92006082299Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers PrevCancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology1055-99651538-775523355601448076810.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1266HHSPA701612ArticleCervical Cancer Screening Among Young Adult Women in the United StatesRolandKatherine B.1BenardVicki B.1SomanAshwini2BreenNancy3KepkaDeanna4SaraiyaMona1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control; Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Atlanta, GeorgiaNorthrop Grumman, Atlanta, GeorgiaNational Cancer Institute; Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences; Applied Research Program; Health Services and Economics Branch, Rockville, MarylandUniversity of Utah; Huntsman Cancer Institute, College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UtahCorresponding Author: Katherine B. Roland MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, NE, MS K-55, Atlanta, GA 30341. Phone: 770-488-1089; Fax: 770-488-4639; kroland@cdc.gov20620152512013420132562015224580588© 2013 American Association for Cancer Research.2013Background

Cervical cancer screening guidelines have evolved significantly in the last decade for young adult women, with current recommendations promoting later initiation and longer intervals.

Methods

Using self-reported cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2000–2010 data, trends in Papanicolaou (Pap) testing among women ages 18–29 years were examined. NHIS 2010 data were used to investigate age at first Pap test (N =2,198), time since most recent Pap test (n =1,622), and predictors of Pap testing within the last 12 months (n = 1,622).

Results

The percentage of 18-year-olds who reported ever having a Pap test significantly decreased from 49.9% in 2000 to 37.9% in 2010. Mean age at first Pap test in 2010 was significantly younger for non-Hispanic black women (16.9 years), women < high school education (16.9 years), women who received the HPV vaccine (17.1 years), and women who have ever given birth (17.3 years). The majority reported their last Pap test within the previous 12 months (73.1%). Usual source of healthcare (OR, 2.31) and current birth control use (OR, 1.64) significantly increased chances of having a Pap test within the previous 12 months.

Conclusions

From 2000 to 2010, there was a gradual decline in Pap test initiation among 18-year-olds; however, in 2010, many women reported ≤12 months since last screening. Evidence-based guidelines should be promoted, as screening young adult women for cervical cancer more frequently than recommended can cause considerable harms.

Impact

A baseline of cervical cancer screening among young adult women in the United States to assess adherence to evidence-based screening guidelines.

Introduction

During the last 6 decades, reductions in cervical cancer incidence and mortality have been achieved, due to integration of cytology into women’s preventive healthcare (1, 2), and increased understanding that cervical cancer is caused by persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV; refs. 36). HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, with peak prevalence among females ages 14–24 years (7). Persistent HPV infections occur within a few years of first sexual intercourse (8) but can take years to develop into invasive cervical cancer (911). Although the prevalence of HPV is greater among younger women than among women of older ages (7), cervical cancer incidence is very rare in women younger than 29 years of age (4, 12) because the majority of HPV infections are transitory and usually regress spontaneously within 2 years (9).

Cervical cancer screening guidelines for average-risk women have evolved significantly over the last decade promoting later initiation and longer intervals. In 2000, guidelines recommended to begin screening at 18 years of age or at initiation of sexual activity (1315), with annual (14, 15) to triennial (13) intervals. By 2003, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued recommendations and rationale for later starting age and triennial screening intervals (16). In November 2012, concurrence across organizations was achieved; average-risk women should avoid screening before 21 years of age, with triennial screening intervals until 65 years of age (1719).

Guidelines that promote recommendations for less intervention can be difficult for physicians and the public to understand and support (20). However, as screening increases, so do false-positive test results and colposcopies, with more false-positive test results occurring in women aged younger than 21 years (21). Consequent unnecessary procedures conducted for treatment of pre-invasive lesions that would regress or were falsely identified may have adverse reproductive and pregnancy outcomes (22) are especially salient for younger adult women who anticipate future pregnancy. In addition, screening women aged younger than 21 years, and all women annually can cause undue patient anxiety (23, 24) and costs to both patients and the healthcare infrastructure (2527).

By adhering to evidence-based guidelines, clinicians can minimize the physical, emotional, and financial costs of overscreening and overtreatment (20, 22, 2830). A national baseline of cervical cancer screening among young adult women before the 2012 screening guidelines update is necessary to measure implementation of current evidence-based guidelines for screening onset and frequency. To meet this need, national survey data from 2000–2010 were analyzed to estimate the prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women ages 18–29 years in the United States, focusing on these ages because of the distinction made in screening initiation and test recommendations on the basis of patient age.

Materials and MethodsStudy population

The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is an annual survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Using multistage cluster sample design, a representative sample of households is selected for participation, and a personal household interview is conducted by U.S. Census Bureau interviewers according to procedures specified by NCHS. CDC’s Division of Cancer Prevention and Control and National Cancer Institute’s Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences sponsor the Cancer Control Supplement of NHIS. Analyses that use public-use data do not require CDC Institutional Review Board approval.

