The South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (SC-CPCRN) implemented the Community Health Intervention Program (CHIP) mini-grants initiative to address cancer-related health disparities and reduce the cancer burden among high-risk populations across the state. The mini-grants project implemented evidence-based health interventions tailored to the specific needs of each community.
To support the SC-CPCRN’s goals of moving toward greater dissemination and implementation of evidence-based programs in the community to improve public health, prevent disease, and reduce the cancer burden.
Three community-based organizations were awarded $10,000 each to implement one of the National Cancer Institute’s evidence-based interventions. Each group had 12 months to complete their project. SC-CPCRN investigators and staff provided guidance, oversight, and technical assistance for each project. Grantees provided regular updates and reports to their SC-CPCRN liaisons to capture vital evaluation information.
The intended CHIP mini-grant target population reach was projected to be up to 880 participants combined. Actual combined reach of the three projects reported upon completion totaled 1,072 individuals. The majority of CHIP participants were African-American females. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 81 years. Evaluation results showed an increase in physical activity, dietary improvements, and screening participation.
The success of the initiative was the result of a strong community-university partnership built on trust. Active two-way communication and an honest open dialogue created an atmosphere for collaboration. Communities were highly motivated. All team members shared a common goal of reducing cancer-related health disparities and building greater public health capacity across the state.
The South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (SC-CPCRN) is one of 10 Centers of the Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI)-funded CPCRNs spread across the U.S. The CPCRNs are charged with working to promote and increase the adoption of evidence-based public health interventions to address health disparities. Though there is special focus on dissemination and implementation (D&I) research, the SC-CPCRN has developed infrastructure to support research that spans the research continuum from discovery to the dissemination and adoption of effective, evidence-based interventions, with an emphasis on translation. Active collaborative efforts with community partners have been instrumental to the success of these initiatives and projects. The SC-CPCRN continually seeks out opportunities to establish innovative partnerships to address cancer-related health disparities Disseminate and implement efficacious public health interventions to address cancer-related health disparities in South Carolina. Engage community partners and other stakeholders to increase the cancer prevention and control evidence base in South Carolina and share findings with communities and service providers that are working to eliminate health disparities and reduce the cancer burden on high risk and disparate populations in the state. Implement and evaluate interventions focused on increasing cancer screenings, physical activity, and access to and consumption of healthful foods among low-income and minority populations.
African Americans in South Carolina experience above-average cancer incidence
In 2011, the SC-CPCRN implemented the Community Health Intervention Program (CHIP) mini-grants initiative to address cancer-related health disparities among high-risk populations through the implementation of evidence-based interventions. The SC-CPCRN team viewed the CHIP initiative as a potentially effective strategy for moving toward increasing D&I of evidence-based programs in the community to improve public health. In addition, the initiative was seen as an important means of community building and improving community relations.
Face-to-face and web-based information sharing sessions about the CHIP initiative were held in May 2011. Twelve community, not-for-profit, organizations from across South Carolina with an interest in cancer-related health disparities applied for CHIP mini-grants. Each applicant organization was instructed to select a single evidence-based, cancer prevention or control intervention as identified through the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Research Tested Intervention Programs (RTIPs;
Jones Chapel Baptist Church was awarded a CHIP mini-grant to implement the
New participants were continually recruited for KISKIM! through early June 2012. Eligible participants had to be: 1) ≥18 years old; 2) free of serious, unstable illness that would make participating in a physical activity program difficult or risky, 3) willing to walk individually or as a member of a team on the newly constructed walking trail at Jones Chapel, 4) willing to complete pre- and post-assessment surveys (baseline and follow-up) as well as pre- and post-fitness measures (baseline and follow-up), and 5) willing to consent to participate.
The Chester County Literacy Council’s CHIP mini-grant was designed to extend its mission of supporting community education and literacy by promoting adult life skill enhancement and encouraging healthy lifestyle choices. The Chester County group was awarded CHIP funding to implement
Refuge Community Outreach in upstate South Carolina implemented
SC-CPCRN investigators served as liaisons for the CHIP mini-grant projects. Working closely with grantees, SC-CPCRN investigators and staff provided guidance, oversight, and technical assistance for each project. The three community groups implemented their specific evidence-based intervention according to the guidelines and recommendations of each intervention. Each partner had 12 months to complete their project. Grantees provided regular updates and reports to their SC-CPCRN liaisons to evaluate progress. The strong university-community partnership was critical to the collaboration and the success of the project.
SC-CPCRN team members developed a CHIP mini-grant project report to capture pertinent quantitative and qualitative evaluation information. A project evaluation report was completed by each grantee and submitted for analysis. Each group also conducted their own internal evaluations via pre- and post-project surveys. In addition to the written project reports, each grantee presented their results and findings during CHIP mini-grant presentations in September 2012. Jones Chapel conducted their own internal evaluation via pre- and post-assessment surveys, walking logs, and pre- and post-program BMI measurements. The Chester County Literacy Council used pre- and post-surveys to evaluate the
The intended CHIP mini-grant target population reach was projected to be up to 880 participants combined. Actual combined reach of the three projects reported upon completion totaled 1,072 individuals. The majority of CHIP participants were African-American females. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 81 years. Participants reported an increase in physical activity, dietary improvements, and screening participation.
