Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that affects approximately 6-10% of women of child-bearing age. Although preliminary studies suggest that certain pollutants may act as endocrine disruptors in animals, little is known about their potential association with PCOS. The objective of this case-control pilot study is to determine whether women with PCOS have higher concentrations of specific environmental contaminants compared to women who have not developed PCOS.
Fifty-two PCOS case-patients (diagnosed using the National Institutes of Health 1990 definition) and 50 controls were recruited in 2007–2008, from an urban academic medical center in Los Angeles, CA. Brominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides, and perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) were measured in serum, and phthalates metabolites and bisphenol A (BPA) in urine.
PCOS case-patients had significantly higher geometric mean (GM) serum concentrations of two PFCs: perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) (GMcases = 4.1 μg/L, GMcontrols = 2.3 μg/L; p = 0.001) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) (GMcases = 8.2 μg/L, GMcontrols = 4.9 μg/L; p = 0.01), and lower urinary concentrations of monobenzyl phthalate (mBzP) (GMcases = 7.5 μg/g creatinine, GMcontrols = 11.7 μg/g creatinine; p = 0.02). Logistic regression, controlling for body mass index, age and race, identified an increased likelihood of PCOS in subjects with higher serum concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (adjusted-ORs = 5.8–6.9, p < 0.05), and with lower urine concentrations of mBzP and mono-n-butyl phthalate (mBP) (aORs = 0.14–0.25, p < 0.05).
Our data suggest that PCOS case-patients may differ from controls in their environmental contaminant profile. PCOS subjects had higher serum concentrations of two PFCs, PFOA and PFOS, and lower urine concentrations of mBP and mBzP. Future studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings and determine if these chemicals or their precursors may have a role in the pathogenesis of PCOS.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6823-14-86) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine-metabolic disorder that affects approximately 6-10% of women of child bearing age [
Some pollutants may disrupt endocrine processes, but little is known about the effects of environmental contaminants on the development of PCOS. Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and bisphenol A (BPA) have been postulated as potential xenohormones in women by mimicking estrogen action and/or antagonizing testosterone action and potentially altering the secretions of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone [
Considering the high prevalence of PCOS, the existence of an association between exposure to environmental chemicals and disease could have significant public health and economic impact. We investigated whether an increase in the likelihood of being diagnosed with PCOS may be associated with exposure to 36 PCBs, 9 OCPs, 11 PBDEs, 8 PFCs, 8 phthalates, and BPA as measured by concentrations in serum or urine.
Between March 2007 and May 2008 the Center for Androgen-related Research and Discovery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) in Los Angeles, CA recruited fifty-two women with PCOS and fifty controls through media advertisements and subspecialty clinics. Most (>90%) of PCOS patients agreed to store blood and urine samples for future studies. As part of the CSMC study, controls volunteered in response to advertising in the surrounding community and university for “healthy” women aged 25–45 years. All women were aged 18–45 years. Both PCOS patients and controls provided CSMC with information about their age, race, ethnicity, virilization and body mass index which are associated with case status. Participants enrolled in the CSMC study provided written informed consent to allow CSMC to provide Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with anonymized data and samples for our nested pilot study. This study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC protocol #4918).
Exclusion criteria included concurrent pregnancy, the use of hormonal (including oral contraceptives) or other medications for the prior three months, diabetes, menopause, and inability to provide written consent.
