Country monitoring and accountability system visit to Dominican Republic – June 10-14, 2013 : summary of key findings and recommendations
Corporate Authors:Center for Global Health (U.S.). Division of Global HIV/AIDS. ; United States. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. ;
Series:CDC’s Country Monitoring and Accountability System II
Description:As the U.S. science-based public health and disease prevention agency, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) plays an important role in implementing the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) under the direction of the Department of State’s (DOS) Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator (OGAC). CDC uses its technical expertise in public health science and long-standing relationships with Ministries of Health (MOH) across the globe to work side-by-side with countries to build strong national programs and sustainable public health systems that can respond effectively to the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. CDC global HIV/AIDS PEPFAR-related activities are implemented by the Division of Global HIV/AIDS (DGHA) in CDC’s Center for Global Health. PEPFAR activities represent the largest portfolio of global health activities at CDC.
CDC/DGHA launched the Country Monitoring and Accountability System (CMAS) in 2011 to identify challenges resulting from the rapid scale-up of complex CDC/PEPFAR programming as a part of CDC’s commitment to transparency and accountability. This initiative serves as a basis for ongoing, monitored quality improvement of DGHA’s programs and operations through internal programmatic and financial oversight. CMAS is a proactive response on the part of CDC to: 1) ensure accountability for global programs and proper stewardship of U.S. government resources by promoting explicit performance standards and defining expectations for brining all components of program accountability up to the highest standards; 2) ensure DGHA is supporting DOS, OGAC, and the Presidential Initiatives; 3) serve as a basis for ongoing, monitored quality improvement; and 4) effectively prepare CDC for future oversight audits, congressional inquiries, and special data calls.
The CMAS strategy was designed to systematically assess CDC’s accountability and proper stewardship of U.S. government resources and provide feedback on key business and program operations in the following key areas:
• Intramural Resources: Ensuring proper management and stewardship of financial resources, property, and human resources within CDC’s overseas offices
• Extramural Funding: Ensuring responsible and accurate management of financial and other resources external to CDC’s overseas offices
• Public Health Impact: Ensuring the delivery of consistently high quality interventions and technical assistance that positively impact the populations the program serves
The first round of CMAS visits (formally known as Country Management and Support visits - CMS I) took place between February 2011 and March 2012 and assessed 35 country offices. A second round of CMAS visits (CMAS II) evaluated 30 countries and one pilot. A few CMAS II visits were cancelled due to political unrest. CMAS II visits occurred between June 2012 and June 2014 and increasingly emphasized supportive technical assistance to ensure continual quality improvement. In addition to the focus on CDC’s PEPFAR program activities, CDC’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer reviewed financial transactions for CDC’s other global health programs.
DGHA conducted a CMAS II visit to Dominican Republic from June 10–14, 2013. The principal objectives of this visit were to:
• Perform a CDC headquarters assessment of internal controls in the field to ensure the highest level of accountability;
• Review intramural and extramural resource management to ensure financial stewardship of U.S. government funds;
• Generate a multidisciplinary snapshot of how CDC country offices are performing regarding programmatic effectiveness in the areas of AIDS-Free Generation Strategy, site visits, and data driven programs to ensure DGHA is achieving the greatest public health impact; and
• Provide clear feedback and technical assistance to the country office to improve current internal controls.
Publication date from document properties.
Supporting Files:No Additional Files
You May Also Like: