75030624443J Am Geriatr SocJ Am Geriatr SocJournal of the American Geriatrics Society0002-86141532-541525333535421128810.1111/jgs.13038NIHMS611530ArticleUsing the Memory Impairment Screen by Telephone to Determine Fall Risk in Community-Dwelling Older AdultsFlattJason D.PhD, MPHabSwailesAlexaBAcKingJenniferBAcPrasadTanushreeMAbBoudreauRobert M.PhDbAlbertSteven M.PhDcDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PADepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PADepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PACorresponding Author: Jason D. Flatt, PhD, MPH, 130 N. Bellefield Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 412-383-1066, jdf50@pitt.eduAlternate Corresponding Author: Steven M. Albert, PhD, 208 Parran Hall, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, 412-624-3102, smalbert@pitt.edu137201410201401102015621019831984

To the Editor: Nearly one-third of community-dwelling older adults aged 65 and older fall each year, and about 10% of these falls result in a serious injury, rendering falls a common and potentially devastating health problem.1 Cognitive assessments are currently a part of the multi-factorial fall risk assessment recommended by the American and British Geriatric Societies’ Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons;2 however, there is a need for reliable, valid and time-efficient screening tools. The aim of this study was to determine whether a brief, telephone-administered screening for dementia, the Memory Impairment Screen by Telephone (MIS-T),3 could be used to determine fall risk over one year in a large sample of community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

Falls-Free PA was a nonrandomized statewide trial for primary prevention of falls among older adults in Pennsylvania.4,5 The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of Healthy Steps for Older Adults (HSOA), a statewide falls prevention program offered in senior centers. Falls incidence was measured monthly for 1 year by telephone call using an interactive voice response (IVR) system. The primary outcomes included: 1) number of months in which participants reported a fall (fall-months) per 100 person-months of follow-up, and 2) number of fall-months per 100 person-months of follow-up adjusted for physical activity (active person-months).6 The MIS-T is comprised of four-items with semantic cues to assess episodic memory performance; a cut-point of 5 or less was used to classify those with potential memory impairment.3,7

RESULTS

Of the 1834 individuals enrolled in the study, 1777 completed one or more months of telephone follow-up(median = 10).The mean age of participants was 75.6 years (± 8.5), and 22% of participants (n = 391) at baseline had a MIS-T cut score of 5 or less, with only 15 participants (<1%) unable to complete the screening. Participants with memory impairment were older, more likely to be male, non-white, less educated, and more likely to report poorer balance than those without memory impairment.

Thirty-five percent (614) of all participants reported a fall, of whom 37.9% reported falls in more than one month (median = 2; range 2 to 9). Thirty-nine percent of those with memory impairment (151) and 33% (463) without memory impairment reported a fall. Fall rates per 100 person-months were 8.5for those with memory impairment, compared to 6.2 for those without memory impairment. Participants with memory impairment had 11.9 falls per 100 active person-months compared to 8.3 among those without memory impairment. After adjustment for multiple risk factors related to memory impairment and falls, participants with memory impairment had between a 24 to 29% increased risk of falling compared to those without memory impairment (Table 1). Other significant covariates included race, taking three or more medications, and self-reported balance deficits.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first longitudinal studies to examine whether the MIS-T can be used to assess fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. Those with memory impairment were more likely to experience a fall and have other fall risk factors. While there is a lack of consensus regarding the association between deficits in memory performance and prospective risk of falls, studies have found that deficits in other cognitive domains, such as executive function, processing speed, and visuospatial skills, may be better predictors of fall risk.8,9 These cognitive deficits often co-occur with impaired episodic memory.10

Current guidelines for preventing falls in community-dwelling older adults suggest that those who screen positive for falls or fall risk should receive a cognitive assessment.2 A brief telephone screening may provide greater opportunities for identifying those at risk for falls and those who may benefit from a full cognitive assessment. Researchers and practitioners may want to consider using telephone-administered screenings for population-based studies and studies with limited time for screening.

Strengths of this study included monthly follow-up for nearly one year, assessment of fall risk factors, and accounting for differences in exposure to fall risks or FARE (FAlls Risk by Exposure) by adjusting for level of physical activity.6 Study limitations include weaknesses of telephone-administered cognitive screenings,3 a need for identifying an optimal cut score for memory impairment, and possible misreporting of falls; however, follow-up calls with people reporting falls were made to minimize potentially biased reporting.