We defined case-patients based on the strict National Institutes of Health 1990 criteria for PCOS, specifically including anovulation or oligo-ovulation; clinical (i.e., a modified Ferriman-Gallwey [mFG] hirsutism score >6) or laboratory evidence of hyperandrogenism; and the exclusion of related disorders (i.e. thyroid dysfunction, hyperprolactinemia, non-classic adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting tumors, etc.), as previously described [
Recruited participants provided single spot urine and blood samples at CSMC. To avoid environmental contamination, participants were asked to open the urine containers when ready to provide a sample and to avoid touching the inside of the container. Serum samples where obtained by venipuncture performed using standard protocol and precautions, and the samples drawn into one 10 ml red top Vacutainer® tube per participant. Tubes were placed upright and blood allowed to clot at room temperature for 60 min, after which they were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm (~1000 g) for 10 min. Using a disposable pipet, the serum was transferred to CDC-provided containers (10 mL amber glass bottle with Teflon-lined screw cap [Wheaton, Millville, NJ] Serum vial for serum PBDE content and 2 mL Nalgene® [Rochester, NY] cryovials for serum PFCs and lipids content). The serum PBDE vials had been previously cleaned in a laboratory dish washer and baked at 300°C overnight and the screw caps had been rinsed with methanol [
First morning void urine samples were collected in individually wrapped collection cups provided by the CDC. At the time of collection participants were asked to wash their hands with soap and water, to collect at least 10–15 ml of urine in the cup, to not remove the cap from the cup until ready to void, and to not touch the inside of the cup or cap. Using a sterile disposable plastic pipet, urine samples were transferred into prelabeled 5 ml Nalgene® cryovials (for urinary Phthalates/BPA content) and 2 ml Nalgene® cryovials (for urinary creatinine content). The urinary samples were then placed in CDC-provided storage boxes and frozen at -20°C until shipping.
All sample collection vials were labeled with preprinted bar-coded labels provided by the CDC, and the date and time of collection was added using a permanent marker. Operators used disposable powder-free nitrile gloves and surgical masks during sample collection and processing, and all collection and processing supplies were provided by the CDC to maximize the integrity of the samples. All sample processing was performed in a fume hood lined with aluminum foil to minimize contamination by ambient dust, as PBDEs are well known contaminants in indoor dust. The laboratory space was further thoroughly cleaned before any laboratory work was undertaken to minimize any dust or particulate matter that could contaminate the samples. All samples were shipped to the CDC on dry ice and upon arrival stored at -70°C until the time of analysis [
Blood samples were analyzed for concentration of 36 PCBs, 9 OCPs, 11 PBDEs and 8 PFCs. Laboratory results of blood-agent concentration included both whole serum and lipid-adjusted concentration values of PCBs, OCPs and BDEs and serum only for PFCs.
Analytical determination of PCBs, OCPs and PBDEs in serum were performed by gas chromatography isotope dilution high resolution mass spectrometry, after solid phase extraction (SPE) and co-extracted lipid removal techniques [
The measurements of PCBs, OCPs, and PBDEs were made in batches of twenty-four unknowns, three quality controls and three method blanks. The method blanks were used to track any analytical background during the sample preparation and the final analytical results were blank subtracted. The limits of detection (LODs) were calculated as standard deviations (SDs) of the method blanks analyzed in parallel with the unknowns after subtracting the average blank concentration or as the instrumental LOD in the absence of a detectable blank level (Additional file
We measured PFCs in serum using a modification of the on-line SPE coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) approach previously described in detail [
Urine samples were analyzed for 11 phthalate metabolites and for BPA (total concentrations) using a modification of the on-line SPE-high performance liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry approaches described before [
Concentrations that were below the LOD were assigned a value equal to LOD/√2 [
We used the serum concentrations or urine concentrations of the chemicals to categorize exposures to the chemicals or their parent compounds. We split observations into tertiles based on chemical concentrations then performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to explore associations between the concentrations of the chemicals (in μg/L for PFCs; lipid-adjusted for PCBs, OCPs and PBDEs and creatinine-adjusted for phthalate metabolites and BPA) and PCOS case status after adjusting for potential confounders (i.e. age [divided into 5 categories], body mass index [BMI], and White race [compared to all other races]). This multivariable logistic regression model is represented as PCOS (0/1) = α + β1(chemical concentration tertile) + β2(age) + β3(BMI) + β4(race). Hispanic ethnicity was not significantly related to PCOS when tested in preliminary analyses by logistic regression alone or when controlling for race, BMI, or age; therefore we did not statistically control for Hispanic ethnicity in the final models to conserve power. Due to the high ratio of variables in the model to study participants we calculated exact adjusted odds ratios, exact p values, and exact confidence intervals using the network method [
Comparing the 52 PCOS case-patients and 50 controls, we observed that women with PCOS had a greater mean BMI (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0–1.2) and were younger (OR = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.5–0.9) than controls (Table
ap-value comparing mean of cases to mean of controls.
