<!DOCTYPE article
PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><?properties manuscript?><processing-meta base-tagset="archiving" mathml-version="3.0" table-model="xhtml" tagset-family="jats"><restricted-by>pmc</restricted-by></processing-meta><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">7705941</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">7382</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Sex Transm Dis</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Sex Transm Dis</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Sexually transmitted diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0148-5717</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1537-4521</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">40178090</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">12339204</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002165</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">HHSPA2070742</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>High Volume and High Positivity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests by Anatomic Site from a Large National Laboratory in the United States, 2019&#x02013;2023</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>Guoyu</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Gift</surname><given-names>Thomas L.</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref rid="A1" ref-type="aff">1</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="A1"><label>1</label>Division of STD Prevention (DSTDP), The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA</aff><author-notes><corresp id="CR1">Requests for correspondence should be sent to Guoyu Tao, Ph.D., Division of STD Prevention, NCHHSTP, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-4, Atlanta, GA 30329-4018. fax: (404) 639-8607; <email>gat3@cdc.gov</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>2</day><month>4</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><day>01</day><month>9</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>4</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>12</day><month>8</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>523</fpage><lpage>528</lpage><abstract id="ABS1"><sec id="S1"><title>Background:</title><p id="P1">Chlamydia and gonorrhea are among the most commonly reported sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the U.S. Testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea infection can be conducted by anatomic site (site-specific). Monitoring testing volume and positivity by anatomic site is important.</p></sec><sec id="S2"><title>Methods:</title><p id="P2">Using a large national laboratory dataset, we assessed chlamydia and gonorrhea test volume and positivity by anatomical site in patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years.</p></sec><sec id="S3"><title>Results:</title><p id="P3">The data contained 45 million tests each for chlamydia and gonorrhea for 2019&#x02013;2023. Of chlamydia tests, 71.6% were for women. Among women, 0.4%, 1.5%, and 98.1% were performed on rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens; chlamydia positivity was 7.3%, 2.0%, and 4.3%, respectively. Among men, 10.5%, 13.7%, and 75.8% were performed on rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens; chlamydia positivity was 8.0%, 1.4%, and 6.3%, respectively. Among people aged 15&#x02013;24 years, chlamydia positivity was 12.8% for rectal, 3.4% for pharyngeal, and 8.7% for urogenital among women, and 11.6%, 2.4%, and 12.2% among men, respectively. Gonorrhea testing volume overall and by age and sex was similar to that of chlamydia. Gonorrhea rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital positivity was 3.2%, 2.4%, and 1.0% among women; 6.8%, 5.2%, and 3.3% among men; and 4.3%, 3.0%, and 1.6% among women aged 15&#x02013;24 years, and 10.5%, 7.2%, and 4.6% among men aged 15&#x02013;24 years, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="S4"><title>Conclusion:</title><p id="P4">Although men accounted for &#x0003c;30% of overall chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, they accounted for a majority of extragenital testing. High rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity by specimen type among many demographic groups, especially for extragenital specimens from men and young people, highlight the importance of STI prevention in the U.S.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>chlamydia and gonorrhea tests</kwd><kwd>positivity</kwd><kwd>specimen</kwd><kwd>anatomic site</kwd><kwd>laboratory data</kwd><kwd>extragenital testing</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><p id="P5">Chlamydia and gonorrhea are among the most common reportable sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States (U.S.). In 2022, a total of 1,649,716 cases of <italic toggle="yes">Chlamydia trachomatis</italic> infection and a total of 648,056 cases of gonorrhea were reported, making them the two most common nationally notifiable STIs in the U.S. for that year.(<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>) Asymptomatic chlamydial infection is common among both men and women.(<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>) To detect chlamydia or gonorrhea, healthcare providers frequently rely on screening and diagnostic testing. Annual chlamydia and gonorrhea screening among sexually active women aged &#x0003c;25 years, prenatal chlamydia and gonorrhea screening among pregnant women, and routine chlamydia and gonorrhea screening among sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) are recommended.(<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>) Previous studies have shown that among patients who had access to healthcare, about 47%&#x02212;62% of sexually active women aged 16&#x02013;24 years were tested annually for chlamydia, 60%&#x02212;77% of pregnant women were tested prenatally for chlamydia and gonorrhea, and 70% of MSM were routinely tested for chlamydia or gonorrhea. (<xref rid="R3" ref-type="bibr">3</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R7" ref-type="bibr">7</xref>)</p><p id="P6">Patients may have chlamydia and gonorrhea at different anatomic sites (rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital), and infections at different anatomic sites may have different implications for chlamydia and gonorrhea transmission and treatment.(<xref rid="R8" ref-type="bibr">8</xref>&#x02013;<xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>) For example, anogenital or rectal infections are more likely to potentiate HIV transmission than pharyngeal infections, and pharyngeal gonorrhea is more difficult to cure than urogenital gonorrhea.(<xref rid="R9" ref-type="bibr">9</xref>, <xref rid="R10" ref-type="bibr">10</xref>) In terms of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection at different anatomic sites, the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines also recommend that rectal chlamydia screening should be performed among men who report sexual activity at the rectal site and that MSM should be routinely screened at all anatomic sites of exposure for gonorrhea.