NHIS collects self-reported information about Papanicolaou (Pap) test use from a randomly selected adult participant through the adult core and supplemental cancer control modules. Two distinct study samples based on survey data years were used for analysis. For the trend analysis (years 2000, 2005, 2008, and 2010), the study sample was restricted to women ages 18–29 years who reported never having a hysterectomy and ever having a Pap test (n =11,248). This analysis was to estimate Pap test use over time. The second analysis focused only on 2010 data and was restricted to women ages 18–29 years who reported never having a hysterectomy and ever having a Pap test (n = 2,198). This analysis was to estimate age of first Pap test, time since most recent Pap test, and predictors of having a Pap test in the previous 12 months. To examine time since most recent Pap test and predictors of having a Pap test in the previous 12 months, the study sample was further restricted to women who both reported their most recent Pap test was a part of a regular screening exam, and no abnormal Pap test in previous 3 years (n = 1,622).

Data measures

Two distinct outcome measures were created for the analysis of cervical cancer screening practices of women ages 18–29 years. First, to provide an historical assessment of Pap test participation, responses to the question, “Have you ever had a Pap test?” were analyzed. Respondents were read a definition of the Pap test before responding: “A Pap smear or Pap test is a routine test for women in which the doctor examines the cervix, takes a cell sample from the cervix with a small stick or brush, and sends it to the lab.” Rates of women who reported they ever received a Pap test in 2000, 2005, 2008, and 2010 are presented, the years that NHIS included this question in the supplemental cancer control module.

Second, to provide a baseline for measuring future changes in screening initiation and frequency among women ages 18–29 years, 2010 data concerning reported age at first Pap test, time since most recent Pap test, and predictors of having a Pap test within the previous 12 months were examined. Respondents who reported ever having a Pap test were asked “At what age did you have your first Pap test?” and “When did you have your most recent Pap test?” Age of first Pap test was a new question on the 2010 NHIS, providing novel data findings and an opportunity for comparison with future screening initiation data.

Correlates

Self-reported sociodemographic variables, namely age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, poverty level (imputed income data), marital status, healthcare coverage (public, private, or none), and access to usual source of healthcare (a place other than emergency room where routine care is sought), were analyzed in relation to cervical cancer screening outcome measures. To adjust for their potential impact on age of initiation and frequency of Pap testing, awareness of HPV, HPV vaccine status, having ever given birth to a live born infant (increased visits with a provider, and Pap testing may occur during antepartum care), current birth control use (pills, implants, shots), and whether a physician recommended the most recent Pap test were included in the model.

Statistical analysis

NHIS has a complex survey design involving stratification, clustering, and disproportionate sampling. To provide national estimates of cervical cancer screening outcome measures, SAS version 9.2 and SUDAAN release 10.0.1 (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC) were used to apply sampling weights and account for stratified survey design.

Linear trends for years 2000–2010 for all women ages 18–29 years were tested using unadjusted logistic regression models. Differences between years 2000 and 2005, 2000 and 2008, and 2000 and 2010 were tested separately for each age group (18, 19, 20, 21, 22–29 years) using linear test for contrast.

For the 2010 analysis of women who have ever had a Pap test, examining age at first Pap test by sociodemographic variables, the mean, median, and range, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. The difference between mean age for all covariates was tested using the t test for mean and corresponding P values were noted. For the univariable analysis of time since most recent Pap test, weighted proportions with 95% CIs were reported. Association between last reported screening and sociodemographic variables was assessed using χ2 statistics.

To better understand the determinants of a more frequent interval for average-risk women ages 18–29 years, potential predictors of having a Pap test in the previous 12 months using multivariable logistic regression model were examined. To construct the multivariable model, a univariable analysis comparing last Pap test reported within 12 versus 13–36 months (data not shown) was conducted. Only statistically significant variables with P < 0.05 were included in the multivariable models. Associations were assessed with Wald-F statistics and differences among the age groups were tested using linear contrast and footnoted as significant. In addition, estimates based on 30 or fewer sample cases are considered to be unreliable and were suppressed and footnoted in the tables when necessary.

ResultsPap test trends among women ages 18–29 years, 2000–2010

Pap test trends for all ages combined reporting ever having a Pap test from 2000–2010 were not significant (P = 0.243). However, the percentage of 18-year-old women who ever had a Pap test significantly decreased from 49.9% in 2000 to 37.9% in 2010 (P = 0.045), and among 22–29-year-old women, the percentage significantly decreased from 91.3% in 2000 to 89.3% in 2008 (P = 0.034; Fig. 1).