Mean (Range) S.D. t (control–case) p-value
a
Cases 32.82 (18.9-51.2) 8.32
0.001 Controls 27.62 (17.5-47.1) 6.91
Cases 28.12 (18.0-45.0) 6.04
0.009 Controls 31.84 (20.0-45.0) 7.94 Mean Range Median Interquartile range
Cases 1.97 1.86-2.04 1.99 1.94-2.00 Controls 1.97 1.87-2.04 1.99 1.96-2.01
Cases 607.09 404.9-1002.8 590.3 519.48-684.98 Controls 589.82 347.8-830.2 560.4 491.05-691.53
Cases 1.89 129-287 186.5 165-213 Controls 1.88 98-281 187.5 160-214
Cases 114.75 37-457 96.5 67.25-138.00 Controls 99.8 24-223 77.0 58.25-135.25
Overall, more than 50% of participants had detectable serum or urine concentrations of 6 PBDEs, 14 PCBs, 6 OCPs, 11 phthalate metabolites, 4 PFCs, and BPA. Correlations between concentration values can be found in (Additional file
PCOS case-patients had perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) geometric mean serum-concentration higher than controls (4.1 μg/L vs. 2.3 μg/L, p = 0.001; and 8.2 μg/L vs. 4.9 μg/L, p = 0.01, respectively) (Table
ap = 0.02 where controls have higher BB153 levels than case-patients.
bp = 0.04 where controls have higher PCB180 levels than case-patients.
cp = 0.001 where case-patients have higher PFOA levels than controls.
dp = 0.01 where case-patients have higher PFOS levels than controls.
aControlling for age, BMI, and race. Bold font highlights, for any individual agent, middle or highest tertile serum concentrations that are significantly different than the lowest tertile concentration.Geometric mean whole weight concentration (pg/g serum) Lipid-adjusted concentration (ng/g lipid) Compounds Case-patients Controls Case-patients Controls
2,4,4′-tribromodiphenyl ether (PBDE28) 10.8 9.9 1.9 1.8 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE47) 144.5 148.6 24.9 26.5 2,2′,4.4′,5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE99) 27.5 28.8 4.7 5.1 2,2′,4,4′,6-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE100) 27.8 29.8 4.8 5.3 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexabromobiphenyl (BB153) 3.3 6.0 0.6 1.0a
2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexabromodiphenyl (PBDE153) 29.7 34.3 5.1 6.1
2,2′,4,4′,5-pentaCB (PCB99) 10.8 12.8 1.9 2.3 2,3,3′,4,4′-pentaCB (PCB105) 3.8 3.8 0.7 0.7 2,3′,4,4′,5-pentaCB (PCB118) 15.6 15.6 2.7 2.8 2,2′,3,4′,5,5′-hexaCB (PCB146) 4.2 5.0 0.7 0.9 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexaCB (PCB153) 38.6 47.2 6.7 8.4 2,3,3′,4,4′,5-hexaCB (PCB156) 4.3 5.4 0.7 1.0 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′-hexaCB (PCB138-158) 31.5 35.7 5.4 6.4 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5-heptaCB (PCB170) 9.9 12.0 1.7 2.1 2,2′,3,4,4′,5,5′-heptaCB (PCB180) 25.1 29.7 4.3 5.3b