(<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>) Previous studies have shown that a substantial proportion of chlamydial and gonococcal infections may be missed with only urogenital testing.(<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>, <xref rid="R12" ref-type="bibr">12</xref>) Because the current national STI surveillance report does not report chlamydia and gonorrhea cases by anatomic site in the U.S. (<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>), only a few studies provide the limited information related to frequency of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests or positivity by anatomic site.(<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>, <xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>, <xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>) Those studies have shown that the proportion of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests that were from the rectal anatomic site among women was much lower than among men (&#x0003c;0.1% for women vs. 4% for men) in 2012&#x02013;2015, and rectal chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity was high both among women (2.8% for gonorrhea and 8.8% for chlamydia) in 2012&#x02013;2015 and among men (8.8% for gonorrhea and 11.0% for chlamydia) in 2013&#x02013;2015, and especially high among MSM (13%&#x02212;17% for rectal gonorrhea, 16%&#x02212;18% for rectal chlamydia, 3%&#x02212;4% for pharyngeal chlamydia, and 7%&#x02212;15% for pharyngeal gonorrhea) in 2010&#x02013;2018.(<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>) On May 23, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared the first diagnostic tests for extragenital testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea.(<xref rid="R15" ref-type="bibr">15</xref>) With this FDA approval, healthcare providers and laboratories were broadly able to collect rectal and oropharyngeal specimens for chlamydia and gonorrhea testing from persons engaged in oral sex or receptive anal sex without having to find a laboratory that had gone through the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) validation process for unapproved assays.(<xref rid="R16" ref-type="bibr">16</xref>) However, volume and positivity of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by anatomic site have not been assessed after this FDA approval in the U.S.</p><p id="P7">In this study, we aimed to describe the volume/number and positivity of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests recently performed by anatomic site, and further stratified by patients&#x02019; age, sex, healthcare provider type, and region, using data from a large national laboratory.</p><sec id="S5"><title>METHODS</title><p id="P8">Data were obtained from a large commercial U.S. laboratory that performs testing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and were transferred to CDC&#x02019;s National Syndromic Surveillance Program (NSSP). These data arrive at NSSP via HL7 (Health Level Seven refers to a set of international standards for transfer of clinical and administrative data between software applications used by various healthcare providers) message every ten minutes; at the time a provider orders the test from the laboratory company. The result of the test is then updated when available. Testing data were identified using an encounter identifier (Accession_ID). Under a given Accession_ID, there may be multiple records for the given patient. For example, healthcare providers could collect and request testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea from rectal, pharyngeal, or urogenital sites and the data might contain 6 records under the assigned Accession_ID. However, there is no patient-level identifier that can be linked longitudinally. The data used in this study were from 2019 to 2023.</p><p id="P9">Because most chlamydia and gonorrhea cases were reported from persons aged 15&#x02013;60 years in U.S., chlamydia and gonorrhea tests were included if specimens were from patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years who resided in the U.S. and had results that were either positive or negative.(<xref rid="R1" ref-type="bibr">1</xref>) In general, chlamydia and gonorrhea tests were identified by a text field of &#x02018;C_Result_Test_Description&#x02019;, chlamydia and gonorrhea test results were identified by another text field of &#x02018;C_Result_Description&#x02019;, and specimen type was identified by a numeric field of &#x02018;C_Result_Test_Code&#x02019; in the dataset. Among all test results, tests with other results, such as test not performed or inconclusive were excluded. For specimen type, &#x02018;C_Result_Test_Code&#x02019; was corresponded with anatomic site, such as rectal, anal, pharyngeal, oral, throat, vaginal, endocervical, urine, blood, or serum. We excluded any blood or serum specimens for chlamydia or gonorrhea tests in this study to maintain the focus on specific anatomical site testing. We classified rectal or anal specimens as &#x0201c;rectal&#x0201d; testing, pharyngeal, oral, or throat specimens as &#x0201c;pharyngeal&#x0201d; testing, and vaginal, endocervical, urine, or urethral specimens as &#x0201c;urogenital&#x0201d; testing. For a given Accession_ID with chlamydia (gonorrhea) testing, the number of chlamydia (gonorrhea) tests ranged from 1 to 3, depended on which of rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens were collected.</p><p id="P10">Analyses were stratified by patient sex (men and women), age group (15&#x02013;24 years, 25&#x02013;34 years, 35&#x02013;44 years, and 45&#x02013;60 years), and U.S. Census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). In addition, analyses were stratified by clinical setting and provider specialty: primary care providers (family practice, general practice, and internal medicine), obstetrics and gynecology, infectious disease, multiple specialty group, hospital/emergency department, public health, pediatrician, and others. The dates of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests were based on the dates the tests were received by the laboratory facility, not the dates of the results.</p><p id="P11">Overall percent positive or positivity was defined as the total number of tests that were positive divided by the total number of tests that were either positive or negative. Percent positive for a given anatomic site was defined as the total number of tests that were positive at the given anatomic site divided by the total number of tests that were either positive or negative for the given anatomic site.</p><p id="P12">SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC) was used for analyses. A chi-squared test was used to test the statistical significance between number and positivity of specimen-related tests by patient characteristics. With large sample sizes used in this study, only the chi-squared test with p&#x0003c;.0001 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p id="P13">The database was originally created under the CDC&#x02019;s National Syndromic Surveillance Program- under federal law and CDC policy [Public Health Surveillance 45 CFR 46.102(l)(2)]. No Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was needed for these analyses as these were deemed to be secondary data analysis of unidentifiable data.