The Jones Chapel Walking Trail participants reported increasing their walking from 1–2 times per week to 3–4 times per week for at least 30 minutes per day. Four participants reported using the trail 5–6 times per week. Sixty-five percent reported losing weight and 53% reported an improvement in or a lowering of their Body Mass Index (BMI) at program completion.
Post-program results from the Chester County Literacy Council showed that 100% of participants reported making healthier family recipes, reading food labels more carefully, reducing salt intake, increasing daily water intake, and reducing the amount of cholesterol in their diets. An improvement in the ability to make healthier choices was reported by 98% of participants, 89% reported increasing their fruit and vegetable consumption to 5 or more servings per day, and 84% reported reducing the amount of fats, added sugars, salt and cholesterol in their diet.
In the Refuge Community Outreach
Upon completion of the Jones Chapel Walking Trail, the proportion of individuals walking regularly for physical activity increased, indicating implementation of the walking trail and walking program were effective. Jones Chapel successfully engaged 91% of their intended reach of 100 participants. Additionally, 65% of walking program participants lost weight, as determined by pre- and post-program data, while 53% lowered or improved their body mass index. Qualitative feedback from walking trail participants indicated participant satisfaction with delivery of the project. Examples:
The Chester County Literacy Council
Refuge’s implementation of the
Jones Chapel adapted the walking trail to accommodate the needs and existing resources of the community. The approved budget was amended to meet the needs of the walking trail area. The project team recognized a need to add benches, trash cans, and trees to the walking trail to enhance its usefulness and appearance.
The efficiency of the Chester County
The
Jones Chapel Walking Trail participants indicated that the environment was a major influence on their confidence to use the trail under certain conditions. Some reported that they felt
The Chester County Literacy Council
A challenge to the implementation and evaluation process was the often competing needs of the community versus the research/evaluation process. As an example, several weeks after the community partner initiated the first
Community support and involvement were the foundation for the success of each project. The community and university partnerships were instrumental to the success of the entire initiative. Already having a visible and active presence in the Orangeburg community, Jones Chapel was able to continue building on existing relationships while establishing new ones with the County Council, Sheriff’s Office, newspaper, churches, university, and businesses. There was representation and active involvement by these entities at various walking trail events, as well as support and collaboration. Such support made delivery of the walking intervention easier and desire to participate by project participants greater.
Conducting Chester County
The
The close-knit community-university partnership was built on a relationship of trust and the university honoring commitments and promises made to the communities. University team members demonstrated a sincere desire to understand the needs of each community and support community driven projects. Additionally, the university demonstrated support by providing quality technical assistance and project guidance. The desire for active two-way communication and an honest open ongoing dialogue created an atmosphere for collaboration and ensured project success.
Because the
Refuge Community Outreach is an organization that is trusted in the community and was able to implement the
The SC-CPCRN is dedicated to disseminating and implementing interventions that have been shown to improve public health. The South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Program, in which SC-CPCRN is housed, is dedicated to the principles of community-based participatory research. The CHIP program was a very efficient use of resources employed to conduct D&I projects in the context of strong community commitment and support. The community driven initiative tailored health programs to the specific needs of each community effectively using community health educators to build public health capacity to reduce the cancer burden. While the focus of SC-CPCRN research is cancer related, the evidence-based interventions implemented promoted improvements in diet and physical activity potentially having a positive impact on obesity, diabetes, and other chronic conditions, in addition to cancer. The CHIP project also provided a means of community building and improving community relations. All team members shared a common goal of reducing cancer-related health disparities and building greater public health capacity in South Carolina.
This publication was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number U48/DP001936 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute (PI, J.R. Hébert; Co-PI, D.B. Friedman). This work was also partially supported by an Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention and Control from the Cancer Training Branch of the National Cancer Institute to J.R. Hébert (K05 CA136975). We would like to thank the communities that implemented and evaluated these intervention programs. The mini-grants program and associated documents were adapted from the Emory University’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network mini-grants program.
Comparison of Common Data Elements across the Three CHIP Sites
| Jones Chapel | Chester County | Refuge Community | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intended = 100 | Intended = 30 | Intended = 750 | |
| Orangeburg County | Chester County | Cherokee, Anderson, Greenville, and Spartanburg Counties | |
| Christian | Christian | Christian | |
| Physical Activity | Diet | Screening Participation | |
| All African American | 50 African American | 28 African American | |
| 19 – 76 years | 22 – 81 years | 21 – 73 | |
| 66 (F) 25 (M) | 52 (F) 5 (M) | All Female | |
| 60% Married or member of a couple, 24% Single, | Not Collected | Not Collected | |
| pedometers, water bottles, walking logs, T-shirts, rally towels, certificates, exercise weights, jump ropes, fanny packs, elastic bands, radios, first aid kits, stress relief balls | Eat for Life Cookbooks, | WRMs and LHAs were given $75 incentives for their participation (8-hour training and 3 community presentations) |
See text for description