2,2′,3,4,4′,5′,6-heptaCB (PCB183) 3.8 4.4 0.7 0.8 2,2′,3,4′,5,5′,6-heptaCB (PCB187) 7.1 9.2 1.2 1.7 2,2′,3,3′,4,5,6,6′-octaCB (PCB199) 4.0 5.3 0.7 0.9 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′-octaCB (PCB 194) 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5′,6-octaCB and 2,2′,3,4,4′,5,5′,6-octaCB (PCB196_203) 4.6 6.2 0.8 1.1
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 53.9 51.2 9.2 9.1 β-Hexachlorocyclohexane (B-HCCH) 16.0 16.1 4.2 4.4 Oxychlordane 18.6 23.1 3.2 4.1 Trans-Nonachlor 29.6 31.9 5.1 5.7 2,2-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 1-dichloroethene (PP DDE) 1217.5 1397.2 210.2 248.7 2,2-Bis(4-chlorophenyl-1, 1, 1-trichloroethane (PP DDT) 19.0 18.1 3.3 3.2
μg/L serum μg/L serum Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) 4.1 2.3c
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) 8.2 4.9d
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) 1.1 0.7 Perfluorononanoate (PFNA) 1.2 0.9 Unadjusted concentrations Lipid-adjusted concentrations Agent N Case N Control Tertile OR 95% C.I. p Adj OR
a
Exact 95% C.I Exact p N Case N Control OR 95% C.I. p Adj OR
a
Exact 95% C.I Exact p
2,4,4′-tribromodiphenyl ether (PBDE28) 15 19 Middle 0.79 0.30-2.05 0.54 0.14-1.90 19 16 1.32 0.51-3.41 1.04 0.29-3.68 20 14 Highest 1.43 0.55-3.72 0.95 0.27-3.31 15 18 1.00 0.38-2.68 0.69 0.17-2.64 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE47) 17 17 Middle 1.00 0.39-2.59 0.67 0.18-2.30 16 18 0.79 0.30-2.05 0.65 0.17-2.38 18 16 Highest 1.12 0.43-2.91 0.70 0.21-2.76 18 16 1.00 0.39-2.59 0.73 0.20-2.60 2,2′,4.4′,5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE99) 18 15 Middle 1.27 0.49-3.29 1.04 0.30-3.52 17 17 0.89 0.34-2.30 1.21 0.36-4.26 17 17 Highest 1.06 0.41-2.72 0.70 0.20-2.37 17 17 0.89 0.34-2.30 0.63 0.18-2.16 2,2′,4,4′,6-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE100) 18 16 Middle 1.00 0.39-2.59 0.68 0.18-2.38 20 14 1.43 0.55-3.72 0.90 0.25-3.14 16 18 Highest 0.79 0.31-2.05 0.65 0.17-2.40 15 19 0.79 0.30-2.05 0.66 0.17-2.50 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexabromobiphenyl ether (BB153) 23 13 Middle 1.24 0.47-3.25 1.26 0.35-4.60 17 12 0.85 0.32-2.26 1.10 0.30-4.14 9 23 Highest
0.10-0.77 0.01 0.31 0.04-2.15 10 23
0.10-0.69 0.01 0.49 0.08-2.90 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE153) 19 16 Middle 1.06 0.41-2.72 1.29 0.39-4.45 17 17 0.70 0.27-1.83 1.03 0.30-3.65 15 18 Highest 0.74 0.28-1.94 1.11 0.31-4.04 15 19 0.55 0.21-1.44 1.01 0.27-3.94