</p></sec><sec id="S6"><title>RESULTS</title><sec id="S7"><title>Proportion of Encounters with Chlamydia or Gonorrhea Tests</title><p id="P14">About 181 million encounters (by Accession_ID) for people aged 15&#x02013;60 years who resided in the U.S. were documented during 2019&#x02013;2023 in this lab database: 66.7% for women and 33.3% for men. Of those 181 million encounters, 41 (22.3%) million encounters had specimens ordered for chlamydia or gonorrhea testing: specifically, 25.2% among women and 16.6% among men.</p><p id="P15">Among these 41 million encounters, there were about 46.0 million chlamydia tests and 45.8 million gonorrhea tests from rectal, pharyngeal, or urogenital sites of collection. Of these 46.0 million chlamydia tests and 45.8 million gonorrhea tests, about 45.3 million (98.4%) and 45.5 million (99.4%) had valid test results, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="S8"><title>Number and Proportion of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests by Anatomic Site</title><p id="P16">Based on the 45.3 million chlamydia tests with a valid test result, the annual number of chlamydia tests increased from 7.6 million in 2019 to 10.9 million in 2023. Of these 45.3 million chlamydia tests, 71.6% were for women; 30.4% and 36.9% for people aged 15&#x02013;24 years and 25&#x02013;34 years; 51.7% for people who resided in the South; 28.7%, 26.1%, and 8.1% for people who were cared for by providers specializing in primary care, obstetrics and gynecology, and infectious disease, respectively (<xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>).</p><p id="P17">The proportion of all chlamydia tests that were rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital were 2.7%, 4.1%, and 93.2% in 2019, and 4.0%, 6.4%, and 89.6% in 2023 (<xref rid="T1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). Of chlamydia tests, 10.5%, 13.7%, and 75.8% were performed on rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens among men, while 0.5%, 1.6%, and 97.9% among women (p&#x0003c;.0001). Of chlamydia tests, 2.5%, 3.9%, and 93.6% were performed on rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens among people who were cared for by primary care doctors, compared to 0.1%, 0.3%, and 99.6% by obstetrics and gynecology and 20.9%, 28.8%, and 50.3% by infectious disease doctors (p&#x0003c;.0001). Of all rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital tests performed among men and women, respectively, 91.4%, 78.1%, and 23.5% were collected from men.</p><p id="P18">The number of gonorrhea tests overall and by anatomic site, plus by age, sex, region, provider specialty, and year was similar to that of chlamydia tests.</p></sec><sec id="S9"><title>Positivity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests by Anatomic Site</title><p id="P19">Overall, chlamydia rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital positivity was 8.0%, 1.5%, and 4.8%, respectively (<xref rid="T2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). Positivity was 7.3% for rectal, 2.0% for pharyngeal, and 4.3% for urogenital among women, and 8.0% for rectal, 1.4% for pharyngeal, and 6.3% for urogenital among men. Positivity was 8.2% for rectal, 1.5% for pharyngeal, and 3.5% for urogenital among people who were cared for by infectious disease doctors, and 8.6% for rectal, 2.0% for pharyngeal, and 3.5% for urogenital among people who were cared for by obstetrics and gynecology doctors. Of chlamydia tests among people aged 15&#x02013;24 years, positivity was 12.8% for rectal, 3.4% for pharyngeal, and 8.7% for urogenital among women, and 11.6% for rectal, 2.4% for pharyngeal, and 12.2% for urogenital among men (<xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p id="P20">Of all chlamydia positive tests, 64.2%, 28.7%, and 5.0% were from female urogenital, male urogenital, and male rectal specimens, respectively.</p><p id="P21">Overall, gonorrhea rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital positivity was 6.4%, 4.6%, and 1.5%, respectively (<xref rid="T2" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>). Positivity was 3.2% for rectal, 2.4% for pharyngeal, and 1.0% for urogenital among women, and 6.8% for rectal, 5.2% for pharyngeal, and 3.3% for urogenital among men. Positivity was 7.1% for rectal, 4.9% for pharyngeal, and 2.0% for urogenital among people who were cared for by infectious disease doctors, and 5.4% for rectal, 3.4% for pharyngeal, and 0.6% for urogenital among people who were cared for by obstetrics and gynecology doctors. Of gonorrhea tests among people aged 15&#x02013;24 years, positivity was 4.3% for rectal, 3.0% for pharyngeal, and 1.6% for urogenital among women, and 10.5% for rectal, 7.2% for pharyngeal, and 4.6% for urogenital among men (<xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p id="P22">Of all gonorrhea positive tests, 38.7%, 36.7%, 11.4%, and 11.1% were from male urogenital, female urogenital, male pharyngeal, and male rectal specimens, respectively.</p><p id="P23">Coinfections among encounters with both chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by a given anatomic site among patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years were presented in <xref rid="T3" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>. Of 78,785 encounters that had both chlamydia rectal specimens and genital specimens among women, 1.26% were positive for genital infection only, 2.48% for rectal infection only, and 4.72% for both rectal and genital infection. Similarly, of 79,010 encounters that had both gonorrhea rectal specimens and genital specimens among women, 0.38% were positive for genital infection only, 1.44% for rectal infection only, and 1.61% for both rectal and genital infection.</p></sec></sec><sec id="S10"><title>Discussion</title><p id="P24">This large database of chlamydia and gonorrhea testing from diverse practice settings can provide insights into chlamydia and gonorrhea testing practices in the U.S. For example, although men accounted for &#x0003c;30% of overall chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, they accounted for a majority of extragenital testing (91.4% of all rectal tests and 78.1% of all pharyngeal tests). The high number of tests among women aged 15&#x02013;34 years and the high proportion of tests that were extragenital among men who were cared for by infectious disease doctors may be corresponding to routine chlamydia and gonorrhea screening among young sexually active women aged &#x0003c;25 years, among pregnant women, and among MSM. Although there are limited data available on sexual behaviors of persons reported with chlamydia and gonorrhea from this lab data and at the national level, enhanced data from jurisdictions participating in a sentinel surveillance system, the STD Surveillance Network (SSuN), suggests that the rectal chlamydia and rectal gonorrhea testing rates were 55.0% and 58.4% among MSM who attended STD clinics in 2018.