Participant demographics, 2010

The 2010 study sample comprised mostly of non-Hispanic white (63.4%) women between the ages of 22–29 years (76.6%), who reported completing at least some college (39.7%), were living <200% above the federal poverty level (55.2%), never been married (48.2%), or were married/living with a partner (48.0%). Many were enrolled in a private health insurance plan (32.0%), reported a usual source of healthcare (79.0%), reported awareness of HPV (82.6%), or reported never receiving the HPV vaccine (81.4%). Most had never given birth to a live born infant (55.7%), and less than half were currently using non-barrier birth control (41.3%). Most reported having received a physician recommendation for their most recent Pap test (54.0%; Table 1).

Age at first Pap test, 2010

Reported mean age at first Pap test was significantly younger for 18-year-olds (15.9 years; P < 0.001) compared with women ages 19–29 years. Mean age at first Pap test was significantly younger for non-Hispanic blacks (16.9 years; P < 0.001), and older for Hispanics (18.1 years; P < 0.001) and Asians (19.8 years; P < 0.001) compared with non-Hispanic whites (17.4 years). Mean age at first Pap test was significantly younger for those with <high school education (16.9 years) compared with those with a college degree or greater (18.5 years; P < 0.001), for those reporting HPV vaccination (17.1 years; P 0.002), and having ever given birth (17.3 years; P < 0.001; Table 2). Among women ages 18–29 years who reported receiving the HPV vaccine, 20.6% (n = 80) also reported a history of an abnormal Pap test in the previous 3 years (data not shown).

Time since most recent Pap test and predictors of last Pap test within 12 months, 2010

Most women ages 18–29 years reported their last Pap test was within the previous 12 months (73.1%; 95% CI, 70.4%–75.6%); few reported last Pap test within the previous 2 to 3 years (7.6%; 95% CI, 6.3%–9.2%). Usual source of healthcare (P < 0.001) and current birth control use (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with screening frequency (Table 3). Multivariable regression modeling to examine the odds of reporting a Pap test during the previous 12 months, compared with greater than 12 months found that current use of birth control (P < 0.001; OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.74%–3.06%) and usual source of healthcare (P = 0.002; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.20%–2.25%) were significant (Table 4).

Discussion

Because of how rare cervical cancer is among young women, and the harms associated with overscreening and treatment, national organizations are consistently recommending initiating cervical cancer screening at age 21 years, with longer intervals between screenings (1719). These data showed a significant continuing decline in Pap testing among 18-year-old women during 2000–2010. This may reflect early adoption of later screening initiation recommendations among women younger than 21 years of age (31), possibly due to provider acceptance of, or the growing awareness among the public of the harms associated with premature screening and intervention. However, most young adult women reported screening within the previous 12 months, signaling the possibility of too-frequent Pap testing. Having a usual source of healthcare and current use of birth control methods requiring provider administration or provision (pills, implants, or shots) were strongly associated with the likelihood of having a Pap test in the previous year.

Although fewer 18-year-olds reported ever receiving a Pap test in 2010, those who did had a younger age of initiation, compared with those ages 19–29 years who were surveyed. Upon further examination of the 18-year-olds who did report ever having a Pap test, 15.6% had a history of abnormal screening results (data not shown). Previous studies have shown greater Pap test use among women reporting risky sexual behaviors (32), possibly explaining earlier Pap test initiation among these young women. Following younger users of the Pap test is important to understanding whether guidelines that discourage screening on the basis of sexual history are being implemented.

Non-Hispanic black women and women with less than a high school education reported a significantly younger age of Pap test initiation. Because 2010 was the first time data on age of first Pap test were collected on the NHIS, there is no previous screening initiation data available with which to compare these findings. Lower Pap testing rates have been documented among women with less education, Hispanic ethnicity, and shorter length of U.S. residency (3336). Women who were vaccinated with the HPV vaccine also reported a younger age of first Pap test. Vaccine and Pap test receipt may be correlated, potentially indicating vaccination and screening in the same visit. In addition, age of first Pap test was younger for women who reported ever giving birth, as antepartum care increases visits with a provider and the potential for Pap testing.

The finding that most women reported their last Pap test within 12 months is not surprising. While at least one-third of the sample should report their last Pap test within the previous 12 months, even if all women were screened every 3 years, annual cervical cancer screening is commonly reported by young adult women (3740) and providers (41, 42). Usual source of healthcare and current birth control use as significant variables impacting cervical cancer screening frequency has also been supported by previous research (36, 43, 44). Pap tests and pelvic exams often are used as a prerequisite for birth control prescriptions, despite guidelines indicating they are unnecessary (45, 46). The relationship between birth control use and Pap test receipt among young adults is significant, considering 36.6% of all women ages 18–29 years in the 2010 NHIS (data not shown) and 41.3% of this study sample report current birth control use. If the relationship between birth control use and Pap test receipt among younger adults is linked (38), it would be important to discourage providers from offering Pap testing during visits for prescribing and administering contraception and to inform providers that an annual Pap test is not a necessary prerequisite to prescribe birth control through system-level intervention and incentive.