2,2′,4,4′,5-pentaCB (PCB99) 18 16 Middle 0.70 0.27-1.83 2.12 0.55-9.07 16 22
0.11-0.86 0.024 0.94 0.23-3.41 13 21 Highest 0.38 0.14-1.02 0.055 1.10 0.27-4.65 15 19
0.12-0.95 0.040 0.86 0.23-3.84 2,3,3′,4,4′-pentaCB (PCB105) 19 15 Middle 1.00 0.38-2.60 1.19 0.34-4.26 16 16 0.86 0.34-2.19 0.92 0.27-3.14 14 20 Highest 0.55 0.21-1.45 0.79 0.22-2.83 15 16 0.80 0.31-2.07 1.16 0.34-4.09 2,3′,4,4′,5-pentaCB (PCB118) 17 17 Middle 0.89 0.34-2.30 1.68 0.46-6.57 20 14 1.27 0.49-3.31 2.06 0.59-7.89 17 17 Highest 0.89 0.34-2.30 2.18 0.56-9.22 14 20 0.62 0.24-1.62 1.21 0.31-4.88 2,2′,3,4′,5,5′-hexaCB (PCB146) 17 13 Middle 1.12 0.43-2.92 4.01 0.98-19.44 0.055 15 12 0.98 0.37-2.60 3.33 0.81-15.86 14 19 Highest 0.63 0.25-1.61 2.91 0.68-14.15 14 20 0.55 0.22-1.38 2.40 0.60-10.83 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexaCB (PCB153) 22 12 Middle 1.83 0.69-4.85
1.41-28.11 0.011 17 17 0.48 0.18-1.28 1.88 0.47-8.21 13 21 Highest 0.62 0.24-1.62 4.20 0.81-24.95 12 22
0.09-0.71 0.009 1.42 0.27-7.89 2,3,3′,4,4′,5-hexaCB (PCB156) 21 14 Middle 1.33 0.51-3.46 3.40 0.91-14.21 20 14 1.05 0.40-2.78 2.25 0.62-8.79 13 20 Highest 0.58 0.22-1.52 4.50 0.76-31.05 13 22 0.44 0.16-1.15 2.58 0.45-16.22 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′-hexaCB and 2,3,3′,4,4′,6-hexaCB (PCB138-158) 20 14 Middle 1.13 0.43-2.95 2.73 0.72-11.33 18 18 0.60 0.23-1.58 1.57 0.43-6.11 13 21 Highest 0.49 0.18-1.29 2.48 0.50-13.49 14 20 0.42 0.16-1.13 1.70 0.39-7.90 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5-heptaCB (PCB170) 24 10 Middle 2.70 0.99-7.33 0.051
1.71-32.96 0.003 20 13 1.30 0.49-3.40
1.24-25.16 0.020 12 22 Highest 0.61 0.23-1.62 4.04 0.64-29.31 13 21 0.52 0.20-1.36 4.97 0.78-37.25 2,2′,3,4,4′,5,5′-heptaCB (PCB180) 11 23 Middle 2.35 0.88-6.30
1.60-30.52 0.005 19 14 1.02 0.39-2.66
1.08-21.73 0.037 21 13 Highest 0.70 0.27-1.83 5.21 0.88-36.37 13 21 0.46 0.18-1.22 5.93 0.88-48.77 0.073 2,2′,3,4,4′,5′,6-heptaCB (PCB183) 22 12 Middle 1.83 0.69-4.85
1.11-18.26 0.017 21 12 1.65 0.63-4.36 3.49 0.94-14.53 0.065 13 21 Highest 0.62 0.24-1.62 3.55 0.67-21.68 13 21 0.59 0.22-1.52 2.94 0.59-16.46 2,2′,3,4′,5,5′,6-heptaCB (PCB187) 20 14 Middle 1.27 0.49-3.31 2.99 1.35-18.96 23 17 1.11 0.43-2.87 3.07 0.81-13.00 14 20 Highest 0.62 0.24-1.62 3.26 0.80-12.47 12 19 0.52 0.19-1.43 3.68 0.71-21.89 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′-octaCB (PCB194) 17 11 Middle 1.26 0.47-3.37 3.64 0.93-16.27 0.060 19 10 1.55 0.58-4.17 3.85 1.00-17.04 0.051 13 21 Highest 0.51 0.20-1.29 3.45 0.61-22.50 11 22 0.41 0.16-1.06 2.86 0.48-19.26 2,2′,3,3′,4,5,6,6′-octaCB (PCB199) 20 13 Middle 1.23 0.47-3.21 3.04 0.83-12.59 19 11 1.43 0.54-3.72 3.89 1.00-16.80 0.054 12 21 Highest 0.46 0.17-1.20 2.04 0.43-10.71 11 21 0.43 0.16-1.12 2.31 0.48-12.61 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5′,6-octaCB and 2,2′,3, 4, 4′,5,5′,6-octaCB (PCB196-203) 23 11 Middle 2.09 0.78-5.59