(<xref rid="R14" ref-type="bibr">14</xref>) Our data show that extragenital testing was most commonly ordered by infectious disease providers (49.7% of all chlamydia and gonorrhea tests ordered were pharyngeal or rectal), and least commonly ordered by OB/GYN providers (0.4% of all chlamydia and gonorrhea tests ordered were pharyngeal or rectal). These results showed not only specific populations served for each type of healthcare provider, but also may indicate gaps in whether sexual risk assessments were conducted by type of provider.(<xref rid="R2" ref-type="bibr">2</xref>)</p><p id="P25">High chlamydia and gonorrhea positivity by anatomic site among many demographic groups highlights the importance of STI prevention in the U.S. (<xref rid="F1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref> and <xref rid="F2" ref-type="fig">2</xref>). For example, high rectal positivity may be closely related to diagnostic testing or patients who are at increased likelihood for HIV/STI infection. Our study is consistent with other previous studies: chlamydia pharyngeal positivity was lower than gonorrhea pharyngeal positivity among men, and gonorrhea positivity, regardless of specimen type, was much higher among men than women, especially among young men than young women.(<xref rid="R11" ref-type="bibr">11</xref>, <xref rid="R13" ref-type="bibr">13</xref>) With current practices, our study also showed that the highest number of chlamydia positive tests were from women urogenital (64.2%), men urogenital (28.7%), and men rectal (5.0%) specimens, while the highest number of gonorrhea positive tests were from men urogenital (38.7%), women urogenital (36.7%), men pharyngeal (11.4%), and men rectal (11.1%) specimens. Although the numbers of rectal or pharyngeal tests were much lower than that of urogenital tests among women, the overall rectal infection rates for both chlamydia and gonorrhea were high if patients were tested, regardless of where patients received care, indicating they either had STI-related symptoms or were at increased likelihood for STI infection. Furthermore, although we were not certain women with rectal chlamydia tests had involved in rectal sex or women who involved in rectal sex had not been tested with rectal specimen in this database, it seems high chlamydia and gonorrhea infections with both genital and rectal specimens among women were partially due to autoinoculation.</p><p id="P26">There were several limitations in this study. First, as we mentioned previously, the data are not amenable to longitudinal analysis. Reinfection or repeat testing cannot be assessed. Second, the data had limited information on pregnancy and STI symptom and had no sexual behavior information. We could not identify persons who were at increased likelihood for STI infection or distinguish screening versus diagnostic testing. Third, because most records had missing information with race/ethnicity, we are unable to report any results by race/ethnicity. Finally, due to lack of data prior to the FDA approval of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea tests, this study cannot directly assess the impact of this FDA approval on the proportion of all chlamydia or gonorrhea tests that were extragenital. However, the proportion of all chlamydia and gonorrhea tests that were extragenital increased from 2019&#x02013;2023 in this study, and the proportion of all chlamydia and gonorrhea tests that were rectal specimens was much higher in this study than that reported in previous studies (0.4% among women and 10.5% among men in this study vs. &#x0003c;0.1% among women and 4% among men in previous studies), indicating that healthcare providers are likely ordering extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea tests more often.</p><p id="P27">This study presents empiric evidence on the current practice of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by anatomic sites ordered by various healthcare providers across the U.S., showing much lower extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea testing among women than men, and high positivity among many demographic groups and healthcare provider settings, suggesting that some healthcare providers are closely following the current guidelines. Our study also indicates potential gaps in research and patient care. With FDA approval of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea tests in 2019, more extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea tests have been expected. It also provides opportunity to assess the value of detection and treatment of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea that has not been well-established yet, particularly among asymptomatic individuals in which direct long-term sequelae need to be further assessed. With high chlamydia and gonorrhea pharyngeal and rectal positivity among young people and men of all ages, and potential practice changes after FDA approval of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea tests, it is warranted to routinely assess the number and positivity of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by anatomic site, as well as by patient demographics, and by healthcare provider type, to assess patterns in STD incidence and care practices.</p></sec></body><back><ack id="S11"><p id="P28">Authors declares no funding for this work and there were no conflicts of interest in the development of this manuscript.</p></ack><fn-group><fn id="FN1"><p id="P29">Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p></fn></fn-group><ref-list><title>REFERENCE</title><ref id="R1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><collab>CDC</collab>. &#x0202f;<part-title>Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance 2022</part-title>. . In: <source>HHS</source>, ed. <publisher-loc>Atlanta</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Department of Health and Human Services</publisher-name>; <year>2024</year>.; <comment>2024.</comment></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Workowski</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Bachmann</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021</article-title>. <source>MMWR Recomm Rep</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>70</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>187</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>. <article-title>National Chlamydia Screening Rate in Young Sexually Active Women Using HEDIS Measures in the United States, 2011 to 2020</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>. <year>2023</year>;<volume>50</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>415</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36943794</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Niles</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Kaufman</surname><given-names>HW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Peterman</surname><given-names>TA</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Pregnancy: Trends in United States, 2010 to 