We acknowledge several limitations with this study. While self-report is a common method used to assess Pap test utilization in national surveys, social desirability bias, recall bias, and overreporting of Pap test use possibly due to women equating any examination of the pelvic area with Pap test (43, 4749) could potentially impact results. The number of women ages 18 and 19 years included in the 2010 study sample was small and should be noted. Because of the small percentage of women who reported HPV vaccination (18.6%), consistent with the lower uptake of the vaccine throughout the United States (50), the variable could not be further examined in this analysis. However, we believe it is crucial to provide baseline estimates of HPV vaccination for this age group, anticipating future analyses will have larger sample sizes to evaluate relationships. In addition, we were not able to control for screening in this age group that could occur in the context of prenatal and post-partum care (38).

NHIS is the principal source of information on the health of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States and provides self-reported screening rates to evaluate trends and determine whether collectively we are progressing toward meeting Healthy People 2020 objectives. This analysis presents an opportunity to nationally track screening behaviors among young adult women. It is significant because it is the first study using NHIS data to assess cervical cancer screening among women ages 18–29 year, and includes results from a novel NHIS question regarding age at initiation of cervical cancer screening. Studying this age cohort is important because of the distinct changes to screening guidelines that have occurred and the growing evidence base for less frequent intervention among young adult women.

Conclusions

Given the growing body of scientific evidence, women and clinicians should feel comfortable adopting later and less frequent intervention for cervical cancer detection among young adult women. As evidence-based screening guidelines gradually become more accepted among patients and providers, we anticipate continued decreases in the percentage of 18-year-old women reporting ever being screened and 18- to 29-year-old women reporting their last Pap test 12 months before survey. These anticipated changes signal research opportunities, including examining the characteristics and predictors of women who report their most recent Pap test 2 to 3 years before survey, and whether their reported interval was due to their provider implementing screening according to guidelines, or irregular healthcare access. In addition, understanding how the HPV vaccine and Pap test are used together in clinical practice will be of increasing public health significance as girls who were vaccinated become old enough for Pap testing. It will also be important to understand the content and delivery of cervical cancer screening guidance providers are offering to their patients after HPV vaccination. Continued unnecessary clinical services can lead to evaluation and treatment that generate physical, emotional, and financial costs. Implementation of evidence-based cervical cancer screening would increase the quality of cervical cancer prevention services for all women and reduce costs throughout society.

Grant Support

The study was supported by the U.S. Government.

Note: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors’ Contributions

Conception and design: K.B. Roland, V. Benard, A. Soman, N. Breen, D. Kepka, M. Saraiya

Development of methodology: K.B. Roland, V. Benard, A. Soman, N. Breen

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): N. Breen

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): K.B. Roland, A. Soman, N. Breen, D. Kepka, M. Saraiya

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: K.B. Roland, V. Benard, A. Soman, N. Breen, D. Kepka, M. Saraiya

