Online J Public Health InformOnline J Public Health InformOJPHIOnline Journal of Public Health Informatics1947-2579University of Illinois at Chicago Library4050783ojphi-06-e3110.5210/ojphi.v6i1.5071ISDS 2013 Conference AbstractsDetection of Some Lyssaviruses from Fruigivorous and Insectivorous Bats in NigeriaKiaGrace S.12*KuzminIvan I.2UmohJarlath U.1KwagaJacob K.1KazeemHaruna M.3OsinubiModupe O.2RupprechtCharles E.2Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, NigeriaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta., Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, ABU., Zaria, NigeriaGrace S. Kia, E-mail: gracegracekia@yahoo.com2942014201461e31ISDS Annual Conference Proceedings 2013. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.2014© 2014 the author(s)Eidolon helvumMokola bat virusShimoni bat virusLagos bat virusChaerophon pumilaObjective

To investigate the evidence of Lyssavirus antigens in the brain tissues of bats and the presence of some lyssaviruses (Lagos bat virus (LBV), Mokola virus (MOKV), Duvenhage virus (DUVV), West Caucasian bat virus (WCBV), Shimoni bat virus (SHBV) and classical rabies virus (CVS) antibodies in the sera of bats from Plateau State, Nigeria.

Introduction

One of the most significant zoonotic pathogen of bat origin is the rabies virus of the genus Lyssavirus. Lyssaviruses cause fatal encephalitis for which there is no effective treatment . The close association of some people to bats on account of residence, tourism, occupation, the consumption of bats by people in many parts of Nigeria and the public health implication of these remains to be assessed. Thus, the need for surveillance for lyssaviruses in bats is expedient. Surveillance is also particularly important for nonrabies lyssaviruses, because the rabies biologics commercially available do not reliably protect against Lagos bat virus (LBV), Mokola virus (MOKV), and West Caucasian bat virus (WCBV).

Methods

In total, 356 bats representing 7 genera and 8 species (Chaerephon pumila, Eidolon helvum, Epomophorous franqueti, Epomophorous gambianus, Lavia frons, Nycteris macrotis, Rhinolophous landerii and Rhinopoma microphylum) were collected during 2010-2011 in 8 locations in Plateau State of northern Nigeria (Table 1) . Collection of bats was based on the availability of bat roosts and consent from relevant authorities.

Brain tissues of the 356 bats were screened by direct fluorescent antibody (DFAT) 1 test for Lyssavirus antigens utilizing an anti-rabies monoclonal (Fujirebio Diagnostics, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA) and polyclonal (Chemicon Int., Temecula, CA) fluorescent isothiocyanate-labelled anti-rabies virus antibodies. The modified rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) 2 was used to test 76 available bat sera for the presence of Lyssavirus neutralizing antibody under a biological safety cabinet (Baker, Sterilgard III).

Results

None of the 356 bat brains screened by direct fluorescent antibody (DFAT) test was positive for Lyssavirus antigens. Of the 76 sera screened by the modified rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), 24 (31.6%) had neutralizing activity (Table 1). Among these, 22(29.0%) neutralized LBV, 6(7.9%) neutralized MOKV and 18 (23.7%) neutralized SHBV. Eighteen (23.7%) sera neutralized more than one Lyssavirus: 2 (2.6%) neutralized LBV and MOKV; 12 (15.8%) neutralized both LBV and SHBV while 4 (5.3%) neutralized LBV, MOV and SHBV. None of the sera neutralized CVS, DUVV and WCBV. Eight of the serum samples from E. helvum bats were cytotoxic to the mouse neuroblastoma (MNA) cells.

Conclusions

This study reports the first evidence of Shimoni bat virus circulation in Nigeria. LBV, MOKV and SHBV antibodies detected in this study suggest these lyssaviruses may be circulating in bats or other animals in the wild. There is need for continuous surveillance in order to understand the epidemiology of lyssaviruses in the country and public enlightenment of the possible risk of rabies through unprotected contact and handling of bats.

(1) All brains were negative for Lyssavirus antigen (2) NA - not available

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by Education Trust Fund ETF/DESS/ AST&D/UNIV/ABU/ZARIA/VOL.2.

ReferencesDean DJ, Abelseth MK, Atanasiu P. The fluorescent antibody test. In F.-X. Meslin, M. M. Kaplan, and H. Koprowski (ed.), Laboratory techniques in rabies, 4th ed. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland 1996, Pp. 88-93.SmithJSYagerPABaerGM 1973 A rapid reproducible test for determining rabies neutralizing antibody. Bull World Health Organ. 48, 535-414544144