1.72-40.29 0.004 22 13 1.41 0.53-3.72
1.07-19.09 0.038 12 22 Highest 0.54 0.21-1.44 4.67 0.78-33.23 12 22 0.45 0.17-1.21 3.28 0.56-21.38
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 18 15 Middle 1.27 0.49-3.30 3.55 0.90-16.35 15 17 0.63 0.24-1.64 1.06 0.29-3.99 17 17 Highest 1.06 0.41-2.72 2.46 0.64-10.29 16 18 0.63 0.25-1.63 1.58 0.43-6.38 β-Hexachlorocyclohexane (B-HCCH) 20 15 Middle 2.05 0.78-5.39 3.87 0.96-18.35 22 11 2.02 0.75-5.42 3.79 0.98-17.20 16 18 Highest 1.13 0.43-2.93 2.71 0.72-11.36 13 20 0.74 0.29-1.92 2.13 0.57-8.63 Oxychlordane 18 16 Middle 0.89 0.34-2.31 2.16 0.59-8.60 19 14 1.00 0.37-2.65 3.21 0.81-14.64 15 19 Highest 0.62 0.24-1.62 2.61 0.55-14.25 14 20 0.52 0.20-1.36 2.21 0.47-11.56 Trans-Nonachlor 18 16 Middle 1.00 0.39-2.59 2.19 0.60-8.67 18 16 0.89 0.34-2.31 2.17 0.58-8.80 16 18 Highest 0.79 0.30-2.05 3.16 0.64-18.15 15 19 0.62 0.24-1.62 1.95 0.43-9.67 2,2-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)-1, 21 13 Middle 1.61 0.62-4.24 2.35 0.67-8.74 21 13 1.44 0.55-3.77 2.93 0.78-12.30 1–dichloroethene (DDE) 14 20 Highest 0.70 0.27-1.82 1.15 0.31-4.37 13 21 0.55 0.21-1.44 1.14 0.30-4.44 2,2-Bis(4-chlorophenyl-1, 1, 13 20 Middle 0.52 0.20-1.36 0.45 0.12-1.62 15 18 0.62 0.24-1.63 0.79 0.22-2.79 1-trichloroethane (DDT) 19 14 Highest 1.09 0.42-2.82 1.29 0.35-4.84 17 16 0.80 0.31-2.07 1.02 0.30-3.52
PFOA 15 18 Middle 2.32 0.83-6.45 1.65 0.45-6.14 Perfluorooctanoate 28 7 Highest
3.61-34.24 0.000
1.79-29.92 0.003 PFOS 19 13 Middle
1.38-10.48 0.010 3.43 0.95-13.31 0.062 Perfluorooctane sulfonate 23 11 Highest
1.95-15.13 0.001
1.58-24.12 0.005 PFHxS 16 12 Middle 2.00 0.75-5.33 0.85 0.20-3.31 Perfluorohexane sulfonate 20 14 Highest 2.14 0.84-5.44 1.20 0.35-4.07 PFNA 17 13 Middle 2.15 0.80-5.73 1.13 0.37-4.49 Perfluorononanoate 21 14 Highest 2.46 0.95-6.36 2.25 0.67-8.00
Participants were 5.79-7.5 times more likely to have PCOS if they had PCB 153, 170, 180, 183, or 196 and 203 whole weight (pg/mL serum) concentrations in the middle tertile (but not the highest tertile), when compared to those in the lowest tertile (Table
PCOS case-patients had monobenzyl phthalate (mBzP) geometric mean creatinine-adjusted urine concentrations (7.5 μg/g creatinine)
ap = 0.02 where controls have higher mBzP urinary concentrations than case-patients.