2018</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>48</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<fpage>932</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34192725</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Dude</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Drexler</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Yee</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Adherence to Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening in Pregnancy</article-title>. <source>J Womens Health (Larchmt)</source>. <year>2023</year>;<volume>32</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>652</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37083421</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>. <article-title>STI/HIV Testing and Prevalence of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Among Persons with Their Specified-Type Sex Partner</article-title>. <source>Am J Med</source>. <year>2022</year>;<volume>135</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>196</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>201</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34655542</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>. <article-title>Sexually Transmitted Infection/HIV Testing Among Medicaid/Children&#x02019;s Health Insurance Program-Insured Enrollees Aged 15 to 60 Years Who Were Diagnosed With High-Risk Sexual Behaviors With Their Opposite-Sex or Same-Sex Partners</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>48</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>488</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>92</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33264264</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Menza</surname><given-names>TW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Berry</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Dombrowski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Anatomic Site-Specific Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing and Incidence Among People With HIV Engaged in Care at 4 US Clinical Centers, 2014&#x02013;2018</article-title>. <source>Open Forum Infect Dis</source>. <year>2022</year>;<volume>9</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>ofac298</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35873303</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>DR</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>HIV status and viral loads among men testing positive for rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia, Maricopa County, Arizona, USA, 2011&#x02013;2013</article-title>. <source>HIV Med</source>. <year>2015</year>;<volume>16</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>249</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>54</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25230929</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Quilter</surname><given-names>LAS</given-names></name>, <name><surname>St Cyr</surname><given-names>SB</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Urogenital and Extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Strengthening the US Response to Resistant Gonorrhea and Enhanced Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project, 2018 to 2019</article-title>. <source>Sex Transm Dis</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>48</volume>(<issue>12S Suppl 2</issue>):<fpage>S111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>s7</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34475363</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hoover</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Nye</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Infrequent Testing of Women for Rectal Chlamydia and Gonorrhea in the United States</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. <year>2018</year>;<volume>66</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>570</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29028971</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Kent</surname><given-names>CK</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Chaw</surname><given-names>JK</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Prevalence of rectal, urethral, and pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhea detected in 2 clinical settings among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, California, 2003</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. <year>2005</year>;<volume>41</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15937765</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Tao</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Hoover</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Nye</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Rectal Infection With Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Men in the United States</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. <year>2016</year>;<volume>63</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>1325</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27572098</pub-id>
</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><name><surname>Llata</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Cuffe</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Picchetti</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name>, <etal/>
<article-title>Demographic, Behavioral, and Clinical Characteristics of Persons Seeking Care at Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics - 14 Sites, STD Surveillance Network, United States, 2010&#x02013;2018</article-title>. <source>MMWR Surveill Summ</source>. <year>2021</year>;<volume>70</volume>(<issue>7</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="webpage"><collab>FDA</collab>. <source>FDA clears first diagnostic tests for extragenital testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea</source>. <comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-clears-first-diagnostic-tests-extragenital-testing-chlamydia-and-gonorrhea" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-clears-first-diagnostic-tests-extragenital-testing-chlamydia-and-gonorrhea</ext-link></comment>; <year>2019</year>.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="R16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014</article-title>. <source>MMWR Recomm Rep</source>. <year>2014</year>;<volume>63</volume>(<issue>Rr-02</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back><floats-group><fig position="float" id="F1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p id="P30">Chlamydia test percent positive by specimen type, sex, and age</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2070742-f0001" position="float"/></fig><fig position="float" id="F2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p id="P31">Gonorrhea test percent positive by specimen type, sex, and age</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="nihms-2070742-f0002" position="float"/></fig><table-wrap position="float" id="T1"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p id="P32">Number and proportion of chlamydia tests by specimen type among patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years served in the United States, 2019&#x02013;2023, using a national laboratory database</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number of chlamydia tests<xref rid="TFN2" ref-type="table-fn">&#x02020;</xref><break/>(Col %)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Proportion of tests that were rectal <break/>(%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Proportion of tests that were pharyngeal<break/>(%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Proportion of tests that were urogenital <break/>(%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">45,269,159 (100)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.3</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.0</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Women</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">32,412,946 (71.