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): K.B. Roland, A. Soman

Study supervision: K.B. Roland

CannistraSANiloffJMCancer of the uterine cervixN Engl J Med1996334103088598842ParkinDMBrayFFerlayJPisaniPGlobal cancer statistics, 2002CA Cancer J Clin2005557410815761078BoschFXLorinczAMunozNMeijerCJShahKVThe causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancerJ Clin Pathol2002552446511919208Centers for Disease Control and PreventionHuman papillomavirus-associated cancers-United States, 2004–2008MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2012612586122513527WalboomersJMMJacobsMVManosMMBoschFXKummerJAShahKVHuman papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwideJ Pathol1999189121910451482zur HausenHPapillomaviruses causing cancer: evasion from host-cell control in early events in carcinogenesisJ Natl Cancer Inst200092690810793105DunneEFSternbergMMarkowitzLEMcQuillanGSwanDPatelSHuman papillomavirus (HPV) 6, 11, 16, and 18 prevalence among females in the United States–National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006: opportunity to measure HPV vaccine impact?J Infect Dis2011204562521791658MosherWDChandraAJonesJSexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002Adv Data2005155PlummerMSchiffmanMCastlePEMaucort-BoulchDWheelerCMA 2-year prospective study of human papillomavirus persistence among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesionJ Infect Dis20071951582917471427RodriguezACSchiffmanMHerreroRWacholderSHildesheimACastlePERapid clearance of human papillomavirus and implications for clinical focus on persistent infectionsJ Natl Cancer Inst2008100513718364507SchiffmanMWentzensenNWacholderSKinneyWGageJCCastlePEHuman papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancerJ Natl Cancer Inst20111033688321282563United States Cancer Statistics1999 – 2009 Incidence, WONDER Online DatabaseUnited States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute2011accessed January 7, 2013Available from: http://wonder.cdc.gov/cancer-v2008.htmlU.S. Preventive Services Task ForceGuide to Clinical Preventive Services 2nd Edition; 9. Screening for Cervical CancerU S Department of Health and Human Services1995accessed January 7, 2013Available from: http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/guidecps/ACOG committee opinion. Recommendations on frequency of Pap test screening. Number 152–March 1995. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsInt J Gynaecol Obstet19954921017649335SmithRAMettlinCJDavisKJEyreHAmerican Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancerCA Cancer J Clin200050344910735014U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for cervical cancer. Recommendation and rationale. AHRQ Publication No. 03-515ARockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality2003ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 131Screening for cervical cancerObstet Gynecol201212012223823090560MoyerVAScreening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementAnn Intern Med201215688091W31222711081SaslowDSolomonDLawsonHWKillackeyMKulasingamSLCainJAmerican Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancerCA Cancer J Clin2012621477222422631SawayaGFCervical-cancer screening–new guidelines and the balance between benefits and harmsN Engl J Med20093612503519940285KulasingamSLHavrileskyLGhebreRMyersERScreening for cervical cancer: a decision analysis for the U.S. preventive services task forceRockville, MDAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality20115ArbynMKyrgiouMSimoensCRaifuAOKoliopoulosGMartin-HirschPPerinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysisBMJ2008337a128418801868IdestromMMilsomIAndersson-EllstromAWomen’s experience of coping with a positive Pap smear: a register-based study of women with two consecutive Pap smears reported as CIN 1Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2003827566112848648MonsonegoJCortesJda SilvaDPJorgeAFKleinPPsychological impact, support and information needs for women with an abnormal Pap smear: comparative results of a questionnaire in three European countriesBMC Womens Health2011111821612599The “Top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalismArch Intern Med201117113859021606090BentleyTGEffrosRMPalarKKeelerEBWaste in the U.S. Health care system: a conceptual frameworkMilbank Q2008866295919120983HabbemaDDe KokIMBrownMLCervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countriesMilbank Q20129053722428690SirovichBEWoloshinSSchwartzLMScreening for cervical cancer: will women accept less?Am J Med2005118151815694900SolomonDBreenNMcNeelTCervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelinesCA Cancer J Clin2007571051117392387VescoKKWhitlockEPEderMBurdaBUSengerCALutzKRisk factors and other epidemiologic considerations for cervical cancer screening: a narrative review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnn Intern Med2011155698705W21622006929Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCervical cancer screening among women aged 18–30 years - United States, 2000–2010MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep20136110384223282861HewittMDevesaSBreenNPapanicolaou test use among reproductive-age women at high risk for cervical cancer: analyses of the 1995 National Survey of Family GrowthAm J Public Health200292666911919069AshokMBerkowitzZHawkinsNATangkaFSaraiyaMRecency of pap testing and future testing plans among women aged 18–64: analysis of the 2007 health information national trends surveyJ Womens Health (Larchmt)2012217051222480224Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCancer screening - United States, 2010MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep20126141522278157CoughlinSSLeadbetterSRichardsTSabatinoSAContextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002Soc Sci Med2008662607518022299SelvinEBrettKMBreast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic womenAm J Public Health2003936182312660207GavinLMacKayAPBrownKHarrierSVenturaSJKannLSexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10–24 years - United States, 2002–2007MMWR Surveill Summ20095815819609250HendersonJTSaraiyaMMartinezGHarperCCSawayaGFChanges to cervical cancer prevention guidelines: effects on screening among U.S. women ages 15–29Prev Med20135625923137444SaraiyaMMartinezGGlaserKKulasingamSPap testing and sexual activity among young women in the United StatesObstet Gynecol20091141213919935021SirovichBEWelchHGThe frequency of Pap smear screening in the United StatesJ Gen Intern Med2004192435015009779RolandKBSomanABenardVBSaraiyaMHuman papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests screening interval recommendations in the United StatesAm J Obstet Gynecol2011205447821840492SaraiyaMBerkowitzZYabroffKRWideroffLKobrinSBenardVCervical cancer screening with both human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou testing vs Papanicolaou testing alone: what screening intervals are physicians recommending?Arch Intern Med20101709778520548011HewittMDevesaSSBreenNCervical cancer screening among U.S. women: analyses of the 2000National Health Interview Survey Prev Med2004392708WorthingtonCMcLeishKFuller-ThomsonEAdherence over time to cervical cancer screening guidelines: insights from the Canadian National Population Health SurveyJ Womens Health (Larchmt)20122119920821988527HendersonJTSawayaGFBlumMStrattonLHarperCCPelvic examinations and access to oral hormonal contraceptionObstet Gynecol201011612576421099589StewartFHHarperCCEllertsonCEGrimesDASawayaGFTrussellJClinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidenceJAMA20012852232911325325HowardMAgarwalGLytwynAAccuracy of self-reports of Pap and mammography screening compared to medical record: a meta-analysisCancer Causes Control20092011318802779KlungsoyrONygardMSkareGEriksenTNygardJFValidity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian womenJ Med Screen20091691719564522NewellSGirgisASanson-FisherRIrelandMAccuracy of patients’ recall of Pap and cholesterol screeningAm J Public Health2000901431510983202Centers for Disease Control and PreventionNational and state vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years - United States, 2011MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep201261671722932301