aControlling for age, BMI, and race. Bold font highlights, for any individual agent, middle or highest tertile serum concentrations that are significantly different than the lowest tertile concentration.Agents Geometric mean concentration (μg/L) Creatinine-adjusted geometric mean concentration (μg/g creatinine) Phthalates Phthalate metabolites measured PCOS case-patients PCOS control-patients PCOS case-patients PCOS control-patients Butylbenzyl phthalate (BBzP) Monobenzyl phthalate (mBzP) 4.7 9.0 7.5 11.7a
Di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) Mono-n-butyl phthalate (mBP) 15.3 24.8 17.7 23.2 Diethyl phthalate (DEP) Monoethyl phthalate (mEP) 103.7 138.3 181.1 195.8 Di-isodecyl phthalate (DiDP) Mono(carboxynonyl) phthalate (mCNP) 3.2 3.0 3.6 2.6 Di-isononyl phthalate (DiNP) Mono(carboxyoctyl) phthalate (mCOP) 6.7 9.0 7.8 8.4 Di-n-octyl phthalate (DOP) Mono-3-carboxypropyl phthalate (mCPP) 2.4 3.6 2.8 3.4 Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) Mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl phthalate (mECPP) 41.5 43.2 47.9 40.4 Mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate (mEHHP) 23.7 28.3 27.3 26.4 Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (mEHP) 3.3 4.0 3.2 3.5 Mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate (mEOHP) 14.0 17.4 16.2 16.3 Di-isobutyl phthalate (DiBP) Mono-isobutyl phthalate (miBP) 6.0 8.7 7.0 8.2
bisphenol A (BPA) 1.6 2.1 1.6 1.9 Agent N Cases N Controls Tertile Odds ratio 95% C.I. Adjusted OR
a
Exact 95% C.I Exact p-value
mBzP 16 18 Middle 0.43 0.16-1.14
0.06-0.86 0.025 Monobenzyl phthalate 13 20 Highest
0.10-0.75 0.012
0.03-0.58 0.004 mBP 15 19 Middle
0.07-0.58 0.012
0.03-0.54 0.002 Mono-n-butyl phthalate 14 19 Highest
0.15-1.12 0.003
0.06-0.96 0.042 mEHP 11 20 Middle
0.08-0.65 0.006
0.04-0.63 0.005 Mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate 16 17 Highest 0.87 0.34-2.21 0.91 0.26-3.19 mEP 16 18 Middle
0.10-0.75 0.012
0.02-0.48 0.001 Monoethyl phthalate 15 18 Highest 0.66 0.25-1.75 0.30 0.06-1.18 mCNP 16 19 Middle 1.00 0.39-2.59 0.80 0.23-2.71 Mono (carboxynonyl) phthalate 18 14 Highest 1.06 0.41-2.77 1.45 0.43-5.07 mCOP 18 16 Middle
1.05-7.60 0.040 2.27 0.61-8.84 Mono (carboxyoctyl) phthalate 14 18 Highest 1.45 0.55-3.85 1.58 0.46-5.55 mCPP 16 14 Middle 0.78 0.30-2.07 0.83 0.23-2.91 Mono-3-carboxypropyl phthalate 14 19 Highest 0.54 0.21-1.44 0.36 0.09-1.28 mECPP 16 17 Middle 0.95 0.36-2.45 0.78 0.22-2.73 Mono-2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl 16 17 Highest 1.85 0.69-4.91 2.09 0.57-8.16 mEHHP 15 19 Middle 0.66 0.25-1.72 0.50 0.15-1.66 Mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl 16 17 Highest 1.00 0.38-2.63 1.27 0.34-4.96 mEOHP 16 17 Middle 0.94 0.36-2.45 0.88 0.27-2.87 Mono-2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl phthalate 15 18 Highest 0.84 0.32-2.18 1.07 0.29-4.00 miBP 17 17 Middle 0.58 0.22-1.54 0.56 0.16-1.91 Mono-isobutyl phthalate 12 21 Highest 0.40 0.15-1.08 0.31 0.08-1.08
BPA 15 16 Middle 0.43 0.16-1.15 0.44 0.13-1.46 Bisphenol A 14 20 Highest 0.84 0.32-2.21 0.73 0.20-2.58
PCOS case-patients and controls had similar geometric mean lipid-adjusted PBDEs, and OCPs serum concentrations (Table
Our findings suggest that increasing odds of PCOS case-status was associated with higher serum concentrations of two PFCs (PFOA and PFOS) and with several PCB congeners. PFOS, PFOA, PCBs and phthalates have all been implicated as endocrine disruptors and have been linked to other reproductive outcomes. Previous epidemiologic investigations suggest that exposure to PFCs may increase women’s risk of early menopause [
PCOS case-patients had urinary mBzP concentration lower than controls, and
Unlike previous studies [