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">98.1<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Men</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,856,213 (28.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">75.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age groups</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;15&#x02013;24 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,757,329 (30.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">95.4<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;25&#x02013;34 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">16,693,176 (36.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">90.3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;35&#x02013;44 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,087,083 (20.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">90.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;45&#x02013;60 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,731,571 (12.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">89.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Region</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Northeast</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,206,605 (18.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.6</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.3<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Midwest</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,073,810 (11.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;South</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">23,405,797 (51.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.0</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.9</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;West</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,582,947 (19.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.2</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">90.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Provider type</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Primary care</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,959,444 (28.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">93.6<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Hospital/ER</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,459,477 (7.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">95.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Infectious disease</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,678,705 (8.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">20.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">28.8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">50.3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Multiple specialty groups</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,565,485 (5.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.6</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">91.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;OB/GYN</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,821,656 (26.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Pediatrician</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,064,152 (2.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.6</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">99.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Public health</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,621,831 (3.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11.9</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">84.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Others</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,098,411 (17.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1.8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.8</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">95.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Year of tests performed</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2019</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,631,203 (16.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">93.2<xref rid="TFN1" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2020</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,695,248 (17.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2.4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.6</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94.0</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2021</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,248,202 (20.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.1</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.5</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">92.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2022</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,802,565 (21.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5.7</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">90.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2023</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">10,891,941 (24.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4.0</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6.4</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">89.6</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN1"><label>*</label><p id="P33">p&#x0003c;.0001 between the distribution of chlamydia tests by specimen type and demographic or another variable.</p></fn><fn id="TFN2"><label>&#x02020;</label><p id="P34">The number of chlamydia tests was the sum of the number of chlamydia tests for all encounters with chlamydia testing, and at each encounter the number of chlamydia tests ranged from one to three, depended on which of rectal, pharyngeal, and urogenital specimens were collected for chlamydia testing.