusting for the potential major effect modifiers of sex, age, and BMI that were clearly different between cohorts. Direct comparisons across sex, age, and BMI are shown in Figure
Multivariate regression was also applied to test the transcriptional outcomes relative to the potential effect modifiers. In considering all variables and potential interactions among sex, age, and BMI as confounders, differences between healthy and CAD subjects for expression of IL-8, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 remained significant. Thus, despite the unmatched cohorts, there is high confidence that the CAD condition alone imparts an independent pro-inflammatory effect on the serum.
In exploring potential factors that may contribute to serum-induced endothelial cell responses, we found a number of demographic factors in CAD patients that correlated with IL-8, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression (Table
Diabetic 0.262 0.079 Glucose −0.358 0.013 HDL −0.298 0.039 HDL2 −0.272 0.061 HDL3 −0.283 0.052 VLDL1/2 0.254 0.081 C-Reactive protein 0.329 0.038 Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 0.367 0.077 VCAM-1
Smoking 0.263 0.074 Homocysteine −0.274 0.059 ICAM-1
Age −0.301 0.038 Homocysteine −0.368 0.010 Time post-event −0.312 0.033
As IL-8 expression had the most robust correlates, we developed a regression model to better understand the factors that predict this outcome (Table
Intercept 0.141 0.0815 1.73 0.092 0 VLDL 1/2 0.0199 0.0062 3.22 0.0027 0.438 CRP 0.0100 0.0028 3.54 0.0011 0.474 Glucose −0.0012 0.0005 −2.22 0.0328 −0.298
To assess whether inflammatory cytokines might explain differences in the serum inflammatory potential between healthy and CAD subjects, we measured 8 key inflammatory cytokines in serum from all patients using an electrochemiluminescence technique (Figure
The present study assessed cumulative serum inflammatory potential from a cohort of CAD patients in stable condition under standard-of-care for medications and lifestyle adjustments, using an endothelial biosensor assay. Utilization of circulating biomarkers has proven valuable for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in atherosclerotic disease, but even the most predictive single mediators provide only small incremental improvements in overall prediction of risk or patient reclassification [
Serum obtained from patients with a previous history of a major coronary vascular event showed a greater potential for inducing endothelial cell inflammatory responses, such as IL-8, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 expression, compared to serum from healthy individuals. The CAD patients, all substantially post-event (mean = 1.1y; range = 16d − 7.5y), were expectedly receiving numerous medications (>7) as standard-of-care. CAD subjects were generally prescribed at least one lipid control agent (
In previous research, we have found this endothelial bioassay paradigm valuable for assessing potential benefits of grape seed extract with added resveratrol in a healthy adult population [
Several study limitations are also viewed as opportunities for future research, as the overall concept of holistic cell-based responses to whole serum remains quite novel and unexplored. For one, while IL-8, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1 mRNA are consistently reported as involved in vascular disease progression, both in clinical studies and basic research, there are a number of important response factors that have not been assessed. It is highly probable that many other transcripts are more responsive to the inflammatory factors in the CAD serum, or that specific proteins may be produced, expressed on the cell surface, or secreted in a selective manner. It is likely that endothelial genomic or proteomic outcome patterns would identify stronger response elements or provide “fingerprint” responses to specific clinical conditions or allow differentiation between acute environmental influences (
Secondly, we have yet to clearly link endothelial cell responses to serum with outcomes of morbidity and/or mortality, thus the clinical value of the present study remains uncertain. Our previous work suggests that this approach may be valuable for studies of toxicology [
Lastly, there is inherently concern relative to the unmatched study cohorts, despite our findings revealing negligible influence of sex, age, or BMI on the coronary artery endothelial cell transcriptional responses to CAD patient serum. Improved matching in future research will certainly provide greater confidence in this outcome. However, our findings remain notable due to the power of this novel approach to discriminate these populations when conventional inflammatory cytokines did not. There is a vast amount of clinical and research efforts invested in the use of circulating biomarkers. The finding in the present study that CAD patients on standard-of-care medication showed no difference in cytokine profiles from a cohort that was younger, had a lower BMI, and more predominantly female, is naturally a concern and clear motivation for the development of novel diagnostic and prognostic markers, such as pursued in the present study.
The use of cells as biosensors to detect cumulative circulating inflammatory may have significant clinical value. Serum contains thousands of factors - proteins, lipids, and metabolites - that can be augmented by numerous pathologies. Hundreds of potential drivers of endothelial cell activation and vascular inflammatory pathologies exist, such as myeloperoxidase, oxidized lipids or lipoproteins, advanced glycation endproducts or damage-associate molecular patterns (DAMPs). Additionally, endogenous proteins may be modified (fragmented or adducted) by reactive molecules, leading to altered biological activity or pathological epitopes. The present findings, combined with previous experience with this assay, highlight the potential usefulness of a cumulative bioactivity response, compared to measurements of individual factors to assess an overall inflammatory potential of the circulation. Sophisticated proteomic, lipidomic and metabolomics approaches will naturally be valuable to establish key drivers and link back to clinical course. However, we remain skeptical that any single marker will explain the net inflammatory serum potential; thus, there is need for holistic assessments such as this endothelial biosensor method. Future work is required to address the value of this approach for prediction of risk, efficacy of therapies, or safety of pharmaceuticals.
Body mass index
Cardiovascular risk reduction clinic
Coronary artery disease
C-reactive protein
Hemoglobin A1C
Human coronary artery endothelial cells
Interleukin-8
Intracellular adhesion molecule-1
Malondialdehyde
Tumor necrosis factor-α
Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
The authors declared that they have no competing interests.
HC optimized and conducted the endothelial cell bioassays, qPCR, and cytokine multiplex assays. MA was similarly involved in the conduct of technical aspects of the assays, trained HC on the cellular and molecular techniques. KZ contributed to the development of assays and analysis of data. JA and JN initiated the Cardiovascular Pharmacy Clinic, collected the blood samples along with much of the clinical chemistry and demographics data. AS collected/contributed the control patient serum samples. He also provided invaluable insight into the design and analysis of clinical data. CR consulted on the design and analyses and contributed to the writing. CQ conducted statistical analysis. MJC conceived the assay paradigm, funded, and provided overall stewardship of this innovative and collaborative project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This project was supported in part by the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000041), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014639) and National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (OH010495). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.