CONCLUSION

Screening positive for memory impairment via the MIS-T was associated with increased fall risk. Future studies aimed at reducing falls in community-based samples should consider the MIS-T or similar instruments to assess potential cognitive impairment in older adults at risk for falls.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the study participants and staff of Falls-Free PA.

Funding sources and related paper presentations:

This study was supported by Cooperative Agreement DP002657 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC Prevention Research Centers program U48 DP001918, and NIH P30 AG024827. Dr. Flatt is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number TL1TR000145. Findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of Interest: The editor in chief has reviewed the conflict of interest checklist provided by the authors and has determined that the authors have no financial or any other kind of personal conflicts with this paper.

Author Contributions:

Preparation of manuscript (Jason Flatt), data analysis and interpretation (Jason Flatt, Tanushree Prasad, Robert Boudreau, Steven Albert), study concept and design of study (Steven Albert, Robert Boudreau), study management (Alexa Swailes, Jennifer King), and revising manuscript for intellectual content (Jason Flatt, Alexa Swailes, Jennifer King, Tanushree Prasad, Robert Boudreau, Steven Albert), and final approval of the version to be published (Jason Flatt, Alexa Swailes, Jennifer King, Tanushree Prasad, Robert Boudreau, Steven Albert).

Sponsor’s Role: None

REFERENCESKelseyJLProcter-GrayEHannanMTHeterogeneity of falls among older adults: Implications for public health preventionAm J Public Health20121022149215622994167Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons AGS, British Geriatrics S. Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society clinical practice guideline for prevention of falls in older personsJ Am Geriatr Soc20115914815721226685LiptonRBKatzMJKuslanskyGScreening for dementia by telephone using the memory impairment screenJ Am Geriatr Soc2003511382139014511157AlbertSEdelsteinOKingJAssessing the quality of a nonrandomized pragmatic trial for primary prevention of falls among older adultsPrev Sci2014000000AlbertSMKingJBoudreauRPrimary Prevention of Falls: Effectiveness of a Statewide ProgramAm J Public Health2014104e77e8424625164WijlhuizenGJChorusAMHopman-RockMThe FARE: a new way to express FAlls Risk among older persons including physical activity as a measure of exposurePrev Med20105014314720045023BuschkeHKuslanskyGKatzMScreening for dementia with the memory impairment screenNeurology1999522312389932936AnsteyKJvon SandenCLuszczMAAn 8-year prospective study of the relationship between cognitive performance and falling in very old adultsJ Am Geriatr Soc2006541169117616913981HermanTMirelmanAGiladiNExecutive control deficits as a prodrome to falls in healthy older adults: A prospective study linking thinking, walking, and fallingJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2010651086109220484336BaudicSBarbaGDThibaudetMCExecutive function deficits in early Alzheimer's disease and their relations with episodic memoryArch Clin Neuropsychol200621152116125364

Number of Falls Per 100 Person-Months and Active Person-Months of Follow-Up (n = 1777)

Person-Months ofFollow-UpActive Person-Months ofFollow-Up

VariablesIncidence Rate Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Age1.001 (0.99, 1.01)1.001 (0.99, 1.01)
Gender
Male1.001.00
Female0.85 (0.73, 0.99)*0.86 (0.74, 1.001)
Race
White1.001.00
Non-White1.25 (1.04, 1.50)*1.35 (1.13, 1.62)
Education
<High School1.001.00
High School Graduate0.83 (0.69, 1.001)0.82 (0.68, 0.99)
Some College0.99 (0.81, 1.21)0.97 (0.79, 1.19)
College Graduate0.92 (0.74, 1.15)0.90 (0.72, 1.13)
Self-Reported Balance
Excellent to Good1.001.00
Fair to Poor1.96 (1.72, 2.23) 2.15 (1.89, 2.44)
Number of Medications
01.001.00
10.82 (0.62, 1.10)0.80 (0.60, 1.06)
20.94 (0.73, 1.22)0.95 (0.74, 1.24)
≥ 31.20 (0.98, 1.46)1.26 (1.03, 1.55)
MIS-T Score
Not Impaired (Score ≥ 6)1.001.00
Memory Impaired (Score ≤ 5 or Missing)1.24 (1.07, 1.44)1.29 (1.11, 1.49)

Note: MIS-T = Memory Impairment Screen by Telephone; Missing represents those unable to complete the MIS-T during the baseline telephone call (n = 15).

P <*.05,

<.01,

<.001