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap position="float" id="T2" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p id="P35">Number and positivity of chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by anatomic site among patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years served in the United States, 2019&#x02013;2023, using a national laboratory database</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th colspan="3" align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1">Chlamydia</th><th colspan="3" align="center" valign="top" rowspan="1">Gonorrhea</th></tr><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of rectal tests <break/>N (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of pharyngeal tests<break/>N (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of urogenital tests <break/>N (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of rectal tests <break/>N (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of pharyngeal tests<break/>N (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number and positivity of urogenital tests <break/>N (%)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Total</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,477,532 (8.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,260,359 (1.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">41,531,268 (4.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,489,145 (6.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,335,256 (4.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">41,723,691 (1.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sex</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Women</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">127,476 (7.3)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">495,613 (2.0)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">31,789,857 (4.3)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">129,252 (3.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">525,624 (2.4)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">31,864,117 (1.0)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Men</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,350,056 (8.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,764,746 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,741,411 (6.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,359,893 (6.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,809,632 (5.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,859,574 (3.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Age groups</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;15&#x02013;24 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">196,586 (11.8)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">440,264 (2.9)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,120,479 (9.4)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">200,635 (9.3)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">465,746 (5.4)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">13,080,607 (2.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;25&#x02013;34 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">646,341 (8.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">966,493 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,080,342 (3.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">651,516 (7.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">998,710 (5.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">15,155,786 (1.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;35&#x02013;44 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">378,251 (7.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">517,049 (1.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,191,783 (1.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">379,873 (5.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">527,802 (4.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,286,465 (1.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;45&#x02013;60 years</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">256,354 (5.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">336,553 (0.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,138,664 (1.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">257,121 (3.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">342,998 (3.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,200,833 (0.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Region</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Northeast</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">294,660 (7.3)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">421,126 (1.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,490,819 (3.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">295,983 (5.8)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">424,526 (4.6)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,539,668 (0.8)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Midwest</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94,153 (9.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">178,570 (1.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,801,087 (5.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94,377 (7.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">179,187 (4.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">4,833,504 (1.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;South</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">729,429 (8.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,172,699 (1.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">21,503,669 (5.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">732,448 (7.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,217,486 (4.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">21,541,762 (1.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;West</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">359,290 (7.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">487,964 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,735,693 (4.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">366,337 (5.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">514,057 (4.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,808,757 (1.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Provider type</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Primary care</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">323,474 (6.6)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">507,784 (1.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,128,184 (5.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">324,749 (5.0)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">511,857 (4.1)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,322,857 (1.7)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Hospital/ER</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">66,664 (8.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">97,805 (1.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,295,008 (7.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">66,976 (7.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">98,294 (5.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,297,533 (4.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Infectious disease</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">769,033 (8.