This study is subject to several limitations. First, our sample size of 52 PCOS case-patients and 50 controls may not be large enough to generate enough statistical power to detect a difference in some of the toxicant concentrations among PCOS case-patients and controls. Similarly, the small sample size limits the possibility of considering non-monotonic dose–response relationships and some significant associations can be chance findings due to the large number of statistical tests.
We obtained a single spot serum and urine specimen. Therefore, the concentrations of each toxicant represent a snapshot of each woman’s exposure at a given time. A single measurement design may be ineffective in detecting an association between PCOS and pollutants that metabolize quickly. For example, some of the measured analytes (such as PCBs, PBDEs, OCPs, and PFCs) persist in the body for years, while phthalates and BPA metabolize quickly and are eliminated from urine within a few hours after exposure.
It is unclear whether the observed associations suggest that PFOA, PFOS, and the implicated PCB congeners increase risk for PCOS or whether the endocrine milieu of the disorder alters the storage and clearance of these chemicals, leading to increased serum measurements in PCOS patients. Oligomenorrhea and amenorrhea are common symptoms of PCOS. Thus, PCOS cases, who menstruate less frequently compared to controls, may have similar exposures to women without PCOS, but higher blood-toxicant concentrations [
Finally, a larger proportion of case-patients were of White race compared to controls, and PCOS patients were younger and had significantly higher BMI than controls, although we attempted to control for these parameters known to be associated with case-status in the logistic regression models.
In summary, associations between PCOS and serum concentrations of PFOS and PFOA as well as some PCBs were observed in this pilot study. This research highlights the need to further substantiate the association between PCOS and exposure to these pollutants using different study designs such as including large cohorts and measuring for additional confounders such as adiposity. The relationships between environmental contaminants are complex. Humans are exposed to many endocrine disrupting chemicals at once. Some chemicals have androgenic effects while others have anti-androgenic effects and for some chemicals those effects are indirect, rather than being a direct agonist or antagonist against specific hormone receptors. It is, therefore, difficult to evaluate true associations between environmental contaminants and disease. Thus, further studies are needed to explore the potential mechanisms by which these chemicals might contribute to the development of PCOS.
Additional file 1:
Additional file 2:
Additional file 3:
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
SV analyzed the data, interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript, EAD contributed to the conception and design of the study, interpreted results of the data analysis and assisted in drafting the manuscript. AS and AC analyzed data and contributed to drafting the manuscript. DD and LG provided interpretation of data analyses and critical review of the manuscript. KK MS and XY analyzed data, provided interpretation of data analyses and critical review of the manuscript, and RA designed the study, oversaw data collection, interpreted results, and provided critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Martin Belson, Dana Flanders, Carol Rubin, John Osterloh, Michael A. McGeehin in the development of the study protocol and the leadership of the Health Studies Branch at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for their support. We also would like to thank Marita Pall for her help in collecting the samples. We also thank CDC’s Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects and Division of Laboratory Sciences, and an endowment from the Helping Hand of Los Angeles for funding this investigation.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.