Trends in the percentage of women ages 18–29 years who report ever having a Pap test, NHIS, 2000–2010. NOTE: Excludes women reporting hysterectomy. Hysterectomy status of respondents was not asked in NHIS 2003 so data from the 2003 survey were not included in the trend analysis of Pap test receipt for years 2000–2010. Significant linear trends include percentages to measure change.

Demographic characteristics among women ages 18–29 years who have ever had a Pap test, NHIS, 2010 (N = 2,198)

Participant demographics
n% (95% CI)
Age of respondent, y
 18643.8 (2.8–4.9)
 191056.2 (4.9–7.7)
 201206.3 (5.1–7.9)
 211567.2 (5.8–8.8)
 22–2582338.2 (35.8–40.6)
 26–2993038.4 (36.1–40.7)
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White108863.4 (60.8–66.1)
 Non-Hispanic Black46215.9 (14.1–17.9)
 Asian1053.3 (2.6–4.2)
 Hispanic or Latino52916.5 (14.7–18.4)
 Otherabb
Education
 <High school30612.0 (10.5–13.6)
 High school graduate/GED51323.1 (20.8–25.4)
 Some college86339.7 (37.3–42.1)
 College graduate or greater51325.3 (23.2–27.5)
% Poverty level
 <200%139955.2 (52.4–58.0)
 200%–<400%41720.7 (18.4–23.2)
 ≥400%38224.1 (21.6–26.8)
Marital status
 Never married114048.2 (45.7–50.6)
 Married/living with a partner92048.0 (45.4–50.5)
 Widowed/divorced/separated1343.8 (3.1–4.8)
Healthcare coverage
 Private only65732.0 (29.6–34.5)
 Public onlyc52720.5 (18.5–22.8)
 Public and private47924.4 (22.2–26.6)
 None52923.1 (21.1–25.4)
Usual source of healthcare
 Yes172179.0 (76.8–81.2)
 No47621.0 (18.9–23.2)
Ever heard of HPV
 Yes177182.6 (80.6–84.5)
 No42017.4 (15.5–19.4)
HPV vaccine status
 Vaccinated39518.6 (16.5–20.8)
 Not vaccinated177581.4 (79.2–83.5)
Currently taking birth controld
 Yes84941.3 (38.7–44.0)
 No133658.7 (56.0–61.3)
Ever given birth to a live born infant?
 Yes109644.3 (41.7–46.9)
 No110155.7 (53.1–58.3)
Doctor recommended most recent Pap teste
 Yes118554.0 (51.2–56.7)
 No95143.8 (41.0–46.6)

NOTE: Excludes women reporting hysterectomy and includes all women who report ever having a Pap test (including those with abnormal Pap test history).

“Other” = non-Hispanic all other race groups.

Estimates are considered statistically unreliable and are suppressed if the cell size is based on fewer than 30 sample cases.

Medicare, Medicaid (Military defined as private)

Pills, implants, shots.

Response “Did not see a doctor on the past 12 months” included in analysis, but not included in this table

Age of first Pap test among women ages 18–29 years, NHIS, 2010 (N = 2,198)