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,059,391 (1.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,850,281 (3.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">769,999 (7.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,091,517 (4.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,852,335 (2.0)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Multiple groups</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">93,562 (7.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">131,167 (1.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,340,756 (5.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">94,736 (5.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">134,417 (4.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,343,675 (1.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;OB/GYN</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,562 (8.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">34,596 (2.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,774,498 (3.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">12,579 (5.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">34,714 (3.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">11,758,285 (0.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Pediatrician</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,945 (9.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">5,923 (2.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,055,284 (5.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">2,953 (6.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">6,040 (4.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,027,382 (1.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Public health</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">65,759 (10.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">193,176 (2.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,362,896 (6.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">72,703 (7.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">216,461 (4.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,363,102 (2.1)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;Others</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">143,533 (8.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">230,517 (1.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,724,361 (4.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">144,450 (5.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">241,956 (4.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,758,522 (1.2)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Year of tests</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2019</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">206,714 (8.9)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">315,741 (1.7)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,108,748 (5.0)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">208,066 (6.2)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">335,157 (4.4)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,135,761 (1.3)<xref rid="TFN3" ref-type="table-fn">*</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2020</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">187,218 (9.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">273,765 (1.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,234,265 (5.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">188,134 (7.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">285,022 (5.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">7,266,753 (1.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2021</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">286,340 (8.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">412,880 (1.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,548,982 (5.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">289,018 (6.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">429,637 (5.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,603,704 (1.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2022</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">364,405 (7.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">561,568 (1.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,876,592 (4.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">367,722 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">577,497 (4.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">8,924,189 (1.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">&#x02003;2023</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">432,855 (7.0)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">696,405 (1.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,762,681 (4.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">436,205 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">707,943 (4.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">9,793,284 (1.2)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="TFN3"><label>*</label><p id="P36">p&#x0003c;.0001</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap position="float" id="T3" orientation="landscape"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p id="P37">Coinfections among encounters with both chlamydia and gonorrhea tests by a given anatomic site among patients aged 15&#x02013;60 years served in the United States, 2019&#x02013;2023, using a national laboratory database</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><colgroup span="1"><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/><col align="left" valign="middle" span="1"/></colgroup><thead><tr><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1"/><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Number of encounters</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Both chlamydia and gonorrhea positive (%)</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chlamydia positive only</th><th align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Gonorrhea positive only</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Urogenital site</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">36,063,687</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">151,888 (0.42)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,502,429 (4.17)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">367,512 (1.02)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pharyngeal site</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,957,029</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">3,502 (0.18)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">25,112 (1.28)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">82,590 (4.22)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">Rectal site</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">1,270,608</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">19,338 (1.52)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">78,538 (6.18)</td><td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="1" colspan="1">58,973 (4.64)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></floats-group></article>