Age of first Pap test
nMean age (95% CI)aPMedian ageAge range
Age of respondent, y
 186215.9 (15.5–16.3)b<0.00116.012–18
 1910317.1 (16.8–17.4)17.014–19
 2011717.0 (16.7–17.3)17.013–20
 2115317.5 (17.1–17.8)18.011–21
 22–2578817.5 (17.3–17.7)17.011–25
 26–2986617.9 (17.7–18.2)18.06–29
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White104817.4 (17.3–17.6)17.08–29
 Non-Hispanic Black43116.9 (16.7–17.1)d<0.00117.06–27
 Asian10119.8 (19.0–20.5)c<0.00119.013–28
 Hispanic or Latino49518.1 (17.8–18.4)d<0.00118.08–26
 Otherdeeee
Education
 <High school28816.9 (16.5–17.2)f<0.00117.09–26
 High school graduate/GED47617.4 (17.1–17.7)17.08–26
 Some college83017.2 (17.0–17.4)17.06–27
 College graduate or greater49218.5 (18.2–18.8)18.011–29
% Poverty levelg
 <200%133717.3 (17.1–17.5)
 200%–<400%39317.8 (17.5–18.2)
 ≥400%35917.9 (17.6–18.2)
Marital status
 Never married108617.5 (17.4–17.7)18.06–27
 Married/living with a partner87817.6 (17.4–17.8)17.08–29
 Widowed/divorced/separated12217.1 (16.6–17.7)17.012–26
Healthcare coverage
 Private only62917.7 (17.8–18.0)18.08–28
 Public onlyh48817.0 (16.8–17.3)17.06–26
 Public and private46217.8 (17.5–18.1)18.011–27
 None50417.5 (17.2–17.8)17.06–29
Usual source of healthcare
 Yes163517.5 (17.3–17.7)17.06–28
 No45317.7 (17.4–18.0)18.06–29
Ever heard of HPV
 Yes170417.5 (17.4–17.7)17.06–29
 No38318.0 (17.7–18.4)18.06–26
HPV vaccine status
 Vaccinated38817.1 (16.8–17.4)i0.00217.011–26
 Not vaccinated168017.6 (17.5–17.8)18.06–29
Currently taking birth controlj
 Yes82817.4 (17.2–17.6)18.06–29
 No125317.6 (17.4–17.8)18.08–28
Ever given birth to a live born infant?
 Yes102017.3 (17.1–17.5)k<0.00117.06–28
 No106917.8 (17.6–17.9)18.08–29
Doctor recommended most recent Pap testl
 Yes113417.5 (17.3–17.6)17.06–28
 No90117.7 (17.4–17.9)18.06–29

NOTE: Excludes women reporting hysterectomy, and includes all women who report ever having a Pap test (including those with abnormal Pap test history)

Unlike median and age range estimates, analyses of mean age were conducted taking into account weighting and complex survey design.

Compared with all other ages, P < 0.001.

Compared with non-Hispanic White, P < 0.001.

“Other” = non-Hispanic all other race groups.

Estimates are considered statistically unreliable and are suppressed if the cell size is based on fewer than 30 sample cases.

Compared with college graduate or greater, P < 0.001.

Poverty is an imputed variable, therefore median age and age range is not available.

Medicare, Medicaid (Military defined as private).

Compared with nonvaccinated, P = 0.002.

Pills, implants, shots.

Compared with never giving birth, P < 0.001.

Response “Did not see a doctor on the past 12 months” included in analysis, but not included in this table.

Time since most recent Pap test among women ages 18–29 years by demographic characteristics, NHIS, 2010 (n = 1,622)

Time since most recent PapP2)≤12 mo
13–24 mo
25–36 moa
n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)n% (95% CI)
Age, y0.057
 18–29118273.1 (70.4–75.6)31719.3 (17.0–21.9)1237.6 (6.3–9.2)
 18–2127078.3 (72.5–83.1)5615.8 (11.6–21.2)b
 22–2544574.7 (70.1–78.8)11018.4 (14.6–23.0)416.9 (4.8–9.7)
 26–2946768.0 (63.5–72.1)15122.6 (19.0–26.5)579.5 (6.9–12.8)
Race/ethnicity0.052
 Non-Hispanic White58472.4 (68.6–75.9)16120.2 (17.0–23.8)597.4 (5.7–9.6)
 Non-Hispanic Black25478.6 (72.4–83.7)5816.2 (11.9–21.7)b
 Asian5466.8 (52.2–78.8)bb
 Hispanic or Latino28571.7 (66.5–76.5)7517.7 (14.0–22.1)3910.6 (7.3–15.0)
 Othercbbb
Education0.167
 <High school14669.5 (61.7–76.3)5119.5 (14.3–26.1)b
 High school graduate27369.0 (63.0–74.4)7622.3 (17.4–28.1)b
 Some college47476.9 (72.2–80.6)10515.9 (12.7–19.7)477.2 (5.2–9.8)
 College graduate28972.4 (65.9–78.1)8421.7 (16.6–27.7)b
% Poverty level0.666
 <200%73573.9 (70.3–77.3)20019.5 (16.4–23.0)726.6 (5.0–8.6)
 200%–<400%23471.9 (64.9–77.9)6220.1 (14.8–26.7)b
 ≥400%21372.3 (65.4–78.3)5518.2 (13.2–24.7)b
Marital status0.426
 Never married61173.5 (69.2–77.3)16218.6 (15.4–22.4)697.9 (5.9–10.5)
 Married/living with partner51173.0 (68.7–76.8)13920.4 (17.0–24.1)456.7 (4.8–9.2)
 Widowed/divorced/separated5968.7 (53.8–80.5)bb
Healthcare coverage0.072
 Private only36173.3 (68.1–77.8)9118.3 (14.3–23.1)398.4 (5.8–12.2)
 Public onlyd29978.5 (72.4–83.6)5616.5 (11.8–22.6)b
 Both private and public29175.3 (69.9–79.9)7418.4 (14.4–23.2)b
 None22866.6 (60.8–72.0)9322.7 (18.1–27.9)4110.7 (7.7–14.7)
Usual source of healthcare<0.001
 Yes97875.8 (72.9–78.6)23718.0 (15.5–20.9)756.2 (4.8–7.8)
 No20361.5 (55.1–67.6)8024.8 (19.2–31.3)4813.7 (9.9–18.5)
Ever heard of HPV0.366
 Yes96273.9 (70.8–76.7)24318.6 (16.0–21.5)977.5 (6.1–9.3)
 No21669.0 (62.6–74.8)7423.0 (17.8–29.2)b
HPV vaccine status0.606
 Vaccinated22075.6 (68.6–81.5)5217.9 (12.6–24.9)b
 Not vaccinated95072.5 (69.6–75.2)26019.6 (17.2–22.3)1067.9 (6.3–9.9)
Ever given birth to a live born infant0.238
 Yes56570.2 (66.0–74.1)16221.5 (18.0–25.5)618.2 (6.1–11.0)
 No61675.1 (71.3–78.6)15517.7 (14.7–21.2)627.2 (5.4–9.4)
Currently taking birth controle<0.001
 Yes53482.5 (79.1–85.4)10013.4 (10.8–16.5)324.1 (2.7–6.1)
 No64265.9 (62.1–69.5)21423.7 (20.3–27.4)9110.4 (8.5–12.8)
Doctor recommended most recent Pap testf0.043
 Yes61873.2 (69.2–76.9)16820.3 (17.0–24.1)576.4 (4.7–8.7)
 No55574.0 (70.0–77.6)14218.2 (15.2–21.7)557.8 (5.9–10.3)

NOTE: Includes all women who report ever having a Pap test, excludes women reporting hysterectomy, women who report an abnormal Pap in last 3 years, and women who reported their last Pap was not part of a regular screening exam.

Does not include responses “more than 3 years but not more than 5 years”; “over 5 years” because this study sample excludes women who reported an abnormal Pap in the last 3 years, thereby excluding women who report most recent Pap > 3 year ago. “Refused” and “don’t know” excluded from analysis.

Estimates are considered statistically unreliable and are suppressed if the cell size is based on fewer than 30 sample cases.

“Other” = non-Hispanic all other race groups.

Medicare, Medicaid (Military defined as private).

Pills, implants, shots.

“Did not see a doctor on the past 12 months” included in analysis, but suppressed in this table.

Multivariate analysis of characteristics associated with Pap test screening in the last 12 months among women ages 18–29 years, NHIS, 2010 (n = 1,622)

Most recentPap test ≤ 12 moa
OR (95% CI)P (Wald-F)
Age, y0.086
 18–211.54 (1.03–2.31b)
 22–251.24 (0.92–1.69)
 26–291.00
Healthcare coverage0.219
 Private only1.00
 Public onlyc1.57 (0.93–2.66)
 Both private and public1.13 (0.79–1.61)
 None0.99 (0.66–1.48)
Usual source of healthcare0.002
 Yes1.64 (1.20–2.25)
 No1.00
Ever heard of HPV0.620
 Yes1.09 (0.77–1.54)
 No1.00
Ever given birth to a live born infant0.534
 Yes0.90 (0.64–1.26)
 No1.00
Currently taking birth controld<0.001
 Yes2.31 (1.74–3.06)
 No1.00
Doctor recommended most recent Pap teste0.094
 Yes0.96 (0.72–1.29)
 No1.00

NOTE: Excludes women reporting hysterectomy, women who report an abnormal Pap in last 3 years, and women who reported their last Pap was not part of a regular screening examination. To construct our multivariable model, we conducted a separate bivariate analysis comparing last Pap test reported within 12 versus 13–36 months (data not shown). Statistically significant variables with P < 0.05 from this separate bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. as covariates.

Among women who have ever had a Pap, odds of reporting most recent Pap within 12 months, compared to all other intervals (>1–2, >2–3, >3–5, >5years).

Because the confidence interval does not overlap the referent group, we ran a contrast test for 18–21 versus 26–29 and the Wald-F P = 0.036.

Medicare, Medicaid (Military defined as private).

Pills, implants, shots.

Response “Did not see a doctor on the past 12 months” included in analysis, but suppressed in this table.